Difference between revisions of "Chemtrails"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (formatting)
(2024)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''Note: All things discussed under the wording 'Chemtrails' is framed as "[[conspiracy theory]]" by the [[CCM|press]]. But the very same issue is discussed on the scientific and administrative level with different terminology - ie as: '[[Geoengineering]]', 'Solar geoengineering', 'Solar Radiation Management', 'Solar Radiation Modification', 'Stratospheric Aerosal Injection', etc.
 +
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
+
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
 
|image=Chemtrails.jpg
 
|image=Chemtrails.jpg
|description=Chemtrails or Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering is officially only a proposed international government funded weather modification program.
+
|image_width=400px
 +
|description=Chemtrails, or Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering, is officially <u>only a proposed</u> international government funded weather modification program.
 +
|constitutes=Geoengineering
 +
|ON_constitutes=Conspiracy Theory
 
}}
 
}}
<br/><br/>
+
 
 +
'''Trails from airplanes''' in [[Europe]] and the [[United States]], but presumably worldwide, since approximately the mid-[[2000s]], are more persistent and do not disappear after half an hour or so. Some trails do disappear relatively fast, while others stay for prolonged periods, broaden over time, and build a milky cloud ceiling together with other trails that are left in proximity. This phenomena is unlike what many people remember from the [[80s]], and [[90s]], or earlier. At the same time, air traffic has increased manifold since the early [[1980s]].<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20100703201645/http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch3en/conc3en/evolairtransport.html</ref> The simple fact, however, that these trails are now way more visible and persistent than they used to be, has been noticed by some [[ccm|mainstream]] publications.<ref>http://www.lavanguardia.com/medio-ambiente/20121119/54354620686/nuves-artificiales-mas-frecuentes-trafico-aereo.html saved via [http://archive.is/jvpqe archive.is]</ref><ref>https://actualidad.rt.com/opinion/iluminando_conciencias/view/4639-Chemtrails-y-Cambio-Climatico.</ref>
  
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
<div style="float:right;background:#fff; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px;  margin: 1em; z-index: 10; padding: 0.4em; margin-right:0px;">{{#widget:YouTube|width=300px|height=240px|id=uY1z2_eswpY}} </div>
+
[[Wikipedia]]'s title (''Chemtrail conspiracy theory'') leaves no room for doubt, making clear that it considers chemtrails a pseudoscientific [[conspiracy theory]]. However Wikipedia's ''Solar radiation management''<ref>http://archive.today/2020.05.27-194925/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management</ref> page (and others)<ref>http://archive.today/2019.07.27-171820/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Particle_Injection_for_Climate_Engineering</ref> suggests, that this method is one possible candidate for [[Geoengineering|climate engineering projects]]. A feasibility and cost analysis study for different methods of releasing particles into the atmosphere was done by the [[University of Calgary]] in 2010,<ref>https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/16m_2010_aurora_flight_sciences_geoengineering_cost_analysis_final_report_october_30_2010-pdf.12497/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200527195549/https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/16m_2010_aurora_flight_sciences_geoengineering_cost_analysis_final_report_october_30_2010-pdf.12497/ Archive.org]</ref> while studies that discuss the:  
Wikipedia's title leaves no room for doubt and essentially considers the chemtrails theory pseudoscientific. However wikipedia's Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering page suggests that it is a possible candidate for climate engineering projects.  
+
* "use (of) aircraft to maintain a cloud of dust in the low stratosphere to reflect sunlight"
 +
*"decrease (of the) efficiency of burning in engines of aircraft flying in the low stratosphere to maintain a thin cloud of soot to intercept sunlight"
 +
date back at least to 1992.<ref>https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1605/policy-implications-of-greenhouse-warming-mitigation-adaptation-and-the-science</ref>
 +
[[File:Cloud seeding.jpg|Malaysian Air Force conducting cloud seeding<ref>http://archive.today/2014.05.13-155447/http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=/2005/8/23/nation/11845177&sec=nation</ref>|thumb|400px]]
 +
 
 +
===Known projects===
 +
Known and documented US projects are:
 +
*[[Operation Popeye]] during the [[Vietnam War]] ([[1967]] to [[1972]]) which attempted to extend the monsoon season over the tunnels of the [[Ho Chi Minh Trail]]
 +
*[[Project Stormfury]] ([[1962]] to [[1983]]) which attempted to weaken tropical cyclones by flying aircraft into them and seeding with silver iodide
 +
 
