Difference between revisions of "Pax Americana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 6 August 2019.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
(Importing from WP) |
m (reference tidy) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Americana | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Americana | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''''Pax Americana'''''<ref>Joseph S. Nye, Jr., ''[https://www.jstor.org/stable/2151022 "The Changing Nature of World Power"]''. ''Political Science Quarterly'', The Academy of Political Science, Vol. 105, No. 2 (Summer, 1990), pp. 177–92</ref><ref>''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science''. Philadelphia: Published by A.L. Hummel for the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1917. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=xmkvAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA40 Pax Americana]", George W. Kihchwey. pp. 40+.</ref><ref>Abbott, Lyman, Hamilton Wright Mabie, Ernest Hamlin Abbott, and Francis Rufus Bellamy. ''The Outlook''. New York: Outlook Co, 1898. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=rkUAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA465 Expansion not Imperialism]" p. 465. (''cf''. [...] Felix Adler [states ...] "if, instead of establishing the Pax Americana so far as our influence avails throughout this continent, we should enter into' the field of Old World strife, and seek the sort of glory that is written in human blood." Here it is assumed that we have failed in establishing self-government, and propose to substitute, at least in other lands, an Old World form of government. This sort of argument has no effect on the expansionist, because he believes that we have magnificently succeeded in our problem, in spite of failures, neglects, and violations of our own principles, and because what he wishes to do is, not to abandon the experiment, but, inspired by the successes of the past, extend the Pax Americana over lands not included in this continent.")</ref> (Latin for "'''''American Peace'''''") is a term applied to the concept of relative peace in the Western Hemisphere and later the world beginning around the middle of the 20th century, thought to be caused by the preponderance of power enjoyed by the [[United States]]. | + | '''''Pax Americana'''''<ref>Joseph S. Nye, Jr., ''[https://www.jstor.org/stable/2151022 "The Changing Nature of World Power"]''. ''Political Science Quarterly'', The Academy of Political Science, Vol. 105, No. 2 (Summer, 1990), pp. 177–92</ref><ref>''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science''. Philadelphia: Published by A.L. Hummel for the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1917. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=xmkvAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA40 Pax Americana]", George W. Kihchwey. pp. 40+.</ref><ref>Abbott, Lyman, Hamilton Wright Mabie, Ernest Hamlin Abbott, and Francis Rufus Bellamy. ''The Outlook''. New York: Outlook Co, 1898. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=rkUAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA465 Expansion not Imperialism]" p. 465. (''cf''. [...] Felix Adler [states ...] "if, instead of establishing the Pax Americana so far as our influence avails throughout this continent, we should enter into' the field of Old World strife, and seek the sort of glory that is written in human blood." Here it is assumed that we have failed in establishing self-government, and propose to substitute, at least in other lands, an Old World form of government. This sort of argument has no effect on the expansionist, because he believes that we have magnificently succeeded in our problem, in spite of failures, neglects, and violations of our own principles, and because what he wishes to do is, not to abandon the experiment, but, inspired by the successes of the past, extend the Pax Americana over lands not included in this continent.")</ref> (Latin for "'''''American Peace'''''") is a term applied to the concept of relative peace in the Western Hemisphere and later the world beginning around the middle of the 20th century, thought to be caused by the preponderance of power enjoyed by the [[United States]]. Although the term finds its primary utility in the latter half of the 20th century, it has been used with different meanings and eras, such as the post-[[American Civil War|Civil War]] era in [[North America]],<ref>Lalor, John J., ''Cyclopaedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States''. Chicago: Rand, McNally, 1884. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=OC0QAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA959 The Union]", p. 959.</ref> and regionally in the Americas at the start of the 20th century. |
''Pax Americana'' is primarily used in its modern connotations to refer to the peace among ''Great Powers'' established after the end of [[World War II]] in 1945, also called the ''Long Peace''. In this modern sense, it has come to indicate the military and economic position of the [[United States]] in relation to other nations. For example, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan Marshall Plan,] which spent $13 billion to rebuild the economy of [[Western Europe]], has been seen as "the launching of the Pax Americana".<ref>Charles L. Mee, ''The Marshall Plan: The launching of the pax americana'' (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984)</ref> | ''Pax Americana'' is primarily used in its modern connotations to refer to the peace among ''Great Powers'' established after the end of [[World War II]] in 1945, also called the ''Long Peace''. In this modern sense, it has come to indicate the military and economic position of the [[United States]] in relation to other nations. For example, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan Marshall Plan,] which spent $13 billion to rebuild the economy of [[Western Europe]], has been seen as "the launching of the Pax Americana".<ref>Charles L. Mee, ''The Marshall Plan: The launching of the pax americana'' (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984)</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:01, 9 August 2021
 Pax Americana    | |
|---|---|
Pax Americana[1][2][3] (Latin for "American Peace") is a term applied to the concept of relative peace in the Western Hemisphere and later the world beginning around the middle of the 20th century, thought to be caused by the preponderance of power enjoyed by the United States. Although the term finds its primary utility in the latter half of the 20th century, it has been used with different meanings and eras, such as the post-Civil War era in North America,[4] and regionally in the Americas at the start of the 20th century.
