Difference between revisions of "Panama Papers"
(Higher priority to the no response image) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|wikiquote=http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Panama_Papers | |wikiquote=http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Panama_Papers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[image:Panama Papers no respone.jpg|left|300px|thumb|[[Daphne Caruana Galizia]] proved the exception to the rule. The Maltese blogger picked up the Panama Papers and ran with them. She was assassinated by a [[car bomb]] the following year.]] | ||
The '''Panama Papers''' is a huge (2.6TB) cache of confidential documents from [[Mossack Fonseca]], the Panamanian provider of offshore companies to minimize taxes and/or launder money. The leak in 2015 to the [[International Consortium of Investigative Journalists]] and to ''[[Süddeutsche Zeitung]]'', published in April 2016, identified numerous wealthy and powerful political figures and organisations of many countries. Several commentators have suggested it is [[limited hangout]] of some kind. | The '''Panama Papers''' is a huge (2.6TB) cache of confidential documents from [[Mossack Fonseca]], the Panamanian provider of offshore companies to minimize taxes and/or launder money. The leak in 2015 to the [[International Consortium of Investigative Journalists]] and to ''[[Süddeutsche Zeitung]]'', published in April 2016, identified numerous wealthy and powerful political figures and organisations of many countries. Several commentators have suggested it is [[limited hangout]] of some kind. | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
:"Such hypocrisy from people who we have voted into parliament to protect our interest is a breach of trust which should carry serious consequences. The threat of resignation or public disgrace is simply not enough. Yet the public memory is short and fickle and if the dust does not settle within a few days we get an official Inquiry which will last as long as it takes until the next scandal hits the headlines and wipes the memory."<ref>''[http://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2016/08/26/remember-the-panama-papers/ "Remember the Panama Papers?"]''</ref> | :"Such hypocrisy from people who we have voted into parliament to protect our interest is a breach of trust which should carry serious consequences. The threat of resignation or public disgrace is simply not enough. Yet the public memory is short and fickle and if the dust does not settle within a few days we get an official Inquiry which will last as long as it takes until the next scandal hits the headlines and wipes the memory."<ref>''[http://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2016/08/26/remember-the-panama-papers/ "Remember the Panama Papers?"]''</ref> | ||
| − | [[Edward Snowden]] described the leak as the "biggest leak in the history of data journalism".<ref name="TwittEdw"> | + | [[Edward Snowden]] described the leak as the "biggest leak in the history of data journalism".<ref name="TwittEdw">http://www.webcitation.org/6gVVScO9U</ref> |
==Perpetrators== | ==Perpetrators== | ||
| Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
|source_URL=http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/12/swiss-banker-whistleblower-cia-behind-panama-papers.html | |source_URL=http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/12/swiss-banker-whistleblower-cia-behind-panama-papers.html | ||
|date=12 April 2016 | |date=12 April 2016 | ||
| − | |subjects= | + | |subjects=Panama Papers, CIA |
| + | |authors=Bradley Birkenfeld | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 60: | Line 62: | ||
==Response== | ==Response== | ||
| − | [[ | + | The [[corporate media]] showed very little interest in the Panama Papers. Some independent journalists, such as [[Daphne Caruana Galizia]] picked up the story and ran with it. |
| − | |||
==Cover-up== | ==Cover-up== | ||
| − | Daphne Caruana Galizia, the Maltese journalist and blogger "who led the Panama Papers investigation into [[corruption]] in [[Malta]]" was assassinated on 6 October 2017.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/16/malta-car-bomb-kills-panama-papers-journalist</ref> | + | [[Daphne Caruana Galizia]], the Maltese journalist and blogger "who led the Panama Papers investigation into [[corruption]] in [[Malta]]" was assassinated on 6 October 2017.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/16/malta-car-bomb-kills-panama-papers-journalist</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ===Film=== | ||
| + | In 2019, Mossack Fonseca took legal action against [[Netflix]] to try to prevent release of their film, ''The Laundromat'' about the leak.<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-crime-netflix/panama-papers-law-firm-sues-netflix-over-film-based-on-scandal-idUSKBN1WV2KC</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:46, 15 August 2024
 "How quickly we forget. It was just four months ago we learned of the role of Panama in helping so many rich and famous folk to dodge their fair share of the tax burden." | |
| Date | April 2016 |
|---|---|
| Planners | US Deep state? |
| Exposed by | Daphne Caruana Galizia |
| Interest of | Daphne Caruana Galizia |
| Description | A huge (2.6TB) cache of confidential documents created by the Panamanian corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca that provide detailed information on more than 214,000 offshore companies, including the identities of shareholders and directors. Those identified include numerous wealthy and powerful political figures and organisations of many countries. |
The Panama Papers is a huge (2.6TB) cache of confidential documents from Mossack Fonseca, the Panamanian provider of offshore companies to minimize taxes and/or launder money. The leak in 2015 to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and to Süddeutsche Zeitung, published in April 2016, identified numerous wealthy and powerful political figures and organisations of many countries. Several commentators have suggested it is limited hangout of some kind.
