Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.

Property:Has text

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SMW.png

Status: experimental
This property to specify the text of a quotation.

 
RDF logic:
  • Subject:      Quotation subobjects
  • Predicate:  Has text
  • Object:        chunks of wikitext (type text)


2243 Pages use the property "Has text"

Return to property page
Use Expand/Collapse + Up/Dn symbols to sort

Page nameExpandHas text
Showing 20 pages using this property.
"
<font face="{{{font}}}">“For us therefore, we're really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies [...] ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate,”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“I argue that by far the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that contributes to hiding this truth. In my opinion, activists who, using any justification, feed the global warming myth have effectively been co-opted, or at best neutralized.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“we came up with the idea that ... global warming ... and the like, would fit the bill.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“'''German Business News''': You dedicate a whole chapter to the Bilderbergers. What influence do the [[Bilderbergers]] really exert?<br/> '''Jürgen Roth''': Compared to the "[[round tables]]" I described, their influence is rather small. What stands out among the Bilderbergers is not so much the secrecy or the strict isolation in luxury enclaves, but who the initiators are. They are US banks and US corporations, as well as the [[Deutsche Bank]]. At its core, it is a kind of [[neoliberal]] [[think tank]], whose members sometimes have a rather obscure biography. And they try, with more or less great success, to win over politicians who are well-disposed towards them and their goals. These in turn feel flattered when they are invited. And it is particularly revealing that only representatives of [[neo-liberalism]] are invited. Critics of capitalism will not be found there.<br/> '''German Business News''': Where is the line between real power and conspiracy theory? You criticize the network of the "Round Tables". What is behind it?<br/> '''Jürgen Roth''': There is no [[conspiracy theory]], only the conspiracy of a small, exclusive, European, economic and political elite against the social and democratic state. Their goal is clearly an ideological revolution, the widespread implementation of a free, untamed market economy. [[Ulisses Garrido]], the former Portuguese trade union leader and current director of the Education Department of the European Trade Union Confederation, is far from any conspiracy theory. He explained it to me like this: "What is to be achieved is a complete change in society, without the population having any say in the matter. It is undoubtedly a silent coup."<br/> [...]<br/> '''Jürgen Roth''': The purpose of this silent coup is also the [[privatization]] of all state enterprises, or state or municipal real estate. The Deutsche Bank demands this particularly strongly. Companies are sold off at a ridiculous price, often to the favoured of the ruling political system. Vital areas such as education, health and social services are privatized, as in Portugal or Greece. What is practiced here is the expropriation of national property. I don't even want to know how much criminally gained capital has been invested in Greece, Spain or Portugal.”  
<font face="{{{font}}}">“[...] I never say conspiracy theorist, but I'm incredulous and I check stuff out, and I think if people didn't have that phrase to fall back on, they could be incredulous and check stuff out [...]”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“Here's the thing. There's about 150 people that run the world. Anybody who wants to go into politics, they're all fucking puppets, okay? There are 150 and they're all men that run the world - period, full stop. They control most of the important assets, they control the money flows. And these are not the tech entrepreneurs. Now they are going to get rolled over the next five to ten years by the people that are really underneath pulling the strings. And when you get behind the curtain and see how that world works, what you realize is, it is unfairly set up for them and their progeny. Now, I'm not going to say that that's something that we can rip apart. But first order of business is, I want to break through and be at that table. That's the first order of business.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“individuals who commit elite deviance face limited effective deterrents, due to lenient penalties for such actions. The narrow presentation of elite criminality in the news enables the continued perpetration of elite deviance, allowing for the power elite to maintain a hold on the presentation of deviance in society. While the accountability structures seem to be shifting, the ingrained systems of power remain, thus enabling elite deviance to continue, regardless of the potential consequences. Looking to the future, however, a change in public perception of elite deviance appears to be occurring. With unprecedented frequency, high-power individuals are facing public allegations of crimes, as well as, incarceration, rather than benefiting from the traditional veil of secrecy and protection that previously surrounded their actions.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House ... I mean the [[secret societies]]... It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of [[Europe]] — the whole of [[Italy]] and [[France]] and a great portion of [[Germany]], to say nothing of other countries — is covered with a network of these [[secret societies]], just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government; they do not want ameliorated institutions ... they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments. Some of them may go further...”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“Work in online misinformation details how alternative media intentionally fabricate conspiracy theories, spreading false allegations ranging from reptilian presidents to staged terrorist attacks”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“[Conspiracy beliefs] are — almost by definition — not shared by the majority of people.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“history has repeatedly shown that corporate and political elites do conspire against public interests. Conspiracy theories play an important role in bringing their misdeeds into the light.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“they are emotional given that negative emotions and not rational deliberations cause conspiracy beliefs... One limitation... is that the field is lacking a solid theoretical framework that contextualizes previous findings, that enables novel predictions, and that suggests '''interventions to reduce the prevalence of conspiracy theories in society'''.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“a small part in motivating the endorsement of such seemingly irrational beliefs is the desire to stick out from the crowd, the need for uniqueness.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“a small part in motivating the endorsement of such seemingly irrational beliefs is the desire to stick out from the crowd, the need for uniqueness”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">““Conspiracy belief”, “conspiracy thinking”, “conspiracy mindset”, “conspiracy predispositions”, “conspiracist ideation”, “conspiracy ideology”, “conspiracy mentality” and “conspiracy worldview” — most of these apparently serving no distinct purpose other than an attempt at elegant variation — are all terms based upon the [[psychologists]]' own delusional beliefs. For some reason, all those researching the psychology of those they have labelled conspiracy theorist imagine, without reason, that the so-named “[[conspiracists]]” don’t have any evidence to back up their arguments.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“Conspiracy theories offer simple answers to complex problems by providing explanations for uncertain situations. Thus, they should be attractive to individuals who are intolerant of uncertainty and seek cognitive closure.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“It's important that the UN and WHO remain very clear, but when they challenge governments directly, they often get into this issue of sovereignty. (...) I think it's really critical to think about [[soft power]] influence, which is other influentials, who can call up the head of state, or powerful constituencies within those countries. We've seen this in the context of mobilizing religious leaders in the context of [[polio]], or specific business leaders where you can soften perhaps a very hard line from government through less more '''stealthy entry points''', rather than trying to punish them (...)”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“The current threat from [[Islamist terrorism]] is serious and sustained. It is genuinely international in scope, involving a variety of groups, networks and individuals who are driven by particular violent and extremist beliefs. It is indiscriminate – aiming to cause mass casualties, regardless of the age, nationality, or religion of their victims; and the terrorists are often prepared to commit suicide to kill others. Overall, we judge that the scale of the threat is potentially still increasing and is not likely to diminish significantly for some years.<br/>”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“the counter-disinformation space as a whole [in Georgia] is slightly less evolved than in other regions, still being largely though not exclusively focused on fact-checking, which might be termed counter-disinformation 1.0.”  +
<font face="{{{font}}}">“Another barrier to combating disinformation is the fact that certain Kremlin-backed narratives are factually true. For example, the [[Serbia]]n organisation [[European Western Balkans]] noted that one of the country's most prominent pro-Kremlin narratives relates to Russia's ongoing support for Belgrade in the Kosovo dispute which is true. Responding to inconvenient truths, as opposed to pure [[propaganda]], is naturally more problematic.”  +