From Wikispooks
Jump to: navigation, search

Group.png NATO   History Commons Powerbase Sourcewatch Spartacus WebsiteRdf-icon.png
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (orthographic projection).svg
Abbreviation NATO, OTAN
Motto Animus in consulendo liber
(In discussion, a free mind)
Formation 4 April 1949
Type • international
• military
Headquarters Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, Mons, Belgium
Leaders • Secretary General of NATO
• Supreme Allied Commander Europe
Subgroups • North Atlantic Council
• Defence Planning Committee
• Nuclear Planning Group
• Allied Clandestine Committee
• Clandestine Planning Committee
• NATO/Headquarters
• NATO/Permanent Representatives and National Delegations
• NATO/International Staff
• NATO/Support and Procurement Agency
• NATO/Standardization Agency
• NATO/Communications and Information Agency
• NATO/Science and Technology Organization
• NATO/Air Traffic Management Committee
• NATO/Military Committee Meteorological Group
• International Board of Auditors for NATO
• [[..|“..”.]]
Interest of Atlantic Council of the United Kingdom, Pierre-Henri Bunel, Tony Cartalucci, Niels Haagerup, Rick Rozoff
SubpageNATO/Deputy Secretary General
NATO/Secretary General
Membership • Albania
• Belgium
• Bulgaria
• Canada
• Croatia
• Czech Republic
• Denmark
• Estonia
• France
• Germany
• Greece
• Hungary
• Iceland
• Italy
• Latvia
• Lithuania
• Luxembourg
• Netherlands
• Norway
• Poland
• Portugal
• Romania
• Slovakia
• Slovenia
• Spain
• Turkey
• United Kingdom
• United States
The world's largest military alliance.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) is a military alliance set up after WW2. During the Cold War it was balanced by the Warsaw Pact. Since then it has expanded its reach, in spite of an undertaking given by George H. W. Bush[citation needed] that it would not do so.

On 6 October 2017, when it was announced that the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) had won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg denounced the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty, the accord promoted by ICAN aimed at eliminating all nuclear weapons:

"NATO is committed to preserving peace and creating the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons,” Stoltenberg said. “We share this goal with ICAN and I welcome the attention given to this issue by the Nobel Committee. However, the NWBT does not move us closer to the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. In fact, it risks undermining the progress we have made over the years in disarmament and non-proliferation.”
"What we need is verifiable and balanced reduction of nuclear weapons,” Stoltenberg said. “The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which all NATO Allies have signed, remains the cornerstone of international efforts to do so. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO Allies have dramatically reduced the number of their nuclear weapons. But as long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.”[1]

Official narrative

NATO's original justification and cold war official narrative about "defending the free world against communist aggression", while mendacious from the outset, was a lot clearer than the current position. Since 9/11 particularly, the fallback justifications for war have been "humanitarian intervention" (aimed at the political Left) and fighting 'terrorism' and its 'state sponsors' (aimed at the political Right), both of which are wearing increasingly thin. Some NATO activities, such as Operation Gladio in particular, were never intended to come to light, and have incoherent and/or self-contradictory official narratives - indicative of the strong support given by commercially-controlled media.


NATO was set up after World War II. The Soviet Union applied for membership in 1954, but was refused.

Operation Gladio

Full article: Operation Gladio

In October 1990, Le Cercle member and Italian Prime Minister, Giulio Andreotti, accused NATO of involvement in Operation Gladio. After almost a month of silence on the matter, senior NATO spokesman Jean Marcotta categorically denied Andreotti's allegation, stating at SHAPE headquarters in Mons, Belgium that "NATO has never contemplated guerrilla war or clandestine operations; it has always concerned itself with military affairs and the defence of allied frontiers." The next day a different NATO spokesman retracted NATO's denial.[2] Although established at or very near the start of NATO, it only emerged to become part of the historical record in 1990 after an investigation in the Italian parliament - by which point it had already lead to many violent deaths of civilians in false flag operations in a range of European countries.

Post-Cold War expansion

The post 1989 decline of the Soviet empire and consequent lack of a clear enemy caused something of an existential crisis for NATO, which appears to have lead directly to the "war on terrorism" through the Operation Gladio/B plan.


