Difference between revisions of "9-11/Dissident"
(→Early dissidents: mention of H Gul and B Cooper, and Jones) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|constitutes=Dissident | |constitutes=Dissident | ||
|start= | |start= | ||
| + | |image=Richard Gage.jpg | ||
| + | |image_caption=[[Richard Gage]], founder of [[AE911 Truth]], who was influenced by an interview on [[Guns and Butter]] | ||
|description=A 9-11 dissident is someone who publicly calls into question the [[US Deep state]]'s official narratives surrounding the 9/11 event. The label is not for minor disagreements but for those with a more serious objection to the story as told by {{ccm}}}. | |description=A 9-11 dissident is someone who publicly calls into question the [[US Deep state]]'s official narratives surrounding the 9/11 event. The label is not for minor disagreements but for those with a more serious objection to the story as told by {{ccm}}}. | ||
}}{{SMWData person}} | }}{{SMWData person}} | ||
| − | A '''9-11 dissident''' (or '''9-11 sceptic''') is someone who has publicly challenged the [[9-11/Official narrative|official narrative]] concerning the [[events of 11th September 2001]]. This does ''not'' include those who promote the [[9-11/Official opposition narrative]] | + | A '''9-11 dissident''' (or '''9-11 sceptic''') is someone who has publicly challenged the [[9-11/Official narrative|official narrative]] concerning the [[events of 11th September 2001]]. This does ''not'' include those who promote the [[9-11/Official opposition narrative]] — also promulgated by the [[US Deep state]] — that "mistakes were made" and that a few officials lied to cover up isolated wrongdoing. |
A high profile 9-11 dissident would be [[Richard Gage]], who founded [[AE911 Truth]]. Another example would be [[Richard Falk]], the [[UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied since 1967]], who wrote in 2011 that "what seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred."<ref>https://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/interrogating-the-arizona-killings-from-a-safe-distance</ref> | A high profile 9-11 dissident would be [[Richard Gage]], who founded [[AE911 Truth]]. Another example would be [[Richard Falk]], the [[UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied since 1967]], who wrote in 2011 that "what seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred."<ref>https://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/interrogating-the-arizona-killings-from-a-safe-distance</ref> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
==Early dissidents== | ==Early dissidents== | ||
| − | Back in 2001, awareness of [[false flag attack]]s was very rarified, and the public at large had almost no awareness even of the [[US/Deep state]], never mind the fact that it was centered on the [[Bush family]]. Although the clues were there, only a few people were both intellectually sharp enough ''and'' emotionally ready to put two and two together and see that the [[US government]]'s {{on}} was a [[big lie]].<ref>[[David McGowan]] claimed the title "[[First 9/11 Sceptic]]", although others were also sceptics from day one and at least one public announcement had been given of an impending [[False Flag]] event that would be blamed on [[Ossama bin Laden]] | + | Back in 2001, awareness of [[false flag attack]]s was very rarified, and the public at large had almost no awareness even of the [[US/Deep state]], never mind the fact that it was centered on the [[Bush family]]. Although the clues were there, only a few people were both intellectually sharp enough ''and'' emotionally ready to put two and two together and see that the [[US government]]'s {{on}} was a [[big lie]].<ref>[[David McGowan]] claimed the title "[[First 9/11 Sceptic]]", although others were also sceptics from day one, like [[Hamid Gul]], and at least one public announcement had been given of an impending [[False Flag]] event that would be blamed on [[Ossama bin Laden]] by [[Bill Cooper]] (thereafter repeated by [[Alex Jones]])</ref> |
==Character== | ==Character== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
===Julian Assange=== | ===Julian Assange=== | ||
{{FA|Julian Assange}} | {{FA|Julian Assange}} | ||
| − | The most notable among supporters of the 9-11 official narrative is [[Julian Assange]], founder of [[Wikileaks]], who apart from considerable information gathering skills has supposedly also seen a lot of leaked information. | + | [[image:Julian Assange.jpg|left|200px]] |
