Document:The World Through the Prism of Europe

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A retrospective on how Europe now views the events of World war II and its aftermath by the wife of Ernst Zundel who has been relentlessly persecuted by the western Establishment for no reason other than stubbornly authoring and publishing research on WWII and The Holocaust.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png article  by Ingrid Rimland Zundel dated 2013
Subjects: World War II, Victor's history, The Holocaust
Source: Veterans Today (Link)

★ Start a Discussion about this document



A View of the World through the Prism of Europe

If a German had said in 1945 that within 60 years large numbers of his countrymen would be celebrating the Wehrmacht’s unconditional surrender as “liberation,” his mental state of mind would have been highly suspect. Today, however, Germany’s national mental health has deteriorated to the point that such insanity is seen by many not only as “normal” but as politically and morally desirable.

What has happened to Germans during the past six decades? In what sense were Germans “liberated” following World War II? - Asks Dr. Hennig, a renown German psychiatrist known for his various writings on brainwashing: Were Germans “liberated” from their sanity?

Below I quote and summarize from Dr. Hennig’s recent essay, Das Deutsche Reich in Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft, translated by James M. Damon:

Were they “liberated” from the 14 to 15 million dead in a war that was forced on the Third Reich, as per the latest writings by the eminent Russian historian, Viktor Suworow, who documented conclusively that Hitler’s War was a preventive strike against the massive military build-up on the Western borders by Stalin?

Were they “liberated” from the three million women, children and elderly who died while attempting to flee rampaging Russians, Poles and Czechs at the end of the war – or who were later expelled from their ancestral lands in the East?

Were they “liberated” from the additional millions of noncombatants killed by Allied terrorist bombings of the densely populated residential areas of Germany’s cities?

Were they “liberated” from the deaths of a million German prisoners of war in the notorious Rheinwiesen Camps run by Eisenhower through starvation and exposure, after all armed forces had capitulated and all the guns had fallen silent?

Were they “liberated” from the loss of a third of their ancestral territory, their Eastern provinces?

“Liberated” from the burden of millions of cripples and orphans in the aftermath of the War?

World War II was, in fact, according to Dr Hennig, designed to complete the permanent mental crippling of the Reich, which was the stated aim of both World Wars. Dr. Hennig makes the following points:

Mental crippling is what has been inflicted on the Germans in the last six decades. The victorious Allies, assisted by collaborators from Germany’s own ranks, succeeded in robbing Germany of its history, laws, culture and, above all, of the capacity to investigate and understand what, precisely, has happened to them.

Germany’s political enemies have succeeded in inducing guilt complexes in an entire unsuspecting population that have produced the classic symptoms of national psychosis that we see today.

The basic techniques of what is now called “brainwashing” have been familiar to history since ancient times. A more closely defined concept of “Induced Insanity” was introduced by Emil Kraepelin over 100 years ago. What is new, writes Dr. Hennig, is the extent to which an entire nation with a highly evolved culture can be driven into an abnormal mental state to the point of collective incapacitation through mental and intellectual manipulation.

The fields of psychology and psychiatry have long been familiar with three forms of insanity: innate, acquired, and induced. The layman needs no further explanation of innate (hereditary) insanity, or of insanity that is acquired by such things as disease, injury, or poisoning.

Induced insanity is something else entirely. Induced insanity has little to do with intelligence but a great deal to do with suspension of logical thought brought about by targeted indoctrination. The younger and less mature the psyche, the more devastating are the effects of indoctrination. Through early targeting and indoctrination all logical thinking, including the inherent reflexes of self-preservation, can be neutralized.

When this happens, the subject can be conditioned to act against his own vital interests.

It was reserved for the modern techniques of Western “re-education” with their sophisticated and gradual brainwashing to turn an entire major nation against its own well-being. It has accomplished this through the combined use of all communication, entertainment and education media. Modern re-education begins in early childhood and is backed by the combined resources of the legislative, executive and the judicial branches of government. The most tragic example of this is present-day Germany in all its anti-national manifestations.



