Difference between revisions of "US/Department/Homeland Security"
(subgroups) |
(|interests=Copyright) |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{work|Time for an update - Covid, censorship and much more}} | ||
{{group | {{group | ||
|logo=US Department of Homeland Security Seal.svg | |logo=US Department of Homeland Security Seal.svg | ||
− | |wikipedia= | + | |logo_width=490px |
+ | |historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=department_of_homeland_security | ||
+ | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland_Security | ||
|website=http://www.dhs.gov | |website=http://www.dhs.gov | ||
|subgroups=United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection, Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Transportation Security Administration, United States Coast Guard, National Protection and Programs Directorate, United States Secret Service | |subgroups=United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection, Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Transportation Security Administration, United States Coast Guard, National Protection and Programs Directorate, United States Secret Service | ||
− | | | + | |leaders=United States Secretary of Homeland Security |
+ | |sponsors=Abt Associates,Institute for Strategic Dialogue | ||
|start=November 25, 2002 | |start=November 25, 2002 | ||
|description=Planned by the same group who planned the 9/11 attacks, and carried out in their wake, the DoHS is a large department which replaced the existing domestic security, disaster planning and management functions of the US government. | |description=Planned by the same group who planned the 9/11 attacks, and carried out in their wake, the DoHS is a large department which replaced the existing domestic security, disaster planning and management functions of the US government. | ||
+ | |headquarters=Nebraska Avenue Complex, Washington DC, USA | ||
+ | |num_staff=216000 | ||
+ | |sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security | ||
+ | |keywiki=http://www.keywiki.org/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security | ||
+ | |interests=Disaster/Preparation, TOPOFF, Copyright | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | The '''Department of Homeland Security''', wrote [[John Whitehead]] in [[2014]], was established to "prevent terrorist attacks within the United States," but "has grown from a post-[[9/11]] knee-jerk reaction to a leviathan with tentacles in every aspect of American life". The article, entitled ''Has The Department of Homeland Security Become America’s Standing Army?'' began with the claim that "If the United States is a [[US/Police state|police state]], then the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is its national police force, with all the brutality, ineptitude and corruption such a role implies."<ref>https://www.mintpressnews.com/department-homeland-security-become-americas-standing-army/192576/</ref> | ||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
− | In 1998, [[Bill Clinton]] tasked former Senators [[Gary Hart]] and [[Warren Rudman]] to chair the [[U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century]]. The commission panel has been described as "a cross-section of the [[military-industrial-media complex]]".<ref>http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/11/a-trillion-ways-to-build-a-new-military-industrial-complex/</ref> Its members included [[Leslie Gelb]], editor of the [[New York Times]], [[Norman Augustine]], former CEO of [[Lockheed-Martin]] and [[US Army]] General [[John Galvin]]. The panel's report in January 2001 declared that it was not a matter of “if” the U.S. would suffer a mass-casualty terrorist strike but “when.” The panel’s recommendations included the massive integration of all of the domestic security, disaster planning and recovery functions into a single behemoth. After the [[9/11]] [[false flag]] attacks, President [[George W. Bush]] announced the establishment of the The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to coordinate "homeland security" efforts. | + | In [[1998]], [[Bill Clinton]] tasked former Senators [[Gary Hart]] and [[Warren Rudman]] to chair the [[U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century]]. The commission panel has been described as "a cross-section of the [[military-industrial-media complex]]".<ref>http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/11/a-trillion-ways-to-build-a-new-military-industrial-complex/</ref> Its members included [[Leslie Gelb]], editor of the [[New York Times]], [[Norman Augustine]], former CEO of [[Lockheed-Martin]] and [[US Army]] General [[John Galvin]]. The panel's report in January [[2001]] declared that it was not a matter of “if” the U.S. would suffer a mass-casualty terrorist strike but “when.” The panel’s recommendations included the massive integration of all of the domestic security, disaster planning and recovery functions into a single behemoth. After the [[9/11]] [[false flag]] attacks, President [[George W. Bush]] announced the establishment of the The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to coordinate "homeland security" efforts. |
The office was headed by former Pennsylvania Governor [[Tom Ridge]], who assumed the title of [[Assistant to the President for Homeland Security]]. The official announcement stated: | The office was headed by former Pennsylvania Governor [[Tom Ridge]], who assumed the title of [[Assistant to the President for Homeland Security]]. The official announcement stated: | ||
