Difference between revisions of "Transatlantic"
(expanding NATO) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{concept | {{concept | ||
| + | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transatlantic | ||
|constitutes=elite concept to concentrate power | |constitutes=elite concept to concentrate power | ||
| − | |description= | + | |description=Across [[Europe]] and [[North America]] |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
The [[Atlantic Council]] (by far the strongest member of the [[Atlantic Treaty Association]]), is a nominally independent supporting think-tank for NATO. Its tentacles (shown by who are board members and experts) reaches into all aspects of media ([[Rupert Murdoch|Murdoch media]],[[Reuters]], entertainment ([[Hollywood]], computer games..), politics, the economy and intelligence services, and is one of the leading organizers of transatlantic propaganda. | The [[Atlantic Council]] (by far the strongest member of the [[Atlantic Treaty Association]]), is a nominally independent supporting think-tank for NATO. Its tentacles (shown by who are board members and experts) reaches into all aspects of media ([[Rupert Murdoch|Murdoch media]],[[Reuters]], entertainment ([[Hollywood]], computer games..), politics, the economy and intelligence services, and is one of the leading organizers of transatlantic propaganda. | ||
| − | ==Transatlantic Networks== | + | ==Transatlantic Elite Networks== |
| − | If politicians or | + | If politicians, journalists, CEOs or academics are heard to profess their faith in "transatlantic values" or the "international community", one can be sure that they are members of one or multiple transatlantic elite networks. To not be part, makes a successful career in any field significantly harder. |
| − | In the decade after WW2, the United States founded or financed a myriad of conferences, foundations, fellowships, organizations, groups, networks, exchanges etc. Particularly the new leadership in the occupied countries, Italy and Germany, were thoroughly joined to the transatlantic networks. For Germany, the most prominent of these was the [[Atlantik-Brücke]], founded 1952. | + | In the decade after WW2, the United States founded or financed a myriad of national and transnational conferences, foundations, fellowships, organizations, groups, networks, exchanges etc. In addition, extensive intelligence activities have been directed at strengthening this political ideology and pushing out competing ideas. |
| + | |||
| + | It is a trait of this effort that the general population is relatively unaware of the actual extent of this elite networking, it being either secret, private, or formally public but not highlighted, since central media personalities are part of this elite. So a governing elite with a core of maybe a few thousand people on both side of the Atlantic, who each participates in several seminars, gatherings, or are members of Foundations etc, where all participants invited are within a narrow band of acceptable ideas (military, economic), are busy among themselves creating and effectuating plans that don't reflect democratic wishes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Particularly the new leadership in the occupied countries, Italy and Germany, were thoroughly joined to the transatlantic networks. For Germany, the most prominent of these was the [[Atlantik-Brücke]], founded 1952. | ||
The rest of Western Europe, made economically dependent through the [[Marshall Plan]], the most prominent transatlantic network is the [[Bilderberg Conference]], since 1954, but it is but by no means the only one. | The rest of Western Europe, made economically dependent through the [[Marshall Plan]], the most prominent transatlantic network is the [[Bilderberg Conference]], since 1954, but it is but by no means the only one. | ||
| − | The UK has, for example, the [[Ditchley Foundation]] conferences and the [[British-American Project]], nominally an equal partnership, but dominated by the most powerful country. | + | The UK has, for example, the US/Canadian/British [[Ditchley Foundation]] conferences and the [[British-American Project]], nominally an equal partnership, but dominated by the most powerful country. |
The European unification movement was not seen as a power challenge, and was indeed in large parts sponsored by the United States. | The European unification movement was not seen as a power challenge, and was indeed in large parts sponsored by the United States. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:07, 27 November 2021
The adjective transatlantic refers to the historic, cultural, political, economic and social relations between countries on both side of the Atlantic Ocean. In post-WW2 power terms, it particularly means the relationship between the the (dominant) United States and European countries or organizations, most prominently through NATO.
It is sometimes interchangeably used with the terms "the West", or "the First World","the international community" or "developed countries", in the old days, "civilized countries" or "white countries". Canada is integral a part, and even Australia, while Muslim Turkey has never been fully accepted.
Contents
History
After WW2, the United States created a multitude of initiatives to maintain control over Western Europe, by the State Department, the CIA and other, formally private, initiatives.
