|Date||1941 - 1945|
|Location||NSDAP Germany, German-occupied territories|
|Blamed on||NSDAP Germany|
• ethnic cleansing
• mass murder
|Interest of||Edwin Black, Martin Brech, Alison Chabloz, Robert Faurisson, International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Greville Janner, Mati Kochavi, Fred Leuchter, Paul Rassinier, Germar Rudolf, Timothy Snyder, Georges Theil, Frederick John Partington Veale, Udo Walendy, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, Ernst Zündel|
|Description||In its capitalised form 'The Holocaust' has become the concensus Western term for the treatment of the Jewish populations of Germany and German occupied territories through the period of the second world war (1939-45). Its use in this format stems from about the mid-1960's (i.e. more than 20 years after the events it claims to define). It does not appear in histories or documents before that time.|
The three fundamental tennets
- That extermination of the Jewish populations of Germany and the countries it occupied during World War II had become official German government policy by 1941.
- That a large majority of the Jews killed during the war died in purpose-built gas chambers from the effects of inhaling the gas produced by the cyanide-based industrial compound Zyklon-B.
- That the total number killed was about 6 million.
Criminal offense to question the official narrative
In much of Western Europe and in Russia it is a criminal offense to publicly question any one of the trinity of holocaust tenets. The laws defining such offenses are justified on grounds of the prevention of incitement to racial/religious hatred - hence their generic description "Hate Laws", despite the painfully obvious fact that the academic re-examination of a major historical event such as this does not constitute an incitement to religious or racial hatred. Anyone who does so is also likely to be branded (and "branded" is the operative word) a "Holocaust Denier" by Official Narrative defenders and apologists; as such, they are subject to total ruination - the loss of their career, freedom, relationships, and even their life. Thus the term is ubiquitous on Wikipedia pages about people who raise such questions. It should be noted that there have been multiple exposés describing Wikipedia as having a pro-Jewish/pro-Israeli bias, and with its strict regulations on notability and censorship, automatically delete any revisionist material.
One of the first, or perhaps the first, holocaust revisionist is actually a French communist, pacifist and holocaust survivor Paul Rassinier. He was a member of the French resistance effort, although he was against violence, he distributed fake identity documents and helped people to escape the Nazis and their collaborators. Due to the Nazis discovery of many of Rassinier's fake papers, and subsequent interrogation of the owners, Rassinier was identified and arrested. The Gestapo arrested him on 30 October 1943. They tortured and interrogated him, crushing his hands, breaking his jaw and rupturing his kidney. After this he was sent to Buchenwald concentration camp. Here it is said that the conditions were atrocious, hunger, disease, overwork, exhaustion and physical abuse by the S.S. and the corrupt mafia of the Häftlingsführung. (A group comprised of prisoners who formed a self-government). However Rassinier attributes his survival to several factors, his relationship with a work-shy SS officer at the camp, landing a cushy job and as he had developed nephritis as a result of his torture, he was put in the infirmary for no less than 250 days. After the war finished, Rassinier was confused by the claims of gas chambers in Buchenwald, since he knew first hand that there were none. He knew that those who had claimed this were among those who had added to the torment inside the prison as part of the Haftlingsfuhrung. However, he still believed that there were gas chambers in other camps.
Rassinier then decided to visit those who claimed to know of such chambers with a very specific list of questions. A rigorous test of whether their story was consistent. According to Rassinier, everyone he interviewed would not be able to answer his pressing questions and would say that they themselves had not seen it, but that they had had a friend who died there and that the story comes from them. The essence of historical revisionism, as it applies to "The Holocaust", is the rigorous and detailed probing of the three tenets of its Official Narrative. There is no settled consensus among those labeled as Revisionists by a deeply hostile Establishment, other than that dispassionate examination of the available evidence renders the Official Narrative deeply suspect.