− | {{QB|The mission of the Office will be to develop and coordinate the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist threats or attacks. The Office will coordinate the executive branch's efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks within the United States.<ref name="hsact2002"> | + | {{QB|The mission of the Office will be to develop and coordinate the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist threats or attacks. The Office will coordinate the executive branch's efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks within the United States.<ref name="hsact2002">http://web.archive.org/web/20120112224223/http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nat_strat_hls.pdf</ref>}} Ridge began his duties as OHS director on October 8, 2001. |
==Etymology== | ==Etymology== | ||
− | In an August 5, 2002 speech, [[U.S. President]] [[George W. Bush]] stated: "We're fighting...to secure freedom in the homeland".<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2002-10-08-oplede_x.htm Bovard, James. "Moral high ground not won on battlefield", ''USA Today'', October 8, 2008]. Retrieved on August 19, 2008.</ref> Prior to the creation of DHS, American presidents had referred to the United States as "the nation" or "the republic", and to its internal policies as "domestic".<ref name=wolf>Wolf, Naomi (2007). ''The End of America'', page 27. Chelsea Green Publishing. | + | In an August 5, [[2002]] speech, [[U.S. President]] [[George W. Bush]] stated: "We're fighting...to secure freedom in the homeland".<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2002-10-08-oplede_x.htm Bovard, James. "Moral high ground not won on battlefield", ''USA Today'', October 8, 2008]. Retrieved on August 19, 2008.</ref> Prior to the creation of DHS, American presidents had referred to the United States as "the nation" or "the republic", and to its internal policies as "domestic".<ref name=wolf>Wolf, Naomi (2007). ''The End of America'', page 27. Chelsea Green Publishing.</ref> Also unprecedented was the use, from 2002, of the phrase "the homeland" by White House spokespeople.<ref name=wolf/> The choice of this phrase, echoing Nazi Germany as it does, has raised questions regarding the self-image of the United States.<ref>http://www.spectacle.org/1201/bartlett.html</ref> |
==Restructuring== | ==Restructuring== | ||
− | In 2002, the [[United States Secret Service]] was subordinated to the Department of Homeland Security, a decision criticised by many observers.<ref name="www">http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/14/the-one-thing-you-missed-about-the-secret-service-directors-resignation/</ref> | + | In [[2002]], the [[United States Secret Service]] was subordinated to the Department of Homeland Security, a decision criticised by many observers.<ref name="www">http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/14/the-one-thing-you-missed-about-the-secret-service-directors-resignation/</ref> |
− | == | + | ==Activities== |
− | === | + | ===Checks on baggage=== |
− | + | In [[2017]], the DoHS set up checkpoints to "randomly" check people luggage. <ref>https://chicagoist.com/2017/02/14/cta_riders_confused_concerned_as_ho.php</ref> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==Mail interception== | + | ===Mail interception=== |
{{FA|Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program}} | {{FA|Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program}} | ||
In 2006, [[MSNBC]] reported that Grant Goodman, "an 81-year-old retired [[University of Kansas]] history professor, received a letter from his friend in the [[Philippines]] that had been opened and resealed with a strip of dark green tape bearing the words “by [[U.S. Customs and Border Protection|Border Protection]]” and carrying the official Homeland Security seal."<ref name=Mail>[[Brock N. Meeks|Meeks, Brock]] (January 6, 2006) [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10740935/ns/us_news-security/ Homeland Security opening private mail], [[MSNBC]]</ref> The letter was sent by a woman with no known terrorist connections.<ref name=Mail/> A spokesman for [[U.S. Customs and Border Protection]] "acknowledged that the agency can, will and does open mail coming to U.S. citizens that originates from a foreign country whenever it's deemed necessary": | In 2006, [[MSNBC]] reported that Grant Goodman, "an 81-year-old retired [[University of Kansas]] history professor, received a letter from his friend in the [[Philippines]] that had been opened and resealed with a strip of dark green tape bearing the words “by [[U.S. Customs and Border Protection|Border Protection]]” and carrying the official Homeland Security seal."<ref name=Mail>[[Brock N. Meeks|Meeks, Brock]] (January 6, 2006) [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10740935/ns/us_news-security/ Homeland Security opening private mail], [[MSNBC]]</ref> The letter was sent by a woman with no known terrorist connections.<ref name=Mail/> A spokesman for [[U.S. Customs and Border Protection]] "acknowledged that the agency can, will and does open mail coming to U.S. citizens that originates from a foreign country whenever it's deemed necessary": | ||
Line 37: | Line 44: | ||
