"War on Terror"

From Wikispooks
Jump to: navigation, search
Concept.png "War on Terror" 
(Strategy of Tension) Average Rating: 4 4 from 1 reviews
Nofear.jpg
Type front
Start 1979
Founder(s) Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism,  Deep State
Interest of • Kevin Barrett
• Josh Begley
• Peter Clarke
• Jeffrey Kaye
• Norman Lamont
• Le Cercle
• Steve Pieczenik
• Daniel Pipes
• Quilliam Foundation
The campaign, launched by the USA under the Presidency of George W. Bush with the support of the UK, and most NATO members (at least formally) and other Western-aligned countries. Nominally a response to the events of 11 September 2001, its stated objective is the elimination of so called 'terrorist organisations', it was in fact conceived long before by a group of terrorist experts, including his father and the groundwork laid at a 1979 conference in Jerusalem.

Nafeez Ahmed wrote in December 2015 that data from the US state department reveals that since 2001, the number of terrorist attacks has increased by around 6500%.[1] This is not to say that the "war on terror" is a failure: worldwide it has facilitated the transfer of trillions of dollars from governments to the wealthy elite.[2] Mere venality however is of course a veneer on the deeper purposes of those who established the project - control of their fellow man.

Official Narrative

War-on-terror-i-say.jpg

In response to increasingly violent and radicalised opposition by a small but determined number of extremists who are ruthlessly using technology, national governments, especially those under the hegemony of the US/UK/NATO are increasingly being forced to resort to more ruthless counter measures to protect the welfare of the majority of their citizens. The official opposition narrative, as with the "war on drugs" is that the policy is misguided - never that it is as well though out as it is cynical and hypocritical. This page suggests that both narratives were consciously created to obscure a multitude of less palatable deep political purposes.

Problems

"Terrorism" is rarely defined, only vaguely alluded to, alongside stereotypical images of "Islamic extremists". Earlier terrorism (such as IRA, for example) were treated differently and not exploited to promote fear amongst the population. Although the risk of death or injury from terrorism is a fraction of 1% of the risk of, for example traffic accidents[3] the commercially-controlled media and governments continuously play it up.

"War" is the systematic use of violence against a designated enemy, a prime source of "terror". It is blatantly counterproductive to use terrorist methods such as assassination, torture and indefinite detention to do so. So the "War on Terror" is absurd on its face... and yet people are expected to tolerate ever greater proportions of their tax revenues being diverted to this end. In the post-WWII West the Bogeyman was "Communism"; in earlier times it was "Anarchism", earlier still, "Witchcraft". Stoking fear of "Terrorism" fulfills a similar function.[4].

Alternative view

The "War on Terror" has been called "the biggest lie of the 21st century"[5] and is used by the military-industrial-intelligence-congressional complex as a pretext for their continued existence (and expansion) after the obvious (and to a certain extent real) dangers of the cold war have subsided. A lot of evidence suggests that the majority of high profile "terrorist attacks" are in fact designed to promote the "war on terror" and keep profits up for the MICC.

War on terror makes terrorists.jpg
After the 7-7 London bombings MP Robin Cook stated a month before his death that "The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means".

Sir Ivor Roberts, former UK ambassador in Rome, noted in 2004 that George W Bush was "al-Qa'ida's best recruiting sergeant". In 2007, he gave a valedictory telegram which was "curtly dismissive"[6] of the "war on terror". The response from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office was to ignore the substance of his telegram but ban the century-old practice of valedictory telegrams from British envoys.

Origins

Although "officialy" launched on 7 October 2001, as a response to the events of September 11th, the global war on terror has roots which go back to the 1970's. Historically, false Flag attacks were something of a rarity, used only at time of greatest need, such as when a casus belli was sought. However, the Gladio networks set up at the end of WW2 allowed them to be carried out with ruthless efficiency, and deep state control of national governments and commercially-controlled media minimised the chances of effective exposure. As a result, they became more common after WWII, most nostably in Italy. After the end of the Cold War they were invoked by the MICC and other aspects of the apparatus of "national security" to try to fabricate a raisin-d'etre.

