Difference between revisions of "Biological weapon"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(|constitutes=WMD, Poison, Disaster)
(Official narrative)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|constitutes=WMD, Poison, Disaster
 
|constitutes=WMD, Poison, Disaster
 
|image=
 
|image=
|description=
+
|description=A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs.
 
}}'''Biological weapons''' are organisms, viruses or biological toxins intended for use as destructive agents, typically by infecting and incapacitating or killing people.
 
}}'''Biological weapons''' are organisms, viruses or biological toxins intended for use as destructive agents, typically by infecting and incapacitating or killing people.
 
==Legality==
 
==Legality==
 
[[Research]] into biological weapons is allowed for ''defensive'' purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from ''offensive'' research.
 
[[Research]] into biological weapons is allowed for ''defensive'' purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from ''offensive'' research.
 +
 +
==Official narrative==
 +
A "bioterrorist" attack is something we need to be prepared for. Preparing for "pandemics" might be a test case for a more severe "bioterrorist" attack.
  
 
==Preparations==
 
==Preparations==
Line 30: Line 33:
  
 
==Level 4 Bioweapons labs==
 
==Level 4 Bioweapons labs==
Research into the most hazardous substances is carried out at [[BSL4 facility | Biosafety level 4 facilities]]. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level</ref>
+
Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at [[BSL4 facility | Biosafety level 4 facilities]]. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.<ref>http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level</ref>
  
 
===USA===
 
===USA===

Revision as of 22:08, 14 June 2020

Concept.png Biological weapon 
(WMD,  Poison,  “Disaster”)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Interest of• Francis Boyle
• Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy
• Clade X
• Emergent BioSolutions
• George C. Marshall Institute
• Steven J. Hatfill
• Tom Inglesby
• Bruce Ivins
• Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
• Robert Kadlec
• Tara O'Toole
• Project MKNAOMI
• Jim Talent
Subpage(s)"Biological weapon/Terrorism"
Biological weapon/Preparation
Biological weapon/Research
A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs.

Biological weapons are organisms, viruses or biological toxins intended for use as destructive agents, typically by infecting and incapacitating or killing people.

Legality

Research into biological weapons is allowed for defensive purposes. In practice, this is difficult or impossible to differentiate from offensive research.

Official narrative

A "bioterrorist" attack is something we need to be prepared for. Preparing for "pandemics" might be a test case for a more severe "bioterrorist" attack.

Preparations

Full article: Biological weapon/Preparation

In over 200 cases the US tested bioweapons on their own citizens, according to 'official' news in the commercially-controlled media.[1] Preparations overlap with "Terrorism/Preparation" since Anthrax was used in a false flag event and Pandemic/Preparation as the proposed solution is preemtive development and large scale funding of new (genetically modified) vaccines.

Ethnic bioweapon

The development of ethnic bioweapons and their projected use has been a matter of discussion for decades.[2][3]

Events

2002-2003 SARS epidemic in Southern China

Full article: SARS

In 2003 ABC News reported on Sergei Kolesnikov's claim that the virus was made in a laboratory.[4] The Sydney Morning Herald headlined a 2008 article SARS a Chinese weapon: Taiwan official which began "Taiwan's top national security chief was forced to apologise after suggesting the deadly SARS virus could have been developed in Chinese laboratories as a bio-weapon. National Security Bureau director Tsai Chao-ming..."[5]

2009 avian flu contamination

In February 2009, Baxter International shipped 72 kg material to 16 laboratories in 4 countries. The material was marked as vaccine, but contained live H5N1 avian flu virus material as well as a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses.[6]

2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak‎‎

Full article: 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak‎‎

In late 2019 Covid-19 was detected, first in China, leading the Commercially-controlled media to assume it originated there. The suggestion that it might be a man-made biological weapon was met with widespread censorship by the commercially-controlled media (most obviously Twitter).[7]

Level 4 Bioweapons labs

Research into the most hazardous substances and so called "feature enhancement" is carried out at Biosafety level 4 facilities. The diseases studied there are fatal to humans and animals and with no known cure.[8]

USA

The United States operates a high number of level 4 labs worldwide.[9][10] Accidents and carelessness on the side management shows, that it is not possible to operate these labs, even those with the highest security level, safely all the time.[11] Especially notorious is the Plum Island bio lab near Long island.[12][13] It was operated only as a biosafety level 3 lab,[14] but it stands as an well documented example for technical and administrative problems that these facilities face. The research facility at Fort Detrick was shut down by the CDC in July 2019, citing failure to follow local procedures, lack of periodic recertification training for workers in the biocontainment laboratories and problems with the wastewater decontamination system.[15]

China

2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak map.jpg

The only such facility in mainland China is the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8.6 miles from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which the World Health Organization linked to the first reported cluster of Covid-19 patients, 44 people who became unwell with pneumonia of unknown cause, at the start of what was then referred to as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, later the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.


