Difference between revisions of "Biological weapon"
(+quote "feature enhancement") |
(→Problems with the official narrative: Latypova quote) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{concept | {{concept | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_warfare | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_warfare | ||
− | |constitutes=WMD, Poison | + | |constitutes=WMD, Poison |
− | |image= | + | |image=Biohazard.jpg |
|description=A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs. | |description=A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs. | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
: '''''Bioterror'' and ''Bioterrorism'' link here.''' | : '''''Bioterror'' and ''Bioterrorism'' link here.''' | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
== Legality == | == Legality == | ||
− | [[Research]] into biological weapons is allowed for ''defensive'' purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from ''offensive'' research. | + | [[Research]] into biological weapons is allowed for ''defensive'' purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from ''offensive'' research.{{CN}} |
== Official narrative == | == Official narrative == | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
== So called "Feature enhancement" == | == So called "Feature enhancement" == | ||
− | {{FA|Biological weapon/ | + | {{FA|Biological weapon/Research}} |
− | To deny offensive research, making viruses more dangerous for humans is called "feature | + | To deny offensive research, making viruses more dangerous for humans is called "feature enhancement" or "gain-of-function". |
− | + | {{SMWQ | |
− | + | |text=The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called ''furin cleavage site'' (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...) | |
− | The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called ''furin cleavage site'' (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. | ||
− | The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...) | ||
|subjects=COVID-19/Origins, Pandemic/Preparation, Disaster/Preparation | |subjects=COVID-19/Origins, Pandemic/Preparation, Disaster/Preparation | ||
|source_URL=https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/ | |source_URL=https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/ | ||
|source_details=(emphasis added) | |source_details=(emphasis added) | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | {{YouTubeVideo | ||
+ | |code= -43pjRwkVMU | ||
+ | |caption= '''''False Flags and the Dawn of Bioterrorism''''' (29:08) a 2020 short documentary by [[James Corbett]], a contextual history and critical overview of the threat of the military industrial biological [[technocracy]] and their duplicitous "defensive" threat to humanity.<ref name=BioterrorAndTranscript>https://www.corbettreport.com/bioterror/ </ref><ref name=BioterrorYouTube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-43pjRwkVMU </ref> | ||
+ | "''For the past twenty years, the world has been in the midst of a so-called "war on terror" set in motion by a false flag attack of spectacular proportions. Now the stage is being set for a new spectacular attack to usher in the next stage in that war on terror: the war on bioterrorism. But who are the real bioterrorists? And can we rely on government agencies, their appointed health authorities, and the corporate media to accurately identify those terrorists in the wake of the next spectacular terror attack?''" | ||
+ | |align=right | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | ===Problems with the official narrative=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{SMWQ | ||
+ | |subjects=CRISPR,Ralph Baric,lab leak,biodefense,gene drive | ||
+ | |text=Fabricating scary narratives about [[superbugs]] is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by [[narratives]] just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary [[bioengineered virus]]. [[Biodefense]] is a huge [[grift]] on both sides. 'Their' side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for 'Pandemic Preparedness'. 'Our' side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in [[Wuhan]], [[Ukraine]] and lately [[California]]. They leak' from labs almost every week, and using [[CRISPER]] [[gene drive]] narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like [[Ralph Baric]] by now. | ||
+ | |source_URL=https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/weaponization-of-disease-agents | ||
+ | |date=November 2023 | ||
+ | |authors=Sasha Latypova | ||
+ | |description= | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are a large number government-funded biolabs researching gain-of-function [[viruses]]. Over the decades there should have been thousands of leaked viruses leading to deadly [[epidemics]] - but this is not the case. This leads to the strong suspicion that the danger from contaminable biological agents is overrated, and that the claims are there as a part of a power grab with "[[pandemic countermeasures]]"<ref>https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/omg-pfizer-is-mutating-covid</ref> - or "[[vaccines]]" which might be the real weapons. Even, [[HIV]], which might have had some gain-of-function research and [[South African Institute for Maritime Research|might have been injected into Africans]] in the [[1980s]] in an attempted [[depopulation]], did not live up to its claimed effects, and does not cause [[AIDS]]. | ||