 +
===Peer reviewed study===
 +
A [[2016]] peer-reviewed paper concluded that "the evidence as evaluated here does not point to a secret atmospheric spraying program. Changes in aircraft technologies may be causing contrails to persist longer than they used to, and changes in industrial development could potentially be increasing aerosol deposition in some areas. But the focus on a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program may be taking attention away from real, underlying problems that need addressing."<ref>http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084011/pdf</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Military applications===
 +
A speculative paper by the [[Air University]] at [[Maxwell Air Force Base]] from [[2011]] commented on a future in which [[satellite]] based, full motion video ('''FMV''') from space has become common:<ref>https://media.defense.gov/2017/May/05/2001743003/-1/-1/0/OP_69_SHANNON_FINDING_SHAPE_SPACE.PDF</ref>
 +
{{YouTubeVideo
 +
|align=right
 +
|code=rf78rEAJvhY
 +
|caption=The Dimming, Full Length Climate Engineering Documentary
 +
}}
 +
{{QB|Controlling the weather is a tactic that could counter the FMV sensors. For example, in a hypothetical 2035 scenario, China is preparing for a large-scale exercise in which it intends to test several new weapon systems. It doesn’t want the United States to observe events on the ground or in the air. To conceal the activity, China saturates the upper atmosphere with silver iodide crystals, forming a layer of cirrus clouds that effectively prevents, or significantly reduces, observation from space. This scenario is not farfetched. China leads the world in its efforts to control the weather. Bill Woodley, a scientist who ran several cloud-seeding experiments for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, calls China the “epicenter of all weather modification activity.” “They’re training young scientists and pilots; they’ve just gone crazy over there,” adds Woodley. He notes that Beijing employs 32,000 people nationwide in its Weather Modification Office and invests $100 million annually in the program.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140418165026/http://www.wired.com/2007/11/china-leads-wea</ref>}}
 +
Since the earth is constantly watched by many [[satellites]], military and civilian (even if only by high resolution pictures and not live video feed), this capability is something that any military of a certain size wants to have and thus, is most likely fully developed at present by the [[United States]] itself and some other countries. Neither the United States, nor any other country must have an open communication strategy with this. As with any other [[advanced weapons research]], it is most certainly hidden from public oversight through classification and/or [[black budget]] financing.
 +
 
 +
==Non-State Actors==
 +
A department of the [[German Army]] made a whitepaper in [[2012]] which warned that non-state actors can start their own projects and that they are not under any regulation.<ref>https://www.bundeswehr.de/resource/blob/140534/0e09f412cb61da2bef8e5279772c31e3/geo-data.pdf saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20200515232705/https://www.bundeswehr.de/resource/blob/140534/0e09f412cb61da2bef8e5279772c31e3/geo-data.pdf Archive.org]</ref><ref>https://www.regenauer.press/wetter-als-waffe saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20230320002928/https://www.regenauer.press/wetter-als-waffe Archive.org] saved at [https://archive.is/Kwo8p Archive.is]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Alternative explanation==
 +
[[File:Inside_chemtrail_plane1500w.jpg|thumbnail|440px|This is what some argue is a leaked picture from a plane specifically retrofitted for the purpose. A system like this, with tanks/barrels inside the cabin, could, as the Wikipedia article on Chemtrails points out, as well be used to simulate different points of gravity. The low volume of these barrels, compared to the overall cabin volume may indicate, that a configuration like this is not a cost effective solution to bring larger volumes of material into the atmosphere and thus, is used for a different purpose.]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Evergreen Supertanker.jpg|right|thumb|440px|Another picture of a retrofitted plane for firefighting, the Evergreen Supertanker. This demonstrates that the technology is fairly well developed and high volume/cabin ratio is possible. - [https://www.metabunk.org/threads/explained-chemtrail-plane-interior-ballast-barrels.661/ Thread] at [[Metabunk]] that does explain several of the design/layouts that are known and used for various purposes.]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Nozzles-on-chemtrail-spraying-plane 400.png|thumbnail|Plane spraying chemtrails{{cn}}]]
 +
The term chemtrails is used to refer to a climate engineering concept scientifically named Stratospheric Aerosal [[Geoengineering]]. Chemtrails are much different than contrails that evoporate quickly in the sky. Chemtrails do not evaporate. Rather, planes that are fitted with special nozzles release aerosols in the sky that produce thick white lines similar to contrails. Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel often seen in “checkerboard” patterns and the the sky is then covered with many grayish-white lines. The blue sky has vanished and has been replaced by a grayish-white toxic haze that blocks out and greatly diminishes the sunshine a process scientifically known as global dimming. Chemtrails can be seen as low as 18k feet while contrail formation is only supported at 37K feet according to Met office. High-bypass turbofan jet engines are less likely to create contrails because the ratio of air to exhaust is too high to facilitate the formation of condensation because the majority of air expelled from the back of the engine is not combusted. It passes through the fan and blown out the back without mixing with any fuel. Chemtrails have been independently tested and show high levels of barium, CHAFF, Strontium and other metals. These metals are dangerous to human health and could have adverse effects on the environment.<ref>http://www.globalresearch.org/chemtrails-the-consequences-of-toxic-metals-and-chemical-aerosols-on-human-health/19047</ref><ref>[http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/ A list of patents that are argued to be related to weather modification on a website dedicated to the topic of geoengineering.]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==2023==
 +
In February 2023 the [[UN]] released a report on the deployment and research into solar radiation techniques.<ref>https://www.unep.org/resources/report/Solar-Radiation-Modification-research-deployment - [https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/41903/one_atmosphere.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y PDF]</ref> In June of that year a document by the [[European Commission]] noted that: "deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems (referred to as “geoengineering”), such as solar radiation modification, is attracting more attention".<ref>https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2023/JOIN_2023_19_1_EN_ACT_part1_v7.pdf</ref>
  