NATO has an extensive civilian structure, under the Secretary General of NATO, as distinct from its military structure, commanded by the Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR)

Full article: Stub class article Supreme Allied Commander Europe

The SACEUR (Supreme Allied Commander Europe), NATO's top military executive, is always an American. As of 2015 NATO's SACEUR is Philip M. Breedlove[3]. Every NATO member has its own ambassador. According to Daniele Ganser "these channels function like this: NATO - and here predominantly the USA - says 'here are the facts and you have to do that'."[4].

Secretary General of NATO

Full article: Stub class article Secretary General of NATO

The Secretary General of NATO has no power in the military command structure, but chairs several of the senior decision-making bodies of NATO, including the North Atlantic Council, the Defence Planning Committee and the Nuclear Planning Committee, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, the Mediterranean Cooperation Group and serves as co-chair of the Permanent Joint Council and the NATO-Ukraine Commission. No publicly acknowledged selection procedure exists for this position; since the Bilderberg group arranged to reorganise NATO in 1966[5], all permanent holders of this position have been prior attendees of this conference.[6]



NATOs military activities provide not only huge profits for the military industrial complex but also provide a cover for other business such as the organising of deep events.

Operation Gladio

Full articles: Operation Gladio, Operation Gladio/B

Since just after World War II, NATO established a network of terrorist cells. Officially for use in case of a communist invasion, this has increasingly been used for a range of purposes, such as promoting the strategy of tension through false flag attacks, possibly also for political assassinations, and in the 21st century especially, for promoting the "War on Terror".

Illegal Drug Trade

Full article: Rated 4/5 Illegal Drug Trade

It is possible that senior figures in NATO are involved in the global drug trade. Circumstantial evidence surfaced in 2003 with the arrest of Willem Matser,[7] a senior advisor to the NATO Secretary General, George Robertson, whom he saw on a daily basis. Matser was charged with money laundering, along with Pietro Fedino, an Italian crime boss connected to the Columbian Cali cartel. The failure of the commercially-controlled media to report any follow ups on this story supports the conjecture that this was no isolated enterprise, but part of a plan under deep state control.

Alliance Duty

On September 11th, 2001 the U.S. claimed to be under military attack, and called the other NATO members to assist its self-defence. NATO's treaty requires that the other members investigate the truth of this claim.[8] As of 2016 it is unclear:

  1. Whether this is still the case;
  2. If so, what consequences this has in terms of national sovereignty of NATO members;
  3. Whether any investigation has ever been carried out.


A video by James Corbett

The wisdom of NATO's leaders may be questioned by Western commercially-controlled media, but their good intentions are not. Following the "humanitarian intervention" in Libya. One critic asked the rhetorical question "When was the last time that any war, anywhere, amounted to anything more than a swindle for the benefit of the bankers and the war industry, or anything less than a bloodbath for the average man or woman in the target country?"[9]


Events carried out

2001 Invasion of Afghanistan7 October 2001 - PresentAfghanistan
Operation Gladio/B1997 - Present

Documents by NATO

TitleDocument typePublication dateSubject(s)Description
File:NATO-PSYOPS.pdfguidelineOctober 2007PsyopNATO’s standard doctrine for psychological operations. Though unclassified, NATO doctrine documents are not released to the public.
File:Nato-master-narrative-2008.pdfhandbook6 October 2008International Security Assistance Force
2001 Afghanistan war