Contents
Background
Early in 2015, the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and the ICIJ received documents related to the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca that provide detailed information on more than 214,000 offshore companies, including the identities of shareholders and directors. Those identified include numerous wealthy and powerful political figures and organisations of many countries from an anonymous source.[1]
In 2016, Wikileaks tweeted about the Panama Papers "Putin attack was produced by OCCRP which targets Russia & former USSR and was funded by USAID & Soros".[2]
On 6 April 2016, Voice Hindi News aka Voice of America Hindi News published the "complete list of people named in the Panama Papers".[3]
Commentary
In a striking illustration of the maxim that the initial response to any event fixes the main outlines of the Official Narrative in the public mind, Western media – almost without exception – focused on the names of Vladimir Putin (though struggling a bit because only "his cronies" were immediately implicated), Syria's Bashar al Assad, Iceland Premier Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson and Chinese prime minister Xi Jinping. The Sydney Morning Herald coverage was typical [4].
Policy makers including German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble and European Commission Vice President Jyrki Katainen said the leak will strengthen the resolve of governments to combat tax avoidance and evasion. In a statement reminiscent of Benjamin Netanyahu's notorious remarks in the immediate aftermath of 9-11, Wolfgang Schaeuble said: “Even though it’s not surprising, it helps us. It increases the pressure to halt abuse.”[5]
Noting that the papers were in the hands of commercially-controlled media funded by big money, Craig Murray cautioned "Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished."[6]
On 26 August 2016, Ronnie Morrison in Bella Caledonia noted:
- "How quickly we forget. It was just four months ago we learned of the role of Panama in helping so many rich and famous folk to dodge their fair share of the tax burden. It was even more disgusting to see so many politicians in the rogues gallery.
- "The first response from the Panamanian law firm was indignation at the breach of privacy and to raise an action against the hacker. Most of us thought he should get a knighthood or at least a medal for his guts and public spirit however, as we know from the experience of the Snowdens and Assanges of this world, political asylum is not for the likes of them.
- "Indeed, how many of us remember Hervé Falciani who just last year was sentenced to five years in prison for leaking the names of 130,000 suspected tax evaders holding accounts with UBS Private Bank in Switzerland? That information went to several governments and the IMF before being discreetly buried.
- "Such hypocrisy from people who we have voted into parliament to protect our interest is a breach of trust which should carry serious consequences. The threat of resignation or public disgrace is simply not enough. Yet the public memory is short and fickle and if the dust does not settle within a few days we get an official Inquiry which will last as long as it takes until the next scandal hits the headlines and wipes the memory."[7]
Edward Snowden described the leak as the "biggest leak in the history of data journalism".[8]
Perpetrators
Bradley Birkenfeld, the "most significant financial whistleblower of all time" said
“The CIA I'm sure is behind this, in my opinion... there’s something seriously sinister here behind this [the Panama Papers].”
