Difference between revisions of "9-11"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Event template)
Line 1: Line 1:
<big>'''This is the main page covering the events of 11 September 2001 in the USA.'''</big>
+
{{Event
{{9/11 rules}}<br/>
+
|start=2001-09-11
<div style="float:right;">{{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}</div>
+
|end=2001-09-11
 +
|ON_cause=Al Qaeda
 +
|cause=9/11/Perpetrators
 +
|constitutes=False Flag Attack
 +
}}<div style="float:right;">{{#widget:YouTube|id=yuC_4mGTs98}}</div>
 
==Official Narrative==
 
==Official Narrative==
 
Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly understood to be no more than a convenient cover story that has worn very thin. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been denounced in the [[Document:Ahmadinejad 2010 UN Speech|UN]], EU parliament and questioned in parliaments from Japan<ref>http://www.projectcensored.org/24-japan-questions-9-11-and-the-global-war-on-terror/</ref> to Iran<ref>http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=17845</ref>. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or by the {{ccm}}.
 
Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly understood to be no more than a convenient cover story that has worn very thin. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been denounced in the [[Document:Ahmadinejad 2010 UN Speech|UN]], EU parliament and questioned in parliaments from Japan<ref>http://www.projectcensored.org/24-japan-questions-9-11-and-the-global-war-on-terror/</ref> to Iran<ref>http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=17845</ref>. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or by the {{ccm}}.

Revision as of 09:08, 30 December 2013

Event.png 9-11(False Flag Attack) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
4
Date2001-09-11
Exposed by9-11/Whistleblowers, Francesco Cossiga, David Graham, Indira Singh
Interest of911 Blogger, 911 Review, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Ed Asner, Lorie Van Auken, Dylan Avery, Amy Baker Benjamin, Daniel Bruno, Mathias Bröckers, Michael Corbin, Elias Davidsson, Lucy Morgan Edwards, Jonathan Elinoff, James H. Fetzer, Tod Fletcher, David Frasca, Mark Gaffney, Richard Gage, Mark Gorton, Mike Gravel, Richard Grove, Kurt Haskell, E. P. Heidner, Kyle Hence, Sander Hicks, Steven E. Jones, John Judge, Mujahid Kamran, Dave von Kleist, Adam Larson, Lawyers Committee for 911 Inquiry, Graeme MacQueen, Mad Cow News, Jim Marrs, Philip Marshall, David McGowan, Cynthia McKinney, Thierry Meyssan, Ray Nowosielski, Manfred Petritsch, David Ray Griffin, Saidit, Michael Schmidt, Ralph Schoenman, Jochen Scholz, Peter Dale Scott, Clare Swinney, Veterans Today, Vyzygoth... further results
Subpage"9-11/Israel did it"
"9-11/The 19 Hijackers"
9-11/20th Anniversary
9-11/Air Defence
9-11/Aircraft Wreckage
9-11/Censorship
9-11/Coincidences
9-11/Commission
9-11/Compensation fund
9-11/Cover-up
9-11/Dissident
9-11/Drills
9-11/E-4B
9-11/Exposure
9-11/Flight 93
9-11/George Washington Bridge plot
9-11/Insider Trading
9-11/Joint Congressional Inquiry
9-11/Legal action
9-11/Media response
9-11/Official narrative
9-11/Pentagon
9-11/Perpetrators
9-11/Premature death
9-11/Purposes
9-11/Truth movement
9-11/WTC Controlled demolition
9-11/WTC6
9-11/WTC7
9-11/Whistleblowers

Official Narrative

Over a decade after the events, the official narrative about the 9/11 attacks is increasingly understood to be no more than a convenient cover story that has worn very thin. Almost everyone is agreed on the lack of integrity of the officials who came up with the official story, and the implausibility of their '19 men with boxcutters' story has been denounced in the UN, EU parliament and questioned in parliaments from Japan[1] to Iran[2]. A mound of compelling evidence has been produced, and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which point to glaring anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report. None of these has been addressed by US government or by the commercially-controlled media.

Subsidiary 9/11 articles

Did you know that WTC7 collapsed spontaneously on 9/11, although it was not hit by a plane? Or that its collapse was announced on television before it happened?

See Also

References

External Links