Difference between revisions of "Cryptome"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
http://cryptome.org/
({{SMWDocs}} {{stub}}) |
m (Text replacement - "|Description" to "|description") |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Owner=John Young | |Owner=John Young | ||
|Founder=John Young | |Founder=John Young | ||
− | | | + | |description=Cryptome is the grand-daddy of anti-authoritarian whistleblower, leak, publish-and-be-damned sites. It was a major source of both content and inspiration when setting up the WikiSpooks site. It is ''highly recommended'' when researching anything concerning WikiSpooks articles. |
|OwnWords=Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance -- open, secret and classified documents -- but not limited to those. Documents are removed from this site only by order served directly by a US court having jurisdiction. No court order has ever been served; any order served will be published here -- or elsewhere if gagged by order. Bluffs will be published if comical but otherwise ignored. | |OwnWords=Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance -- open, secret and classified documents -- but not limited to those. Documents are removed from this site only by order served directly by a US court having jurisdiction. No court order has ever been served; any order served will be published here -- or elsewhere if gagged by order. Bluffs will be published if comical but otherwise ignored. | ||
|Image=Cryptome-01.jpg | |Image=Cryptome-01.jpg |
Revision as of 13:19, 13 June 2014
Cryptome is the grand-daddy of anti-authoritarian whistleblower, leak, publish-and-be-damned sites. It was a major source of both content and inspiration when setting up the WikiSpooks site. It is highly recommended when researching anything concerning WikiSpooks articles. |
Sub-Page
Page Name | Size | Description |
---|---|---|
Cryptome/Principled Leaks, Deep State Agency - or a bit of both? | 10,661 | A critical discussion about John Young and Cryptome, stemming from discussions between a Wikispooks editor and Trowbridge H Ford. |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc | article | 13 February 2016 | Tim Shorrock | Commentary on an interview with John Young and his wife Deborah Natsios by Pit Schultz of reboot.fm at the 'Transmedia 2016' event in Berlin on 6 February 2016 |
Document:John Young Interview | interview | 15 November 2013 | Michael Morisy | |
Document:Nothing too Threatening to Publish | article | 10 July 2011 | John Young | |
Document:Secrets and Lies | article | 1 September 2007 | John Cook | |
Document:That's Outrageous | article | 1 March 2005 | Michael Crowley | A Readers Digest contributor is outraged, OUTRAGED I say, that a web site like Cryptome should be 'allowed to exist'. He does not intend humour at all, he is deadly serious - which is precisely what makes the piece so funny. |
Document:Your Man in the Public Gallery: Assange Hearing Day 14 | blog post | 22 September 2020 | Craig Murray | Following defence witness Professor Grothoff, the only further evidence heard was the reading by Edward Fitzgerald QC of the gist of a statement from Cassandra Fairbanks. I did not hear most of this because, having adjourned to 4.30pm, the court re-adjourned earlier than advertised, while Julian’s dad John Shipton, the musician M.I.A. and I were away having a coffee. |
Document:Your Man in the Public Gallery: Assange Hearing Day 17 | blog post | 25 September 2020 | Craig Murray | I am going to write to Judge Baraitser applying for a copy of the transcript of Lewis cross-examining Professor Kopelman on the razor blade, with a view to reporting James Lewis QC to the Bar Council. I do wonder whether the General Medical Council might not have reason to consider the practice of Dr Rachel Daly in this case. |
Documents sourced from Cryptome
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.