National Endowment for Democracy

National Endowment for Democracy
Abbreviation	NED
Motto	Supporting freedom around the world.
Founder	•  Robert Pickus •  George Weigel
Type	501c3
Interests	US Sponsored Regime-change efforts since 1945
Sponsor of	Poynter Institute, Institute for War and Peace Reporting, Abdorrahman Boroumand Foundation, Advocates for Community Alternatives, African Civic Leadership Program, Agora Cuba, Ashika Turks Community, Andrei Sakharov Foundation, Asia Catalyst, Bank Information Center, Boat People SOS, Center for a Free Cuba, Center for Justice and International Law, Center for Victims of Torture, China Aid Association, China Labor Watch, China Strategic Analysis Center, China Rights in Action, Chinese Feminist Collective, Civic Space Institute, Coda Media, Democratic China Incorporated, Eritrean Global Solidarity, EurasiaNet, Foundation for Human Rights in Cuba, Free Russia Foundation, Free Society Project, Freedom House, Friends of Angola, Institute for Asian Democracy, Institute of Modern Russia, International Center for Journalists, International Institute for Vietnam, International Tibet Network, Project on Middle East Democracy, Atlantic Council, Tides Center, Tibet Justice Center, Uighur Human Rights Project, World Affairs Institute, Index on Censorship, n-ost, Reporters Without Borders, TESEV, Friends of the Democratic Center in Central America, Detector Media, Foreign Policy Centre, Internews, Open Democracy
Subpage	•National Endowment for Democracy/Board
The "traditional intermediary of the CIA", promoting the US "national interest" by "soft power".

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has been termed the "traditional intermediary of the CIA".

Official narrative

Wikipedia terms it a "soft-power organization". The NED's president Carl Gershman explained, “It would be terrible for democratic groups around the world to be seen as subsidized by the C.I.A. We saw that in the 60’s, and that’s why it has been discontinued. We have not had the capability of doing this, and that’s why the endowment was created.”

New York Times reporter John Broder wrote in 1997 that NED was created:

“to do in the open what the Central Intelligence Agency has done surreptitiously for decades,”
John Broder (March 31, 1997) 

Allen Weinstein, who worked in the same framework of NGO activity, commented about the general situation in an interview by the Washington Post in 1991:

“A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA,”
Allen Weinstein (September 22, 1991) 

And CIA whistleblower Philip Agee described the NED as:

“Nowadays, instead of having the CIA going around behind the scenes and trying to manipulate the process by inserting money here and giving instructions secretly and so forth, they have now a sidekick, which is this National Endowment for Democracy, NED”
Philip Agee

Frances Stonor Saunders, who researched covert CIA funding of cultural organizations during the Cold War, described it as:

“The NED is the umbilical cord of gold that leads directly back to Washington...And by this I’m not only referring to official U.S. government programmes, but to the vast network of clandestine players that plan and enact its information warfare operations.””
Frances Stonor Saunders (January 2022) 

Problems

In July 2015, Vladimir Putin banned the NED from Russia as the first "undesirable NGO".

In 1993, Barbara Conry, a foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute an article on the group entitled "Loose Cannon: The National Endowment for Democracy".

Steven Gowens has written that "The Dalai Lama is hardly a democrat, yet he has received Washington’s lucre for decades, including from the CIA and later the NED... old Tibet, then, was hardly a society of peace and tranquility ruled over by a benign ruler. It was a class society torn by conflict and predicated on brutal, naked, exploitation. Despite this, a February 16, 2010 NED press release describes the former Tibetan feudal overlord “not only as a moral and religious leader respected throughout the world but as a fellow democrat who shares America’s deepest values.”

"The NED does, however, care deeply about the interests of US corporations, banks and investors which, after all, play the dominant role in shaping US policy and whose representatives staff the key positions of the US state."

Staff

Full article: National Endowment for Democracy/board

Institutes

The NED distributes most of its money through four core channels. The National Democratic Institute seems to be the most active of them.

Full article: National Democratic Institute

Full article: Solidarity Center

Full article: International Republican Institute

Full article: Center for International Private Enterprise

Funding

The NED is funded by the US Congress. The very incomplete list of sponsored organiations is from their 990-tax form for 2017.

 

Related Documents

Title	Type	Publication date	Author(s)	Description
Document:Bangkok Blast - Who the Liars Say Did It, Says it All	article	18 August 2015	'Tony Cartalucci'	Analysis of the 18 August terrorist bombing in Bangkok illustrating western media (especially the BBC) bias by omission of major salient points
Document:Is Oil Behind Washington’s Venezuela Coup Madness	Article	3 February 2019	William Engdahl	Leaving aside whether or not Maduro is a saint, the decision by President Trump to back the Bolton-Pence call for a US intervention in Venezuela may prove a fatal error for the Trump presidency.
Document:The Making of Juan Guaidó: How the US Regime Change Laboratory Created Venezuela’s Coup Leader	Article	29 January 2019	Dan Cohen Max Blumenthal	Juan Guaidó is the product of a decade-long project overseen by Washington’s elite regime change trainers. While posing as a champion of democracy, Guaidó has spent years at the forefront of a violent campaign of destabilisation in Venezuela

Rating

17 January 2020 Terje 

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.