Talk:Keir Starmer

A tidy would help...

I was looking at this page with a view to evaluating and possibly adding the following:

“But even if you do not accept my theory that Starmer may be destroying the Labour Party on purpose, perhaps you might accept that Starmer would prefer to see the Labour Party destroyed than see it in power as a left-wing party. The Thatcherite agenda of austerity, benefit cuts and attacks on the non-working and disabled, monetarism, militarism and jingoism, with anti-immigrant policies allied to unquestioning Zionism, is perhaps a true reflection of Starmer’s core beliefs; as these align precisely with the Deep State agenda, the question of whether Starmer is a true believer or a blank cipher for the Deep State is moot.”
Craig Murray (5 May 2025) 

Even after the by-election exodus, I found it still (at only 30k) offputtingly long. Do you think it could benefit from some more subpages to help leave the top level page clearer? -- Robin (talk) 02:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

The toolmaking background could be shaved down to a few lines, it comes across as unnecessary detailed for a reader outside the UK. IMO, the section about his career as a public prosecutor is the only part long enough to be put in a separate sub-article.Terje (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

There's now space in the lede for an extract from Craig Murray's Document:The Strange Death of Social Democratic Britain to fill.

I suggest this is the better extract:

"It remains my belief that Starmer has always been a deep state operative and that he is deliberately driving the Labour Party to its own destruction. Among the strongest evidence for this, in my view, is the fact that all of the documentation on his involvement in the Assange case, the Savile case, the Janner case, and other high-level paedophile cases while he was Director of Public Prosecutions was allegedly destroyed by the state while the Conservatives were in office and Starmer in opposition. The Deep State was protecting him and preparing his way to power."--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 10:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes the quote is good as a start. But remember that to make a good Wiki, as a rule is much better to avoid external links. So instead of Savile case, internal linking like this Savile case.--Terje (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Done (and suitably wikified).--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 20:11, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2025/05/the-strange-death-of-social-democratic-britain/ Craig Murray's blog