Mass surveillance

From Wikispooks
Jump to: navigation, search
Concept.png Mass surveillance 
Mass surveillance.jpg
Interest of Jacob Applebaum
Subpage(s)Mass surveillance/Technology
Wholesale surveillance of the citizenry is the new normal, introduced under the smokescreen of the "war on terror". In the "art of warfare" surveillance is tought as a preparatory act for more invasive measures like the suspension of habeas corpus (as i.e. introduced in the patriot act) or other covert operations.

Rhetoric about the "war on terror" and repeated false flag terror attacks have been used in conjunction the commercially-controlled media to instill fear in populations. This fear has been used to quell dissent and justify the introduction of mass surveillance techniques. This has been particularly useful in countries such as the USA and the UK which had laws and traditions about privacy which, if enforced, could have prevented such surveillance. A widespread culture of impunity for those who control the structures of Western nation states mean that few (if any?) serious commentators regard such objections to mass surveillance as effective in practice - the only remaining limitations on data collection are purely technical in nature. UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy, Joseph Cannataci referred UK's oversight of surveillance as “worse than a bad joke.”[1]


Harry S. Truman was concerned about the power accrued by both the CIA and the FBI. In 1947 he wrote about the FBI: "Edgar Hoover's orgnization would make a good start toward a citizen spy system. Not for me."[2]

Official narrative

Mass surveillance is usually presented by the commercially-controlled media as being a necessary evil to fight the "war on terror" - the question being how much is an acceptable compromise between safety and liberty.


No evidence has been presented that mass surveillance was intended to stopping "terrorism". A simpler explanation suggests that it is "a corrupt power grab... not an effort aimed at stopping terrorism".[3] In 2017, the United Nations' Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy echoed this sentiment in more diplomat terms. Criticising recent mass surveillance laws in France, Germany, the UK and the USA, he stated that they are "predicated on the... disproportionate though understandable fear that electorates may have in the face of the threat of terrorism" but are informed by "little or no evidence" of their "efficacy or... proportionality".[4]

Modern Methods

Mass surveillance cartoon.jpg

The rise of electronic communication methods have lead to a burgeoning of the mass surveillance in the 21st century. The blatant - and unpunished - disregard for the law by NSA and GCHQ should leave little doubt that legal restrictions are only really left for show.

Internet Surveillance

Full article: Internet/Surveillance

While the Internet was designed to be decentralised, and so non-trivial to censor/monitor, the NSA has been consistently trying for decades to stifle an effective roll out of cryptography for decades. Several whistleblowers have revealed that the NSA has fiber optic splitters which allow for monitoring of huge amounts of data. The connection with internet censorship is clear; when everyone's posting is watched, unwanted content is easily removed, moreover, self-censorship may become endemic due to fear of reprisals - Webster Tarpley and others have suggested that this perspective may help understand the Edward Snowden Affair, and would tally with a large number of disclosures of mass surveillance of other natures made recently.

Watch lists

Full article: Stub class article Watch lists

The official narrative of watch lists is that they help assist law enforcement in prevention of terrorist activity. In practice, however, they are better understood as a means of mass surveillance (because everyone has to give their details, to prove that they are not on a watch list). Since the management of these lists is completely opaque, they can also be understood as a precursor to the enforcement of a heavy-handed police state - one in which individual rights are conditional and can be revoked at a moment's notice without the need for such matters as evidence of wrong doing.

Postal surveillance

Full article: Mail Isolation Control and Tracking

After the 2001 anthrax attacks, which were initially blamed on "Islamic terrorists", although the anthrax was later proved to have come from a US military laboratory, the US government secretly instituted a program to photograph all the mail sent in the US. This went undisclosed to the general public for over a decade. In 2015, it was revealed that the US Postal Inspection Service had installed a utility box "positioned to capture and record the license plates and facial features of customers leaving a Golden Post Office." [5]

Cellphone location data

In 2013, in response to a subpoena for cellphone data, the NSA claimed that "The government does not possess the records the defendant seeks", i.e. specifically denied that they had collected cellphone data, although the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court order stated that they could have collected this data.[6]

Emerging surveillance Technologies

Full article: Mass surveillance/Technology

The US military has developed new surveillance technologies which - with or without trialling in war zones overseas - are being rolled out across the country. Legal barriers are no effective impediment in what many have termed a police state. These include surveillance by Reaper Drones[7], Hand Held Radar[8], Cellphone Surveillance Tools[9], X-Ray vans[10] and automatic recognitino of faces, car license plates and other data from CCTV by computers.[11][12]


Several NSA whistleblowers such as William Binney, Russell Tice and Thomas Drake have directly challenged the official narrative of mass surveillance, arguing that it makes the US public less safe rather than more.[13] The "Surveillance State Repeal Act" was introduced into US Congress in March 2015, to end the US PATRIOT Act and reform the NSA.  


