Wikispooks:About
![Wikispooks logo FAQ.png](/w/images/thumb/5/54/Wikispooks_logo_FAQ.png/100px-Wikispooks_logo_FAQ.png)
Wikispooks is an open licensed, open source encyclopedia of deep politics. This whole site is freely downloadable.[1]
Our community of 877 registered editors have made 31,033 pages (13,584 people, 4,929 groups, 1,383 events...) supplemented by 2,287 third party documents.
![](/w/images/thumb/8/80/War-on-drugs-no.jpg/300px-War-on-drugs-no.jpg)
Wikispooks was established to facilitate a collective re-examination of recent history.[2] Since 2010 we have gradually focused our research on deep politics (the business of deep state groups) since this area is not subject to proper scrutiny by corporate media such as Wikipedia. Wikispooks aims to organise documents and first hand testimony as clearly as possible, carefully avoiding enemy images and polarising perspectives, respecting our common humanity and looking forward to a deep seated truth and reconciliation, as the formerly hidden business of deep politics becomes increasingly exposed. Of particular interest are structural deep events with official narratives[3] which cannot explain readily observable facts, such as such as the "war on terror", the "war on drugs", 9/11 and of course COVID-19 and the associated injections.
Contents
Why Wikispooks?
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
![](/w/images/thumb/d/d2/WP-censorship.png/600px-WP-censorship.png)
We are an open source wiki, so unlike Wikipedia all changes to pages are recorded and publicly available. Wikispooks has no bias towards commercially-controlled media or such other establishment institutions - sources are welcomed to the extent that they help shed light on the murky business of deep politics, which by design aims to be difficult to fathom. As a 100% volunteer project, Wikispooks is not beholden to the special interests which define the corporate media.
What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?
- Full article:
Wikipedia/Problems
- Full article:
Wikipedia has been revealed all the way back in the 2000s by Wikiscanner to be monitored, infiltrated and its content edited by royals, dozens of intelligence agencies, hundreds of corporations and even the assistants of politicians themselves.[6] Wikipedia's editorial policies on "notability" and "reliability" make it little more than just one more corporate media outlet for the the official (i.e. establishment-controlled) narrative, which the US Deep state's Operation Mockingbird has been targeting for decades. Wikipedia does not welcome first hand reports, but seeks secondary i.e. controllable reporting from the commercially-controlled media. Moreover it is censored and as of February 2018 its robots.txt file disallowed archival programs from recording page histories, so as to obscure its censorship.
Editorial Policy
- Full article: Wikispooks:Editorial Policy
- Full article: Wikispooks:Editorial Policy
Wikispooks encourages editors to be critical of the evidence presented. Unlike corporate media such as Wikipedia, this site does not have a "by domain" policy of deeming information either reliable or unreliable. Instead, evidence should be addressed on its merits. Wikispooks does not assume good faith on the part of authorities. If observable reality conflicts with the official narrative, the former deserves priority. Especially in the case of deep politics, official narratives deserve a close scrutiny which the commercially-controlled media seldom if ever gives them.[7] Wikispooks therefore does not aim for Wikipedia's (status-quo friendly) "Neutral Point of View".[8] Since newspapers and broadcasters (like governments) can and do lie with impunity, it is naive to assume mere publication of information to be a reliable indication of veracity.
Where To Start?
- Full articles: Wikispooks:FAQ, Wikispooks:Glossary
- Full articles: Wikispooks:FAQ, Wikispooks:Glossary
To see what we have on a specific topic, try the box in the top right corner of this page. For casual browsing, try this list of top-rated pages or this list of pages with the most revisions. For common queries, we have an FAQ. If you feel lucky, try a Random article. If the language here is new to you, the glossary might help - and should give you an idea of the sort of material here. To ask about a specific page, use the "Discussion" tab to edit its talk page (requires a login). If you have further specific questions, you could contact a site administrator.
Become an Editor
We welcome input from like-minded, researchers interested to assist our exploration into deep political matters. To become and editor yourself, apply at Request Account, but read these guidelines first. Note that to protect the integrity of the site, you will be expected to identity yourself.
Acknowledgements
- Full article: Wikispooks:Acknowledgments
- Full article: Wikispooks:Acknowledgments
Wikispooks is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, including Cryptome, Wikileaks, The Deep Politics Forum, SpinProfiles, SourceWatch and last but not least, that keeper of the official narrative on the internet, Wikipedia, with which it shares a common software platform, MediaWiki.[9]
References
- ↑
wikispooks-latest.zip
(~13 Gb) - ↑ Project:Site Rationale
- ↑ And official opposition narratives
- ↑ https://archive.fo/OIyCT
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suicide_of_Vince_Foster&offset=&limit=500&action=history
- ↑ https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikiscanner
- ↑ For more on this, see Media Lens, a media-monitoring website.
- ↑ Wikipedia - 'Neutral Point of View'
- ↑ MediaWiki on MediaWiki
| ||||||
|