After Germany lost the Second World War, along with its intellectual elite and leading culture carriers, its enemies introduced a sharply focused and skillfully applied program of re-education. This program radically rejected everything that constituted the national German character and transformed it into its opposite.

Allied re-education destroyed the characteristic German behavior patterns that maintain national identity as well as cultural and intellectual heritage. These inherited behavior patterns and strategies had emerged over generations of selection as a survival strategy in the struggle for existence. Robbed of these patterns and strategies, Germany is doomed to destruction.

The German nation has already fallen a great distance backwards, assaulted by its envious competitors far beyond the own limits of law and morality, sacrificing spirituality and vitality. Why did the treacherous representatives of the “Bundesrepublik” recently welcome their own defeat on the occasion of enemy victory celebrations in Normandy? This was, after all, an assault on Europe by non-European powers!

Or what reasons could Chancellor Schroeder possibly have for apologizing to the Poles in Warsaw? Schroeder might have been called “Chancellor,” but he was obviously not a rational leader of a sovereign nation.

These treacherous “re-educated” collaborators are misusing the commemorations of Germany’s disastrous defeat to confuse cause and effect. Their object is to imprison all Germans in a paranoid ghetto of “Crime and Punishment,” incessantly repeating the fiction of Germany’s sole responsibility for the War.

Germany’s enemies and “re-educated” collaborators constantly ignore the fact that not Germany but England and France declared war in 1939 – as well as the fact that the United States had already initiated hostilities without declaring war. Germany attacked Poland only after Poland, incited by British-French guarantees, had murdered thousands of Germans in the provinces stolen at Versailles, while driving additional tens of thousands from their homes and interning them in concentration camps. The United States attacked Yugoslavia in 1991 for much weaker reasons!

Of all of Germany’s enemies, the ones who have done the most harm are not its Allied “liberators” but rather their German helpers, mentally crippled and “re-educated” flunkies who are determined to be “more Catholic than the Pope.” The victors of World War II benefited greatly from a tragic German character trait that the Allies factored into their postwar calculations. Bismarck described this proclivity very well:

“The compulsion to serve foreign interests, even when this is possible only through abandonment of our own national interests, is a disease whose geographic distribution is limited to Germany.”

Napoleon had made a similar observation forty years before, when he wrote:

“There is no nation that is more congenial than the Germans, but no nation that is more credulous. It was never necessary for me to sow discord among them, all I had to do was spread my nets and they would run into them like skittish animals, grabbing each other by the throat in the belief they were doing their ‘duty.’ No nation on Earth is more foolish. No lie is so crude that the Germans will not believe it! On account of some fanciful slogan they would attack their fellow countrymen with greater fury than they attacked their real enemies.”

Does the absurd Holocaust Myth come to mind?

Consider this: There are only two countries on earth where the “Holocaust” has morphed into an absolute religion – Israel and Germany! In the words of former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, “We have falsified our own history into a criminal record!”

This induced insanity is no longer restricted to limited groups within Germany proper. Amazing numbers of citizens of Western nations are now behaving like Pavlovian dogs. Pavlov, the famous St. Petersburg behaviorist, conditioned his laboratory animals so that they would begin salivating and releasing gastric juices at the sound of a bell. He did this by feeding them only when the bell rang, and so succeeded in “re-educating” them by resetting their nervous and digestive systems to a false stimulus.

The same thing has happened to re-educated Germans – they have been conditioned to the extent that when they hear words such as “Heimat,” “Vaterland,” “Nation,” and “Volk,” their nervous systems release adrenalin with the result that they react aggressively, even hysterically.

To recognize and confront a superior enemy operating from cover is without doubt one of the most difficult tasks imaginable – and yet this is precisely what Germany is beginning to do to survive. To recognize and see through her enemy’s methods is to win half the victory. Complete victory will be achieved only when Germany regains its sovereign capacity to act in its legitimate state, which is the German Reich.



Despite its thousand year existence and the fact that “The Reich” is a neutral term connoting an authentic and legitimate state under international law, the concept of the “German Reich” has little credibility among Germans today. Many are terrified by its mere mention. However, it is reassuring to know, writes Dr. Hennig, that re-education can proceed in both directions, and many Germans are optimistic enough to believe that the side that tells the truth will ultimately win.