== Preparations == | == Preparations == | ||
Line 33: | Line 48: | ||
In over 200 cases the US tested bioweapons on their own citizens, according to 'official' news in the {{ccm}}.<ref> | In over 200 cases the US tested bioweapons on their own citizens, according to 'official' news in the {{ccm}}.<ref> | ||
https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/us-military-simulated-biological-warfare-san-francisco/ | https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/us-military-simulated-biological-warfare-san-francisco/ | ||
− | </ref> Preparations overlap with "[[Terrorism/Preparation]]" since [[2001_Anthrax_attacks|Anthrax]] was used in a [[false flag]] event and [[Pandemic/Preparation]] as the proposed solution is preemtive development and large scale funding of new (genetically modified) [[vaccine]]s. | + | </ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States</ref> Preparations overlap with "[[Terrorism/Preparation]]" since [[2001_Anthrax_attacks|Anthrax]] was used in a [[false flag]] event and [[Pandemic/Preparation]] as the proposed solution is preemtive development and large scale funding of new (genetically modified) [[vaccine]]s. |
== Ethnic bioweapon == | == Ethnic bioweapon == | ||
− | |||
The development of ethnic bioweapons and their projected use has been a matter of discussion for decades.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.24-184408/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon</ref><ref>https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20180225002059/https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/mrAJN Archive.is]</ref> | The development of ethnic bioweapons and their projected use has been a matter of discussion for decades.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.24-184408/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon</ref><ref>https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20180225002059/https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/mrAJN Archive.is]</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Events == | == Events == | ||
=== 2002-2003 SARS epidemic in Southern China === | === 2002-2003 SARS epidemic in Southern China === | ||
− | |||
{{FA|SARS}} | {{FA|SARS}} | ||
− | In 2003 [[ABC News]] reported on [[Sergei Kolesnikov]]'s claim that the virus was made in a laboratory.<ref>https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20121105201705/http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/1kuvu Archive.is]</ref> The ''[[Sydney Morning Herald]]'' headlined a 2008 article ''SARS a Chinese weapon: Taiwan official'' which began "Taiwan's top national security chief was forced to apologise after suggesting the deadly SARS virus could have been developed in Chinese laboratories as a bio-weapon. National Security Bureau director [[Tsai Chao-ming]]..."<ref>https://www.smh.com.au/world/sars-a-chinese-weapon-taiwan-official-20081007-4vse.html</ref> | + | In [[2003]] [[ABC News]] reported on [[Sergei Kolesnikov]]'s claim that the virus was made in a laboratory.<ref>https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20121105201705/http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/1kuvu Archive.is]</ref> The ''[[Sydney Morning Herald]]'' headlined a 2008 article ''SARS a Chinese weapon: Taiwan official'' which began "Taiwan's top national security chief was forced to apologise after suggesting the deadly SARS virus could have been developed in Chinese laboratories as a bio-weapon. National Security Bureau director [[Tsai Chao-ming]]..."<ref>https://www.smh.com.au/world/sars-a-chinese-weapon-taiwan-official-20081007-4vse.html</ref> |
=== 2009 avian flu contamination === | === 2009 avian flu contamination === | ||
− | In February 2009, [[Baxter International]] shipped 72 kg material to 16 laboratories in 4 countries. The material was marked as vaccine, but contained live H5N1 avian flu virus material as well as a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses.<ref>http://www.legitgov.org/baxter_sends_live_avian_flu_viruses_270209.html</ref> | + | In February [[2009]], [[Baxter International]] shipped 72 kg material to 16 laboratories in 4 countries. The material was marked as vaccine, but contained live H5N1 avian flu virus material as well as a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses.<ref>http://www.legitgov.org/baxter_sends_live_avian_flu_viruses_270209.html</ref> |
=== 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak === | === 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak === | ||
Line 66: | Line 71: | ||
== Level 4 Bioweapons labs == | == Level 4 Bioweapons labs == | ||
− | + | [[File:Map US Biodefense Program.jpg|left|thumb|410px]] | |
Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at [[BSL4 facility | Biosafety level 4 facilities]]. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level</ref> | Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at [[BSL4 facility | Biosafety level 4 facilities]]. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level</ref> | ||
=== USA === | === USA === | ||
− | |||