     Page name     DateDescription
Internet/SurveillanceWholesale surveillance of the citizenry is the new normal, introduced under the smokescreen of the "war on terror".
Mail Isolation Control and Tracking2001 - Present
NSA/Boundless Informant
Surveillance and censorship program2007 - Present

A victim of Mass surveillance on Wikispooks

Use the Up/Dn symbols to sort

Denis RancourtFormerly a former tenured professor of physics, Rancourt was dismissed after covert surveillance and legal maneuverings by the University of Ottawa in Canada.

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
10 Ways We Are Being Tracked Traced and Databasedblog post10 July 2010'Activist'A summary overview of technological developments in the main branches of surveillance technology with examples of their current and developing application.
File:Full-Disclosure.pdfreport4 December 2013The AdversariesIf your UK internet service and equipment provider is BT (and probably any other of the large UK ISP's), then it is a trivial matter for GCHQ and its agencies to route a duplicate of all your traffic to a spook server, access your home computer network, install malware and retrieve any passwords and encryption keys stored on it. You have been warned.
Hacker Generationsarticle23 August 2011Richard ThiemeOn the origins and real meaning of "Hacker"; a term which, in company with "conspiracy-theory", "Holocaust-denial" and many others has been co-opted/invented by Establishments to marginalise research deemed most threatening to the Official Narratives that define "Consensus trance" reality.
Julian Assange at Moment of TruthVideo transcript15 September 2014Julian AssangeSpeech by Julian Assange to the Moment of Truth event in New Zealand on 15 September 2014
NSA GCHQ and the Death of Gareth Williamsarticle14 November 2011Trowbridge FordA speculative article connecting the NSA with the death of Gareth Williams
File:Operation-shady-rat.pdfreport2 August 2011Dmitri Alperovitch
The Essential Rules of Tyrannywebpage29 July 2011Brandon Smith
Unthinking extremism - Radicalising narratives that legitimise surveillancepaper26 October 2015Ben Harbisher

Related Quotations

Holger Münch“The still high incidence of punishable hate posting shows a need for police action. Our free society must not allow a climate of fear, threat, criminal violence and violence either on the street or on the internet.”Holger Münch21 June 2017
Transportation Security AdministrationEl Reg: "Sonic Screwdriver is cleared aimed at molesting seized machines, or during black bag operations, not at interfering with factory-fresh products in transit."

Do it at airports during a customs inspection. Take the computer out of the owner's sight and install whatever you want.

Or better still, come up with some sort of bogus excuse to force everyone to put their laptops in checked baggage, and then do it in the baggage handling process. That way the subject wouldn't know they had been targeted. Not that anyone would ever dream of doing something as disruptive as arbitrarily forcing people to check their laptops of course...”
23 March 2017


Facts about "Mass surveillance"
DescriptionWholesale surveillance of the citizenry is
Wholesale surveillance of the citizenry is the new normal, introduced under the smokescreen of the "war on terror". In the "art of warfare" surveillance is tought as a preparatory act for more invasive measures like the suspension of habeas corpus (as i.e. introduced in the patriot act) or other covert operations.
e patriot act) or other covert operations. +
Display docTypeWikiSpooks Page +
Display imageFile:Mass surveillance.jpg +
Display image2File:Mass surveillance.jpg +
Has fullPageNameMass surveillance +
Has fullPageNameeMass_surveillance +
Has imageFile:Mass surveillance.jpg +
Has image2File:Mass surveillance.jpg +
Has keyPropertiesDisplay_date/Description +
Has keyPropertyHeadersDate/Description +
Has noRatings0 +
Has objectClassConcept +
Has objectClass2Concept +
Has revisionSize7,910 +
Has revisionUserRobin +
Has wikipediaPage +
Has wikipediaPage2 +
Is not stubtrue +