New hopes are rising and new avenues of civic activism are opening up – even in Germany. It is indisputable that within the System a number of intrepid dissenters are making their presence known – the well-known TV anchor Eva Hermann, the politician Thilo Sarrazin and professors Hampel and Schachtschneider along with their supporters are some of the better-known critics of the current leadership of Germany. “The System” itself is showing terminal symptoms of disease and decay. It is now in retreat, which makes it even more dangerous and unpredictable.

Let us say a word or two about “The System.”

“The System” is another word for Globalism, also known as Zionism, which has its headquarters in New York, London, and Tel Aviv. The Globalist–Zionist System derives its power from the oceans of dollars printed by the Federal Reserve Bank or “FED” (the privately owned central bank of the USA) as well as the Council on Foreign Relations or “CFR.” The latter, controlled by Henry Kissinger, is seen in Europe as the secretive de facto government of the USA.

The Globalist–Zionist System is supported by numerous other secretive groupings that are dependent on the FED and CFR, such as the Bilderberger Group, Trilateral Commission and other subsidiary organizations – including the United Nations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, European Union and Federal Republic of Germany.

The raison d’etre of the German occupation regime, the so-called “Federal Republic of Germany” is to obstruct restoration of the authentic German nation state, the German Reich. Two irreconcilable worlds are confronting each other here. On one side is the world of the Zionist-Globalist System and on the other side is the world of free nations, the world of competent and natural international relations, especially the Reich, even though it continues to be devastated and desecrated.

In order to understand the present situation of the Reich, Dr. Hennig takes us back in history.

As the Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation (German Nation of the Holy Roman Empire) the Reich provided centuries of relative peace because it saw itself as a protector rather than an expansionist empire. At the time of the religious wars, which were actually civil wars, the Reich lost its religious as well as secular power, and its neighbors were able to fortify their positions at the Reich’s expense. Still, the idea of a German Reich as a political benchmark was absent from the world stage for only 65 years, from 1806 until 1871, and it never ceased to exist in the hearts and minds of the people.

By the time the Kingdom of Prussia succeeded in reuniting the German lands and King Wilhelm IV was elected Kaiser Wilhelm I in January 1871 thanks to Bismarck’s political acumen, Germany’s detractors had smugly become accustomed to political impotence on the parts of Germany and the Reich. That was the era of geopolitical expansion that was successfully pursued in North America and Eurasian Russia. It might have been high time for a similar consolidation in Europe, with the Reich as Europe’s nucleus and protector. Alas, this never happened.

Bismarck missed the most auspicious moment for the Reich and the entire Western world. Bismarck’s military genius, Fieldmarshall Moltke, argued in vain for either abandoning the concept of KAISERREICH or else reducing France to its basic components and incorporating Poland. Fieldmarshall Moltke perceived that the German Reich could keep the individual European countries in bounds, but Germany’s enemies would have an advantage if they combined their forces in an anti-German alliance. Moltke had the larger vision over Bismarck, who was happy with a small but self-satisfied, complacent Reich that did not even include German-speaking Austria in a confederate-like arrangement, which would have been a plausible geopolitical move even then and would have strengthened Germany.

The catastrophes that Moltke had foreseen occurred in the First World War and were redoubled in the Second World War, followed by the sociopolitical collapse that has devastated all Europe since 1945.

These catastrophes had more complicated and profound causes than meet the eye. The First World War had already been a fraternal European conflict in which Germany’s neighbors served as useful idiots for the moneyed powers that were lurking in the wings. Today we identify those moneyed powers, known in those days as Großkapital, as Zionist Globalists. They strive for nothing less than total and undivided world power, and they would be greatly hindered by a vigorous, functioning Reich in a dominant geopolitical position in Europe.

Their plan was quite simple: if they were successful in speculating on the shortsightedness of Germany’s neighbors and reviving their envy, they could sit back and watch the European nations maul each other in another fratricidal war.

