Difference between revisions of "International Court of Justice"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Stub) |
(Slight expand) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice | |wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice | ||
|website=http://www.icj-cij.org | |website=http://www.icj-cij.org | ||
| + | |description=The international court charged with preventing war crimes which is constitutionally unable to carry out its mission as regards the permanent members of the UN security council (and their allies) which are also (more or less) the world's most active weapons producers and wagers of illegal war. | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Established in 1945 by the UN Charter, the Court began work in 1946 as the successor to the [[Permanent Court of International Justice]]. | + | Established in 1945 by the [[UN/Charter]], the Court began work in 1946 as the successor to the [[Permanent Court of International Justice]]. |
| + | |||
==Problems== | ==Problems== | ||
| − | In 1986, After the court ruled that the | + | In 1986, After the court ruled that the [[United States]]'s covert war against [[Nicaragua]] violated international law, the US simply withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction. Although Chapter XIV of the UN Charter authorizes the [[Security Council]] to enforce court rulings, such enforcement is subject to the [[veto]] power of the five permanent members of the council, so the United States simply vetoed enforcement of the case, allowing it to avoid the effective sanction of the ICJ. |
| − | The court has ignored obvious evidence of illegality in connection with the 2003 [[Iraq War]], notably when the [[Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission]] found [[Tony Blair]] and a bunch of [[US]] government officials | + | The court has ignored obvious evidence of illegality in connection with the 2003 [[Iraq War]], notably when the [[Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission]] found [[Tony Blair]] and a bunch of [[US]] government officials guilty of [[war crime]]s. |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 11 March 2015
 International Court of Justice  (Court)    | |
|---|---|
| Formation | 1945 |
| Parent organization | UN |
| Type | •  legal• international |
| The international court charged with preventing war crimes which is constitutionally unable to carry out its mission as regards the permanent members of the UN security council (and their allies) which are also (more or less) the world's most active weapons producers and wagers of illegal war. | |
Contents
Background
Established in 1945 by the UN/Charter, the Court began work in 1946 as the successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice.
Problems
In 1986, After the court ruled that the United States's covert war against Nicaragua violated international law, the US simply withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction. Although Chapter XIV of the UN Charter authorizes the Security Council to enforce court rulings, such enforcement is subject to the veto power of the five permanent members of the council, so the United States simply vetoed enforcement of the case, allowing it to avoid the effective sanction of the ICJ.
The court has ignored obvious evidence of illegality in connection with the 2003 Iraq War, notably when the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission found Tony Blair and a bunch of US government officials guilty of war crimes.
A Document by International Court of Justice
| Title | Document type | Publication date | Subject(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:South Africa institutes Genocide Convention proceedings against Israel | statement | 29 December 2023 | Israel South Africa Occupied Palestinian Territory International Court of Justice Genocide Convention Israeli–Palestinian conflict 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict | South Africa's 84-page Application instituting Genocide Convention proceedings against Israel |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Craig Murray | “The International Court of Justice has stated definitively that the Israeli occupation is illegal and it is the duty of states not to support it. Yet in UK law it is perfectly legal to state that you support the IDF and hope that they kill all the Palestinians in Gaza But it is illegal in the UK - and carries 14 years in jail - to express support for named Palestinian organisations engaged, legally in international law, in armed resistance to illegal occupation.” | Craig Murray | 20 August 2024 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:A Devastating Indictment of Israel’s War on Gaza | Article | 11 January 2024 | Mike Small Roshdi Sarraj | |
| Document:Dikgang Moseneke to join bench of judges in Israel-Hamas world court case | Article | 5 January 2024 | Kgaugelo Masweneng | Should presiding American Judge Joan Donoghue recuse herself when it comes to determining whether US staunch ally Israel has committed genocide in Gaza? |
| Document:Ex-Israeli Supreme Court chief Aharon Barak appointed as ICJ judge for genocide case | Article | 8 January 2024 | The New Arab Staff | Aharon Barak argued that the rules of collateral damage permit the killing of Palestinian fighters even if led to the deaths of children. This was approved by Barak himself in a 2006 Supreme Court ruling, as cited in a report by a Canadian news outlet. |
| Document:Existence vs Expansion | blog post | 21 July 2024 | Craig Murray | The International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion is extremely lucid and decisive. The ball is now back in the court of the UN General Assembly, which requested the Opinion. The General Assembly now should move to suspend Israel’s membership of the United Nations. That is the next project on which I shall be working. |