The United States operates a high number of level 4 labs worldwide.<ref>https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200224191207/https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/Px61P Archive.is]</ref><ref>http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20180509103048/http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/h2ucY Archive.is]</ref> Accidents and carelessness on the side management shows, that it is not possible to operate these labs, even those with the highest security level, safely all the time.<ref>http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20120131144306/http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf Archive.org]</ref> Especially notorious is the [[Plum Island bio lab]] near Long island.<ref>https://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20181019025938/http://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/jdf8t Archive.is]</ref><ref>https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/product-reviews/006078184X saved at [http://archive.is/DUe5C Archive.is]</ref> It was operated only as a biosafety level 3 lab,<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/nyregion/another-option-to-consider-for-plum-island.html</ref> but it stands as an well documented example for technical and administrative problems that these facilities face. The research facility at [[Fort Detrick]] was shut down by the [[CDC]] in July 2019, citing failure to follow local procedures, lack of periodic recertification training for workers in the biocontainment laboratories and problems with the wastewater decontamination system.<ref>https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200307193700/https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/AGQE2 Archive.is]</ref> | The United States operates a high number of level 4 labs worldwide.<ref>https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200224191207/https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/Px61P Archive.is]</ref><ref>http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20180509103048/http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/h2ucY Archive.is]</ref> Accidents and carelessness on the side management shows, that it is not possible to operate these labs, even those with the highest security level, safely all the time.<ref>http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20120131144306/http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf Archive.org]</ref> Especially notorious is the [[Plum Island bio lab]] near Long island.<ref>https://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20181019025938/http://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/jdf8t Archive.is]</ref><ref>https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/product-reviews/006078184X saved at [http://archive.is/DUe5C Archive.is]</ref> It was operated only as a biosafety level 3 lab,<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/nyregion/another-option-to-consider-for-plum-island.html</ref> but it stands as an well documented example for technical and administrative problems that these facilities face. The research facility at [[Fort Detrick]] was shut down by the [[CDC]] in July 2019, citing failure to follow local procedures, lack of periodic recertification training for workers in the biocontainment laboratories and problems with the wastewater decontamination system.<ref>https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200307193700/https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html Archive.org] saved at [http://archive.is/AGQE2 Archive.is]</ref> | ||
=== China === | === China === | ||
− | [[image:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak map.jpg|right|300px]] | + | [[image:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak map.jpg|right|300px|thumb]] |
The only such facility in mainland China is the [[Wuhan Institute of Virology]] of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8.6 miles from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which the [[World Health Organization]] linked to the first reported cluster of [[Covid-19]] patients, 44 people who became unwell with pneumonia of unknown cause, at the start of what was then referred to as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, later the [[2020 coronavirus pandemic]]. | The only such facility in mainland China is the [[Wuhan Institute of Virology]] of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8.6 miles from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which the [[World Health Organization]] linked to the first reported cluster of [[Covid-19]] patients, 44 people who became unwell with pneumonia of unknown cause, at the start of what was then referred to as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, later the [[2020 coronavirus pandemic]]. | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
− | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
− | |||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 03:29, 25 September 2024
Biological weapon (WMD, Poison) | |
---|---|
Interest of | • Jeffrey Amherst • Francis Boyle • Catastrophic Contagion • Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy • Clade X • Emergent BioSolutions • George C. Marshall Institute • Steven J. Hatfill • Tom Inglesby • Bruce Ivins • Johns Hopkins/Center for Health Security • Robert Kadlec • Robert Malone • Tara O'Toole • Project MKNAOMI • Jim Talent |
Subpage(s) | •"Biological weapon/Terrorism" •Biological weapon/Preparation •Biological weapon/Research |
A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs. |
- Bioterror and Bioterrorism link here.
