AIDS

From Wikispooks
(Redirected from HIV-1)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concept.png Acquired immune deficiency syndrome 
(Disease,  Epidemic)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Start1981
AbbreviationAIDS
Interest of• Deborah Birx
• Peter Duesberg
• Anthony Fauci
• Robert Gallo
• Gregg Gonsalves
• David Lewis
• Jeanne Marrazzo
• Stanley Monteith
• Jon Rappoport
• Robert Redfield
• Zhengli Shi
• Soumya Swaminathan
• The Perth Group
• Blaine Trump
• UNAIDS
• Don Craig Wiley
Subpage(s)AIDS/Background

The Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is a large number of medical conditions stated to be caused by a single pathogen, the HIV virus. As usual when one digs a bit further, the official narrative is not as straightforward as it seems.

Things such as the Big Pharma profit motive, using a PCR testing method that is unreliable, and harsh iatrogenic "treatments" come into play. In addition, research into biological means for an untraceable mass killing has been researched by spooky deep state milieus, including having been part of the South African biological weapons program in collaboration with Western intelligence agencies.

Official Narrative

Full article: AIDS/Background

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is caused by the HIV virus. Following initial infection, there is a prolonged period with no symptoms, which again is followed by a breakdown of the immune system. This virus is widely believed to have emerged by zoonotic jump. A constellation of symptoms named "Gay-related immune deficiency" was noted in 1982.[1] In 1983, a group of scientists and doctors at the Pasteur Institute in France, led by Luc Montagnier, discovered a new virus in a patient with signs and symptoms that often preceded AIDS. They named the virus lymphadenopathy-associated virus, or LAV, and sent samples to Robert Gallo in the United States, who promtly claimed the honors for discovering it.

The high-profile new virus brought on "a new era in government-guided vaccine research, under the guidance of Anthony Fauci."[2]

Problems with official narrative

  • Critics of the "HIV is causing AIDS" theory may argue:
    • HIV does not exist, or HIV has not been adequately isolated
    • HIV does not fulfill Koch's postulates, or HIV testing is inaccurate
    • HIV came around at a time when virus related cancer research proved to be a dead-end. In the late 70s this branch of science came to the realization that a virus is not the cause of cancer - thus a number of laboratories around the world had to cease operation and were to be closed, but the narrative of the virus related illness (AIDS) offered a new avenue for research and so they could continue to operate. In other words there was incentive for some laboratories that were threatened by closure to agree to the conclusions of Gallo and Montagnier and not look critically at the facts that were presented.
  • Suggested alternative causes for the what is diagnosed as AIDS include a mix of:
    • recreational drugs, such as amyl nitrite ("poppers") [3]; combined with certain hygiene and hedonistic practices in gay milieus in the early 1980s.
    • malnutrition and other diseases
    • the very antiretroviral drugs used to treat the syndrome, especially AZT[4]
    • symptoms from other diseases have been summarized under AIDS[5]

Nobel Prize-winner and inventor of the PCR technique Kary Mullis became doubtful about the science behind AIDS when he couldn't get an answer from Luc Montagnier about a study that would prove the sentence "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS".[6]

AIDS industry

Peter Duesberg interviewed on the Joe Rogan - podcast 282 in 2013,[7] where he relates that his critical stand towards the official theory on AIDS did cost him his career. (video is archived, buffering may take a while)
Full article: AIDS industry

According to critics, the HIV/AIDS paradigm is politically, economically and socially driven, rather than based on verifiable scientific data. In fact, the orthodox version of the "AIDS pandemic", has been rife with dissent, corruption and censorship from the onset.

The drug AZT was used during the 1980s to suppress the outbreak of AIDS in a person infected with the HIV virus.[8] The inventor of AZT, Jerome Horwitz, is said to have been so unsatisfied with the drug that he "dumped it on the junk pile" and "didn’t [even] keep the notebooks". AZT was an chemotherapy-like drug of extreme, even fatal, toxicity and "so worthless" to him that he "didn’t think it was worth patenting" as former BusinessWeek journalist Bruce Nussbaum writes in his book: "Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment are Corrupting the Fight against AIDS, Alzheimer’s, Cancer and More."[9]

South Africa

Full article: South African Institute for Maritime Research

According to former members, a South African intelligence-connected militia spread the HIV virus through vaccines in the early 1980s. The subject was also mentioned by the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, but not investigated in full, possibly because it would touch on foreign partners.