| Document:Has International Law Survived, or Has the Western Political Class Killed It? | blog post | 28 January 2024 | Craig Murray | Now think of this: the very next day after President Herzog made a genocidal statement, as determined by the International Court of Justice, he was met and offered “full support” by Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission and Roberta Metsola, President of the European Parliament |
| Document:ICC prosecutor says world leaders 'threatened' him over Israel arrest warrants | Article | 5 September 2024 | News Desk | “Target Israel, and we will target you,” US Senators, led by Tom Cotton, warned in the letter. “Such actions are illegitimate and lack legal basis, and, if carried out, will result in severe sanctions against you and your institution.” Senators Mitch McConnell (minority leader), Rick Scott, Tim Scott, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio also signed the letter. |
| Document:ICJ to decide on emergency measures in Israel-Gaza genocide case this week | Article | 24 January 2024 | Al Jazeera staff | South Africa’s Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor will travel to The Hague to be present at the International Court of Justice as it rules on the Israeli genocide in Gaza. |
| Document:International justice: the South African complaint against Israel for “genocide” in Gaza | Article | 10 January 2024 | United Nations Regional Information Centre for Western Europe | |
| Document:Israel Goes to Court for the Crime of Genocide | Article | 12 January 2024 | Philip Giraldi | The plan by America’s “best friend” and “closest ally” to nuke the world even has a name: the “Samson Option,” recalling how the Biblical strongman Samson brought down the temple where the Philistines were mocking him, killing thousands of them. |
| Document:Jeremy Corbyn leads cross-party push in Parliament for immediate recognition of Palestine | Article | 4 September 2024 | Joe Connor | Early Day Motion 71 "Calls on HM Government to immediately recognise the state of Palestine in accordance with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 2024, which recognised that the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip constitute a single territorial unit the integrity of which is to be respected." |
| Document:On Gaza, Sunak's Tories and Starmer's Labour have merged into a single pro-war party | Article | 22 January 2024 | Peter Oborne | If the ICJ rules in South Africa’s favour then Rishi Sunak, as well as US President Joe Biden, will be wide open to the charge that they are aiding and abetting genocide. And so will Labour’s Keir Starmer. |
| Document:Only a failing US empire would be so blind as to cheer Netanyahu and his genocide | Article | 26 July 2024 | Jonathan Cook | Members of the US Congress roared “USA!” to their satrap from Israel, just as Roman senators once roared “Glory!” to generals whose victories they assumed would continue forever. Every empire falls. Its collapse becomes inevitable once its rulers lose all sense of how absurd and abhorrent they have become. |
| Document:Open Letter To The Judges Of The International Criminal Court | Letter | 7 October 2024 | Yanis Varoufakis Brian Eno | |
| Document:Returning the Sausages | Article | 24 September 2024 | Mike Small | "Keir Starmer’s speech to conference was one of the most stage-managed and vapid addresses I’ve ever seen. It’s not enough to have hollowed out his party, the idea of being a protestor – or having values – or even using accurate language to describe the horrors going on in Gaza must be banned and mocked." |
| Document:South Africa institutes Genocide Convention proceedings against Israel | statement | 29 December 2023 | International Court of Justice | South Africa's 84-page Application instituting Genocide Convention proceedings against Israel |
| Document:South Africa’s Case Was a Display of International Solidarity - We Should Support It | Article | 12 January 2024 | Jeremy Corbyn | At the International Court of Justice, South Africa spoke on behalf of the billions of people who oppose Israel's genocide in Gaza — and put Western governments to shame for their deplorable complicity. |
| Document:The Presence of Evil | blog post | 25 July 2024 | Craig Murray | Netanyahu’s slanderous attacks on the institutions of international law were applauded to the rafters by America’s political leaders. The whole world was watching, and took note. The Zionist project per se is evil. To steal another people’s land and subject them to long and progressive genocide is about as evil a deed as can be imagined. |
| Document:To continue the Gaza genocide, Israel and the US must destroy the laws of war | Article | 31 May 2024 | Jonathan Cook | Now, as Netanyahu and Gallant risk being put in the dock at The Hague, Washington is finally finding its resolve to act. Not to stop genocide. But to offer Israel protection to carry on. |
| Document:Watch the West continue to make a mockery of international law | blog post | 19 July 2024 | Jonathan Cook | The World Court concludes that the Palestinians are owed massive reparations. At a bare minimum, western governments must recognise the state of Palestine and impose sanctions on Israel until it withdraws from the occupied territories. |
| Document:Your Man in the Hague (In a Good Way) Part 1 | blog post | 11 January 2024 | Craig Murray | The fact of genocide is incontrovertible and had been plainly set out. But several of the Judges are desperate to find a way to please the USA and Israel and avoid countering the current Zionist narrative, the adoption of which is necessary to keep your feet comfortably under the table of the elite. |
| Document:Your Man in the Hague (In a Good Way) Part 2 | blog post | 14 January 2024 | Craig Murray | "These two days in the Hague were absolutely crucial for deciding if there is any meaning left in notions of international law and human rights. I still believe action by the Court could cause the US and UK to back off and provide some measure of relief. For now, let us all pray or wish, each in our way, for the children of Gaza." |
A document sourced from International Court of Justice
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
