Difference between revisions of "Team Worst Case Scenario"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+Gates)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|image_width=540px
 
|image_width=540px
 
|interests=COVID-19/Panic
 
|interests=COVID-19/Panic
|members=Geert Vanden Bossche, John Campbell, Alina Chan, Paul Cotrell, Peter Daszak, Eric Feigl-Ding, Kim DotCom, Richard Ebright, Anthony Fauci, Neil Ferguson, Sam Harris, Mary Holland, Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Kevin McKernan, Meryl Nass, Angela Rasmussen, Joe Rogan, George Webb, Bret Weinstein  
+
|members=Geert Vanden Bossche, John Campbell, Alina Chan, Paul Cotrell, Peter Daszak, Eric Feigl-Ding, Kim DotCom, Richard Ebright, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Neil Ferguson, Sam Harris, Mary Holland, Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Kevin McKernan, Meryl Nass, Angela Rasmussen, Joe Rogan, Jessica Rose, George Webb, Eric Weinstein, Bret Weinstein  
 
}}
 
}}
'''"Team Worst Case Scenario"''', occasionally Team [[Robert Malone],  is a name coined by [[J. Jay Couey]] to describe a (fairly loosely defined) coalition<ref>i.e. a set of separate but aligned groups</ref> who worked for years or even decades to stoke [[fear of COVID-19]].  
+
'''"Team Worst Case Scenario"''', occasionally Team [[Robert Malone]],  is a name coined by [[J. Jay Couey]] to describe a (fairly loosely defined) coalition<ref>i.e. a set of separate but aligned groups</ref> who worked for years or even decades to stoke [[fear of COVID-19]].  
  
 
Some  [[academic]]s were active since long before 2020, promoting fear of zoonotic jumps, or of engineered viruses. [[Journalist]]s typically had shorter set up processes. Most became publicly active around [[March 2020]] to help launch the new "pandemic threat". They consistently presented apocalyptic but quite unfounded scenarios. In 2021/2022, as the mass deaths from COVID-19 that they had forecast failed to appear and fear of COVID-19 subsided, they mostly switched focus to issuing dire warnings about subsequent pandemics.  
 
Some  [[academic]]s were active since long before 2020, promoting fear of zoonotic jumps, or of engineered viruses. [[Journalist]]s typically had shorter set up processes. Most became publicly active around [[March 2020]] to help launch the new "pandemic threat". They consistently presented apocalyptic but quite unfounded scenarios. In 2021/2022, as the mass deaths from COVID-19 that they had forecast failed to appear and fear of COVID-19 subsided, they mostly switched focus to issuing dire warnings about subsequent pandemics.  

Latest revision as of 16:18, 9 December 2024

Group.png "Team Worst Case Scenario"Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Gigaohm Biological on How the Pandemic was created - 2023-12-23 - Dark Days before Xmas.jpg
J. Jay Couey on How the Pandemic was created - 2023-12-23
InterestsCOVID-19/Panic
Interest ofJonathan Jay Couey, Amazing Polly
Membership• Geert Vanden Bossche.webp Geert Vanden Bossche
•  John Campbell
•  Alina Chan
•  Paul Cotrell
• Peter Daszak.jpg Peter Daszak
• Eric Feigl-Ding.jpg Eric Feigl-Ding
•  Kim DotCom
•  Richard Ebright
• Anthony Fauci.jpg Anthony Fauci
• Gates9900.jpg Bill Gates
• Nial Ferguson.jpg Neil Ferguson
•  Sam Harris
•  Mary Holland
• Steve Kirsch.jpg Steve Kirsch
• R W Malone.png Robert Malone
•  Kevin McKernan
•  Meryl Nass
•  Angela Rasmussen
• Joe Rogan.jpg Joe Rogan
•  Jessica Rose
• George Webb.jpg George Webb
•  Eric Weinstein
• Bret Weinstein.png Bret Weinstein

"Team Worst Case Scenario", occasionally Team Robert Malone, is a name coined by J. Jay Couey to describe a (fairly loosely defined) coalition[1] who worked for years or even decades to stoke fear of COVID-19.

Some academics were active since long before 2020, promoting fear of zoonotic jumps, or of engineered viruses. Journalists typically had shorter set up processes. Most became publicly active around March 2020 to help launch the new "pandemic threat". They consistently presented apocalyptic but quite unfounded scenarios. In 2021/2022, as the mass deaths from COVID-19 that they had forecast failed to appear and fear of COVID-19 subsided, they mostly switched focus to issuing dire warnings about subsequent pandemics.

Activities

In the run up to the launching of COVID-19, the narrative of the killer pandemic was widely seeded since about 2002, and academic papers talked of viruses' "pandemic potential". Pandemic planning exercises roleplayed the release of killer viruses,both naturally occuring and engineered. The theme also featured prominently in popular culture.

2000s and 2010s

The academic literature began to accumulate references to the "pandemic potential" of coronaviruses in animals. Considerable sums were disbursed to examine this, including so-called "gain-of-function" efforts to weaponise viruses.

2019

Usual suspects including Bill Gates and Peter Daszak appeared in a documentary entitled The Next Pandemic about a disease from China with the potential to cause millions of deaths. On 19 December for episode 8 of his Dark Horse Podcast, Bret Weinstein interviewed Sam Harris about jab mandation in the face of a hypothetical airborne virus with a 70% case fatality rate.

