Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:About"
m (Text replacement - "WikiSpooks" to "Wikispooks") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{HelpSection|image=Wikispooks logo FAQ.png}} | {{HelpSection|image=Wikispooks logo FAQ.png}} | ||
− | <big><big>''''' | + | <big><big>'''''Wikispooks'' is an [[Project:Licensing|open licensed]], [[Project:Site_Backup|open source]] encyclopedia of [[deep politics]]. This whole site is [[project:Site Backup|freely downloadable]].'''<ref><u class="plainlinks">[[image:compressed.gif|link={{server}}/backups/wikispooks-latest.zip]][{{server}}/backups/wikispooks-latest.zip <code>wikispooks-latest.zip</code>]</u> (~{{BackupSize}})</ref></big></big><br/> |
''Our {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} [[Wikispooks:Editor Undertakings|registered editors]] have made {{formatnum:{{#expr: {{NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}}-{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Document]]|format=count}}}}}} pages ({{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Person]]|format=count}}}} [[people]], {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Group]]|format=count}}}} [[group]]s, {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Event]]|format=count}}}} [[event]]s... ) supplemented by {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Document]]|format=count}}}} third party [[document]]s.''<br/><hr/> | ''Our {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} [[Wikispooks:Editor Undertakings|registered editors]] have made {{formatnum:{{#expr: {{NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}}-{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Document]]|format=count}}}}}} pages ({{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Person]]|format=count}}}} [[people]], {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Group]]|format=count}}}} [[group]]s, {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Event]]|format=count}}}} [[event]]s... ) supplemented by {{formatnum:{{#ask: [[Has objectClass::Document]]|format=count}}}} third party [[document]]s.''<br/><hr/> | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Wikispooks''' was established in [[Project:History|2010]] as a collaborative space for the joint re-examination of recent [[history]].<ref>[[Project:Site Rationale]]</ref> We research [[people]] and [[group]]s not subject to proper scrutiny by [[corporate media]] and as such, poorly treated by [[Wikipedia]]. Wikispooks is particularly focused on those {{on}}s which do not seem to fit the facts, such as the [[9/11]] [[event]] and [[concept]]s such as the "[[war on terror]]" or the "[[war on drugs]]". |
==Why Wikispooks?== | ==Why Wikispooks?== | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Editorial Policy == | == Editorial Policy == | ||
− | {{FA| | + | {{FA|Wikispooks:Editorial Policy}} |
− | + | Wikispooks does ''not'' assume good faith on the part of [[authorities]]. If observable reality conflicts with the {{on}}, the former deserves priority. Especially in the case of [[deep politics]], official narratives deserve a close scrutiny which the {{ccm}} seldom if ever gives them.<ref>For more on this, see [[Media Lens]], a media-monitoring website.</ref> Wikispooks therefore does ''not'' aim for [[Wikipedia]]'s (status-quo friendly) "Neutral Point of View".<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPOV Wikipedia - 'Neutral Point of View']</ref> Since newspapers and broadcasters ([[Edwin_P._Wilson#Overturning_the_conviction|like governments]]) can and do [[Corporate media#Mendacity|lie with impunity]], it is naive to assume mere publication of information to be a ''reliable'' indication of veracity. | |
== Where To Start? == | == Where To Start? == | ||
− | {{FAs| | + | {{FAs|Wikispooks:FAQ|Wikispooks:Glossary}} |
To see what we have on a specific topic, try the [[image:search_box.png|128px|alt=Search ⌕]] box in the top right corner of this page. For casual browsing, try this [[Main_Page#tab=_C2_A0Top_Rated|list of top-rated pages]]. Another idea would be to look at the [[Special:MostRevisions|pages with the most revisions]]. For common queries, we have an {{WSLink|FAQ}}. If you feel lucky, try a [[Special:Random|Random article]]. If the language here is new to you, the {{WSLink|glossary}} might help - and should give you an idea of the sort of material here. To ask about a specific page, use the "Discussion" tab to edit its talk page (requires a login). If you have further specific questions, you could {{WSLink|contact}} a site administrator. | To see what we have on a specific topic, try the [[image:search_box.png|128px|alt=Search ⌕]] box in the top right corner of this page. For casual browsing, try this [[Main_Page#tab=_C2_A0Top_Rated|list of top-rated pages]]. Another idea would be to look at the [[Special:MostRevisions|pages with the most revisions]]. For common queries, we have an {{WSLink|FAQ}}. If you feel lucky, try a [[Special:Random|Random article]]. If the language here is new to you, the {{WSLink|glossary}} might help - and should give you an idea of the sort of material here. To ask about a specific page, use the "Discussion" tab to edit its talk page (requires a login). If you have further specific questions, you could {{WSLink|contact}} a site administrator. | ||
