From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concept.png Pandemic/Preparation
Interest of• Big pharma
• Big pharma/Lobby
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
• Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
• Peter Daszak
• Christian Drosten
• Anthony Fauci
• Bill Gates
• Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization
• Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
• Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
• National Center for Medical Intelligence
• Stephen Redd
• Robert Koch Institute
• Jens Spahn
• Swissmedic
• Wuhan Institute of Virology

Preparation for pandemics has been a frequent activity - including preemptive emergency legislation, preemptive mandatory vaccination legislation, setting up of planning exercises and the use of propaganda.

Official narrative

Preparation for pandemics is an important activity to minimise their impact on public health. Lessons learned are used to stockpile essential items and to identify and address knowledge gaps for their successful containment or management.


Pandemic preparation does not appear to have included basic research about the spread of airborne pathogens, such as the impacts of climactic conditions, or masks are beneficial in which circumstances,[1] whether it is safe or effective to reuse masks etc. As with so-called "bioweapons defense", the Covid-19 pandemic has shown little evidence of their effectiveness at their stated aim.


"Now, I’ll tell you something – it’s a mystery to me that all of these big important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci have been planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades, planning it so that we would all be safe when the pandemic finally came. And yet, now that it’s here, they don’t seem to know what they’re talking about. They seem to be making it up as they go along. They’re inventing numbers. They cannot tell you what the Case Fatality Rate for Covid is – that’s basic. They cannot give us a PCR test that actually works. They don’t have… They have to change the definition of Covid on the death certificates constantly to make it look more and more dangerous. But one thing that they’re good at is pumping up FEAR."[2]

The purported risks of novel viruses have been repeatedly overestimated.

2018-19 EU-WHO “Global Vaccination Summit”

2018 saw EU reports on State of Vaccine Confidence and Designing and implementing an immunisation information system. On the 12th September 2019, at the joint EU-WHO “Global Vaccination Summit”, they announced a “10 Actions Towards Vaccination for All” plan, to

  • “Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccinationcard/passport for EU citizens“
  • “Develop EU guidance for establishing comprehensive electronic immunization information systems for effective monitoring of immunization programmes.”
  • “overcome the legal and technical barriers impeding the interoperability of national immunisation information systems”

In November of 2019, these suggestions were published as a “call to action”. One month later, China reported the first cases of Covid-19. The point is that proposed COVID countermeasures, which have been presented to the public as emergency measures thought up on the fly by panicking institutions, have in fact existed since before the emergence of the disease.[3]


General recommendations and briefings include:

  • Redefinition of terms and conditions:
    • The WHO relaxed standards for epidemics, so that common flu is included in the definition; the number of infected people required has been drastically reduced
    • The term herd immunity has been redefined in WHO standards to refer to the vaccination of a majority of the world population, instead of natural immunity
    • The term vaccination includes injection of RNA as of 2009, which is not vaccination in a sense that immunity is achieved[citation needed]
    • Strengthening of top-down control: media and government contracts to foster propaganda, fear-mongering and outright censorship
  • Public-Private Partnerships, i.e. corporations replacing governments (in response to Chinese competition?)
  • increased spending on vaccination and related infrastructure, i.e. surveillance
  • militarization
  • psyops (defamation campaigns targeting critics, deportation and threats to habeus corpus), hit pieces, wild guesses, wired assumptions and recommendations in sponsored "scientific" studies, namely the Drosten PCR test
  • crowd control and tackling civil unrest
  • confusion of relative vs. absolute numbers in vaccine studies
  • drastically lowering the protective requirement for vaccines and
  • neglect of long term studies which may uncover health risks

The following examples are just the tip of an iceberg of symposiums, simulations, exercises, papers, studies, research projects, press releases - relentlessly manipulating governments; warning about their un-preparedness; threatening catastrophic events; particular flu or other viruses:

New bureaucracies to manage a permanent state of emergency

Examples, including Epidemic/Preparation. The following examples are just the tip of an iceberg of symposiums, simulations, exercises, papers, studies, research projects, press releases - relentlessly manipulating governments; warning about their un-preparedness; threatening catastrophic events; particular flu or other viruses:



Page nameDescription
A Spreading PlagueTabletop simulation of a global biological warfare attack predicting an apocalyptic outcome. Included several senior pandemic planners. Held February 2019.
AIDS industry
Clade XA pandemic/biowarfare preparation exercise by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Held May 2018.
Crimson ContagionAn U.S. nationwide exercise in how to handle an influenza pandemic. Held January to August 2019
DNA Vaccine
Event 201A Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security/World Economic Forum/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored large scale simulation of a global coronavirus pandemic predicting an apocalyptic outcome. Held October 2019.
Exercise AliceSecret 2016 UK pandemic exercise modelling the impact of a coronavirus outbreak
Exercise CygnusSimulation exercise to estimate the impact of a hypothetical H2N2 influenza pandemic in the UK. One of the purposes of the scenario prepared by experts from Imperial College London was to overcome Whitehall skepticism of their earlier absolutely wrong epidemic forecasting, and to drill politicians to make certain prepared responses in case of an emergency. Held October 2016.
Lock StepA Rockefeller Foundation sponsored large scale simulation of a global pandemic followed by a world totalitarian outcome. Held October 2010
Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological RisksSimulation of a global influenza pandemic predicting an apocalyptic outcome. Held February 2020, with a who-is-who of pandemic planners. Held February 2020.
Public Health Emergency of International Concern
SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028A tabletop pandemic planning exercise that gave advice how to handle "communication challenges" in a vaccination campaign after the public has become aware that it is more damaging than the disease. Held October 2017.


Related Quotations

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded two models to “predict” the spread of COVID-19. The Imperial College London and the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation in Seattle predicted that 2.2-million Americans would die unless drastic lockdown measures were followed. Both colleges quickly reduced their predictions, but the world is still in lockdown as a result of it. In 2005, the Imperial College of London predicted that 200-million people worldwide would be killed by bird flu. When the “crisis’ was over, the virus had killed 78 people worldwide. In 2009, the College predicted that the swine flu would kill 65,000 people in the UK, but the final number was 457. From 2006 through 2018, the Gates Foundation donated $185-million to the College to continue their good work.”William Engdahl
Jon Rappoport
1 May 2020
Biological weapon“The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called furin cleavage site (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...)”
Anthony Fauci“I feel confident that over a period of time we will get a good vaccine, that we will never have to get back to where we are right now.”Anthony Fauci8 April 2020
Bill Gates“This pandemic is bad, but a future pandemic could be 10 times more serious,”Bill Gates27 January 2021
Bill Gates“So we, you know, we'll have to prepare for the next one. That, .., you know I'd say is, will get attention this time.”Bill Gates23 June 2020


Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Bioterror: Manufacturing Wars The American Wayforeword1 April 2003William H. Schaap
Ellen Ray


An official example

Freedom Day