Biological weapons are organisms, viruses or biological toxins intended for use as destructive agents, typically by infecting and incapacitating or killing people.
Contents
Legality
Research into biological weapons is allowed for defensive purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from offensive research. [Citation Needed]
Official narrative
A "bioterrorist" attack is something we need to be prepared for. Preparing for "pandemics" might be a test case for a more severe "bioterrorist" attack.
So called "Feature enhancement"
- Full article: Biological weapon/Research
- Full article: Biological weapon/Research
To deny offensive research, making viruses more dangerous for humans is called "feature enhancement" or "gain-of-function".
“The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus features a so-called furin cleavage site (FCS), which makes the virus more infectious and virulent than it would otherwise be. Such an FCS is not known in any other SARS-like coronavirus, but it is often inserted as part of gain-of-function studies in virus research. However, similar FCS are known to occur in non-SARS-like coronaviruses, hence a natural origin cannot be excluded based on this. The furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2 uses an arginine (amino acid) double codon, which is rather rare in natural coronaviruses, but quite common in engineered viruses used in lab experiments (...)”
' [1]
False Flags and the Dawn of Bioterrorism (29:08) a 2020 short documentary by James Corbett, a contextual history and critical overview of the threat of the military industrial biological technocracy and their duplicitous "defensive" threat to humanity.[2][3]
"For the past twenty years, the world has been in the midst of a so-called "war on terror" set in motion by a false flag attack of spectacular proportions. Now the stage is being set for a new spectacular attack to usher in the next stage in that war on terror: the war on bioterrorism. But who are the real bioterrorists? And can we rely on government agencies, their appointed health authorities, and the corporate media to accurately identify those terrorists in the wake of the next spectacular terror attack?" |
Problems with the official narrative
“Fabricating scary narratives about superbugs is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by narratives just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary bioengineered virus. Biodefense is a huge grift on both sides. 'Their' side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for 'Pandemic Preparedness'. 'Our' side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in Wuhan, Ukraine and lately California. They leak' from labs almost every week, and using CRISPER gene drive narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like Ralph Baric by now.”
Sasha Latypova (November 2023) [4]
There are a large number government-funded biolabs researching gain-of-function viruses. Over the decades there should have been thousands of leaked viruses leading to deadly epidemics - but this is not the case. This leads to the strong suspicion that the danger from contaminable biological agents is overrated, and that the claims are there as a part of a power grab with "pandemic countermeasures"[5] - or "vaccines" which might be the real weapons. Even, HIV, which might have had some gain-of-function research and might have been injected into Africans in the 1980s in an attempted depopulation, did not live up to its claimed effects, and does not cause AIDS.
Preparations
- Full article: Biological weapon/Preparation
- Full article: Biological weapon/Preparation
In over 200 cases the US tested bioweapons on their own citizens, according to 'official' news in the commercially-controlled media.[6][7] Preparations overlap with "Terrorism/Preparation" since Anthrax was used in a false flag event and Pandemic/Preparation as the proposed solution is preemtive development and large scale funding of new (genetically modified) vaccines.