Officially, there is nothing going on.
+
==2024==
 +
Legislation in [[Florida]] and [[Tennessee]] aims to ban weather manipulation with chemical and technological methods, used to manipulate weather patterns, temperature, or sunlight intensity.<ref>"Florida Republican Senator has introduced SB 56" - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/florida-republican-lawmaker-introduces-legislation-ban-weather-engineering/</ref>
  
==Alternatives==
+
==Weblinks==
 +
*The case against Chemtrails - [http://vaccinepapers.org/chemtrails-debunked/ "Chemtrails Debunked Part 1: Contrails"]
 +
*[[UN]] [https://www.un.org/disarmament/enmod/ Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques]
 +
*[https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Chemtrails-Deep_Shield Chemtrails-Deep Shield]
  
[[File:Highbypassturbofan.gif|thumbnail|right|High Bypass Turbofan Engine 80% thrust from the turbofan, 20% from engine output.]]
 
Proponents suggest that the persistent "contrails" we see in the sky are not contrails at all but rather are given the nickname chemtrails. Referring to a climate engineering concept scientifically named Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering. Contrails are defined by wikipedia as "''Contrails (/ˈkɒntreɪlz/; short for "condensation trails") or vapor trails are long, thin artificial (man-made) clouds that sometimes form behind aircraft''." Proponents of the chemtrail theory point out that the trails (see above) are much thicker even before accumulation can occur. Proponents of the chemtrail theory point out that high-bypass turbofan jet engines are less likely to create contrails because the ratio of air to exhaust is too high to facilitate the formation of condensation because the majority of air expelled from the back of the engine is not combusted. It passes through the fan and blown out the back without mixing with any fuel. <ref> http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/high-bypass-turbofan-jet-engines-contrails/ </ref> <ref> http://www.rense.com/general4/fre.htm </ref>
 
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
[[Category:Climate Change]]
 
  
 
==Refrences==
 
==Refrences==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 23:24, 2 December 2024

Note: All things discussed under the wording 'Chemtrails' is framed as "conspiracy theory" by the press. But the very same issue is discussed on the scientific and administrative level with different terminology - ie as: 'Geoengineering', 'Solar geoengineering', 'Solar Radiation Management', 'Solar Radiation Modification', 'Stratospheric Aerosal Injection', etc.

Concept.png Chemtrails 
(Geoengineering)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Chemtrails.jpg
Interest of• Geoengineering Watch
• G. Edward Griffin
• Manfred Petritsch
• Sofia Smallstorm
• Clare Swinney
Chemtrails, or Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering, is officially only a proposed international government funded weather modification program.