Goodman's story provoked outrage in the blogosphere,<ref>Cole, John (January 9, 2006) [http://www.balloon-juice.com/2006/01/09/your-mail-free-for-government-inspection/ Your Mail- Free for Government Inspection], ''Balloon Juice''</ref> as well as in the more established media. Reacting to the incident, ''Mother Jones magazine'' remarked that "[u]nlike other prying government agencies, Homeland Security wants you to know it is watching you".<ref>Dees, Diane (January 9, 2006) [http://motherjones.com/mojo/2006/01/department-homeland-security-opens-kansas-professors-mail Department of Homeland Security opens Kansas professor's mail], ''[[Mother Jones]]''</ref> [[CNN]] observed that "[o]n the heels of the NSA wiretapping controversy, Goodman's letter raises more concern over the balance between privacy and security".<ref>[http://quiz.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/12/sitroom.02.html Transcript] from ''The Situation Room'' (January 12, 2006)</ref> | Goodman's story provoked outrage in the blogosphere,<ref>Cole, John (January 9, 2006) [http://www.balloon-juice.com/2006/01/09/your-mail-free-for-government-inspection/ Your Mail- Free for Government Inspection], ''Balloon Juice''</ref> as well as in the more established media. Reacting to the incident, ''Mother Jones magazine'' remarked that "[u]nlike other prying government agencies, Homeland Security wants you to know it is watching you".<ref>Dees, Diane (January 9, 2006) [http://motherjones.com/mojo/2006/01/department-homeland-security-opens-kansas-professors-mail Department of Homeland Security opens Kansas professor's mail], ''[[Mother Jones]]''</ref> [[CNN]] observed that "[o]n the heels of the NSA wiretapping controversy, Goodman's letter raises more concern over the balance between privacy and security".<ref>[http://quiz.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/12/sitroom.02.html Transcript] from ''The Situation Room'' (January 12, 2006)</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Covid=== | ||
+ | [[Image:DHS Encouraged Children To Report Family To Facebook For Challenging US Government Covid Claims.png|thumb|left|In a 2021 cartoon, the DHS encouraged a young female protagonist to report her "Uncle Steve" to [[Facebook]] for posting "[[disinformation]]" (that "[[Covid-19]] is no worse than [[the flu]]")<ref>https://report.foundationforfreedomonline.com/8-29-22.html</ref>]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Equipment== | ||
+ | The DOHS has contributed significantly to the [[militarization]] of US law enforcement, to the extent that it has been referred to as a tool of the [[Military-industrial-congressional complex]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Drones=== | ||
+ | [[image:DOHS drone.jpg|right|500px]] | ||
+ | {{FA|Drones}} | ||
+ | In [[2015]], the Department of Homeland Security was very active in warning other government agencies of the dangers of [[drone]]s. [[CBS]] News reported the Department of Homeland Security had sent an intelligence assessment to police agencies across the country about drones being used as weapons in an attack.<ref>http://www.cbsnews.com/news/homeland-security-warns-drones-could-be-used-in-attacks/</ref><ref>https://www.rt.com/usa/311358-drones-terrorism-security-USA/</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===X-Ray Scanners=== | ||
+ | The DHS had paid contractors "millions of dollars on mobile body scanner technology that could be used at railways, stadiums, and elsewhere."<ref>http://endthelie.com/2011/05/26/epic-sues-department-homeland-security-secret-naked-body-scanners-public-places/</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles=== | ||
+ | The DHS has also been criticised for purchasing 2,717 Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles formerly used for counterinsurgency in Iraq.<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/03/10/why-the-heck-is-dhs-buying-more-than-a-billion-bullets-plus-thousands-of-guns-and-mine-resistant-armored-vehicles/ Why The Heck Is DHS Buying More Than A Billion Bullets Plus Thousands Of Guns And Mine-Resistant Armored Vehicles?], Forbes.com</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/dhs-ammo-investigation-napolitano-645/</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Hollow Point Bullets=== | ||
+ | The AP reports that the DOHS has already bought 360,000 rounds of hollow point bullets - which cost nearly twice as much as full metal jacket rounds. Hollow point bullets are categorically banned for use in international [[war]] by the [[Geneva Convention]] since they explode on impact for maximum damage to the individual hit. However, this property of exploding within the individual causes minimum damage to whatever is behind the individual, they are more suitable for use in an urban environment if minimal property damage were a priority. AP reported further that the DHS plans to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (enough for a 24-year Iraq War) over the next four or five years, and bought 1.5 billion rounds in [[2012]]. Many have found these purchases unsettling. DHS officials have denied stockpiling ammunition, but have issued no explanation to the Members of Congress who have repeatedly asked why the DHS would need such large amounts of ammo, noting only that buying ammo in bulk allowed them to save money. Many have drawn the obvious conclusion that the ammunition is part of contingency plans for mass civil unrest, others noting that such huge purchases may also be an effort to “strategically den[y] the American people access to ammunition.” | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 22:30, 10 June 2023
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Formation | November 25, 2002 |
Parent organization | US |
Headquarters | Nebraska Avenue Complex, Washington DC, USA |
Leader | United States Secretary of Homeland Security |