Pax Americana is primarily used in its modern connotations to refer to the peace among Great Powers established after the end of World War II in 1945, also called the Long Peace. In this modern sense, it has come to indicate the military and economic position of the United States in relation to other nations. For example, the Marshall Plan, which spent $13 billion to rebuild the economy of Western Europe, has been seen as "the launching of the Pax Americana".[5]
The Latin term derives from Pax Romana of the Roman Empire. The term is most notably associated with Pax Britannica (1815–1914) under the British Empire, which served as the global hegemon and constabulary from the late 18th century until the early 20th century.[6]
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine | “I asked them – are you with us?” Zelensky said. “They answered that they are with us, but they don’t want to take us into the alliance. I’ve asked 27 leaders of Europe, if Ukraine will be in NATO, I’ve asked them directly — all are afraid and did not respond We were left by ourselves. Who is ready to go to war for us? Honestly, I don’t see anybody. Who is ready to give Ukraine guarantees of NATO membership? Honestly, everybody is afraid” | Russia Today Volodymyr Zelensky | 24 February 2022 |
| Cold War II | “The United States remains the world’s leading power with global interests, and it cannot afford to choose between Europe and the Indo-Pacific. Instead, Washington and its allies should develop a defense strategy capable of deterring and, if necessary, defeating Russia and China at the same time.” | Atlantic Council Matthew Kroenig | 18 February 2022 |
| Vladimir Putin | “Whoever would try to stop us and further create threats to our country, to our people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and lead you to such consequences that you have never faced in your history. We are ready for any outcome.” | Vladimir Putin ThePrint | 21 February 2022 |
| US/Deep state | “I join with those who assess the decay of the so-called Pax Americana into ever widening arms build-ups and military violence, in the light of the very similar decay a century ago of the so-called Pax Brittanica. We need to rescind policies that are as visibly detrimental to America and the world today as they were to Britain then. The problem is that Amnerican institutions are again in the grip of collective mania, as they were in the Palmer raids of 1919 and the McCarthy persecutions of the early 1950s. People outside government must work for a redirection of the U.S. government away from mania and illegality, like the awakening that ends the McCarthy era. But to regain control of politics, Americans must learn to understand and cope with the dark forces of the deep state. America, I try to suggest at the end [of The American Deep State] has like Britain far more to contribute to the world than violent power.” | Peter Dale Scott | 2015 |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ Joseph S. Nye, Jr., "The Changing Nature of World Power". Political Science Quarterly, The Academy of Political Science, Vol. 105, No. 2 (Summer, 1990), pp. 177–92
- ↑ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Philadelphia: Published by A.L. Hummel for the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1917. "Pax Americana", George W. Kihchwey. pp. 40+.
- ↑ Abbott, Lyman, Hamilton Wright Mabie, Ernest Hamlin Abbott, and Francis Rufus Bellamy. The Outlook. New York: Outlook Co, 1898. "Expansion not Imperialism" p. 465. (cf. [...] Felix Adler [states ...] "if, instead of establishing the Pax Americana so far as our influence avails throughout this continent, we should enter into' the field of Old World strife, and seek the sort of glory that is written in human blood." Here it is assumed that we have failed in establishing self-government, and propose to substitute, at least in other lands, an Old World form of government. This sort of argument has no effect on the expansionist, because he believes that we have magnificently succeeded in our problem, in spite of failures, neglects, and violations of our own principles, and because what he wishes to do is, not to abandon the experiment, but, inspired by the successes of the past, extend the Pax Americana over lands not included in this continent.")
- ↑ Lalor, John J., Cyclopaedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States. Chicago: Rand, McNally, 1884. "The Union", p. 959.
- ↑ Charles L. Mee, The Marshall Plan: The launching of the pax americana (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984)
- ↑ Harper's Magazine. 1885. "The Federal Union", p. 413.
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 6 August 2019.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