Few commentators were perspicacious enough to detect what was underway, but Mae Brussell saw already in the 1970's that the lure of a way to control public perceptions was likely to prove irresistible to deep politicians. She wrote in 1974 that "We are going to see a great number of articles in the future from so-called experts and public officials. They will warn about more violence, more kidnappings, and more terrorists. Mass media, the armed forces, and intelligence agencies will saturate our lives with fascist scare tactics and "predictions" that have already been planned to come true."[7]

Terror management theory

Full article: Stub class article Terror management theory

Terror management theory is the psychological theory about how humans deal with fear of death. Systematic research on this in the 1970s began to confirm that even subliminal reminders of mortality can have a huge effect on people, motivating them to become not only more fearful, but xenophobic and submissive to authorities. This explains why, for example, the popularity of George W. Bush leaped after September 11th, in spite of his demonstrably underwhelming performance (reading a story about a pet goat to a class of Florida first graders, even after he is told about the terrorist attacks underway in New York).

Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism

Full article: Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism

In 1979, the Jonathan Institute held what was a key step in the development of the 'Global War on Terror'. The Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism attempted to found the study of terrorism as an academic discipline in its own right, separate from established areas such as criminology, politics, international relations etc. With 700 attendees[8] including several top level deep state bosses such as George H. W. Bush (The Enterprise) and Brian Crozier (Le Cercle, The 61), this appears to have been a seminal event in the global coordination of false flag terrorism. It was followed up 5 years later the Washington Conference on International Terrorism which helped establish "terrorism" as a new focus of Israeli, U.S., and European foreign policy.

Purposes

Like the "war on drugs", the "war on terror" serves many deceitful purposes. Possibly the most important of these is to increase fear among populations exposed to the concept (i.e. primarily the populations of US, UK, other 'developed' nations). This is well understood as a modern version of the "strategy of tension" applied in Italy in the 1970's and 80's by Operation Gladio. Damaging social cohesion and rendering people mentally (and in the longer term, also physically) weaker in this way is an effort to strengthen the relative position of those who behind the operation. As well as providing numerous avenues for profiteering, the war on terror appears to be an effort to hamper those who are actively resisting the roll out of a totalitarian police state and who are investigating crimes such as those of the cabal. Various symptoms are manifesting:

Increasing censorship

Full article: Stub class article Censorship

Governments involved in the "war on terror" are increasingly seeking to censor information rather than trying to explain the serious discrepancies between the official narrative and the observable (and now, with modern communication technology, also easily broadcastable) real world. For example, the UK government, is seeking to ban web content that - although legal - it deems to be "unsavoury".[9] In USA, FOIA requests have become become more or less useless due to exemptions made for "national security".

Rolling back Civil Liberties

War-on-Terror.jpg
Full article: Stub class article Civil liberties

The "war on terror" serves as a pretext for rolling back civil liberties[10] including habeus corpus, the freedom from unlawful search and seizure or the absolute ban on torture. Western governments have repeatedly drafted legislation in vague legal terms, presenting it in the context of Islamic terrorism and once it is passed, then applying it to so-called "domestic terrorists", abusing the deliberately plastic nature of the concept.

Mass surveillance

Full article: Mass surveillance

After the Edward Snowden Affair, widespread mass surveillance by the NSA and other government agencies is now widely known to have been carried out illegally for years. There is no serious discussion in the commercially-controlled media of legal proceedings against the perpetrators, and the discussion is framed in the context of the "war on terror".

Forced disappearance

Full article: Forced disappearance

In contravention of international human rights law, many national governments have been engaging in (and even attempting to legalize) the forced disappearance of their own citizens, or other other "terrorist suspects" within (or particularly in the case of the US also outside) their borders. A variety of legal tactics are employed to muddy the waters, and the commercially-controlled media is generally complicit in its failure to clearly report such cases.

Extraordinary rendition

Full article: “Extraordinary rendition”

In fact far from extraordinary, what the commercially-controlled media refer to as "extraordinary rendition" is used increasingly commonly under the "War on Terror" rhetoric. It is basically the forced deportation of a victim from one legal jurisdiction into another, e.g. to circumvent legal obstacles to their torture.