2020

In early 2020, dire predictions about COVID-19 abounded. Many members of the team helped to seed the panic, to prepare the public for the coming COVID lockdowns "to slow the spread". Echoing his activities as regards earlier "pandemic threats" such as swine flu, UCL's Neil Ferguson made repeated disastrous predictions about deaths which would occur if unprecedented restrictions on personal freedom (especially lockdowns were not adhered to strictly).

2021

On 11 June 2021 in a widely censored[citation needed] but mysteriously viral video entitled Saving The World In 3 Easy Steps, Bret Weinstein interviewed Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. This was important in raising the profile of all three. In highlighting the hypocricy of ignoring existing drugs such as ivermectin the discussion broke from the official narrative at the time (which declared that no such drugs existed) but the contention that COVID-19 presented a huge threat to public health was never called into question.

2022

As awareness began to spread widely that COVID-19 was not the great killer pandemic it was initially marketed as, members of team worst case scenario came from a variety of perspectives to unite around the prediction that a future pandemic would be.

2023

Several members of the team attended a conference in Romania to which independent COVID dissidents such as Denis Rancourt were also invited. Subsequently they were remarkably incurious about some of his findings (such as the lack of evidence of spread, and the 2020 iatrogenic murders) instead choosing to echo his statistics about deaths due to the COVID jabs.

Modus operandi

The group members tend to project doomsday worst case scenario, promoting fear of Covid by exaggerating dangers and risks. Several of them cite each other or appear together on podcasts. They typically have a narrow field of interest. They rarely put Covid, or Covid deaths in a wider context or comment critically on one another's chosen angle.

Topics

One characteristic of the group, says Couey, is the sharp avoidance of a number of third rail topics.

Third rails

Members of the group never question the dangers of gain-of-function viruses, or review the evidence that SARS-COV-2 is a novel cause of death, as described by the official narrative. They do not teach much basic biology beyond what is needed to appreciate their fear du jour. Contradictory evidence is ignored.

Virus Origins

Almost all initial coverage by commercially-controlled media aggressively promoted the theory that COVID-19 emerged zoonotically from a wet market in Wuhan, ignoring the proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Later the media pivoted to suggesting that the virus was a product of "gain of function" research, a theory echoed by several members of "Team Worst Case Scenario" who suggested that therefore the virus would likely be particularly serious and unpredictable. It was widely suggested that surviving an initial infection might not confer long lasting immunity against subsequent infections.

Jab Dangers

Several members of the team talk at length about the dangers of the COVID jabs. Often they have a relatively narrow focus, such as DNA impurities or the danger of injecting people as regards evolutionary pressure on the virus.

Exposure

J. Jay Couey reports that after personal contact with many people making public pronouncements about COVID-19 he gradually felt forced to conclude that their statements -- and their silences -- were far less independent than he had initially assumed. He inferred that (possibly unbeknownst to some of them) they were part of a coalition formed with a single main purpose, to support the COVID-19 official narrative by stoking fear of COVID-19, and of the "pandemic threat" in general. He named the group "Team Worst Case Scenario" in late 2023. Since then Couey published a series of broadcasts highlighting the roles of different members of the group, noting how different group members apparently seemed coordinated in 2020, generally unsurprised by the goings on, but highly exorcised about a few aspects, new stepping back to give a bigger picture.[2]

"Dream Team Narrative Police"

Deep politics analyst Amazing Polly pointed out a push to corral everyone who spoke out against the Covid "pandemic", especially "conservatives" into a single group with strongly defined leaders. According to her, the way this works is through a crosspromotional "New Narrative Gatekeepers Network" or a "phony Dream Team of 'covid dissidents'", where the financial benefits from crosspromotion made the content producers dependent on each other, herding them into the same focus areas. The bigger the exposure, the more money they will receive from especially X and Rumble. Paypal mafia member Peter Thiel is a big investor in Rumble, while Elon Musk controls Twitter/X[3].

While not claiming any of them were controlled opposition assets, she mentioned many of the same people as in Team Worst Case Scenario, like Robert Malone, Bret Weinstein, Joe Rogan but also more broadly Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro (Daily Wire), Russell Brand, Youtube Doctor John Campbell, Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate and many others being "corralled" this way[3].


 

Known members

11 of the 23 of the members already have pages here:

MemberDescription
Geert Vanden BosscheBelgian vaccine developer who came out strongly against the Covid-jabs pushed by his former employer the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Peter DaszakA "completely discredited, conflict-plagued", "longtime partner" of Zhengli Shi, moved US money to the WIV to weaponise bat coronaviruses but didn't mention this in the influential joint statement he secretly got published in The Lancet to promote the "lone bat" theory. Later "investigated" COVID-19's origins.
Anthony FauciHealth bureaucrat who has a preference for vaccines over other drugs. Covid-19 taskforce leader.
Neil FergusonAcademic used by the UK deep state to create frightening epidemiological models. In 2020 his group promoted the UK COVID Lockdown. Resigned from the SAGE after breaking the lockdown rules.
Bill GatesMulti-billionaire computer businessman, was "very close" to Epstein, Pushing a mass vaccination agenda in 2021. Called a Napoleon and drug trafficker repeatedly caught by the court of Washington D.C in the early 2000s.
Steve KirschAmerican serial entrepreneur and from 2020, a COVID-19/Dissident.
Robert MaloneEarly researcher into mRNA vaccine technology, close connections to DARPA, memory-holed from the Internet after expressing safety concerns and ethical opposition to mandation of the COVID-19 Vaccines.
Joe RoganHost of the world's most popular podcast. He frequently dissents from the Official narrative.
Jessica RoseA "COVID dissident"
George Webb
Bret Weinstein
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.