Difference between revisions of "ISGP"
|Line 14:||Line 14:|
The author of the site, van der Reijden, estimated in January 2018 that he had spent around 20,000 hours on the site .<ref>https://isgp-studies.com/about</ref> By its own account, ISGP published articles on [[Le Cercle]], the [[1001 Club]] and the [[Pilgrims Society]] before there was any mention of them on [[Wikipedia]].<ref>https://isgp-studies.com/faq</ref>
==Archival by Wikispooks==
==Archival by Wikispooks==
Revision as of 15:59, 15 January 2018
The author of the site, Joël van der Reijden, estimated in January 2018 that he had spent around 20,000 hours on the site over the past 14 years. By its own account, ISGP published articles on Le Cercle, the 1001 Club and the Pilgrims Society before there was any mention of them on Wikipedia.
Archival by Wikispooks
In early 2010 van der Reijden began to hint that the site was at risk and advised supporters to make backups of it with a view to being able to mirror it if, for whatever reason, it was taken it down. In late September 2010 the site was taken down, leaving just a single splash page with brief information and contact details. However, a zip file of the entire site was made before it was taken down and made available on WikiSpooks.
In later years Joël made a lot of major additions to the archived site, both in terms of articles and layout. For practical reasons, partly involving long-term financial guarantees, he decided not to restart the site at an independent location. Also, rebuilding the site to its 2007-2010 status would be impossible due to censorship by the major alternative media outlets which, since late 2007, was total.
In December 2014 Joël re-launched the site at ISGP.nl, where it was regularly updated with new articles and revisions. On August 5, 2016, the site's url was moved ISGP-studies.com.
As of January 2018, Alexa reported that around 1/3 of ISGP's traffic comes from Google, with a major decline in overall visits visible over 2017, despite a great number of site additions. Joël van der Reijden has charged that Google has specifically penalised his site and written in detail about the evidence.
In addition, since April 2018 Google is the only search engine to have blocked ISGP's Beyond the Dutroux Affair article. As of January 2018, a Google search for "Beyond The Dutroux Affair" did not return any results from ISGP, at least not in the top 100 hits, although an original article with this title exists there, and is cited by many of the other results returned by such a search (ISGP has removed about 50 unsanctioned copies of the article).
For comparison, ISGP's "Beyond the Dutroux Affair" was #2 on Bing and Yahoo, #4 on DuckDuckGo, #8 on Yandex, #9 on Gigablast and #51 on Baidu. StartPage only listed 81 results for that search, but ISGP was not among them.