Torture

Full article: Torture

The commercially-controlled media have repeatedly invoked the bogus 'ticking time bomb' scenario in an apparent effort to promote public acceptance of the re-legalisation of torture, irrespective of the unreasonableness of this situation. The fact that torture has other purposes (such as the creation of bogus intelligence and the terrorisation of subject populations) is seldom if ever mentioned by big media. in 2014 US President Barack Obama casually admitted "We tortured some folks", but did not go on to make the (legally obvious) point that this meant crimes had been broken and that people would be charged as a result.

Indefinite detention

Full article: Indefinite detention

Indefinite detention, in many countries more or less agreed to be unthinkable in the 20th century, is increasingly being used in the 21st century, particularly against "illegal immigrants" as well as "suspected terrorists". Canada was ahead of the curve in passing a 1978 law to explicitly permits it, while Australia did so in 1994 and the UK passed legislation to the same effect in 2006. In USA the 2012 NDAA authorised this - a law that was challenged by Chris Hedges but deemed legal by the US Supreme Court in April 2014.

Secret trials

Full article: Stub class article Secret trial

In 2008 the UK's Crown Prosecution Service began claiming that for nebulous reasons of "national security", some trials would have to be held partly in secret. In 2014, the claim was expanded to state that completely secret trials were needed. This was not allowed on appeal, but nevertheless, the number of secret trials is increasing and the trend seems pretty clear.

Assassination

Full article: Assassination
CameronTerrorQuiz.jpg

Rebranded "targeted killing" just as torture was rebranded "extreme interrogation", regimes such as US under President Obama have claimed, since their murder of Anwar al-Awlaki came to light, that they have the legal right to kill anyone they deem as a "terrorist" suspect, with no judicial process needed.

"Banning Cash"

The French Finance Minister Michel Sapin claimed in 2015 that it was necessary to "fight against the use of cash and anonymity in the French economy" since this facilitated terrorism. He planned to ban French residents from making cash payments of over €1,000 (€10,000 for tourists). This is just one of a range of restrictions which have lead several commentators to suggest that these are first steps towards "banning cash". Spain has banned cash transactions of over €2,500 and Italy has a limit of €1,000.[11][12][13]

Financial gain

As top level deep politicians, the organisers of the War on Terror are not short of money making schemes[14] so to suggest that they are motivated by financial gain would be incorrect. However, they need help in realising the plan, and it is no coincidence that it has been a boon to the burgeoning "anti-terrorism" industry. The vast majority of those actively engaged in it, from ground level operatives through to CEOs and institutional investors are probably highly motivated by a short term financial self-interest. Promoting terrorism and fear of it is a multi-billion dollar business opportunity both inside government[15] and out.[16]

Cover for future crimes

The presence of fictional terrorists facilitates crimes such as bombings to kill people or destroy embarrassing evidence.

Perpetrators

War on terror US.jpg

The timing of the "war on terror" - just after the end of the cold war would suggest the involvement of the permanent war machine. The rollout seems to be widespread, but is fastest in anglophone countries[citation needed], perhaps suggesting leadership from UK or US, both of which have been aggressive in the rolling back of civil liberties.

Deep State

The deep state are experienced at carrying out black ops, but other groups such as intelligence agencies and some private military contractors could also carry them out. Control of the state invesitgative apparatus and commercially-controlled media reporting is however much harder. Limiting public exposure of the true perpetrators is of course essential to the success of false flag operations which make up the "war on terror". This provides strong circumstantial evidence that the war on terror is (at least) supported by deep state groups such as the cabal.

Intelligence agencies

Full article: Intelligence agencies

Former Italian Prime Minister, Francesco Cossiga, wrote that "all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe... now know well that the disastrous attack [of 9/11] has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."[17][18] If this is true, one might wonder why not even one has been courageous enough to expose the deception. One possible answer to that would be that to see them as separate groups (with national affiliations) is a mistake; international milieux have been highly influential since at least the Safari Club and Le Cercle in creating what Peter Dale Scott refers to as a "supranational deep state".[19]

Controlled media

“Given terrorism's unique dependence on publicity and amplification, the media have a crucial role in either facilitating or obstructing the spread of terrorism against the West... manipulation of public opinion is in fact, central to the terrorist strategy. For this purpose, access to the media, indeed their domination, is indispensable.”
James H. Fetzer   —   [20]