Ethnic bioweapon
The development of ethnic bioweapons and their projected use has been a matter of discussion for decades.[8][9]
Events
2002-2003 SARS epidemic in Southern China
- Full article: SARS
- Full article: SARS
In 2003 ABC News reported on Sergei Kolesnikov's claim that the virus was made in a laboratory.[10] The Sydney Morning Herald headlined a 2008 article SARS a Chinese weapon: Taiwan official which began "Taiwan's top national security chief was forced to apologise after suggesting the deadly SARS virus could have been developed in Chinese laboratories as a bio-weapon. National Security Bureau director Tsai Chao-ming..."[11]
2009 avian flu contamination
In February 2009, Baxter International shipped 72 kg material to 16 laboratories in 4 countries. The material was marked as vaccine, but contained live H5N1 avian flu virus material as well as a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses.[12]
- Full article: 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak
- Full article: 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak
In late 2019 Covid-19 was detected, first in China, leading the Commercially-controlled media to assume it originated there. The suggestion that it might be a man-made biological weapon was met with widespread censorship by the commercially-controlled media (most obviously Twitter).[13]
Level 4 Bioweapons labs
Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at Biosafety level 4 facilities. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.[14]
USA
The United States operates a high number of level 4 labs worldwide.[15][16] Accidents and carelessness on the side management shows, that it is not possible to operate these labs, even those with the highest security level, safely all the time.[17] Especially notorious is the Plum Island bio lab near Long island.[18][19] It was operated only as a biosafety level 3 lab,[20] but it stands as an well documented example for technical and administrative problems that these facilities face. The research facility at Fort Detrick was shut down by the CDC in July 2019, citing failure to follow local procedures, lack of periodic recertification training for workers in the biocontainment laboratories and problems with the wastewater decontamination system.[21]
China
The only such facility in mainland China is the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8.6 miles from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which the World Health Organization linked to the first reported cluster of Covid-19 patients, 44 people who became unwell with pneumonia of unknown cause, at the start of what was then referred to as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, later the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.
Examples
Page name | Description |
---|---|
"COVID-19/Vaccine" | The "vaccine" for COVID 19? |
2001 Anthrax attacks | A week after 9/11, weaponised anthrax spores was sent from a US lab to media offices and to two U.S. Senators who were obstructing the rollback of civil liberties. A $100M FBI investigation concluded that posthumously blamed a "lone nut" researcher. In 2015, the FBI head of the investigation sued the US Attorney General alleging that exculpating evidence had been withheld. |
African swine fever | |
Alpha-gal syndrome | A tick-borne allergy to red meat that some have speculated is a biological weapon. |
France/Biological weapons | The French government is still highly secretive about this research . |
Infectious clone | Artificially created homogenous copies of a single RNA virion, usable as a bioweapon creating symptoms of acute respiratory distress |
Israel/Biological weapons | Among the most advanced in the world. |
MERS | Reportedly very deadly coronavirus, known since 2012 without evidence of spread outside hospitals. |
Morgellons disease | Disputed condition described as the "formation of strange fibers growing out of unbroken skin", that the official narrative stamps as a psychiatric illness - possibly because it might be a biological weapon. |
Potato beetle | |
Smallpox | Deadly virus eradicated in the wild after a vaccination campaign. |
South Africa/Biological weapons | |
UK/Biological weapons | An advanced and extensive biological weapons program based in Porton Down |
Related Quotations
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
1959 | “A US Army operating manual from 1956 stated explicitly that biological and chemical warfare were an integral operating portion of US military strategy, were not restricted in any way, and that Congress had given the military “First Strike” authority on their use. In 1959, an attempt by Congress to remove this first-strike authority was defeated by the White House and bio-chemical weapons expenditures increased from $75 million to almost $350 million.” | Larry Romanoff | 2020 |
David Baltimore | “When I first saw the furin cleavage site <a href="#cite_note-1">[1]</a> in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. (...) These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.” | David Baltimore | |
