From Wikispooks
Jump to: navigation, search
Concept.png Law 
Type fundamental
A system of rules that are enforced through social institutions in an effort to try to control behaviour. In the modern world, it is often enforced top down through a hierarchical system of paid functionaries.
“[A]n individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.”
Martin Luther King (April 16, 1963)  - [1]

Official narrative

"Legal theatre"... Credit:Schlock Mercenary

Law is a system of rules society enforces upon its members. While society's individual members may not agree with all its rules, they must all agree with them, for the collective good. Prisons and police are needed to prevent infractions by threatening sufficiently painful punishment that people are cowed into obeying the law. Officially, no one is above the law, and it should be applied impartially to all.


Law has an uneasy relationship with the legitimization of inherited privilege. The legal process has always been captured to a certain extent, and has served as some sort of pretext for justifying ongoing oppression.

What kind of legal culture allows the massive deprivation of basic liberty without any evidence? If we want to put one person into a cage for a single criminal offense, we are required, at least in theory, to present evidence so compelling that there is no reason to doubt the person’s guilt. We have to be very close to certain, for example, that the heroin found in the backpack belonged to the accused. But laws authorizing the imprisonment of tens of thousands of people have gotten no such scrutiny — we have not required any factual showing that they lead to any benefits. Lawyers have never required evidence that jailing people with heroin in their backpacks furthers a compelling social purpose....

In courtrooms across America, people are sent to jail every day on the basis of a single witness’s testimony (often a police officer) with no supporting evidence, even though, as a matter of common sense, it is impossible for a reasonable person not to have a doubt about the observations or motivations of a single human witness.

Alec Karakatsanis, 2015[2]

Global political awakening

Full article: Global political awakening

As of 2015, a matrix of social changes - notably self-education through the internet - appears to be increasing awareness of the hypocrisy of the law in general and of unpunished establishment criminality in particular. Consider for example, the illegal mass surveillance carried out by the NSA, GCHQ and partner intelligence agencies, deep state false flag terrorism, the thefts referred to euphemistically as "bailouts" or Tony Blair's lying the inveigle the UK into the Invasion of Iraq.

Police State rollout

Full article: Rated 3/5 Police state

Concern about the implications of such a "global political awakening" may be spurring the deep state into a do-or-die to a power grab. In some of the self-styled "democracies" national leaders are abandoning long established legal practice (such as habeus corpus and civil liberties) in a rush to enable authoritarian rule by might rather than right.


Full article: United States/Police state

The US is already something of a police state, with open criminality by government leaders and flagrant abuse such as the DEA's purported right to seize property, even of those who are not accused of a crime[3], or (after a 2015 ruling by Lee Rosenthal) its complete lack to liability to those whose property it damages.[4] In April 2015, Alec Karakatsanis noted that "In the seven years that I have spent working in American courts and jails, one thing sticks out above all else: the divergence between the law as it is written and the law as it is lived."[2]


In May 2015, David Cameron announced a radical re-think, a plan to give "the police powers to apply to the high court for an order to limit the “harmful activities” of an extremist individual. The definition of harmful is to include a risk of public disorder, a risk of harassment, alarm or distress or creating a “threat to the functioning of democracy”. He did this in the name of free speech, stating further "For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone... Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law."[5] This prompted exasperation in some quarters, and the observation that "Leviathan jumps the shark".[6]

In May 2015 [When?] [Who?]Chris Grayling?[citation needed] announced a new policy was announced which would fine defendants £1200 if they plead innocent but were were found guilty - in addition to any fines or other costs including compensation orders and victim surcharges and costs. This has been criticised as creating an "unacceptable pressure to plead guilty" and because it is a flat rate, unrelated even to the crime, for penalising the poor. "Up to 30 Magistrates" resigned in protest about the charge. Unperturbed, the UK government has announced further increases in court fees.[7]

On Wikispooks

Full article: Project:Licensing

Wikispooks is an open licensed project under the CC BY-SA licence. This means that you are free to rebroadcast and remix it, including for commercial purposes, provided that you do so under this same license.



     Page name     TypeDateAuthor(s)Subject(s)Description
Civil Contingencies Act 2004legal
Digital Economy Act 2017lawJohn Whittingdale
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013legal document
Fair Sentencing Act
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act1977
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
Freedom of Information Act 2000law
General Agreement on Tariffs and Tradelegal
George W. Bush/Torture Indictment
Guantanamo Bay detention camp/Prisoners' appeals in Washington courts
International law
NDAA 2017
National Labor Relations Act
National Security Actlaw26 July 1947
Nuremberg CodeThe Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the subsequent Nuremberg trials at the end of WWII.
Official Secrets Act 1911law
Official Secrets Act 1989law
Pan Am Flight 103/The Trial
Patriot ActlawCivil libertiesA legislative coup d'etat
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
Rockefeller drug laws
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugstreaty30 March 1961Heroin
Illegal drug trade
An important step in the globalisation of the illegal drug trade.
Terrorism Act 2000law
Terrorism Act 2006law
United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substancestreaty20 December 1988Heroin
Illegal drug trade

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
File:Terrorism & Relative Justice.pdfpaper2007Mark Findlay

Related Quotations

Attorney General for England and Wales“It’s not unusual for the attorney general to intervene in cases in order to represent the public interest. He has sought to intervene in this case because it raises important issues about the scope of the criminal law.”2017
Brian Crozier“The ultimate sophistication of subversion is to take over the government, not by unlawful but by lawful means.”Brian Crozier
Malcolm Turnbull“The laws of Australia prevail in Australia, I can assure you of that. The laws of mathematics are very commendable but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”Malcolm Turnbull14 July 2017
Robert Cooper“The postmodern world has to start to get used to double standards. Among ourselves, we operate on the basis of laws and open cooperative security. But, when dealing with old-fashioned states outside the postmodern continent of Europe, we need to revert to the rougher methods of an earlier era--force, pre-emptive attack, deception, whatever is necessary. Among ourselves, we keep the law but when we are operating in the jungle, we must also use the laws of the jungle.”Robert CooperApril 2002
Secret trial“No free man shall be taken, or imprisoned, or dispossessed, of his liberties or be outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed excepting by the legal judgment of his peers, or by the laws of the land.”1215


Facts about "Law"
DescriptionA system of rules that are enforced through social institutions in an effort to try to control behaviour. In the modern world, it is often enforced top down through a hierarchical system of paid functionaries. +
Display docTypeWikiSpooks Page +
Display imageFile:law.jpg +
Display image2File:Law.jpg +
Has conceptTypefundamental +
Has fullPageNameLaw +
Has fullPageNameeLaw +
Has imageFile:Law.jpg +
Has image2File:law.jpg +
Has noRatings0 +
Has objectClassConcept +
Has objectClass2Concept +
Has revisionSize6,997 +
Has revisionUserMaintenanceBot +
Has wikipediaPage +
Has wikipediaPage2 +
Is not stubtrue +
Has subobject
"Has subobject" is a predefined property representing a container construct that allows to accumulate property-value assignments similar to that of a normal wiki page.
Law +