Trails from airplanes in Europe and the United States, but presumably worldwide, since approximately the mid-2000s, are more persistent and do not disappear after half an hour or so. Some trails do disappear relatively fast, while others stay for prolonged periods, broaden over time, and build a milky cloud ceiling together with other trails that are left in proximity. This phenomena is unlike what many people remember from the 80s, and 90s, or earlier. At the same time, air traffic has increased manifold since the early 1980s.[1] The simple fact, however, that these trails are now way more visible and persistent than they used to be, has been noticed by some mainstream publications.[2][3]

Official narrative

Wikipedia's title (Chemtrail conspiracy theory) leaves no room for doubt, making clear that it considers chemtrails a pseudoscientific conspiracy theory. However Wikipedia's Solar radiation management[4] page (and others)[5] suggests, that this method is one possible candidate for climate engineering projects. A feasibility and cost analysis study for different methods of releasing particles into the atmosphere was done by the University of Calgary in 2010,[6] while studies that discuss the:

  • "use (of) aircraft to maintain a cloud of dust in the low stratosphere to reflect sunlight"
  • "decrease (of the) efficiency of burning in engines of aircraft flying in the low stratosphere to maintain a thin cloud of soot to intercept sunlight"

date back at least to 1992.[7]

Malaysian Air Force conducting cloud seeding[8]

Known projects

Known and documented US projects are:

Peer reviewed study

A 2016 peer-reviewed paper concluded that "the evidence as evaluated here does not point to a secret atmospheric spraying program. Changes in aircraft technologies may be causing contrails to persist longer than they used to, and changes in industrial development could potentially be increasing aerosol deposition in some areas. But the focus on a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program may be taking attention away from real, underlying problems that need addressing."[9]

Military applications

A speculative paper by the Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base from 2011 commented on a future in which satellite based, full motion video (FMV) from space has become common:[10]

The Dimming, Full Length Climate Engineering Documentary

Controlling the weather is a tactic that could counter the FMV sensors. For example, in a hypothetical 2035 scenario, China is preparing for a large-scale exercise in which it intends to test several new weapon systems. It doesn’t want the United States to observe events on the ground or in the air. To conceal the activity, China saturates the upper atmosphere with silver iodide crystals, forming a layer of cirrus clouds that effectively prevents, or significantly reduces, observation from space. This scenario is not farfetched. China leads the world in its efforts to control the weather. Bill Woodley, a scientist who ran several cloud-seeding experiments for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, calls China the “epicenter of all weather modification activity.” “They’re training young scientists and pilots; they’ve just gone crazy over there,” adds Woodley. He notes that Beijing employs 32,000 people nationwide in its Weather Modification Office and invests $100 million annually in the program.[11]

Since the earth is constantly watched by many satellites, military and civilian (even if only by high resolution pictures and not live video feed), this capability is something that any military of a certain size wants to have and thus, is most likely fully developed at present by the United States itself and some other countries. Neither the United States, nor any other country must have an open communication strategy with this. As with any other advanced weapons research, it is most certainly hidden from public oversight through classification and/or black budget financing.

Non-State Actors

A department of the German Army made a whitepaper in 2012 which warned that non-state actors can start their own projects and that they are not under any regulation.[12][13]

Alternative explanation

This is what some argue is a leaked picture from a plane specifically retrofitted for the purpose. A system like this, with tanks/barrels inside the cabin, could, as the Wikipedia article on Chemtrails points out, as well be used to simulate different points of gravity. The low volume of these barrels, compared to the overall cabin volume may indicate, that a configuration like this is not a cost effective solution to bring larger volumes of material into the atmosphere and thus, is used for a different purpose.
Another picture of a retrofitted plane for firefighting, the Evergreen Supertanker. This demonstrates that the technology is fairly well developed and high volume/cabin ratio is possible. - Thread at Metabunk that does explain several of the design/layouts that are known and used for various purposes.
Plane spraying chemtrails[citation needed]

The term chemtrails is used to refer to a climate engineering concept scientifically named Stratospheric Aerosal Geoengineering. Chemtrails are much different than contrails that evoporate quickly in the sky. Chemtrails do not evaporate. Rather, planes that are fitted with special nozzles release aerosols in the sky that produce thick white lines similar to contrails. Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel often seen in “checkerboard” patterns and the the sky is then covered with many grayish-white lines. The blue sky has vanished and has been replaced by a grayish-white toxic haze that blocks out and greatly diminishes the sunshine a process scientifically known as global dimming. Chemtrails can be seen as low as 18k feet while contrail formation is only supported at 37K feet according to Met office. High-bypass turbofan jet engines are less likely to create contrails because the ratio of air to exhaust is too high to facilitate the formation of condensation because the majority of air expelled from the back of the engine is not combusted. It passes through the fan and blown out the back without mixing with any fuel. Chemtrails have been independently tested and show high levels of barium, CHAFF, Strontium and other metals. These metals are dangerous to human health and could have adverse effects on the environment.[14][15]