Subgroups | • United States Citizenship and Immigration Services • United States Customs and Border Protection • Federal Emergency Management Agency • United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement • Transportation Security Administration • United States Coast Guard • National Protection and Programs Directorate • United States Secret Service |
Staff | 216,000 |
Interests | Disaster/Preparation, TOPOFF, Copyright |
Sponsor of | Abt Associates, Institute for Strategic Dialogue |
Planned by the same group who planned the 9/11 attacks, and carried out in their wake, the DoHS is a large department which replaced the existing domestic security, disaster planning and management functions of the US government. |
The Department of Homeland Security, wrote John Whitehead in 2014, was established to "prevent terrorist attacks within the United States," but "has grown from a post-9/11 knee-jerk reaction to a leviathan with tentacles in every aspect of American life". The article, entitled Has The Department of Homeland Security Become America’s Standing Army? began with the claim that "If the United States is a police state, then the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is its national police force, with all the brutality, ineptitude and corruption such a role implies."[1]
Contents
Origins
In 1998, Bill Clinton tasked former Senators Gary Hart and Warren Rudman to chair the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. The commission panel has been described as "a cross-section of the military-industrial-media complex".[2] Its members included Leslie Gelb, editor of the New York Times, Norman Augustine, former CEO of Lockheed-Martin and US Army General John Galvin. The panel's report in January 2001 declared that it was not a matter of “if” the U.S. would suffer a mass-casualty terrorist strike but “when.” The panel’s recommendations included the massive integration of all of the domestic security, disaster planning and recovery functions into a single behemoth. After the 9/11 false flag attacks, President George W. Bush announced the establishment of the The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to coordinate "homeland security" efforts.
The office was headed by former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge, who assumed the title of Assistant to the President for Homeland Security. The official announcement stated:
The mission of the Office will be to develop and coordinate the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist threats or attacks. The Office will coordinate the executive branch's efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks within the United States.[3]
Ridge began his duties as OHS director on October 8, 2001.
Etymology
In an August 5, 2002 speech, U.S. President George W. Bush stated: "We're fighting...to secure freedom in the homeland".[4] Prior to the creation of DHS, American presidents had referred to the United States as "the nation" or "the republic", and to its internal policies as "domestic".[5] Also unprecedented was the use, from 2002, of the phrase "the homeland" by White House spokespeople.[5] The choice of this phrase, echoing Nazi Germany as it does, has raised questions regarding the self-image of the United States.[6]
Restructuring
In 2002, the United States Secret Service was subordinated to the Department of Homeland Security, a decision criticised by many observers.[7]
Activities
Checks on baggage
In 2017, the DoHS set up checkpoints to "randomly" check people luggage. [8]
Mail interception
- Full article: Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program
- Full article: Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program
In 2006, MSNBC reported that Grant Goodman, "an 81-year-old retired University of Kansas history professor, received a letter from his friend in the Philippines that had been opened and resealed with a strip of dark green tape bearing the words “by Border Protection” and carrying the official Homeland Security seal."[9] The letter was sent by a woman with no known terrorist connections.[9] A spokesman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection "acknowledged that the agency can, will and does open mail coming to U.S. citizens that originates from a foreign country whenever it's deemed necessary":
"All mail originating outside the United States Customs territory that is to be delivered inside the U.S. Customs territory is subject to Customs examination," says the CBP Web site. That includes personal correspondence. "All mail means 'all mail,'" said John Mohan, a CBP spokesman, emphasizing the point.[9]
The Department declined to outline what criteria are used to determine when a piece of personal correspondence should be opened or to say how often or in what volume Customs might be opening mail.[9]
Goodman's story provoked outrage in the blogosphere,[10] as well as in the more established media. Reacting to the incident, Mother Jones magazine remarked that "[u]nlike other prying government agencies, Homeland Security wants you to know it is watching you".[11] CNN observed that "[o]n the heels of the NSA wiretapping controversy, Goodman's letter raises more concern over the balance between privacy and security".[12]
Covid
![](/w/images/thumb/e/e5/DHS_Encouraged_Children_To_Report_Family_To_Facebook_For_Challenging_US_Government_Covid_Claims.png/300px-DHS_Encouraged_Children_To_Report_Family_To_Facebook_For_Challenging_US_Government_Covid_Claims.png)
Equipment
The DOHS has contributed significantly to the militarization of US law enforcement, to the extent that it has been referred to as a tool of the Military-industrial-congressional complex.
