Human experimentation

Human experimentation (Disaster/Preparation)
Examples of unethical "human subject research" abound.

Although human experimentation is legally forbidden, especially in war time, when subjecting minors, women, people with dark skin and in countries with large deep states, examples of unethical "human subject research" are abound.

Official narrative

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation." Below this page are a dozen of examples where that seemingly was forgotten.

Human experimentation

Several new discoveries into biochemical and human DNA editing - accelerated since and with COVID-19 funding - stimulated new eerie discoveries. Scientists report the creation of the first synthetic human embryo from stem cells, without the need for sperm or egg cells in July. Israeli scientists injected artificial modules into mice, curing the Alzheimer Disease in the mice they injected in the mice themselves. Universities of Bristol and Exeter discovered a DNA modification method of a gene is shown to reduce anxiety levels, offering an exciting novel drug target for anxiety disorders, according to Nature magazine.

CRISPR

New therapeutics using DNA editing via a method called CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) were introduced as deemed legal in the UK in 2023, follwiing MIT and Harvard studies, even though a pioneering scientist was jailed for testing the technique on kids in 2018. Ethical considerations and cost issues remain, but gene editing was called a possible cure to many common problems such as blindness and highly-deadly diseases as the first individuals in the U.S appeared to be cured from previously permanent diseases, and was soon eerily named an option to clone food, start a new form of eugenics and make new vaccines. Sperm, eggs and embryos were reported be passed to future generations of DNA-edited children in China, raising the stakes for any mistakes made along the way, earning a warning in the NYT.

 

Examples

Page name	Description
"COVID-19/Vaccine"	The "vaccine" for COVID 19?
Guatemala syphilis experiment	A murderous experiment which infected healthy subjects with syphilis, gonorrhea, chancroid and possibly other diseases.
Nuremberg Code	The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the subsequent Nuremberg trials at the end of WWII.
Plasma Economy	3 million poor donors from rural china get asked to donate blood in very unsafe blood banks. 1,2 million get AIDS.
Sterilization campaign	Large-scale and well organized sterilization efforts for population control and reduction.
Tuskegee syphilis experiment	A murderous experiment which looked at the progression of syphilis. Subjects were told that they were being treated, while in fact treatment was denied them. Exposed after 40 years by a whistleblower who went to the press.

 

Related Quotations

Page	Quote	Author	Date
"COVID-19/Vaccine"	“For us therefore, we're really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies [...] ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate,”	Stefan Oelrich	24 October 2021
2023	“A majority of U.S. intelligence agencies has so far concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic mostly likely started when SARS-CoV-2 jumped from an infected animal host into people; a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, has received intense attention from researchers as the potential source. But the Department of Energy and FBI so far have favored the so-called lab-leak hypothesis, even though none of the agencies has expressed high confidence in their conclusions on COVID-19’s origin. CIA, for example, had reportedly said it was “unable to determine” whether SARS-CoV-2 made a direct jump from animals to humans—or came from a lab. Now, Representative Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), who chairs the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, says his panel and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have heard testimony from a whistleblower “who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer.” According to the press release, the whistleblower testified that only the most senior analyst of a seven-member CIA team investigating the origin of COVID-19 supported the zoonotic transmission theory. The whistleblower alleged the other six team members supporting the lab origin then received “a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” wrote Wenstrup and Representative Mike Turner (R–OH), who chairs the intelligence panel.”	Jon Cohen	September 2023
CIA	“A majority of U.S. intelligence agencies has so far concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic mostly likely started when SARS-CoV-2 jumped from an infected animal host into people; a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, has received intense attention from researchers as the potential source. But the Department of Energy and FBI so far have favored the so-called lab-leak hypothesis, even though none of the agencies has expressed high confidence in their conclusions on COVID-19’s origin. CIA, for example, had reportedly said it was “unable to determine” whether SARS-CoV-2 made a direct jump from animals to humans—or came from a lab. Now, Representative Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), who chairs the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, says his panel and the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have heard testimony from a whistleblower “who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer.” According to the press release, the whistleblower testified that only the most senior analyst of a seven-member CIA team investigating the origin of COVID-19 supported the zoonotic transmission theory. The whistleblower alleged the other six team members supporting the lab origin then received “a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” wrote Wenstrup and Representative Mike Turner (R–OH), who chairs the intelligence panel.”	Jon Cohen	September 2023
COVID-19/Origins	“A majority of U.S. intelligence agencies has so far concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic mostly likely started when SARS-CoV-2 jumped from an infected animal host into people; a wildlife market in Wuhan, China, has received intense attention from researchers as the potential source. But the Department of Energy and FBI so far have favored the so-called lab-leak hypothesis, even though none of the agencies has expressed high confidence in their conclusions on COVID-19’s origin. CIA, for example, had reportedly said it was “unable to determine” whether SARS-CoV-2 made a direct jump from animals to humans—or came from a lab. Now, Representative Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), who chairs the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, says his panel and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence have heard testimony from a whistleblower “who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer.” According to the press release, the whistleblower testified that only the most senior analyst of a seven-member CIA team investigating the origin of COVID-19 supported the zoonotic transmission theory. The whistleblower alleged the other six team members supporting the lab origin then received “a significant monetary incentive to change their position,” wrote Wenstrup and Representative Mike Turner (R–OH), who chairs the intelligence panel.”	Jon Cohen	September 2023

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.