Difference between revisions of "WW3"
m (Robin moved page World War III to WW3 over redirect: simpler, shorter) |
(update) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|start= | |start= | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | '''World War III''' (WWIII, WW3 or The Third World War), is the hypothetical successor to World War II (1939–1945). It is a hypothesis well-founded in real but largely suppressed historical evidence. | + | '''World War III''' ('''WWIII''', '''WW3''' or The '''Third World War'''), is the hypothetical successor to World War II (1939–1945). It is a hypothesis well-founded in real but largely suppressed historical evidence. |
− | To those schooled in the non-{{ON}}'s of the first two world wars and the relentless drive of the post WWII US-UK-NATO alliance towards a 'New World Order' (NWO) controlled by it, WWIII becomes less a matter of hypothesis and more one of inevitability. | + | To those schooled in the non-{{ON}}'s of the first two world wars and the relentless drive of the post WWII US-UK-NATO alliance towards a '[[New World Order]]' (NWO) controlled by it, WWIII becomes less a matter of hypothesis and more one of inevitability. |
− | It is abundantly clear from post WWII history to date that the arbiters of this drive towards a NWO (a concept drilled into the public by constant use of its more touchy-feely synonyms ''"International and world community"'') are not going to volunteer a reduction in the wealth and power it bestows on them by accepting, for example, Russian proposals of "Multi-polarity" as a basis for cooperation and development between the major current power blocks. The internal logic of the globalised corporate capitalism that drives the US-UK-NATO project is, by definition, implacably opposed to any such compromise. | + | It is abundantly clear from post WWII history to date that the arbiters of this drive towards a [[NWO]] (a concept drilled into the public by constant use of its more touchy-feely synonyms ''"International and world community"'') are not going to volunteer a reduction in the wealth and power it bestows on them by accepting, for example, Russian proposals of "Multi-polarity" as a basis for cooperation and development between the major current power blocks. The internal logic of the globalised corporate [[capitalism]] that drives the US-UK-[[NATO]] project is, by definition, implacably opposed to any such compromise. |
+ | |||
+ | The impending tragedy for humanity is that it is these cold, calculating, devoid-of-humanity interests that also control a vast global military and weapons arsenal, the like of which the world has never before known. Together with State policing and [[surveillance]] capabilities that even [[George Orwell]] could not have imagined, these capabilities are being relentlessly exploited and further developed. Sadly, it is naive to believe they will not be fully employed before the inhuman monster that controls them concedes that there is a "better way". | ||
− | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | {{Reflist}} | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} |
Revision as of 21:44, 31 March 2021
Interest of | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Intel Slava |
---|
World War III (WWIII, WW3 or The Third World War), is the hypothetical successor to World War II (1939–1945). It is a hypothesis well-founded in real but largely suppressed historical evidence. To those schooled in the non-Official Narrative's of the first two world wars and the relentless drive of the post WWII US-UK-NATO alliance towards a 'New World Order' (NWO) controlled by it, WWIII becomes less a matter of hypothesis and more one of inevitability.
It is abundantly clear from post WWII history to date that the arbiters of this drive towards a NWO (a concept drilled into the public by constant use of its more touchy-feely synonyms "International and world community") are not going to volunteer a reduction in the wealth and power it bestows on them by accepting, for example, Russian proposals of "Multi-polarity" as a basis for cooperation and development between the major current power blocks. The internal logic of the globalised corporate capitalism that drives the US-UK-NATO project is, by definition, implacably opposed to any such compromise.
The impending tragedy for humanity is that it is these cold, calculating, devoid-of-humanity interests that also control a vast global military and weapons arsenal, the like of which the world has never before known. Together with State policing and surveillance capabilities that even George Orwell could not have imagined, these capabilities are being relentlessly exploited and further developed. Sadly, it is naive to believe they will not be fully employed before the inhuman monster that controls them concedes that there is a "better way".
Examples
Page name | Description |
---|---|
Bunkers in New Zealand | Bunkers for the rich to sit out Armageddon. |
Svalbard Seed Vault | Facility in remote Norwegian Arctic archipelago; often mentioned to be necessary as back-up to restart human civilization. |
Related Quotations
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | “Dozens of versions of the above war-game scenario have been enacted over the last few years, most recently in April by the House Select Committee on competition with China. And while the ultimate outcome in these exercises is not always clear — the U.S. does better in some than others — the cost is. In every exercise the U.S. uses up all its long-range air-to-surface missiles in a few days, with a substantial portion of its planes destroyed on the ground. In every exercise the U.S. is not engaged in an abstract push-button war from 30,000 feet up like the ones Americans have come to expect since the end of the Cold War, but a horrifically bloody one. Soldiers of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army hold up shotguns. And that’s assuming the U.S.-China war doesn’t go nuclear.” | Michael Hirsh | September 2023 |
Cold War II | “The United States remains the world’s leading power with global interests, and it cannot afford to choose between Europe and the Indo-Pacific. Instead, Washington and its allies should develop a defense strategy capable of deterring and, if necessary, defeating Russia and China at the same time.” | Atlantic Council Matthew Kroenig | 18 February 2022 |
Vladimir Putin | “Western countries have been saying for centuries that they bring freedom and democracy to other nations. Nothing could be further from the truth. Instead of bringing democracy they suppressed and exploited, and instead of giving freedom they enslaved and oppressed. The unipolar world is inherently anti-democratic and unfree; it is false and hypocritical through and through.
