| "Fake News" |
(propaganda technique, polarising perspective, plastic phrase)
|Interest of||• 21st Century Wire|
• Mike Adams
• Natalia Antaleva
• Carole Cadwalladr
• Nick Carter
• Ed Chau
• DFR Lab
• Lyudmyla Denisova
• EU Disinfolab
• Ida Eklund-Lindwall
• Yevhen Fedchenko
• Full Fact
• Brian Gerrish
• Chris Hernon
• Nina Jankowicz
• Caitlin Johnstone
• Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group
• Dave Lindorff
• Media Bias/Fact Check
• David Miller
• Alina Mosendz
• Ben Nimmo
• Giovanni Pitruzzella
• Poynter Institute
• Jenni Sargent
• Rianne Siebenga
• Briony Swire-Thompson
• Tackling Tools of Malign Influence
• The European Journalism Centre
• UK Column
• Dave Van Zandt
• Melissa Zimdars
|"Fake news website" is a meme started after the 2016 US election, to disparage websites that dissent from the opinions expressed by commercially-controlled media.|
"Fake news", like the phrase "conspiracy theory", is a modern label of disdain, more or less equivalent to what used to be called "propaganda". It was introduced in November 2016, in the phrase "fake news website", and subsequently linked to discussion of internet censorship. However, the shorter phrase "fake news" caught on, becoming Macquarie Dictionary's "word[sic.] of the year" for 2016.
- 1 What is it?
- 2 Research
- 3 Legal citation
- 4 Eric Schmidt
- 5 Responses
- 6 Related Quotations
- 7 Related Documents
- 8 An official example
- 9 Rating
- 10 References
What is it?
"Fake News" is something the speaker either knows is untrue, believes is untrue or wishes were untrue and hopes to encourage other people to ignore. Toby Young, reporting in May 2020 on Facebook's COVID-19 censorship of the Swedish chief epidemiologist Johan Giesecke defending Sweden's response to the pandemic "what counts as “fake news”? Any newsy content that’s gone viral, apparently." Commercially-controlled media have been using increasingly as a cover for internet censorship of unwelcome ideas, most clearly during the COVID-19/Panic. Their official narrative is that people must not be allowed exposed to "radicalising" material, so nominally unbiased "fact checkers" should vet material and leave only the safe information.
- Full article: “Fact checking”
- Full article: “Fact checking”
Who will fact check the fact checkers?... The establishment's self-styled "fact checkers" have sought to portray corporate media as more reliable than sources who express dissenting opinions. Global Research, targeted as a "fake news" outlet, made the counterclaim that the New York Times was the "world leader in proliferating fake news".
|James Corbett, who was accused by the Washington Post of being a Russian Propagandist. / "A Brief History of Fake News" (archived)|
“In the article, the [Washington] Post blurred the lines between “fake news” – stories that are simply made up – and what was deemed “propaganda,” in effect, information that didn’t jibe with what the U.S. State Department was saying.”
Robert Parry (February 28, 2017) 
On December 29, 2016, Glen Greenwald accused The Guardian of "recklessly attribut[ing] to Assange comments that he did not make" that "those who most flamboyantly denounce Fake News, and want Facebook and other tech giants to suppress content in the name of combating it, are often the most aggressive and self-serving perpetrators of it."
Usage by corporate media
While the BBC admits that "fake news" includes war propaganda created by MI7 a century ago, it continues to report as if the problem is a recent one, or at least, one that recently became acute. In January 2017, for example, an article asserted that "deliberate lies [have] been energised by the viral power of social media". Facebook and Google announced in November 2016 that they would take steps to address the issue.
Usage about corporate media
“CNN is the ultimate "fake news" network. There isn't a day that goes by where CNN doesn't deliberately fake a news story, distort a significant event for political purposes, or censor an important piece of news they don't want their viewers to discover.”
Mike Adams (November 19, 2016) 
Natural News on "Fake News", announcing an "economic boycott of CNN corporate sponsors"
Research is ongoing into strategies to "vaccinate" people against "Fake News".
The June 2017 first issue of the Journal of Human Behavior contained a study of "Fake News" which was widely cited to explain its tendency to "go viral" on social media. After being covered by dozens of news outlets the paper was retracted on 7 January 2019 after an error was discovered which invalidated their conclusion.