| + | The most notable among supporters of the 9-11 official narrative is [[Julian Assange]], founder of [[Wikileaks]], who apart from considerable information gathering skills has supposedly also seen a lot of leaked information. A 2010 cites Assange as stating that "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud".<ref>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/features/wanted-by-the-cia-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-14880073.html</ref> As of 2019, the text of that quote required a login, although the full text was still was available from the [[internet archive]].<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20140303175613/https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/features/wanted-by-the-cia-julian-assange-wikileaks-founder-28548843.html</ref> | ||
===Edward Snowden=== | ===Edward Snowden=== | ||
| + | [[image:Edward Snowden.jpg|left|200px]] | ||
{{FA|Edward Snowden}} | {{FA|Edward Snowden}} | ||
| − | [[Edward Snowden]], like Julian Assange, reportedly has access to a huge amount of secret information. In May 2014, notwithstanding his supposedly adversarial relationship with the [[US Deep state]], he supported their official opposition narrative that {{SMWQ | + | [[Edward Snowden]], like Julian Assange, reportedly has access to a huge amount of secret information. In May 2014, notwithstanding his supposedly adversarial relationship with the [[US Deep state]], he supported their [[official opposition narrative]] that {{SMWQ |
|format=inline | |format=inline | ||
|text=we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States to detect [[9-11|this plot]]. | |text=we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States to detect [[9-11|this plot]]. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
===Ban Ki-moon=== | ===Ban Ki-moon=== | ||
{{FA|Ban Ki-moon}} | {{FA|Ban Ki-moon}} | ||
| + | [[image:Ban Ki-moon.jpg|left|200px]] | ||
On 24 January 2011, [[Ban Ki-moon]] reportedly stated about Richard Falk's call 13 days earlier for a no-holds barred investigation into 9/11: "The Secretary-General condemns these remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous — and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."<ref>http://blog.unwatch.org/index.php/2011/01/25/ngo-says-richard-falk-has-zero-credibility-urges-un-chief-to-fire-him/#more-730</ref>That the [[UN Secretary-General]] refuses to admit that 9-11 needs looking at is less surprising than Assange or Snowden's refusal to go there, but notable for anyone hoping that the UN might prove a suitable organisation to support an international investigation. | On 24 January 2011, [[Ban Ki-moon]] reportedly stated about Richard Falk's call 13 days earlier for a no-holds barred investigation into 9/11: "The Secretary-General condemns these remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous — and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."<ref>http://blog.unwatch.org/index.php/2011/01/25/ngo-says-richard-falk-has-zero-credibility-urges-un-chief-to-fire-him/#more-730</ref>That the [[UN Secretary-General]] refuses to admit that 9-11 needs looking at is less surprising than Assange or Snowden's refusal to go there, but notable for anyone hoping that the UN might prove a suitable organisation to support an international investigation. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:49, 10 October 2022
 9-11/Dissident(Dissident)   | |
|---|---|
 | |
| A 9-11 dissident is someone who publicly calls into question the US Deep state's official narratives surrounding the 9/11 event. The label is not for minor disagreements but for those with a more serious objection to the story as told by commercially-controlled media}. |
A 9-11 dissident (or 9-11 sceptic) is someone who has publicly challenged the official narrative concerning the events of 11th September 2001. This does not include those who promote the 9-11/Official opposition narrative — also promulgated by the US Deep state — that "mistakes were made" and that a few officials lied to cover up isolated wrongdoing.
A high profile 9-11 dissident would be Richard Gage, who founded AE911 Truth. Another example would be Richard Falk, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied since 1967, who wrote in 2011 that "what seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred."[1]
Contents
9-11 Official Narrative
- Full article: 9-11/Official narrative
- Full article: 9-11/Official narrative
The US government was quick to announce, and the controlled corporate media quick to reiterate that the events of September 11th were a complete surprise, but could immediately be seen to carry "all the hallmarks" of Al-Qaeda. The attacks were carried out by 19 Muslim hijackers, under the direction of "the world's most wanted terrorist" Ossama Bin Laden, without the knowing collaboration of anyone within the US government.