 

An example

Page nameDescription
2001 Anthrax attacksA week after 9/11, weaponised anthrax spores was sent from a US lab to media offices and to two U.S. Senators who were obstructing the rollback of civil liberties. A $100M FBI investigation concluded that posthumously blamed a "lone nut" researcher. In 2015, the FBI head of the investigation sued the US Attorney General alleging that exculpating evidence had been withheld.

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
1959“A US Army operating manual from 1956 stated explicitly that biological and chemical warfare were an integral operating portion of US military strategy, were not restricted in any way, and that Congress had given the military “First Strike” authority on their use. In 1959, an attempt by Congress to remove this first-strike authority was defeated by the White House and bio-chemical weapons expenditures increased from $75 million to almost $350 million.”Larry Romanoff2020
David Baltimore“When I first saw the furin cleavage site <a href="#cite_note-1">[1]</a> in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. (...) These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.”David Baltimore
Anthony Fauci“After the 9/11 attacks, and the mysterious anthrax mailings that began a week later (which said, “TAKE PENACILIN [sic] NOW / DEATH TO AMERICA / DEATH TO ISRAEL / ALLAH IS GREAT”), the desire for biopreparedness became all consuming. Now there were emerging biothreats from humans as well as from the evolving natural world. Fauci’s anti-terror budget went from $53 million in 2001 to $1.7 billion in 2003.”Anthony Fauci
Nicholson Baker
4 January 2021
Genetic Extinction Technology“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”Project for the New American Century
Genetic Extinction Technology“Given that Darpa is a military agency, we find it surprising that the obvious and concerning dual-use aspects of this research have received so little attention,”Felix Beck - lawyer at the University of Freiburg2018
Genetic Extinction Technology“It is very much easier to kill or sterilise a plant using gene editing than it is to make it herbicide or insect-resistant.”Guy Reeves
Expert in GM insects at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
2018
Robert Kadlec““If several kilograms of an agent like anthrax were disseminated in New York City today, conservative estimates put the number [of] deaths occurring in the first few days at 400,000. Thousands of others would be at risk of dying within several days if proper antibiotics and vaccination were not started immediately. Millions of others would be fearful of being exposed and seek or demand medical care as well. Beyond the immediate health implications of such an act, the potential panic and civil unrest would create an equally large response.””Robert Kadlec1998

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:All Roads Lead to Dark Winterreport1 April 2020Whitney Webb
Document:Bioterror: Manufacturing Wars The American Wayforeword1 April 2003William H. Schaap
Ellen Ray
Document:Operation Black Dogarticle2000David GuyattThe story of a US covert, airborne biological weapons attack on Iraq during the first US-Iraq war of 1990
File:US-biowarfare in Korea.pdfreportSeptember 1952Joseph NeedhamReport of investigations into the use of biological weapons by the US military during the Korean war of 1951-53
95 pounds thermometer.png
As of 2 June 2021, our 18 Patrons are giving £95/month, which is 95% of our webhosting bill. If you appreciate our efforts, please help keep this site running by donating or spreading the word about our Patreon page.



References

  1. https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/us-military-simulated-biological-warfare-san-francisco/
  2. http://archive.today/2020.02.24-184408/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon
  3. https://journal-neo.org/2017/11/29/confronting-the-threat-of-ethnic-bioweapons/ saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  4. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-04-11/sars-could-be-biological-weapon-experts/1835010 saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  5. https://www.smh.com.au/world/sars-a-chinese-weapon-taiwan-official-20081007-4vse.html
  6. http://www.legitgov.org/baxter_sends_live_avian_flu_viruses_270209.html
  7. https://saidit.net/s/WatchRedditDie/comments/37wk/on_reddit_if_you_post_a_link_to_this_scientific/
  8. http://archive.today/2020.02.13-123142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level
  9. https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  10. http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/ saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  11. http://fairfoods.org/stopthebiolab/stopthebiolab/documents/accidents-list.pdf saved at Archive.org
  12. https://hammettenglish1301.blogspot.com/2017/12/plum-island-conspiracies-by-allan-s.html saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  13. https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/product-reviews/006078184X saved at Archive.is
  14. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/nyregion/another-option-to-consider-for-plum-island.html
  15. https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is