NATO and Atlantic Council
NATO
.svg)
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), founded 1949, is the main pillar in the transatlantic relationship. Nominally a partnership, it is dominated by its main sponsor, the United States. It has a European General Secretary, but the real power in NATO lies with the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR),the commander of NATO's Allied Command Operations (ACO) and head of ACO's headquarters, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE).
By utilizing the European economic and military resources, it makes a U.S global power projection easier. As NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg pointed out "A strong NATO is good for Europe and it's also good for the United States," he said. "The U.S. presence in Europe helps to protect Europe but it also helps the United States project power to the Middle East, to Africa."[1]
And as former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said, "NATO was a new type of partnership: unlike the shifting alliances of convenience, which had brought so much tragedy upon Europe, NATO was permanent. It was democratic.And it was transatlantic....North America and Europe will remain the world's strongest community of like-minded nations: democratic, outward-looking, and with a sense of global responsibility. No other community of nations can generate such a powerful positive momentum..In short, NATO was unlike any other alliance in the past.....NATO remains the institutional foundation for this community."[2]
The Atlantic Council
The Atlantic Council (by far the strongest member of the Atlantic Treaty Association), is a nominally independent supporting think-tank for NATO. Its tentacles (shown by who are board members and experts) reaches into all aspects of media (Murdoch media,Reuters, entertainment (Hollywood, computer games..), politics, the economy and intelligence services, and is one of the leading organizers of transatlantic propaganda.
Transatlantic Elite Networks
If politicians, journalists, CEOs or academics are heard to profess their faith in "transatlantic values" or the "international community", one can be sure that they are members of one or multiple transatlantic elite networks. To not be part, makes a successful career in any field significantly harder.
In the decade after WW2, the United States founded or financed a myriad of national and transnational conferences, foundations, fellowships, organizations, groups, networks, exchanges etc. In addition, extensive intelligence activities have been directed at strengthening this political ideology and pushing out competing ideas.
It is a trait of this effort that the general population is relatively unaware of the actual extent of this elite networking, it being either secret, private, or formally public but not highlighted, since central media personalities are part of this elite. So a governing elite with a core of maybe a few thousand people on both side of the Atlantic, who each participates in several seminars, gatherings, or are members of Foundations etc, where all participants invited are within a narrow band of acceptable ideas (military, economic), are busy among themselves creating and effectuating plans that don't reflect democratic wishes.
Particularly the new leadership in the occupied countries, Italy and Germany, were thoroughly joined to the transatlantic networks. For Germany, the most prominent of these was the Atlantik-Brücke, founded 1952.
The rest of Western Europe, made economically dependent through the Marshall Plan, the most prominent transatlantic network is the Bilderberg Conference, since 1954, but it is but by no means the only one.
The UK has, for example, the US/Canadian/British Ditchley Foundation conferences and the British-American Project, nominally an equal partnership, but dominated by the most powerful country.
The European unification movement was not seen as a power challenge, and was indeed in large parts sponsored by the United States.
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annalena Baerbock | “As European democracies and part of a transatlantic democratic alliance, we are also in systemic competition with an authoritarian regime like China” | Annalena Baerbock | 5 December 2021 |
| Brussels Forum/2014 | “The ultimate soft power instrument in the world is the Brussels Forum” | Carl Bildt | 2014 |
| Klaus von Dohnányi | “Today, Germany and Europe are not sovereign when it comes to security and foreign policy. It's the US that is leading the way here in Europe. Do they also pursue our interests? Are they leading Europe into a peaceful future in terms of foreign and security policy? I have doubts"” | Klaus von Dohnányi | August 2022 |
| Jane Hill | “The annual [ British-American Project ] conference is an experience like no other – stimulating, challenging, always fun.” | Jane Hill | 2005 |
| Kori Schake | “And in addition, even in shrewdly strategic terms, for 5 percent of U.S. Defense spending last year and zero American military casualties, the Ukrainians are destroying the Russian army and that is absolutely in America's interests.” | Kori Schake | 21 May 2023 |
| Maria Zakharova | “NATO countries, and the Secretary General in particular, do not make decisions in the alliance because the United States dominates the organization. "In this structure, not even the member states decide anything, let alone the Secretary General. The Americans run everything.” | Maria Zakharova | 26 June 2024 |