The commercially-controlled media, especially in the US, has long been complicit in an organised effort to keep people fearful and misinformed. The hypocrisy of the "war on terror" would be easily grasped without a compliant media keen to uncritically echo and amplify the authorities' pronouncements. The language used by corporate media frames people's thinking, so that they can be subtly prepared for particular lies by gradual exposure to particular language and ideas.[21] The use of the word "risk" in the UK broadsheet press went up by an order of magnitude between 1994 to 2000.[22] Both the 1995 Oklahoma Bombing and the Amerithrax anthrax attacks were both initially (very quickly) blamed on Islamic terrorists, an official narrative which the corporate media echo unchallenged. Particularly important is the failure of corporate media to investigate certain topics, to leave certain topics unasked.

One exception to the rule of the controlled media's obeisance to the official narrative is the BBC's Adam Curtis, who in 2004 produced a recommended series of films, The Power Of Nightmares, which suggested that Al Qaeda was a name created by the US government.

9/11

Full article: Rated 4/5 9-11
A typical inset image of Bin Laden, as if to strengthen an association in the viewers' minds with the 9-11 attacks.[23]

The single most important event in promoting the "war on terror" narrative was undoubtedly 9/11. In the wake of this, most people were in state of extended shock (half of US adults are suspected of experiencing symptoms of PTSD[citation needed]). As Naomi Klein points out in her Shock Doctrine, this renders people particularly susceptible to 'programming'. This took the form (and indeed, still takes the form) of stock repetition of images and phrases, such as the linking of Al Qaeda to acts and images of terrorism.

The Telegraph's reporting from October 1, 2001 provide a typical example. It did not question Tony Blair's claim to have seen "absolutely powerful incontrovertible evidence" that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. Instead, it echoed his assertion that "the fight against terrorism needs to be a global one. Only a true coalition of the civilised world offers a real chance of cutting out the cancer of mass terrorism."[24]

As an exception to the Western corporate media policy on 9/11, Russia Today produced an interesting video about Operation Gladio and 9/11. However, although still available elsewhere, it is interesting that in Summer 2014 that episode of the series was removed, later followed by all the other "Truthseeker" videos.

Counter Terrorism

The War on Terror has spawned a burgeoning market for "counter terror" groups, in the private, government and international sectors. The United Nations/Security Council/Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate, for example, have failed to investigate the obvious holes in the some official narratives of recent terrorist attacks (most notably 9/11), again, suggesting a coordinated campaign by a highly influential groups with broad reach:- i.e. deep state control. This fits the known evidence of many "counter terror" groups being set up by deep politicians, such as attendees of Le Cercle and/or the 1979 JCIT.

Responses

No fear.jpg

Since 9/11 in particular, the knowledge of false flag terror events is becoming public; once one has seriously entertained the possibility that the authorities may in fact be people ready to tolerate such abhorrent strategies, a previously hidden pattern emerges which allows one to make a lot more sense of what is going on. The main aim of the "war on terror" is to promote fear - so the tactic fails if enough people calmly refuse to be taken in by it. As Bruce Schneier stated “The surest defense against terrorism is to refuse to be terrorized.”[20]

Education can yield the insight and fortitude which will help make it obsolete. As the internet is allowing this deception to be effectively unmasked, increasingly desperate attempts are being made to stifle freedom of speech through censorship.[25]  

