9-11/Joint Congressional Inquiry
| The Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 |
|Membership||• Bob Graham|
• Porter Goss
• Richard Shelby
• Nancy Pelosi
• L. Britt Snider
|The first inquiry into 9/11, by its own admission "not in the blame game". It produced an 800 page report of which 28 pages were censored, and released in redacted form in July 2016.|
This is the first inquiry, from February 2002, not to be confused with the subsequent 9-11/Commission, set up on November 27, 2002.
The Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, a.k.a. the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 was an 'investigation' into [[9/11], carried out by deep state functionaries.
Originally, 28 pages of the report about Saudi Arabia's funding were classified. A redacted version of these 28 pages was released in July 2016.
28 pages were censored from the report for reasons of "national security". These pages are widely reported to implicate figures in the Saudi Arabian government and intelligence agency. Some have speculated that this report was set up as a "false bottom" and/or causus bellum so that, if needed, the classified pages could be revealed and used either as a pretext for a military invasion of Saudi Arabia or to obscure the cabal's role in instigating 9-11.
The 28 Pages
The 28 pages which were redacted for 15 years concern the moving of money from Saudi Arabia to the "19 hijackers". The Choice of 28 pages continued the symbolic 2-1 and 1-2 duality of the 9/11 operation because it recalled the missing 18 pages from John Wilkes Booth's diary.
The main function of the 28 pages was to satisfy doubters that the official story was incomplete. Over time, as more individuals realized the official story was simply incorrect, the 28 pages could replace one set of disinformation with another set. This is a time-honored disinformation technique.