Holocaust Revisionists such as Carlo Mattogno, Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Udo Walendy, Germar Rudolf and many others, who are often labeled "Holocaust Deniers", do not dispute that the German National Socialist Party set up a network of concentration camps and that large numbers of Jews and others considered "enemies" of the Third Reich died from abuse, starvation, disease outbreaks, cruel-unusual human experimentation and other war crimes. Rather they dispute one or more of the three fundamental tenets of the Official Narrative detailed above.
Holocaust revisonism example
The validity of the label "extermination camp" and in particular the use of Zyklon-B gas in purpose-built gas chambers as a mass killing method: Revisionists accept that Zyklon-B gas was routinely used to delouse clothing in purpose-build delousing chambers as part of pervasive measures against typhus outbreaks; but it is argued that "extermination" camps are more accurately described as "labor" camps; and that a number of studies, notably by U.S. government execution expert Fred Leuchter and chemist Germar Rudolf which found no traces of Zyklon B in the supposed "gas chambers" cast considerable doubt (not to say totally disprove) the homicidal Zyklon-B "gas chambers" of the Official Narrative. None of these studies have been effectively countered, other than by recourse to demonisation and even imprisonment of those who produced and published them. The essentially fraudulent nature of the current "Gas chamber" at Auschwitz, was confirmed by its Museum Director Dr Franciszek Piper in a video-taped interview with David Cole in 1992, and again confirmed by a Polish government agency the Institute of Forensic Research (Instytut Ekspertyz Sadowych) of Krakow, which replicated the findings of Fred Leuchter. It was NOT used to kill millions of Jews as, to this day, visitors are led to believe; rather it was built by the Soviet occupiers after the war had ended and is a good example of the nature of the deceits practiced by Official Narrative promoters.  
|Robert Faurisson||““The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.””||Robert Faurisson||11 December 2011|
|Mati Kochavi||“The memory of the Holocaust outside of Israel is disappearing,” Mr. Kochavi said in an interview. “We thought, let’s do something really disruptive. We found the journal and said, ‘Let’s assume that instead of pen and paper Eva had a smartphone and documented what was happening to her.’ So we brought a smartphone to 1944.” The buzz around the project has been intense. Even before the fictional Instagram account was activated, it had more than 200,000 followers, the result of an aggressive marketing campaign involving billboards and online promotions by celebrity social media influencers. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed the project.”||Mati Kochavi||30 April 2019|
|Elie Wiesel||“I cry out with all my heart against forgiveness... Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”||Elie Wiesel||1 December 1962|
|Document:A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz||article||March 2001||Germar Rudolf||A review of the the series of forensic examinations of the Auschwitz concentration camp alleged gas chambers that began with The Leuchter report and ended with the imprisonment in Germany of this author for authoring a similar though more rigorous report that was published without his authority|
|Document:Another Word for Holocaust||article||11 November 2013||Jim Goad|
|Document:Big Pharma pushes Cure for Holocaust Denial Syndrome||article||20 February 2006||Michael James||Big Pharma launches cure for 'Holocaust denial'|
|Document:David Irving and the Aktion Reinhardt Camps||article||1 April 2009||Jürgen Graf|
|Document:Elie Wiesel - A Prominent False Witness||article||1987||Robert Faurisson||Suppressed information about the "Chief Witness to The Holocaust" together with home-truths and opinion for which its author was beaten close to death.|
|Document:Immortalising the Myth||article||22 December 2013||Anthony Lawson|
|Document:Impact and Future of Holocaust Revisionism||review||1 January 2005||Robert Faurisson||A comprehensive review of research into the Official Narrative of "The Holocaust" and the legislation, court cases and other events that publication of this research precipitated, between about 1970 and 2005.|
