Difference between revisions of "Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(French intelligence orchestrated Ghouta poison gas attack: Syria)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|locations=Syria
 
|locations=Syria
 
|ON_perpetrators=Syrian Government
 
|ON_perpetrators=Syrian Government
|constitutes=False Flag Attack
+
|constitutes=false flag attack, mid-level deep event
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack
 
|latitude=33°31′26″N
 
|latitude=33°31′26″N
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|fatalities=281
 
|fatalities=281
 
}}
 
}}
The 2013 Ghouta attacks were a series of alleged chemical warfare attacks that occurred on Wednesday, 21 August 2013, in the Ghouta region of Syria. Hundreds of people died, thousands were injured.
+
The '''2013 Ghouta attacks''' were a series of alleged chemical warfare attacks that occurred on Wednesday, 21 August 2013, in the Ghouta region of Syria. Hundreds of people died, thousands were injured.
  
 
==Official Narrative==
 
==Official Narrative==
Line 23: Line 23:
 
[[The Daily Mail]], a UK newspaper published a story on January 29th, 2013 entitled "[http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime']". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the US government gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to [[Britam Defence Ltd]] and that they no longer believed the email authentic.<ref name="dailymail2013">http://web.archive.org/web/20130130091742/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html</ref>
 
[[The Daily Mail]], a UK newspaper published a story on January 29th, 2013 entitled "[http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime']". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the US government gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to [[Britam Defence Ltd]] and that they no longer believed the email authentic.<ref name="dailymail2013">http://web.archive.org/web/20130130091742/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html</ref>
  
===Orchestrated by French Intelligence===
+
===Assad blames "French Intelligence"===
In August 2016, Syria said that French Intelligence Agencies had orchestrated the deadly chemical attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta to divert UN weapons inspectors from another incident carried out by militants in Aleppo. At a [[UN Security Council]] meeting over the Syrian conflict, Damascus's envoy to the United Nations [[Bashar al-Jaafari]] said:
+
In August 2016, Syria said that the French Intelligence Agency [[DGSE]] had orchestrated the deadly chemical attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta to divert UN weapons inspectors from another incident carried out by militants in Aleppo. At a [[UN Security Council]] meeting over the Syrian conflict, Damascus's envoy to the United Nations [[Bashar al-Jaafari]] said:
:“The use of chemical weapons in the Damascus area was meant to prevent Dr. [[Åke Sellström]] [the head of the weapons inspectors] from going to Aleppo because [France] knew who had used chemical weapons in Aleppo. They wanted to prevent Dr. Sellström from reaching Aleppo by any means and therefore they used chemical weapons in Damascus with the involvement of French intelligence.”
+
:“The use of chemical weapons in the Damascus area was meant to prevent Dr [https://twitter.com/SIPRIorg/status/341511535321047041 Åke Sellström] [the head of the weapons inspectors] from going to Aleppo because [France] knew who had used chemical weapons in Aleppo. They wanted to prevent Dr Sellström from reaching Aleppo by any means and therefore they used chemical weapons in Damascus with the involvement of French intelligence.”
  
 
French representative to the UN, [[François Delattre]], said that allegations were “absurd.”<ref>''[http://en.isna.ir/news/95060101697/French-intelligence-orchestrated-Ghouta-poison-gas-attack-Syria "French intelligence orchestrated Ghouta poison gas attack: Syria"]''</ref>
 
French representative to the UN, [[François Delattre]], said that allegations were “absurd.”<ref>''[http://en.isna.ir/news/95060101697/French-intelligence-orchestrated-Ghouta-poison-gas-attack-Syria "French intelligence orchestrated Ghouta poison gas attack: Syria"]''</ref>

Latest revision as of 13:28, 15 April 2019

Event.png Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack (false flag attack,  mid-level deep event) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Date21 August 2013
LocationSyria
Blamed onSyrian Government
Type Chemical attack
Deaths281
Injured (non-fatal)3600

The 2013 Ghouta attacks were a series of alleged chemical warfare attacks that occurred on Wednesday, 21 August 2013, in the Ghouta region of Syria. Hundreds of people died, thousands were injured.

Official Narrative

The US and UK government were quick to blame the Syrian government. An anonymous aid worker, "Dr Rola" made repeated appearances on UK TV supposedly reporting on a napalm and/or incendiary attack. Full details were never disclosed and the "unverified" footage included deceitful audio editing.