And when the German Reich fell, all the other nation states would fall as well, in a domino effect.

Their evil plan was successful. Germany’s elite perished in the “Great War” with its total of twenty million dead and, following the dictates of Cleménceau at Versailles, Germany was stripped of more than a third of its ancestral lands. Germany’s defeat in both world wars was followed by a generalized stupefication, impoverishment, alienation and a collapsed birthrate.

This sociopolitical calamity was by no means restricted to Germany. The crisis has now affected every country in Europe, and the most devastated of all have been the seemingly victorious colonialist powers England and France. They are no less slaves of the Zionist Globalists than are the Germans.



As part of Germany’s enslavement, the Zionists directed the present “Federal Republic” to destroy their venerable legal system. After the defeat of WWII, they imprisoned Germany’s surviving elite for years, carried out the greatest book-burning of all time and forbade an immense number of teachers and specialists from practicing their professions. They also released an uncouth and untrained mob on Germany’s educational system, re-importing the so-called “Frankfurt School” for the purpose of “re-education” that continues to act as a plague on German intellectual life.

Surprisingly, writes Hennig,

“… it was not until the 1960s that symptoms of our induced insanity began to appear. Sometimes it seems we might have to start all over again in our efforts to re-establish the Reich. Let us take a closer look at the overall situation with all its problems – and possibilities.

In Germany today, legitimacy is diametrically opposed to governmental force. Legally, the Federal Republic is not the legitimate successor to the Reich. It cannot be the legitimate successor because, under international law, the Reich is still the legitimate state and two states cannot legally govern the same area at the same time.

The so-called Federal Republic is not an authentic state. The architect of its basic law, Prof. Carlo Schmidt, described it as Ordnungsform einer Modalität der Fremdherrschaft (Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign Rule) when it was created in 1948. The Federal Republic of Germany has never been legitimized by the will of the German people meeting in a constitutional convention of popularly elected representatives empowered to create an authentic Constitution.

The State is the form of governance assumed by the will of the people. Since the Reich represents the will of the people, it logically follows that the so-called Federal Republic is its adversary. The Federal Republic is not a state. It is a state-like institution of foreign domination under Zionist custodianship. The Americans, as enforcers of this custodianship, are playing the role of useful idiot on behalf of the Zionists.

The “Two Plus Four Treaty” of 1990 was designed to insure that the Federal Republic can take no steps toward self-governance even if it should want to, since Allied dominance still holds sway. This so-called “Treaty” is not really a treaty at all, it is a legalistic deception. Under the laws of international law, treaties can be concluded only between bona fide subjects of international law, and the Federal Republic is not a bona fide subject of international law. It is a custodian for a foreign subject of international law.

Under international law, the 1920 Constitution of the Weimar Reich is still valid, in the same form in which it existed until 23 May 1945. All laws that were in effect on this date are still in effect, since the legitimate Constitution remains unchanged. None of the laws, acts, or treaties passed or enacted by the “Federal Republic of Germany” are backed by legitimate authority. When the Reich regains its sovereignty, the national debt of the “Federal Republic” will be null and void, since the government that amassed it was not legitimate.

All of this sounds good, but for the time being it is nothing but legal doctrine. An awakening of German self-assertion is long overdue.



Adapted and excerpted from the writings of Rigolf Hennig, MD, a prominent European psychiatrist best known for his essays on “Political Correctness” as a psychiatric symptom of deliberate government-induced insanity. Dr. Hennig’s writings reflect the post-WWII European situation, particularly Germany, but parallels can easily be drawn to brainwashing campaigns on the American Continent, courtesy of our Friendly Ghosts.

A retrospective on how Europe now views thA retrospective on how Europe now views the events of World war II and its aftermath by the wife of Ernst Zundel who has been relentlessly persecuted by the western Establishment for no reason other than stubbornly authoring and publishing research on WWII and The Holocaust.ishing research on WWII and The Holocaust. +
File:Document.png +
Document:The World Through the Prism of Europe +
Document:The_World_Through_the_Prism_of_Europe +