|Document:Social Psychology, Religious Belief, Censorship and the Holocaust||essay||1 January 1998||Simon G. Sheppard||A psychological examination of "The Holocaust" Official Narrative as a manifestation of religious belief|
|Document:The American Jewish scholar behind Labour's "antisemitism" scandal breaks his silence||Interview||3 May 2016||Norman Finkelstein|
|Norman G. Finkelstein is clear: "It’s time to put a stop to this periodic charade, because it ends up besmirching the victims of the Nazi holocaust, diverting from the real suffering of the Palestinian people, and poisoning relations between the Jewish and Muslim communities. You just had an antisemitism hysteria last year, and it was a farce. And now again? Another inquiry? Another investigation? No."|
|Document:The Confessions of Rudolf Hoss||article||1986||Robert Faurisson||Text and commentary on the confessions of Auschwitz camp commandant Rudolf Hoss secured under torture and gross ill-treatment by both his British and Polish inquisitors|
|Document:The Warsaw Ghetto myth||article||23 December 2013||Eli Gat||Reflection of a survivor of the Warsaw ghetto|
|Document:The World Through the Prism of Europe||article||2013||Ingrid Rimland Zundel||A retrospective on how Europe now views the events of World war II and its aftermath by the wife of Ernst Zundel who has been relentlessly persecuted by the western Establishment for no reason other than stubbornly authoring and publishing research on WWII and The Holocaust.|
|File:Affaire Williamson.pdf||article||22 May 2005||E. Michael Jones||The hounding of Bishop Williamson by the Catholic Church Hierarchy over his opinions about 'The Holocaust'|
|File:Did 6 Million Really Die.pdf||book||August 1992||Barbara Kulaszka||A witness account of the 1980's Canadian trials of Ernst Zundel in which he was charged with "...disseminating false news" concerning the treatment of Jews by Germany during WWII|
|File:Eavesdropping on Hell.pdf||report||2004||Robert J. Hanyok||Official NSA report on US Intelligence German police intercept decrypts concerning monthly concentration camp reports during WWII. Gas chambers are nowhere mentioned by the German police but inferred by the author of this report|
|File:Heresy in 21st Century France.pdf||book||2006||Georges Theil||A book about the status of historical revisionism in early 21st century France, sub-titled "A Case of insubmission to the Holocaust dogma"|
|File:Israeli Founding Myths.pdf||Book||1995||Roger Garaudy||Described by the author as "...the History of a Heresy". It presents evidence-based criticisms of official narratives that remain absolute taboo in the West, most notably on The Holocaust, Zionism, and the Nuremberg Tribunal|
|File:Resistance is Obligatory.pdf||eBook||April 2012||Germar Rudolf|
|File:Stolen Identity.pdf||book||2007||Mikolaus Gruner||A book by Buchenwald survivor Nikolaus Grüner (A-7713): "... to expose "Elie Wiesel" who took my friend Lazar Wiesel's tattooed Number from Auschwitz A-7713, without being registered in Auschwitz. This spineless profiteer turned the graves of Auschwitz Birkenau - into an industry and himself into an "impostor" of the worst kind."|
|File:Tales of the Holohoax.pdf||Booklet||2000||Michael Hoffman||Biting, cartoon-based satire on the official narrative of The Holocaust|
|File:The Holocaust Industry.pdf||book||20 July 2000||Norman Finkelstein||Devastating criticism of the way in which Jewish organisations use their Official Narrative of "The Holocaust" to extort money from its alleged perpetrators and those considered to have been insufficiently attentive to preventing it.|
|File:The Leuchter Reports.pdf||book||October 2005||Robert Faurisson|
|Three technical reports on the alleged existence and operation of homicidal gas chambers at concentration camps in Germany and Poland during WWII.|
|File:TheGasChamberOfSherlockHolmes.pdf||book||April 2011||Samuel Crowell||A useful and readable non-technical review of the evidence for the alleged extensive use of homicidal gas chambers by Germany during WWII.|
|File:TheRudolfReport.pdf||eBook||2003||Germar Rudolf||A science-based forensic examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz.|
|File:Wiesel and Catholics.pdf||article||November 2004||David O'Connell||Analysis of Elie Wiesels relationship with various naive senior Catholic Church prelates, including the Pope, through the 1990's and early 2000's|
The Official Culprit