The United States is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. And they created a precedent. Recall that during WWII the United States and Britain reduced Dresden, Hamburg, Cologne and many other German cities to rubble, without the least military necessity. It was done ostentatiously and, to repeat, without any military necessity. They had only one goal, as with the nuclear bombing of Japanese cities: to intimidate our country and the rest of the world. The United States left a deep scar in the memory of the people of Korea and Vietnam with their carpet bombings and use of napalm and chemical weapons. It actually continues to occupy Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea and other countries, which they cynically refer to as equals and allies. Look now, what kind of alliance is that? The whole world knows that the top officials in these countries are being spied on and that their offices and homes are bugged. It is a disgrace, a disgrace for those who do this and for those who, like slaves, silently and meekly swallow this arrogant behaviour. They call the orders and threats they make to their vassals Euro-Atlantic solidarity, and the creation of biological weapons and the use of human test subjects, including in Ukraine, noble medical research. It is their destructive policies, wars and plunder that have unleashed today’s massive wave of migrants. Millions of people endure hardships and humiliation or die by the thousands trying to reach Europe.” | Vladimir Putin | 2022 |
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer | “It is not likely. But he is unpredictable and consumed by resentment and rancour. So, you should not exclude the possibility that he'll be creating a problem between Kaliningrad and Belarus. That area is the gateway from Western Europe to the Baltic countries. If he closes that passage, it would be a reason for war for NATO.” | Jaap de Hoop Scheffer NOS | 24 February 2022 |
War party | “The Americans want war. The people that Biden has appointed have an emotional hatred of Russia. I’ve spoken to government people who are close to the Democratic Party, and they’ve told me that there’s a pathological emotional desire for war with Russia, largely stemming from the fact that the Tzars were anti-Semitic and there’s still the hatred about their ancestors: “Look what they did to my great-grandfather.” And so they’re willing to back the Nazis, back the anti-Semites in Ukraine. They’re willing to back today’s anti-Semites all over the world as long as they’re getting back at this emotional focus on a kind of post 19th-century economy. I’ve met these people. Their emotion is one of hatred and anger. You can look at their face and see what they’ve become. This is really dangerous. They are crazy. And Putin is quite right. America has got its power by breaking contracts.” | Michael Hudson | 24 March 2021 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Break the silence: a world war is beckoning | article | 13 May 2014 | John Pilger | The risk that western sponsored events in Ukraine in Spring 2014 and persistent western lies about the situation, will lead to war with Russia |
Document:F-16 for Ukraine - An open letter to Joseph Biden | open letter | 8 May 2023 | Anders Åslund Karel Schwarzenberg Eerik-Niiles Kross Jarno Limnéll Andreas Umland Vytautas Landsbergis Nathalie Tocci Alberto Alemanno Roderich Kiesewetter Anton Hofreiter | Open letter to US President Joe Biden from European deep state minions, pleading for an escalation in Ukraine, and NATO membership. Lo and behold, a week after the letter, Biden approved F-16s, indicating that the letter was astroturf to make a decision already decided seem like done by European demand... Includes barely hidden threatening of those that blocked NATO accession in 2008, who bear "a grave responsibility" and "will be careful not to hinder it again." |
Document:Global Warfare. Preparing for World War III | article | 1 August 2010 | Michel Chossudovsky | US Global military deployments, bases and command structure analysed as integral to an agenda aiming at total world hegemony |
Document:National Missile Defense-Jochen Scholz | interview | 30 January 2011 | Jochen Scholz | Excerpted from a NuoViso interview with Lieutenant-Colonel Jochen Scholz on the American missile defense in Europe and the real reason why it is placed there. |
Document:SITREP: A false flag attack on a USN ship next | blog post | 21 April 2018 | 'Nick for the Saker' | The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group, which comprises the cruiser USS Normandy, six destroyers and carries 6,500 sailors, is heading for Syria. Russia’s hypersonic Kinzhal (‘Dagger’) missile system having made these vessels effectively obsolete, means that the ships and their crews are essentially being sailed into a bloody scrapyard. |
Document:The Elite the Great Game and World War III | article | 8 June 2011 | Mujahid Kamran | A global economic system erected on inhuman and predatory values, where a few possess more wealth than the billions of hungry put together, will end, but the end will be painful and bloody |
Document:The Road to World War III | book extract | 1 September 2010 | David DeGraw | When you are brave enough to leave the Disneyland of mainstream propaganda and face the reality of the current world situation, the foreseeable future looks bleak indeed. Given the course we are on, extreme upheavals are inevitable |
Document:The Third World War | Text | 26 January 2014 | Peter | |
Document:Washington Drives the World Toward War | article | 13 December 2013 | Paul Craig Roberts | Compelling argument and evidence of the US-UK-NATO drive towards inevitable armed confrontation with Russia and China. |
Document:Why US missile defense is not a defensive but an offensive weapons system | article | 10 March 2019 | Thomas Röper | |
Intel Slava - assessment of the Donbass situation end 2021 | Text | Intel Slava |