Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 06:06, 11 July 2014 by Robin (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "|ON_causes" to "|ON_perpetrators")
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Event.png Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack (False Flag Attack) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Date21 August 2013
LocationSyria
Blamed onSyrian Government

The 2013 Ghouta attacks were a series of alleged chemical warfare attacks that occurred on Wednesday, 21 August 2013, in the Ghouta region of Syria. Hundreds of people died, thousands were injured.

Official Narrative

The US and UK government were quick to blame the Syrian government. An anonymous aid worker, "Dr Rola" made repeated appearances on UK TV supposedly reporting on a napalm and/or incendiary attack. Full details were never disclosed and the "unverified" footage included deceitful audio editing.

False Flag Suspicions

Ron Paul was reported on August 31st, 2013 as saying about the attack "I think it’s a false flag".[1]

Britam Defence Leak

On January 29th, 2013, the UK newspaper The Daily Mail published a story entitled "U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'". This was based on evidence provided by an unnamed Malaysian hacker, which began "Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country." The story was removed on January 31st and the newspaper ran an apology on the 18th April which stated that they had paid money to Britam Defence Ltd and that they no longer believed the email authentic.[2]

External Links


 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Another Chemical Weapon False Flag on the Eve of Peace Talks in Brusselsarticle4 April 2017Paul AntonopoulosThe Khan Sheikoun gas attack in Idlib province, like that in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta in 2013, can be a very useful means of propaganda
Document:Controversy surrounding MintPress Ghouta reportarticle22 September 2013Phil GreavesEarly commentary on the furore caused by Mint Press article that revealed evidence of Saudi Arabia being behind the 21 August 2013 chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, Syria
Document:Depravity Redefined - Selling US Slaughter in Syriaarticle8 September 2013'Tony Cartalucci'How horrific images are used to manipulate gullible publics into defending the indefensible in Syria
Document:Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attackarticle28 August 2013Yossef Bodansky
Document:Ed Miliband’s decision to oppose military action against Syria is an action of statesmanship of which Britons will be proudArticle28 August 2013Michael MeacherIt is all very well to rush to war in a surge of moral outrage, it is quite another to spell out clearly what are the war objectives and how exactly they are to be achieved.
Document:Mother Agnes Mariam in her own wordsinterview29 November 2013Sharmine Narwani
Document:New Mint Press statement reveals Saudi pressure on reporterarticle21 November 2013Phil Greaves
Document:Pictures resurface showing US Secretary John Kerry and President Assad dining in Syria togetherArticle3 September 2013Heather SaulJohn Kerry's volte-face: Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region (2009). President Assad is a "thug" like Adolf Hitler (2013).
Document:Questions Plague UN Report on Syriareport23 September 2013Sharmine Narwani
Radwan Mortada
Document:Serious Questions about the Integrity of the UN Report on Syriapaper5 October 2013Subrata GhoshroyA detailed and scholarly study of the evidence presented in the UN special report on the use of Chemical weapons in Ghouta, Syria on 21 August 2013 and a similar report by 'Human Rights Watch' based largely on it. It is a damning indictment of the manner in which UN reports on sensitive matters and the entire HRW organisation are effectively suborned to Western geo-political purposes.
Document:Syria - the rhetoric and the trutharticle13 August 2015Thierry MeyssanThierry Meyssan rubbishes the likelihood of a serious US ground forces operation in Syria because it would trigger a military World War III
Document:Syria:Whose sarin?article19 December 2013Seymour HershIn August-September 2013, Barack Obama, David Cameron and François Hollande accused Syria of killing 1,400 opponents in the suburbs of Damascus. Announcing that a red line had been crossed, they threatened to launch a punitive military campaign against Syria. Shortly after, London withdrew, then Washington, and finally Paris.
Document:Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attackarticle29 August 2013Dale Gavlak
Yahya Ababneh
Evidence that the chemical weapons attacks in Syria are the work of the Syrian rebels and not government forces.
Document:The Trump Administration’s Syria Gas Attack Narrative Continues to UnravelArticle18 April 2017Michael KriegerUnited States Government: "They Lied About Iraq; They Lied About Libya; They're Lying About Syria."
Document:US Intel officials say Syria NOT responsible for chemical attackmemo6 September 2013Philip Giraldi
W. Patrick Lang
Ray McGovern
Larry Johnson
Coleen Rowley
David MacMichael
Matthew Hoh
Elizabeth Murray
Todd Pierce
Sam Provance
Ann Wright
Tom Drake
Document:Western rationality on Syria CW attacksarticle7 September 2013Thierry Meyssan
File:Ghouta-Bad-Intelligence.pdfreport14 January 2014Richard Lloyd
Theodore Postol
A Massachusetts Institute of Technology report that demolishes claims by the US, UK and French governments that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its own civilian population in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013
File:Postol-debunks-kaszeta.pdfreport14 July 2014Theodore PostolExpose of fraudulent claims made by Dan Kaszeta, the West's favourite source for demonising information on President Assad's alleged guilt for the Ghouta chemical weapons attack of August 2013

 

The Official Culprit

NameDescription
SyriaA nation state in the Middle East being targeted by NATO countries and their terrorist proxies with a "humanitarian intervention"/"War on Terror" campaign to effect 'regime change'.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References