Bradley Birkenfeld (12 April 2016) [9]
The Chinese Global Times observed that "...a powerful force is behind the Panama Papers" [10]
Professor Tatiana Yugay of the Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics (MESI) and former advisor to the Presidential Administration and Security Council concluded: "It’s clear that the Panama Leaks are part of the West’s hybrid war against Russia. During the last two years, Russians have survived the devaluation of the rouble, a fall in oil prices, inflation, mutual sanctions and so on. We’re not likely to go to the barricades over Western gossip."[11]
On 14 April 2016, in a televised Q and A session, President Vladimir Putin claimed that Süddeutsche Zeitung belonged to the US bank Goldman Sachs.[12] Putin's claim was swiftly dismissed by SZ managing director Stefan Hilscher, who said in a statement the newspaper “has no relationship under corporate law with Goldman Sachs”, adding the paper’s ownership was publicly available information. Goldman Sachs referred to Hilscher’s statement and declined further comment.[13] Kremlin press spokesman Dmitry Peskov later retracted President Putin's claim.[14]
Response
The corporate media showed very little interest in the Panama Papers. Some independent journalists, such as Daphne Caruana Galizia picked up the story and ran with it.
Cover-up
Daphne Caruana Galizia, the Maltese journalist and blogger "who led the Panama Papers investigation into corruption in Malta" was assassinated on 6 October 2017.[15]
Film
In 2019, Mossack Fonseca took legal action against Netflix to try to prevent release of their film, The Laundromat about the leak.[16]
A Panama Papers victim on Wikispooks
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Louise Blouin | Canadian magazine editor. WEF/Global Leaders for Tomorrow 1993 |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Broadcasting Corporation | “The Australian Broadcasting Corporation shamed the BBC by putting out a Four Corners documentary on the Panama leak that had real balls. In stark contrast to the BBC, the Australians named and shamed Australia’s biggest company and Australia’s biggest foreign investor. BBC Panorama by contrast found a guy who sold one house in Islington. The Australians also, unlike the BBC who deliberately and knowing hid it, pointed out that the corruption centred on the British Virgin Islands, and even went there. All in all an excellent job.” | April 2016 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Appleby launches legal action against ICIJ’s UK partners | Article | 18 December 2017 | Gerard Ryle | "This is a potentially dangerous moment for free expression in Britain" – Gerard Ryle |
| Document:Jeremy Corbyn's speech to the United Nations in full | Speech | 8 December 2017 | Jeremy Corbyn | Jeremy Corbyn at the United Nations in Geneva upstages Theresa May at the European Union in Brussels |
| Document:Was EU Tax Evasion Regulation The Reason For The Brexit Referendum | Blog post | 26 September 2017 | Josh Hamilton | The EU's new anti-abuse measures coming into force in 2019 would tighten up restrictions on UK-based intermediaries that take part in off-shoring and tax avoidance, of which Britain is a global leader |
| File:THE PRICE OF OFFSHORE REVISITED.pdf | paper | July 2012 | James S. Henry | Study on the "offshore" private banking market. |
References
- ↑ "About the Panama Papers" by Frederik Obermaier, Bastian Obermayer, Vanessa Wormer and Wolfgang Jaschensky, Süddeutsche Zeitung
- ↑ "US government, Soros funded Panama Papers to attack Putin – WikiLeaks"
- ↑ Internet Archive: "Complete List of people named in the Panama Papers"
- ↑ "Panama Papers leak exposes how Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping's friends hide money" - Sydney Morning Herald 4 April 2016
- ↑ "China, Pakistan Push Back on Offshore Revelations as Syria Named" - Bloomberg 5 April 2016
- ↑ "Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% From Panama Leak"
- ↑ "Remember the Panama Papers?"
- ↑ http://www.webcitation.org/6gVVScO9U
- ↑ http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/12/swiss-banker-whistleblower-cia-behind-panama-papers.html CNBC
- ↑ Powerful force is behind Panama Papers - Global Times 5 April 2016
- ↑ "Panama Papers: There’s a Purpose to Every Leak"
- ↑ "Putin Sees U.S., Goldman Sachs Behind Leak of Panama Papers"
- ↑ "Panama Papers details are correct but do not implicate me, says Putin"
- ↑ "Kremlin says sorry to Goldman Sachs, German paper over Panama Papers slip-up"
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/16/malta-car-bomb-kills-panama-papers-journalist
- ↑ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-crime-netflix/panama-papers-law-firm-sues-netflix-over-film-based-on-scandal-idUSKBN1WV2KC