Coronavirus

In February 2020 Forbes published No, The Coronavirus Was Not Genetically Engineered To Put Pieces Of HIV In It.[10] Other commercially-controlled media had similar titles.[11]

HIV/SARS virus combinations

In 2007 the Journal of Virology published Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin, a paper by Wuze Ren, Xiuxia Qu, Wendong Li, Zhenggang Han, Meng Yu, Peng Zhou, Shu-Yi Zhang, Lin-Fa Wang, Hongkui Deng and Zhengli Shi. They described preparation of "HIV-based pseudoviruses" and "investigated the receptor usage of the SL-CoV S by combining a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudovirus system with cell lines expressing the ACE2 molecules of human, civet, or horseshoe bat." The corresponding author's address was the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where some (or all?) of the work was carried out.[12]

External links


 

A AIDS victim on Wikispooks

TitleDescription
Nicholas EdenSon of UK PM Anthony Eden

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
1991“It is widely believed by the general public that a retrovirus called HIV causes a group of diseases called AIDS. Many biomedical scientists now question this hypothesis. We propose a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis, to be conducted by a suitable independent group. We further propose that the critical epidemiological studies be devised and undertaken.”Robert Hoffman
Charles A. Thomas Jr
Harvey Bialy
Harry Rubin
Richard C. Strohman
Phillip E. Johnson
Gordon J. Edlin
Beverly E. Griffin
Robert S. Root-Bernstein
Gordon Stewart
Carlos Sonnenschein
Richard L. Pitter
Nathaniel S. Lehrman
John Lauritsen
William Holub
Claudia Holub
Frank R. Buianouckas
Philip Rosen
Steven Jonas
Bernard K. Forscher
Kary B. Mullis
Jeffrey A. Fisher
Hansueli Albonico
Timothy H. Hand
Eleni Eleopulos
Robert W. Maver
Ken N. Matsumura
David T. Berner
Theodor Wieland
Joan Shenton
John Anthony Morris
Sungchul Ji
6 June 1991
Azidothymidine“The reason why only one drug has been made available — AZT — is because it’s the only drug that has been shown in scientifically controlled trials to be safe and effective.”Anthony Fauci
Li Keqiang“In the 90s, several dispensaries of the Government of Henan Province (led at the time by Li) launched a blood trade, exploiting the poverty of many farmers. The lack of hygiene in the transfusions helped spread the HIV virus in the country. In subsequent years, the future prime minister used every form of censorship and repression to prevent the truth from emerging.”Li Keqiang
Asianews.it
2012
Sasha Latypova“The perpetrators desperately, at all cost, need you to to believe that "mutating viruses in a lab" achieves some scary result, that then can be "leaked". That anyone can do it, even a PhD student in their garage. That our enemies are doing it and will "release" a super scary bug any time now, unless the Government is "prepared" by making a stockpile of "predictive vaccines" that can be deployed in DAYS after a new scary virus is detected in China. Or Timbuktu.

It is, however, a narrative. There is no way to "mutate viruses" in a lab in the way they all imply - to artificially make them deadlier and more transmissible at the same time. This is a propaganda fairytale with a very specific goal. You should be very concerned about any person (on "their" side or "ours") who repeats it with a serious face.

Sure, scientists can experiment with soups of DNA/RNA and grow things in petri dishes. They can design mutations on the computer and try to make concoctions of things. Are those "viruses" that can "leak from the lab" and "infect the world"? No. The proof of this is that while there are 1000 biolabs in the US and Western world playing with viruses. no pandemics or epidemics have resulted from these activities.”
Sasha Latypova27 January 2023
Thabo Mbeki“Not long ago, in our own country, people were killed, tortured, imprisoned and prohibited from being quoted in private and in public because the established authority believed that their views were dangerous and discredited. We are now being asked to do precisely the same thing that the racist apartheid tyranny we opposed did, because, it is said, there exists a scientific view that is supported by the majority, against which dissent is prohibited... People who otherwise would fight very hard to defend the critically important rights of freedom of thought and speech occupy, with regard to the HIV-AIDS issue, the frontline in the campaign of intellectual intimidation and terrorism...”Thabo Mbeki
Plasma Economy“In the 90s, several dispensaries of the Government of Henan Province (led at the time by Li) launched a blood trade, exploiting the poverty of many farmers. The lack of hygiene in the transfusions helped spread the HIV virus in the country. In subsequent years, the future prime minister used every form of censorship and repression to prevent the truth from emerging.”Asianews.it2012
Jon Rappoport“Long term, the medical cartel is the most dangerous cartel in the world, because they fly under a politically neutral banner. They claim they are completely non-partisan, we are here to help, to heal, and that's it. Who could doubt that? This is the greatest cover operation anyone could conceive of, using medical science, the medical system, with its toxic drugs, its toxic vaccines, to destroy whole populations from within. And occasionally come out with some massive epidemic program to further suppress and destroy populations.”Jon Rappoport29 September 2022
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References