Anthony Fauci | “After the 9/11 attacks, and the mysterious anthrax mailings that began a week later (which said, “TAKE PENACILIN [sic] NOW / DEATH TO AMERICA / DEATH TO ISRAEL / ALLAH IS GREAT”), the desire for biopreparedness became all consuming. Now there were emerging biothreats from humans as well as from the evolving natural world. Fauci’s anti-terror budget went from $53 million in 2001 to $1.7 billion in 2003.” | Anthony Fauci Nicholson Baker | 4 January 2021 |
Genetic Extinction Technology | “And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” | Project for the New American Century | |
Genetic Extinction Technology | “Given that Darpa is a military agency, we find it surprising that the obvious and concerning dual-use aspects of this research have received so little attention,” | Felix Beck - lawyer at the University of Freiburg | 2018 |
Genetic Extinction Technology | “It is very much easier to kill or sterilise a plant using gene editing than it is to make it herbicide or insect-resistant.” | Guy Reeves Expert in GM insects at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology | 2018 |
Robert Kadlec | ““If several kilograms of an agent like anthrax were disseminated in New York City today, conservative estimates put the number [of] deaths occurring in the first few days at 400,000. Thousands of others would be at risk of dying within several days if proper antibiotics and vaccination were not started immediately. Millions of others would be fearful of being exposed and seek or demand medical care as well. Beyond the immediate health implications of such an act, the potential panic and civil unrest would create an equally large response.”” | Robert Kadlec | 1998 |
Sasha Latypova | “The perpetrators desperately, at all cost, need you to to believe that "mutating viruses in a lab" achieves some scary result, that then can be "leaked". That anyone can do it, even a PhD student in their garage. That our enemies are doing it and will "release" a super scary bug any time now, unless the Government is "prepared" by making a stockpile of "predictive vaccines" that can be deployed in DAYS after a new scary virus is detected in China. Or Timbuktu. It is, however, a narrative. There is no way to "mutate viruses" in a lab in the way they all imply - to artificially make them deadlier and more transmissible at the same time. This is a propaganda fairytale with a very specific goal. You should be very concerned about any person (on "their" side or "ours") who repeats it with a serious face. | Sasha Latypova | 27 January 2023 |
Toxoplasma gondii | “You want to know something terrifying? Here's something terrifying and not surprising. The U.S. military knows about Toxo and its effect on behavior. They're interested in Toxo. They're officially intrigued. An I would think they would be intrigued, studying a parasite that makes mammals perhaps do things that everything in their fiber normally tells them not to do because it's dangerous. But suddenly, with this parasite on board, the mammal is a little more likely to go and do it. Who knows? But they're aware of Toxo.” | Professor in neurology and neurosurgery Robert Sapolsky | 2 December 2009 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:All Roads Lead to Dark Winter | report | 1 April 2020 | Whitney Webb | |
Document:Bioterror: Manufacturing Wars The American Way | foreword | 1 April 2003 | William H. Schaap Ellen Ray | |
Document:Operation Black Dog | article | 2000 | David Guyatt | The story of a US covert, airborne biological weapons attack on Iraq during the first US-Iraq war of 1990 |
File:US-biowarfare in Korea.pdf | report | September 1952 | Joseph Needham | Report of investigations into the use of biological weapons by the US military during the Korean war of 1951-53 |
References
- ↑ https://www.corbettreport.com/bioterror/
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-43pjRwkVMU
- ↑ https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/weaponization-of-disease-agents
- ↑ https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/omg-pfizer-is-mutating-covid
- ↑ https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/us-military-simulated-biological-warfare-san-francisco/
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States
- ↑ http://archive.today/2020.02.24-184408/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon
- ↑ https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
- ↑ https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
- ↑ https://www.smh.com.au/world/sars-a-chinese-weapon-taiwan-official-20081007-4vse.html
- ↑ http://www.legitgov.org/baxter_sends_live_avian_flu_viruses_270209.html
- ↑ https://saidit.net/s/WatchRedditDie/comments/37wk/on_reddit_if_you_post_a_link_to_this_scientific/
- ↑ http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level
- ↑ https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
- ↑ http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
- ↑ http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf saved at Archive.org
- ↑ https://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
- ↑ https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/product-reviews/006078184X saved at Archive.is
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/nyregion/another-option-to-consider-for-plum-island.html
- ↑ https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is