Media Reporting
- Full article: 9-11/Media reporting
- Full article: 9-11/Media reporting
Reporting on the morning of 9-11 did feature considerable eyewitness testimony of events which contradicted the official narrative (such as bombs going of in the World Trade Center); the destruction of WTC7 was shown on live television, albeit presaged by (architecturally highly implausible) suggestions that it was expected to do so (and in several cases by the even more implausible claim that it had already done so). The reporting of real events and eyewitneeses were intermixed with a range of deep state functionaries whose well rehearsed performances were designed to bolster the official story while undercutting any criticism of it.
In the days and weeks after 9-11, the US Deep state, aided by its allies in the emerging supranational deep state, exercised adept control over the US corporate media, resulting in what has been termed a "patriotism police".[2] Anyone who publicly questioned the "19 hijackers" story was savagely criticised. When facts emerged which presented serious problems to the story, they were not followed up on. After publicly announcing that some of the 19 hijackers were still alive, the BBC never issued a retraction, but neither did it investigate further. Three of the attackers' passports were found, but the planes black boxes were supposedly never found.[3] Everyone in corporate media quickly got the message that no questioning of the pronouncements of US government officials would be tolerated, even when they reversed their positions or contradicted one another.
Emotional trauma
People worldwide uncritically absorbed media coverage of that day, letting newsanchors (who themselves were also in a state of shock) read off The Deep State's script of who did what and why. Normally mature, reflective adults looked uncritically to national governments for protection from this unprecedented horror, as a child looks grips their parents' hand in fright. One tangible measure of the net emotional effect that the attacks had on the US populace is provided by the popularity rating of George W. Bush. Despite an underwhelming performance by the US President, it leapt from 51% to 91%.[4]
Censorship of dissent
- Full article: 9-11/Censorship
- Full article: 9-11/Censorship
Once an official narrative had been announced, almost no challenges to it were tolerated. An army of "terror experts" were presented who almost to a man[5] (and like deep politicians, they do tent to be almost all men) accepted it unquestioningly. Anyone who failed to immediately get behind the official story was immediately marginalised.
"Conspiracy theorists"
In spite of the corporate media blackout, the 9-11 Truth movement grew and organised using the internet, which inspired The Deep State to take a different approach. Corporate media chose a few people who challenged the official story and publicly disparaged them, labelling their ideas "conspiracy theory" and tainting them by juxtaposition with ideas such as alien abduction. Various "investigatory" hit pieces were produced, including the BBC "conspiracy files".
Early dissidents
Back in 2001, awareness of false flag attacks was very rarified, and the public at large had almost no awareness even of the US/Deep state, never mind the fact that it was centered on the Bush family. Although the clues were there, only a few people were both intellectually sharp enough and emotionally ready to put two and two together and see that the US government's official narrative was a big lie.[6]
Character
As of 2018, the evidential grounds for the questioning of 9-11 are compelling and more and more people understand this. However, few public figures have chosen to publicly go on the record with doubts of the official narrative, possibly because they feel that to do so entails some degree of risk. Public 9-11 scepticism therefore remains a good indicator of:-
- Critical attitude to the US Deep state and its corporate media
- Courage to speak out
Public questioning of 9/11 is a single, simple, indication that someone is not loyal to The Deep State, and while not infallible, is more to be trusted than promises of "hope and change" or "draining the swamp". The more vocally and intelligently someone has attempted to uncover the truth of 9-11, the stronger the indication they is not a puppet of the supranational deep state.
Examples of Non-dissidents
As of 2018, it is a rare public figure of senior politician who is will to declare that they disbelieve the 9-11 official narrative, although that tendency is increasing as public awareness is growing. Below are some individuals whom one might suspect of been 9-11 dissidents but who have publicly declared support for the official story.