Drones
- Full article: Drones
- Full article: Drones
In 2015, the Department of Homeland Security was very active in warning other government agencies of the dangers of drones. CBS News reported the Department of Homeland Security had sent an intelligence assessment to police agencies across the country about drones being used as weapons in an attack.[14][15]
X-Ray Scanners
The DHS had paid contractors "millions of dollars on mobile body scanner technology that could be used at railways, stadiums, and elsewhere."[16]
Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles
The DHS has also been criticised for purchasing 2,717 Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles formerly used for counterinsurgency in Iraq.[17][18]
Hollow Point Bullets
The AP reports that the DOHS has already bought 360,000 rounds of hollow point bullets - which cost nearly twice as much as full metal jacket rounds. Hollow point bullets are categorically banned for use in international war by the Geneva Convention since they explode on impact for maximum damage to the individual hit. However, this property of exploding within the individual causes minimum damage to whatever is behind the individual, they are more suitable for use in an urban environment if minimal property damage were a priority. AP reported further that the DHS plans to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (enough for a 24-year Iraq War) over the next four or five years, and bought 1.5 billion rounds in 2012. Many have found these purchases unsettling. DHS officials have denied stockpiling ammunition, but have issued no explanation to the Members of Congress who have repeatedly asked why the DHS would need such large amounts of ammo, noting only that buying ammo in bulk allowed them to save money. Many have drawn the obvious conclusion that the ammunition is part of contingency plans for mass civil unrest, others noting that such huge purchases may also be an effort to “strategically den[y] the American people access to ammunition.”
Related Quotation
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Operation Garden Plot | “Oversight of these homeland security missions should be provided by the National Guard Bureau based on the long-standing Garden Plot model in which National Guard units are trained and equipped to support civil authorities in crowd control and civil disturbance missions.” | Major General Richard C. Alexander ARNGUS (Ret.) Executive Director National Guard Association of the United States Testimony in the Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing on Homeland Defense | 11 April 2002 |
References
- ↑ https://www.mintpressnews.com/department-homeland-security-become-americas-standing-army/192576/
- ↑ http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/11/a-trillion-ways-to-build-a-new-military-industrial-complex/
- ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20120112224223/http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nat_strat_hls.pdf
- ↑ Bovard, James. "Moral high ground not won on battlefield", USA Today, October 8, 2008. Retrieved on August 19, 2008.
- ↑ a b Wolf, Naomi (2007). The End of America, page 27. Chelsea Green Publishing.
- ↑ http://www.spectacle.org/1201/bartlett.html
- ↑ http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/14/the-one-thing-you-missed-about-the-secret-service-directors-resignation/
- ↑ https://chicagoist.com/2017/02/14/cta_riders_confused_concerned_as_ho.php
- ↑ a b c d Meeks, Brock (January 6, 2006) Homeland Security opening private mail, MSNBC
- ↑ Cole, John (January 9, 2006) Your Mail- Free for Government Inspection, Balloon Juice
- ↑ Dees, Diane (January 9, 2006) Department of Homeland Security opens Kansas professor's mail, Mother Jones
- ↑ Transcript from The Situation Room (January 12, 2006)
- ↑ https://report.foundationforfreedomonline.com/8-29-22.html
- ↑ http://www.cbsnews.com/news/homeland-security-warns-drones-could-be-used-in-attacks/
- ↑ https://www.rt.com/usa/311358-drones-terrorism-security-USA/
- ↑ http://endthelie.com/2011/05/26/epic-sues-department-homeland-security-secret-naked-body-scanners-public-places/
- ↑ Why The Heck Is DHS Buying More Than A Billion Bullets Plus Thousands Of Guns And Mine-Resistant Armored Vehicles?, Forbes.com
- ↑ http://rt.com/usa/dhs-ammo-investigation-napolitano-645/