2023

In February 2023 the UN released a report on the deployment and research into solar radiation techniques.[16] In June of that year a document by the European Commission noted that: "deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems (referred to as “geoengineering”), such as solar radiation modification, is attracting more attention".[17]

2024

Legislation in Florida and Tennessee aims to ban weather manipulation with chemical and technological methods, used to manipulate weather patterns, temperature, or sunlight intensity.[18]

Weblinks


 

Examples

Page nameDescription
2024 Persian Gulf floodsSevere flash floods in a arid desert kill dozens in countries known for documented geoengineering. CCM quick to copy spokespersons denying any link to geoengineering, after one admitted this to be the caused by geoengineering.
Operation Ranch HandU.S. military herbicidal/chemical warfare operation during the Vietnam War

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthor
'Little Apostate'“when i google chemtrails everything that comes up is "debunking chemtrails" and "i spent a week with chemtrails conspiracy theorists" by twenty something "journalists" so i think its safe to say its probably all real”'Little Apostate'

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Chemtrails - Proof and Purposearticle1 January 2013T. J. ColesAn outline of the activities of various agencies of the US UK military in the fields of climate modification by means of high altitude chemical spraying.
Document:Chemtrails-Deep Shieldinterview2003Deep Shield
Brian Holmes
The individual featured appears to have an "inside track" on the chemtrail spraying programme. There was an opportunity to ask specific questions relating to the aerial spraying and the "insider" then answered the questions.
Document:MPs given guide to spotting conspiracy theoriesArticle10 May 2024Marianna Spring
Jennifer McKiernan
Penny Mordaunt has commissioned a booklet for MPs on conspiracy theories.
File:House of Commons The Regulation of Geoengineering 2009 to 2010.pdfReport10 March 2010Science and Technology Select CommitteeFifth report of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee on the regulation of geoengineering - 2009-10 session.
File:Owning the Weather.pdfpaper1 August 1996Col Tamzy J. House
James B. Near Jr.
Lt Col William B. Shields
Ronald J. Celentano
David M. Husband
Ann E. Mercer
James E. Pugh
An official document of the US Air Force dealing with research and development of weather modification programs on a 25 year view. Its publication coincided with the start of an upsurge in public awareness and disquiet about 'Chemtrails'
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



Refrences

  1. https://web.archive.org/web/20100703201645/http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch3en/conc3en/evolairtransport.html
  2. http://www.lavanguardia.com/medio-ambiente/20121119/54354620686/nuves-artificiales-mas-frecuentes-trafico-aereo.html saved via archive.is
  3. https://actualidad.rt.com/opinion/iluminando_conciencias/view/4639-Chemtrails-y-Cambio-Climatico.
  4. http://archive.today/2020.05.27-194925/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management
  5. http://archive.today/2019.07.27-171820/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_Particle_Injection_for_Climate_Engineering
  6. https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/16m_2010_aurora_flight_sciences_geoengineering_cost_analysis_final_report_october_30_2010-pdf.12497/ saved at Archive.org
  7. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1605/policy-implications-of-greenhouse-warming-mitigation-adaptation-and-the-science
  8. http://archive.today/2014.05.13-155447/http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=/2005/8/23/nation/11845177&sec=nation
  9. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084011/pdf
  10. https://media.defense.gov/2017/May/05/2001743003/-1/-1/0/OP_69_SHANNON_FINDING_SHAPE_SPACE.PDF
  11. https://web.archive.org/web/20140418165026/http://www.wired.com/2007/11/china-leads-wea
  12. https://www.bundeswehr.de/resource/blob/140534/0e09f412cb61da2bef8e5279772c31e3/geo-data.pdf saved at Archive.org
  13. https://www.regenauer.press/wetter-als-waffe saved at Archive.org saved at Archive.is
  14. http://www.globalresearch.org/chemtrails-the-consequences-of-toxic-metals-and-chemical-aerosols-on-human-health/19047
  15. A list of patents that are argued to be related to weather modification on a website dedicated to the topic of geoengineering.
  16. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/Solar-Radiation-Modification-research-deployment - PDF
  17. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2023/JOIN_2023_19_1_EN_ACT_part1_v7.pdf
  18. "Florida Republican Senator has introduced SB 56" - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/florida-republican-lawmaker-introduces-legislation-ban-weather-engineering/