A victim of War on Terror on Wikispooks

Use the Up/Dn symbols to sort

Title
Rafil Dhafir
 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
File:A case to answer.pdfreport2008Amnesty InternationalAn Amnesty International report on the 40 month long detention and rendition of Khaled al-Maqtari, a 25 year old Saudi national at the time of his arrest in Fallujah, Iraq in January 2004.
A lesson from Brussels we refuse to learnarticle24 March 2016Jonathan CookCommentary on the shortcomings of a Simon Jenkins article on the Mass murder in Brussels
America's non-compliancearticle29 April 2010Gareth Peirce
Bloody US-Directed Raid Destabilizes Philippine Politicsarticle1 March 2015Walden BelloAmerican fingerprints are all over a botched commando raid in the southern Philippines that left dozens dead and shocked the country.
Fleeced by Purveyors of Feararticle1 October 2010Simon Jenkins
How Al Qaeda men came to power in Libyaarticle7 September 2011Thierry Meyssan
File:ICJ report 16-2-09.pdfreport2009This report of the Eminent Jurists Panel, based on one a comprehensive surveys on counter-terrorism and human rights, illustrates how 9-11 has influenced the rollback of civil liberties.
File:PSR Body Count.pdfreport15 March 2015IPPNWCasualty figures for the 'War on Terror' after 10 years
Sins of Statecraft - The War on Terror Exposedpaper29 July 2006Brian Bogart
The First 9-11 Scepticarticle12 September 2001David McGowanWritten whilst the events of 11 September 2001 were still unfolding, posted on the author's web site the following morning, qualifying it as probably the first sceptic post to hit the internet.
The International Terrorist Threat and the Dilemas in Countering itspeech1 September 2005Eliza Manningham-BullerA promotion of The War On Terror from the head of UK's MI5. "The world has changed"... etc.
File:The Politics of Fear and SCADs.pdfpaperFebruary 2010Kym Thorne
Alexander Kouzmin
The Politics of Terrorarticle31 August 2010Douglas Valentine
The Power of Nightmaresfilm2005Adam CurtisA some-holds-barred look at how fear has come to dominate politics in America, Britain and around the world — which observes that much of that fear is based on an illusion.
File:The Use of Terrorism to Construct World Order.pdfpaper9 September 2004Ola TunanderA Paper presented at the Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference (Panel 28 Geopolitics) Netherlands Congress Centre, The Hague.
The War on Conspiracy Realists Continuesarticle24 July 2015Brandon MartinezA useful run-down on the Orwellian absurdity of recently announced UK government measures to 'combat extremism' which in practice mean to make life difficult for people who effectively question the Official Narrative on the War on Terror
The War on Terrorarticle16 October 2010Paul Craig Roberts
The political trial of a caring man and the end of justice in Americaarticle8 November 2012John PilgerThe story of a particularly egregious example of the blind sanctimonious viciousness that the US judicial system reserves for Muslims deemed to have impeded US foreign policy objectives.
The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military meansarticle8 July 2005Robin CookBin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west.
The use of terrorism to construct world orderpaper10 September 2004Ola Tunander
This war on terrorism is bogusarticle6 September 2003Michael Meacher
Three Shattered Mythsopen letter26 January 2005Babar Ahmad
US holds world record for the killing of innocent civiliansInterview transcript29 July 2014John McMurtryA wide-ranging interview with Prof. John McMurtry that pulls no punches about the moral bankruptcy of the US globalising elite and its accomplices, allies and self-serving lackies. It covers the US War on Terror project, its military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the 9-11 attacks.
United Nations Security Council and European Union blacklistswebpage16 November 2007Dick Marty
Unlayering the Middle East War Agendaarticle21 January 2011Zahir Ebrahim
Vladimir Putin Interviewinterview5 September 2013Vladimir PutinPress interview with Vladimir Putin ahead of the September 2013 G20 meeting in St Petersburg
War and Peace - The Lost Principles of Science and Valuearticle17 June 2015John McMurtryA wide-ranging critique of the techniques of globalisation and the way in which apparently otherwise well-meaning western NGOs frame the worlds problems in US war propaganda terms
Wolfowitz Directive Gave Legal Cover to Detainee Experimentation Programarticle14 October 2010Jason Leopold
Jeffrey Kaye
 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Coleen Rowley“I began a long time ago right after 9/11 being appalled by the fact that this cover-up was beginning, and then seeing this so-called war on terror began, and again had very little connection to what I knew what was behind that the terrorist attacks, and seeing terrorism grow. In the world right now if we wanted to be safer you do something, but you don’t do something that makes the problem worse.”Coleen Rowley
Internet/Censorship“For some time to come, the delicate balance between freedom and security may have to shift”Tony AbbottSeptember 2014
IslamophobiaTerrorism cannot be defeated because it’s not an enemy, it’s a tactic. A war against Al Qaida is sensible and supportable, but a war against a tactic is ludicrous and hurtful... a propaganda ploy to swindle others into supporting one’s own terrorism ... and encourages prejudices against Muslims everywhere. What if we said “Catholic Christian IRA hitmen” ?”William E. Odom2006
Nice truck eventDemocracy must not be weak, nor simply commemorate. Democracy must say "We will win the war."”Nicolas SarkozyJuly 2016
== Rating ==
4star.png 2 July 2016 Robin  Everyone should be familiar with this back story
The "War on Terror" is not a mistake, nor did it begin in 2001 in response to 9/11. This page clears up a number of misconceptions about this so-called "war" which like the "war on drugs" was designed to be endless.