Julian Assange
- Full article: Julian Assange
- Full article: Julian Assange
The most notable among supporters of the 9-11 official narrative is Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, who apart from considerable information gathering skills has supposedly also seen a lot of leaked information. A 2010 cites Assange as stating that "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud".[7] As of 2019, the text of that quote required a login, although the full text was still was available from the internet archive.[8]
Edward Snowden
- Full article: Edward Snowden
- Full article: Edward Snowden
Edward Snowden, like Julian Assange, reportedly has access to a huge amount of secret information. In May 2014, notwithstanding his supposedly adversarial relationship with the US Deep state, he supported their official opposition narrative that “we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States to detect this plot.” [citation needed].
Ban Ki-moon
- Full article: Ban Ki-moon
- Full article: Ban Ki-moon
On 24 January 2011, Ban Ki-moon reportedly stated about Richard Falk's call 13 days earlier for a no-holds barred investigation into 9/11: "The Secretary-General condemns these remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous — and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."[9]That the UN Secretary-General refuses to admit that 9-11 needs looking at is less surprising than Assange or Snowden's refusal to go there, but notable for anyone hoping that the UN might prove a suitable organisation to support an international investigation.
Ex-dissidents
Very few people, having publicly declared disbelief of the US government's official narrative of 9-11 have then reversed their position. However, one British activist named Charlie Veitch of the Love Police was a prominent 9/11 dissident but according to a post on his website, he publicly reversed his position following a trip to the USA, a decision reported on by The Telegraph. [10]
Examples
| Page name | Born | Died | Nationality | Summary | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/11 Consensus Panel | 9-11/Dissident | ||||
| Mahmoud Ahmadinejad | 28 October 1956 | Politician Academic Engineer 9-11/Dissident | An Iranian President who publicly called for an investigation into the events of 9/11 in the UN. | ||
| Kevin Barrett | 1959 | Author Researcher Academic 9-11/Dissident | An academic and 9-11/Dissident. | ||
| Christopher Bollyn | US | Author Researcher Journalist 9-11/Dissident | |||
| Daniel Bruno | 1967 | US | Journalist 9-11/Dissident | US Journalist who has published numerous articles about digital currencies and privacy protection. 911 dissident. Denied passport and re-entry to country by US government. | |
| Andreas von Bülow | 17 July 1937 | Germany | Politician 9-11/Dissident | West German government minister who attended the 1978 Bilderberg. A prominent 9-11 dissident | |
| David Chandler | Teacher 9-11/Dissident | ||||
| William Cooper | 6 May 1943 | 5 November 2001 | US | Researcher Spook 9-11/Premature death Radio host Dissident 9-11/Dissident | Announced around 10 weeks before 9/11 that "Whatever they're going to blame on Usama bin Laden - don't you believe it...They will soon do something outlandish to gain the support of the Sheeple".<a href="#cite_note-1">[1]</a> He was killed by the US Marshals Service less than two months after the event. |
| Michael H. Doran | 28 April 2009 | Lawyer 9-11/Premature death Pilot 9-11/Dissident | A lawyer who was working for free to help the relatives of 9-11 victims who refused the US government's 9-11/Compensation fund. | ||
| Beverly Eckert | 29 May 1951 | 12 February 2009 | US | Activist 9-11/Premature death 9-11/Dissident | The outspoken wife of a 9/11 victim who refused to accept the 9-11/Compensation fund and forcefully stating "My silence cannot be bought". |
| Richard Falk | 13 November 1930 | US | Academic 9-11/Dissident | Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University and former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories | |
| Richard Gage | Architect 9-11/Dissident | An architect and 9-11 dissident who set up Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth to spread awareness that the 9-11 official narrative is a fraud. | |||
