Difference between revisions of "CDC"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Unstub)
(Added: sourcewatch.)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|predecessors=Office of National Defense Malaria Control Activities (1942), Office of Malaria Control in War Areas (1942–1946), Communicable Disease Center (1946–1967), National Communicable Disease Center (1967–1970), Center for Disease Control (1970–1980), Centers for Disease Control (1980–1992)
 
|predecessors=Office of National Defense Malaria Control Activities (1942), Office of Malaria Control in War Areas (1942–1946), Communicable Disease Center (1946–1967), National Communicable Disease Center (1967–1970), Center for Disease Control (1970–1980), Centers for Disease Control (1980–1992)
 
|num_staff=15000
 
|num_staff=15000
 +
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Tuskegee syphilis experiment==
 
==Tuskegee syphilis experiment==

Revision as of 18:12, 2 January 2018

Group.png CDC   Sourcewatch WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Predecessor•  Office of National Defense Malaria Control Activities (1942)
•  Office of Malaria Control in War Areas (1942–1946)
•  Communicable Disease Center (1946–1967)
•  National Communicable Disease Center (1967–1970)
•  Center for Disease Control (1970–1980)
•  Centers for Disease Control (1980–1992)
FormationJuly 1, 1946
Parent organizationUnited States Public Health Service
HeadquartersDeKalb County, Georgia
Staff15,000
SubpageCDC/CDC Foundation corporate support list
CDC/Director
CDC/MMR vaccine fraud

Tuskegee syphilis experiment

Full article: Tuskegee syphilis experiment

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention carried out a study on syphilis, which resulted in many deaths and denied its subjects treatment for syphilis. It intended to continue the study until all subjects had died and been autopsied but was forced to close it in light of the public outcry after it was exposed by the commercially-controlled media.

Intellectual property claims

In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was granted patent #CA2741523A1 on a particular strain of ebola - that is, it claims to have invented that disease strain. Natural News has questioned whether the desire to increase its patent portfolio and explain the decision to bring sufferers of the 2014 ebola outbreak to USA.[1]

MMR vaccine fraud allegation

Full article: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/MMR vaccine fraud

In 2014, William Thompson, a senior scientist at CDC who had been working there for over 15 years claimed that he had been involved in covering up MMR vaccine fraud.

Water Fluoridation

Full article: Water Fluoridation

In 2015, for the first time since 1962, the CDC announced a lowering of the recommended limit of fluoride (to 0.7 milligrams per liter of water) with the explanation that "Americans now have access to more sources of fluoride, including toothpaste and mouth rinses, than they did when municipal officials first began adding the mineral to water supplies across the United States". This follows increasing evidence of health damage due to fluoridated drinking water.[2]

2017 Censorship

In December 2017, CDC officials were prohibited from using 7 words in official documents being prepared for 2018. The prohibited words were: “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”[3]

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Francis Boyle“I have absolute proof from a Pentagon document that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was doing bio-warfare work for the Pentagon in Sierra Leone, the heart of the outbreak, as early as 1988. Why would they do that? As I suggested to try to circumvent the Biological Weapons Convention to which the US government is a party. So, always bio-warriors do use offensive and defensive bio-warfare work, violating the Biological Weapons Convention. So effectively they try to offshore it into West Africa where Liberia is not a party and Guinea is not a party. Sierra Leone is a party. But in Sierra Leone and Liberia there were disturbances which kept the world from really paying attention of what was going on in these labs.<a href="#cite_note-4">[4]</a>Francis Boyle
Warren Buffett“In the pharmaceutical world of economic durable competitive advantages, having a patent on a best-selling drug is about as good as it gets. The next best thing is having a monopoly on selling a country’s national health program the vaccines it needs for its childhood inoculation programs. Both of these businesses are hugely profitable and GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) excels in both these categories.

The vaccine business is particularly attractive because an individual shot (or jab) costs GSK approximately $1.50 to manufacture and it sells to national vaccine programs for approximately $9 a shot. That gives GSK a net profit of approximately $7.50 a shot. This markup gives GSK a very healthy profit margin that improves with each and every new disease that the company develops a vaccine for. Consider this: GSK's profits rose 10% with the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak—a disease for which the company had a state-of-the-art vaccine ready to inoculate the masses.

In addition to its patents and the durable competitive advantage GSK has with the vaccines, it also established the relationships with the world's governments, and it has the financial capital to create, manufacture, and sell vaccines on a world scale. If you were in charge of the health of a nation's 30 million-plus children, who would you buy your vaccines from? Every year? Year after year? You’d pick the biggest and the best. There are only four pharmaceutical giants that control most of the vaccine production in the world and GSK is one of them.

There is another component to the vaccine equation that also spells BIG MONEY: Every year, women all over the world give birth to approximately 133 million new babies, 4.3 million babies in the U.S. alone. With the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommending that children aged birth through six receive 34 individual vaccine shots/jabs, that means the market for those 34 vaccine shots/jabs increases every year by 4.3 million in just the U.S. alone. This in turn means that the vaccine manufacturers selling in the U.S. have the potential to earn a profit of $1.09 billion every year (4.3 million x 34 x $7.50 = $1.09 billion). Consider the number of yearly vaccines worldwide and the numbers are staggering—approximately $34 billion a year (133 million x 34 x $7.50 = $33.9 billion). After ten years, in the U.S. alone, vaccine manufacturers will see more than $10 billion in net profit. On a world scale, the number jumps to a potential $340 billion in profits.

And wait, it gets even better. With the invention of each new vaccine comes a patent that is good for twenty years and guarantees that no one else can make the vaccine. In other words, the company has a monopoly.

Even when the patents expire, other companies rarely step into the market because the major manufacturers have a permanent relationship with the government health departments of the world. This enables manufacturers to continue making the same vaccines year after year while maintaining their large profit margins even after their patents have expired.

And last but not least, vaccine manufacturers in the US are completely immune from lawsuits. Back in the 1980s several bad batches of vaccines injured so many children that the resulting successful lawsuits threatened to bankrupt the manufacturers, so the manufacturers lobbied a bill through Congress making them a protected class.”
Warren Buffett
Mary Buffett
2011

 

Event Planned

EventStartEndDescription
Tuskegee syphilis experiment19321972A murderous experiment which looked at the progression of syphilis. Subjects were told that they were being treated, while in fact treatment was denied them. Exposed after 40 years by a whistleblower who went to the press.

 

Events Participated in

EventStartEndLocation(s)Description
Pacific Eclipse9 December 201910 December 2019Washington DC
Phoenix
Honolulu
December 2019 pandemic planning exercise. Using mathematical modelling to create scary-sounding predictions for a smallpox epidemic, the real purpose of the exercise was to indoctrinate the participants from 200 organizations in the necessity of coerced "interventions" to avoid a doomsday scenario. The indoctrination came to fruition during the fake official narrative during Covid.
Simpsonwood Conference7 June 20008 June 2000Georgia (State)
Simpsonwood

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Why are government experts holding off vaccinating under-16s in the UK?Article6 August 2021Deepti GurdasaniPro COVID-19/Vaccine propaganda from an epidemiologist with ties to Big Pharma. The JCVI does not recommend jabs for under-16s and the approval process has slowed down. The rushed vaccination process is not rushed enough apparently.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References