== Acknowledgements == | == Acknowledgements == | ||
− | {{FA| | + | {{FA|Wikispooks:Acknowledgments}} |
Wikispooks is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, including [[Cryptome]], [[Wikileaks]], [[Deep Politics Forum|The Deep Politics Forum]], [[SpinProfiles]], [[SourceWatch]] and last but not least, that keeper of the {{on}} on the internet, [[Wikipedia]], with which it shares a common software platform, MediaWiki.<ref>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki on MediaWiki]</ref> | Wikispooks is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, including [[Cryptome]], [[Wikileaks]], [[Deep Politics Forum|The Deep Politics Forum]], [[SpinProfiles]], [[SourceWatch]] and last but not least, that keeper of the {{on}} on the internet, [[Wikipedia]], with which it shares a common software platform, MediaWiki.<ref>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki on MediaWiki]</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
− | {{Template: | + | {{Template:Wikispooks Footer/About}} |
− | [[Category:About | + | [[Category:About Wikispooks| ]] |
Revision as of 17:28, 14 October 2018
Wikispooks is an open licensed, open source encyclopedia of deep politics. This whole site is freely downloadable.[1]
Our 886 registered editors have made 31,230 pages (13,658 people, 4,949 groups, 1,393 events... ) supplemented by 2,316 third party documents.
Wikispooks was established in 2010 as a collaborative space for the joint re-examination of recent history.[2] We research people and groups not subject to proper scrutiny by corporate media and as such, poorly treated by Wikipedia. Wikispooks is particularly focused on those official narratives which do not seem to fit the facts, such as the 9/11 event and concepts such as the "war on terror" or the "war on drugs".
Contents
Why Wikispooks?
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
We are an open source wiki, so unlike Wikipedia all changes to pages are recorded and publicly available. Wikispooks has no bias towards commercially-controlled media or such other establishment institutions - sources are welcomed to the extent that they help shed light on the murky business of deep politics, which by design aims to be difficult to fathom. As a 100% volunteer project, Wikispooks is not beholden to the special interests which define the corporate media.
What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?
- Full article: Wikipedia/Problems
- Full article: Wikipedia/Problems
Wikipedia's editorial policies give it a blind spot on deep political matters, so information there is superficial at best. Its faith in the official narrative as promulgated by "reliable" (i.e. establishment-controlled) sources makes it just one more corporate media source, of the kind which Operation Mockingbird has been targeting for decades. Moreover it is censored and as of February 2018 its robots.txt file disallowed archival programs from recording page histories, so as to obscure its censorship.
Editorial Policy
- Full article: Wikispooks:Editorial Policy
- Full article: Wikispooks:Editorial Policy
Wikispooks does not assume good faith on the part of authorities. If observable reality conflicts with the official narrative, the former deserves priority. Especially in the case of deep politics, official narratives deserve a close scrutiny which the commercially-controlled media seldom if ever gives them.[4] Wikispooks therefore does not aim for Wikipedia's (status-quo friendly) "Neutral Point of View".[5] Since newspapers and broadcasters (like governments) can and do lie with impunity, it is naive to assume mere publication of information to be a reliable indication of veracity.
Where To Start?
- Full articles: Wikispooks:FAQ, Wikispooks:Glossary
- Full articles: Wikispooks:FAQ, Wikispooks:Glossary
To see what we have on a specific topic, try the box in the top right corner of this page. For casual browsing, try this list of top-rated pages. Another idea would be to look at the pages with the most revisions. For common queries, we have an FAQ. If you feel lucky, try a Random article. If the language here is new to you, the glossary might help - and should give you an idea of the sort of material here. To ask about a specific page, use the "Discussion" tab to edit its talk page (requires a login). If you have further specific questions, you could contact a site administrator.
Acknowledgements
- Full article: Wikispooks:Acknowledgments
- Full article: Wikispooks:Acknowledgments
Wikispooks is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, including Cryptome, Wikileaks, The Deep Politics Forum, SpinProfiles, SourceWatch and last but not least, that keeper of the official narrative on the internet, Wikipedia, with which it shares a common software platform, MediaWiki.[6]
References
- ↑
wikispooks-latest.zip
(~13 Gb) - ↑ Project:Site Rationale
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suicide_of_Vince_Foster&offset=&limit=500&action=history
- ↑ For more on this, see Media Lens, a media-monitoring website.
- ↑ Wikipedia - 'Neutral Point of View'
- ↑ MediaWiki on MediaWiki
| ||||||
|