| David Graham | September 2006 | 9-11/Premature death 9-11/Whistleblowers Dentist 9-11/Dissident | David Graham was a dentist who became suspicious after meeting two of the "19 hijackers". He reported being first ignored and then threatened by the FBI. He compiled a large report of his investigations into why the FBI were ignoring his warnings. Poisoned. | ||
| Mike Gravel | 13 May 1930 | 26 June 2021 | US | Politician 9-11/Dissident US/2020 Presidential election/Candidates | US politician who read the Pentagon Papers into the US Congressional record and publicly criticised the 9-11/Official narrative |
| Hamid Gul | 20 November 1936 | 15 August 2015 | Spook 9-11/Dissident | ||
| Danny Jowenko | 14 December 1955 | 16 July 2011 | Netherlands | 9-11/Premature death 9-11/Dissident | Controlled demolition expert who was famously interviewed about the destruction of WTC7, later suddenly died |
| Graeme MacQueen | 1948 | 25 April 2023 | Academic 9-11/Dissident | Canadian academic and 9-11 dissident who participated in the 9/11 Consensus Panel. | |
| Philip Marshall | 2 February 2013 | Author 9-11/Premature death Pilot CIA/Drug trafficking/Premature death 9-11/Dissident | A CIA pilot who published two popular and insightful books on 9-11. He was found shot dead with his children. | ||
| Tony Rooke | UK | Filmmaker Activist 9-11/Dissident | A 9-11 dissident who refused to pay the BBC, stating that this would be a crime under the 2000 Terrorism Act since he "had reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for terrorism purposes". | ||
| Michael Ruppert | 3 February 1951 | 13 April 2014 | Author Activist Narcotics investigator 9-11/Dissident Talk show | Former cop who famously confronted John Deutch about CIA drug dealing. Later became a dissident journalist. | |
| Alan Sabrosky | Soldier Academic 9-11/Dissident | Former Director of Studies at the United States Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, a 9-11 dissident. | |||
| David Shayler | Whistleblower Spook 9-11/Dissident | An MI5 agent turned 'whistleblower' who didn't reveal very much but has since associated himself with some of the most dubious end of those questioning the official narrative. Some believe he is still working for MI5. | |||
| Ben Swann | 17 July 1978 | US | Journalist Activist News presenter 9-11/Dissident | A US information activist with a background in corporate media. | |
| Clare Swinney | Activist 9-11/Dissident | ||||
| Hunter S. Thompson | 18 July 1937 | 20 February 2005 | Author Journalist 9-11/Premature death 9-11/Dissident | A prominent writer, openly critical of the US government. While writing an expose of 9/11 when he was found dead. | |
| Victor Thorn | 1 August 1962 | 1 August 2016 | US | Author Journalist Research 9-11/Premature death 9-11/Dissident Clinton body count | A journalist and reporter who wrote many books on deep politics, including two on involvement of the Mossad and zionists in the events of 9-11. Died of a shot to the head in 2016. |
| Gerhard Wisnewski | 30 November 1959 | Germany | Journalist Filmmaker 9-11/Dissident | German filmmaker and 9-11 dissident |
References
- ↑ https://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/interrogating-the-arizona-killings-from-a-safe-distance
- ↑ Document:Fifty Years of the Deep State
- ↑ There are reports that blackboxes were found, but the official narrative denies this.
- ↑ Family Of Secrets
- ↑ Hiroshi Hasegawa is reported to have publicly urged scepticism of the US government's story on the day died after a fall on 15 October 2001.
- ↑ David McGowan claimed the title "First 9/11 Sceptic", although others were also sceptics from day one, like Hamid Gul, and at least one public announcement had been given of an impending False Flag event that would be blamed on Ossama bin Laden by Bill Cooper (thereafter repeated by Alex Jones)
- ↑ http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/features/wanted-by-the-cia-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-14880073.html
- ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20140303175613/https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/features/wanted-by-the-cia-julian-assange-wikileaks-founder-28548843.html
- ↑ http://blog.unwatch.org/index.php/2011/01/25/ngo-says-richard-falk-has-zero-credibility-urges-un-chief-to-fire-him/#more-730
- ↑ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/10079244/The-911-conspiracy-theorist-who-changed-his-mind.html