Sites such as Facebook have been introducing software to "fact check" information posted in 2017. Their mechanisms are unknown, but they may be presumed to involve keyword matching and data mining rather than a proper semantic analysis. Some computer scientists reportedly hoped that AI would be able to detect and automatically flag up "Fake News", although the problem is proving harder than initially suspected.
Many laws have been proposed to tackle "fake news", but often hit trouble because of freedom of speech traditions and/or the difficulty of agreeing what is and is not "fake". In 2020, Viktor Orbán passed a "coronavirus law" to allow sentences of up to 5 years in prison for spreading of "fake news".
Sharyl Attkisson ties the first usage of the the words "fake news", in the way they are used in the modern context (ie since 2016), back to Google's funding of the non-profit First Draft. By that she also ties it to Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google and later Executive Chairman of Alphabet Inc, since he was a supporter of Hillary Clinton in her 2016 presidential bid with his personal involvement as campaign adviser.
Alternative media have welcomed the focus on "fake news". Some have launched "fake news awards" to highlight the lies of corporate media. Project Censored commented in 2017 that "in a year when pundits and politicians of all stripes as well as members of the public and the establishment press crowed over “fake news,” the US corporate media completely ignored the story of how one of the most powerful US government institutions, the Department of Defense, secretly used taxpayer money to create fake news of its own."
21st Century Wire
|Title: "Media Fakery and the Distortion of History" (archived)|
On February 14, 2017, 21st Century Wire, a website targeted as a "fake news website", launched "Fake News Week" to try to highlight the deliberate lies pushed by commercially-controlled media. In March 2017, the site launched the 2017 Horace Greeley Award for Best Fake News Journalist, nominating Jon Snow ahead of Brian Williams, Chris Cuomo, Craig Timberg, Michael Weiss, Rachel Maddow, Brian Stelter, Nicholas Kristof, Ian Pannell and Jake Tapper who were also on the short list.
Suspending April Fools Day
|"Fake news website"||“The mainstream corporate media is desperate. They want to suppress independent and alternative online media, which it categorizes as “fake news”. Readers on social media are warned not to go onto certain sites. The intent of this initiative is to smear honest reporting and Truth in Media. Our analysis confirms that the mainstream media are routinely involved in distorting the facts and turning realities upside down. They are the unspoken architects of “Fake News”.”||Michel Chossudovsky||24 November 2016|
|"Fake news website"||“long before “fake news” became a major media topic, the US government was already planning its legally-backed crackdown on anything it would eventually label “fake news".”||25 December 2016|
|Bilderberg/2017||“Bilderberg is concerned about fake news? The world’s most secretive conference, which is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars keeping the press away from its sacred discussions, which has spent decades lying and obfuscating about itself, wants to ensure the spread of truth?”||Charlie Skelton||2 June 2017|
|Josep Borrell||“Disinformation in times of the coronavirus can kill. We have a duty to protect our citizens by making them aware of false information, and expose the actors responsible for engaging in such practices. In today's technology-driven world, where warriors wield keyboards rather than swords and targeted influence operations and disinformation campaigns are a recognised weapon of state and non-state actors, the European Union is increasing its activities and capacities in this fight.”||Josep Borrell||10 June 2020|
|Marie-Eve Carignan||“Early findings show that there really is a rapid uptake of different conspiracy theories, particularly in the United States and France. Similar theories about other diseases that took years to establish themselves only took a few weeks to take hold, super quickly, because people are absorbing so much information! That’s what’s alarming.”||Marie-Eve Carignan||5 April 2020|
|William Casey||“We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false”||William Casey||February 1981|
|Consensus trance||“Nine tenths of the news, as printed in the newspapers, is pseudo-news. Some days ten tenths. The ritual morning trance in which one scans columns of newsprint creates a peculiar form of generalised pseudo-attention to pseudo-reality... My own experience has been that renunciation of this self-hypnosis, of this particiption in this trance is not a sacrifice of reality.”||Thomas Merton||1968|
|Riam Dalati||“Sick and tired of activists and [Syrian] rebels using corpses of dead children to stage emotive scenes for Western consumption. Then they wonder why some serious journos are questioning part of the narrative,”||Riam Dalati||February 2019|
|Der Spiegel||“This week, Der Spiegel, the German news weekly, was forced to admit that one of its former star reporters, the award-winning Claas Relotius, “falsified his articles on a grand scale.””||Robert Bridge||22 December 2018|