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
A Cautionary Talearticle3 February 2011William Blum
Alexander Dugin to the American people on Ukraineletter8 March 2014Aleksandr DuginA letter to 'The American people' from senior Russian academic and advisor to President Putin, Alexander Dugin about the Spring 2014 situation in Ukraine and Russia-western relations generally.
Daily NATO War Crimes in Libyawebpage29 July 2011Stephen Lendman
File:ISAF-Spokesperson.pdfpresentation17 September 2012ISAF Staff
It’s Nato that’s empire-building, not Putinarticle7 March 2015Peter HitchensRare honesty, peppered with obligatory obeisances to western official narratives, about Nato empire-building since 1990 from a western mainsteam media journalist.
NATO Proclaims Itself Global Military Forcearticle22 November 2010Rick Rozoff
NATO destroys yet another countryarticle26 August 2011Madhav Das Nalapat
NATO’s new Cold War runs into trouble in Germanyarticle2 May 2014Christoph GermannEvidence of a substantial and growing disconnect between the German establishment and its population. The official narrative of an agressive expansionist Russia is being comprehensively rejected and it spells trouble for NATO
Nyet means Nyetdiplomatic communication1 February 2008William BurnsFebruary 2008 classified diplomatic cable from US ambassador to Russia William J Burns to the State Department about how Russia views NATO involvement in Ukraine
On Naval Blockades and A Hard Days WarArticle11 October 2018Christopher BlackThe NATO leadership are in love with war. They enjoy frightening people. They enjoy the killing. It gives them a thrill talking about it when they sit down in their comfortable chairs and have their cocktails after a hard days war.
Russia-US Conventional Military Balancearticle24 July 2015'The Saker'Further thoughts on the US-Russia conventional military balance in light of continuing NATO sabre-rattling around Russia's western/southern borderlands
The Meaning of the US Saber-Rattling at the Borders of Russiaarticle18 July 2015'The Saker'Some thoughts on the Russia - NATO military balance in light of NATO posturing, excercises and sabre-rettling around Russia's wetern and southern borders
US Recruits Russia as Junior Partnerarticle24 November 2010Rick Rozoff
War and Peace - The Lost Principles of Science and Valuearticle17 June 2015John McMurtryA wide-ranging critique of the techniques of globalisation and the way in which apparently otherwise well-meaning western NGOs frame the worlds problems in US war propaganda terms
File:War-gaming the Baltics.pdfreportDavid Shlapak
Michael Johnson
What Lies Ahead for Libyaarticle13 September 2011Johan Galtung
Who is Bombing European Civilians?article22 March 2016Sott.netSharp questioning of precisely who is responsible for attacks on civilians in Europe

Related Quotations

Douglas HurdNATO is one of the principal props which have allowed Britain to punch above its weight in the world.”Douglas Hurd1993
Hastings Ismay“[NATO was created to] keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”Hastings Ismay1952
Richard SakwaNATO exists to manage the risks created by its existence.”Richard Sakwa2015

See Also


Facts about "NATO"
Display date4 April 1949 - Present +
Display docTypeWikispooks Page +
Display imageImage:NATO.png +
Display image2File:NATO.png +
Has descriptionThe world's largest military alliance. +
Has fullPageNameNATO +
Has fullPageNameeNATO +
Has groupTypeInternational + and Military +
Has headquartersSupreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe +, Mons + and Belgium +
Has historycommons +
Has imageFile:North Atlantic Treaty Organization (orthographic projection).svg +
Has image2File:North Atlantic Treaty Organization (orthographic projection).svg +
Has leaderSecretary General of NATO + and Supreme Allied Commander Europe +
Has logoFile:NATO.png +
Has logo2Image:NATO.png +
Has memberAlbania +, Belgium +, Bulgaria +, Canada +, Croatia +, Czech Republic +, Denmark +, Estonia +, France +, Germany +, Greece +, Hungary +, Iceland +, Italy +, Latvia +, Lithuania +, Luxembourg +, Netherlands +, Norway +, Poland +, Portugal +, Romania +, Slovakia +, Slovenia +, Spain +, Turkey +, United Kingdom + and United States +
Has noRatings0 +
Has objectClassGroup +
Has objectClass2Group +
Has powerbase +
Has revisionSize9,926 +
Has revisionUserPatrick Haseldine +
Has sourcewatch +
Has spartacus +
Has subGroupNorth Atlantic Council +, Defence Planning Committee +, Nuclear Planning Group +, Allied Clandestine Committee +, Clandestine Planning Committee +, NATO/Headquarters +, NATO/Permanent Representatives and National Delegations +, NATO/International Staff +, NATO/Support and Procurement Agency +, NATO/Standardization Agency +, NATO/Communications and Information Agency +, NATO/Science and Technology Organization +, NATO/Air Traffic Management Committee +, NATO/Military Committee Meteorological Group +, International Board of Auditors for NATO + and ... +
Has website +
Has wikipediaPage +
Has wikipediaPage2 +
Is not stubtrue +
Start4 April 1949 +