False Flag Suspicions

Ron Paul was reported on August 31st, 2013 as saying about the attack "I think it’s a false flag".[1]

Britam Defence Leak

The Daily Mail, a UK newspaper published a story on January 29th, 2013 entitled "U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the US government gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to Britam Defence Ltd and that they no longer believed the email authentic.[2]

Assad blames "French Intelligence"

In August 2016, Syria said that the French Intelligence Agency DGSE had orchestrated the deadly chemical attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta to divert UN weapons inspectors from another incident carried out by militants in Aleppo. At a UN Security Council meeting over the Syrian conflict, Damascus's envoy to the United Nations Bashar al-Jaafari said:

“The use of chemical weapons in the Damascus area was meant to prevent Dr Åke Sellström [the head of the weapons inspectors] from going to Aleppo because [France] knew who had used chemical weapons in Aleppo. They wanted to prevent Dr Sellström from reaching Aleppo by any means and therefore they used chemical weapons in Damascus with the involvement of French intelligence.”

French representative to the UN, François Delattre, said that allegations were “absurd.”[3]

External Links


 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Another Chemical Weapon False Flag on the Eve of Peace Talks in Brusselsarticle4 April 2017Paul AntonopoulosThe Khan Sheikoun gas attack in Idlib province, like that in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta in 2013, can be a very useful means of propaganda
Document:Controversy surrounding MintPress Ghouta reportarticle22 September 2013Phil GreavesEarly commentary on the furore caused by Mint Press article that revealed evidence of Saudi Arabia being behind the 21 August 2013 chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, Syria
Document:Depravity Redefined - Selling US Slaughter in Syriaarticle8 September 2013'Tony Cartalucci'How horrific images are used to manipulate gullible publics into defending the indefensible in Syria
Document:Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attackarticle28 August 2013Yossef Bodansky
Document:Ed Miliband’s decision to oppose military action against Syria is an action of statesmanship of which Britons will be proudArticle28 August 2013Michael MeacherIt is all very well to rush to war in a surge of moral outrage, it is quite another to spell out clearly what are the war objectives and how exactly they are to be achieved.
Document:Mother Agnes Mariam in her own wordsinterview29 November 2013Sharmine Narwani
Document:New Mint Press statement reveals Saudi pressure on reporterarticle21 November 2013Phil Greaves
Document:Pictures resurface showing US Secretary John Kerry and President Assad dining in Syria togetherArticle3 September 2013Heather SaulJohn Kerry's volte-face: Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region (2009). President Assad is a "thug" like Adolf Hitler (2013).
Document:Questions Plague UN Report on Syriareport23 September 2013Sharmine Narwani
Radwan Mortada
Document:Serious Questions about the Integrity of the UN Report on Syriapaper5 October 2013Subrata GhoshroyA detailed and scholarly study of the evidence presented in the UN special report on the use of Chemical weapons in Ghouta, Syria on 21 August 2013 and a similar report by 'Human Rights Watch' based largely on it. It is a damning indictment of the manner in which UN reports on sensitive matters and the entire HRW organisation are effectively suborned to Western geo-political purposes.
Document:Syria - the rhetoric and the trutharticle13 August 2015Thierry MeyssanThierry Meyssan rubbishes the likelihood of a serious US ground forces operation in Syria because it would trigger a military World War III
Document:Syria:Whose sarin?article19 December 2013Seymour HershIn August-September 2013, Barack Obama, David Cameron and François Hollande accused Syria of killing 1,400 opponents in the suburbs of Damascus. Announcing that a red line had been crossed, they threatened to launch a punitive military campaign against Syria. Shortly after, London withdrew, then Washington, and finally Paris.
Document:Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attackarticle29 August 2013Dale Gavlak
Yahya Ababneh
Evidence that the chemical weapons attacks in Syria are the work of the Syrian rebels and not government forces.
Document:The Trump Administration’s Syria Gas Attack Narrative Continues to UnravelArticle18 April 2017Michael KriegerUnited States Government: "They Lied About Iraq; They Lied About Libya; They're Lying About Syria."
Document:US Intel officials say Syria NOT responsible for chemical attackmemo6 September 2013Philip Giraldi
W. Patrick Lang
Ray McGovern
Larry Johnson
Coleen Rowley
David MacMichael
Matthew Hoh
Elizabeth Murray
Todd Pierce
Sam Provance
Ann Wright
Tom Drake
Document:Western rationality on Syria CW attacksarticle7 September 2013Thierry Meyssan
File:Ghouta-Bad-Intelligence.pdfreport14 January 2014Richard Lloyd
Theodore Postol
A Massachusetts Institute of Technology report that demolishes claims by the US, UK and French governments that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its own civilian population in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013
File:Postol-debunks-kaszeta.pdfreport14 July 2014Theodore PostolExpose of fraudulent claims made by Dan Kaszeta, the West's favourite source for demonising information on President Assad's alleged guilt for the Ghouta chemical weapons attack of August 2013

 

The Official Culprit

NameDescription
SyriaA nation state in the Middle East being targeted by NATO countries and their terrorist proxies with a "humanitarian intervention"/"War on Terror" campaign to effect 'regime change'.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References