|Event 201||“Some governments have taken control of national access to the internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content, and a small number have shut down internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests. Other countries have taken a more moderate approach and have focused on promoting fact checking efforts and working with traditional media outlets. Yet these approaches are limited in scope. Social media companies report that they're doing all they can to limit the use of their platforms for nefarious or misleading purposes. But this is a technically difficult problem and false misleading or half true information is difficult to sort without limiting potentially true messages. The bottom line is that members of the public no longer know who to trust. Both the misinformation and the measures to control it have led to a crisis of confidence”||18 October 2019|
|Event 201||“I also think we are at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they're a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of the misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”||Matthew Harrington||18 October 2019|
|“it seems every day we uncover information about how platforms like Facebook have used our personal data to target us with highly-tailored messaging that merges advertising for goods and services with political messages that reflect our interests and values through our online viewing reinforced by viewpoints we like and follow. This is exacerbated by a financial model that gives financial reward to content that is clicked and shared most widely.”||6 August 2018|
|Freedom of speech||“Being right doesn’t entitle you to censor everyone who is wrong. That’s the central safeguard against tyranny, because even truth would be a tyranny if it didn’t allow opposition. Free speech – real free speech – has to include the right to be wrong, rude, stupid, offensive and a lying jerk. Because once you outlaw any of that – you’ve effectively ended free speech for all of us forever.”||'Catte'||26 February 2017|
|GCHQ||“Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: |
activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable.”
|Glenn Greenwald||24 February 2014|
|Intimidation||“This is where we come in: deploying a multi-pronged strategy to||2018|
|Věra Jourová||“Disinformation waves have hit Europe during the Coronavirus pandemic. They originated from within as well as outside the EU. To fight disinformation, we need to mobilise all relevant players from online platforms to public authorities, and support independent fact checkers and media. While online platforms have taken positive steps during the pandemic, they need to step up their efforts. Our actions are strongly embedded in fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression and information.”||Věra Jourová||10 June 2020|
|NewsGuard||“A new app claiming to serve as a bulwark against "disinformation" by adding "trust rankings" to news websites has links to a PR firm that received nearly $15 million to push pro-Saudi spin in US media, Breitbart reports. NewsGuard and its shady advisory board – consisting of truth-lovers such as Tom Ridge, the first-ever homeland security chief, and former CIA director Michael Hayden – came under scrutiny after Microsoft announced that the app would be built into its mobile browsers. A closer examination of the company's publicly listed investors, however, has revealed new reasons to be suspicious of this self-declared crusader against propaganda. As Breitbart discovered, NewsGuard's third-largest investor, Publicis Groupe, owns a PR firm that has repeatedly airbrushed Saudi Arabia.”||Anonymous||29 January 2019|
|Charlie Skelton||“Bilderberg is concerned about fake news? The world’s most secretive conference, which is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars keeping the press away from its sacred discussions, which has spent decades lying and obfuscating about itself, wants to ensure the spread of truth.”||Charlie Skelton||2017|
|Document:Rothschild TNK-BP Intriguers Drafted The Trump-Russia Report||article||14 January 2017||Yoichi Shimatsu||An in-depth analysis of a 35 page UK-sourced intelligence document purporting to discredit Donald Trump and prove Russian involvement in the so-called 'hacking' of the 2016 presidential election.|
|Document:Staged ISIS Videos are the Plot of Iron Man 3||article||14 September 2014||Jay Dyer||Predictive programming and fake news - an analysis of the ISIS 'beheading' videos and 'Iron Man 3'|
An official example
- https://consortiumnews.com/2017/02/28/mainstream-medias-victimhood/ ConsortiumNews.com
- http://www.naturalnews.com/056077_CNN_boycott_corporate_sponsors_fake_news.html Natural news
- https://pjmedia.com/video/debra-heine/2018/02/14/sharyl-attkisson-explains-tedx-talk-origins-2016-fake-news-narrative-n90879 saved at Archive.org and Archive.is
- https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-02-27-google-head-eric-schmidt-mastermind-behind-fake-news-censorship-agenda.html# saved at Archive.org and Archive.is