References

  1. https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-to-change-the-world-in-three-easy-steps-92d7ca576fc1#.yp92llqgn
  2. http://theantimedia.org/us-war-terror-5-trillion/
  3. Document:Terrorism, Transit and Public Safety - Evaluating the Risks
  4. http://unwelcomeguests.net/327
  5. http://www.karelvanwolferen.com/48-nato-and-the-two-central-conflicts-of-the-ukraine-crisis-13-march-2015/
  6. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/former-envoy-makes-devastating-attack-on-blairs-bullshit-bingo-management-culture-of-diplomacy-446358.html
  7. http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussell%20Articles/Inside%20The%20Hearst%20Kidnapping.html
  8. http://911blogger.com/node/10264
  9. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-03/15/government-web-censorship
  10. File:ICJ report 16-2-09.pdf
  11. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/18/us-france-security-financing-idUSKBN0ME14720150318
  12. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-23/fighting-war-terror-banning-cash
  13. http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/they-are-slowly-making-cash-illegal
  14. For example, note that deep state groups control the illegal drug trade
  15. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-loses-track-of-31-billion-meant-to-fight-terror/article11629983/
  16. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/2006-09-10-security-industry_x.htm
  17. http://www.globalresearch.ca/ex-italian-president-intel-agencies-know-9-11-an-inside-job/7550
  18. http://www.corriere.it/politica/07_novembre_30/osama_berlusconi_cossiga_27f4ccee-9f55-11dc-8807-0003ba99c53b.shtml
  19. http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/684
  20. a b c http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/joshua-blakeney-on-terrorism-how-the-west-can-win-by-benjamin
  21. http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/505
  22. http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/694
  23. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/osama-bin-laden-dead-reports/story-e6frg6so-1226048421033
  24. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/1358499/Blair-presents-the-proof-that-bin-Laden-is-guilty.html
  25. Some have argued that the Edward Snowden Affair was conceived as a way to let people know the extent of mass surveillance so that they will self-censor.

See Also

Facts about "War on Terror"
ConstitutesStrategy of Tension +
DescriptionThe campaign, launched by the USA under th
The campaign, launched by the USA under the Presidency of George W. Bush with the support of the UK, and most NATO members (at least formally) and other Western-aligned countries. Nominally a response to the events of 11 September 2001, its stated objective is the elimination of so called 'terrorist organisations', it was in fact conceived long before by a group of terrorist experts, including his father and the groundwork laid at a 1979 conference in Jerusalem.
t a 1979 conference in Jerusalem. +
Display date1979 - Present +
Display docTypeWikiSpooks Page +
Display imageFile:nofear.jpg +
Display image2File:Nofear.jpg +
Has averageRating4 +
Has conceptTypefront +
Has founderJerusalem Conference on International Terrorism + and Deep State +
Has fullPageNameWar on Terror +
Has fullPageNameeWar_on_Terror +
Has imageFile:Nofear.jpg +
Has image2File:nofear.jpg +
Has noRatings1 +
Has objectClassConcept +
Has objectClass2Concept +
Has revisionSize23,472 +
Has revisionUserRobin +
Has wikipediaPagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Terror +
Has wikipediaPage2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Terror +
Is not stubtrue +
So calledtrue +
Start1979 +
Has subobject
"Has subobject" is a predefined property representing a container construct that allows to accumulate property-value assignments similar to that of a normal wiki page.
War on Terror + and War on Terror +