Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:Editor Undertakings"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Not needed to know the history)
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Letterindigo.png|right|120px]]
+
{{HelpSection|image=ws_warning.png}}
 +
'''The existing editors require that all new members of their team agree to act in good faith''', as explained below:
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
The nature of WikiSpooks dictates that the usual openness of Wiki-format sites be slightly restricted (oh dear!). This is to ensure that article creation and editing rights are acknowledged as a privilege which can and will be removed should certain undertakings be persistently breached. For what is an essentially libertarian undertaking the restriction galls and is not taken lightly. '''It is however considered necessary because WikiSpooks is NOT seeking to produce content that represents mainstream consensus but rather which reflects consensus among those who regard the mainstream as - always and everywhere - in dire need of effective scrutiny and challenge.'''  The way this is (hopefully) achieved is to restrict creation and editing rights to registered users only and to make registration conditional on acceptance of undertakings. The undertakings are neither onerous nor unreasonable - at least we don't think they are - but are designed simply to exclude those people who may be fundamentally opposed to the entire [[Project:Site Rationale|site rationale]] and it's existence, and therefore likely to behave accordingly.
+
Spam and vandalism led to a registered users only policy for editing. This restriction was not taken lightly, but it is considered necessary because ''Wikispooks is NOT intended to reflect corporate-sponsored worldviews but to facilitate those whose careful study of the evidence has led them to fundamentally question the narratives told by the {{ccm}}.'' Editing this site is a privilege which can and will be removed should this undertaking be persistently breached. The aim of requiring editors to register, and making registration conditional on acceptance of this undertaking, is to exclude those who are fundamentally opposed to the entire [[Project:Site Rationale|site rationale]] and its existence.
 +
 
 +
== Enemy images==
 +
Editors should be particularly wary of invoking nebulous [[enemy images]] such as the threat of "[[Russian Propaganda]]". This has been promoted in recent years by [[Propornot]] and a UK counterpart, the [[Integrity Initiative]]. This is not to say that the [[Russian]] [[establishment]] does not engage in [[Russia/propaganda|propaganda]] - but that it is far from the only government to do so, and emphasis should be given on lies by other [[group]]s such as [[NATO]].<ref>For example, a [[NATO]] spokesman denied all knowledge of [[Operation Gladio]], but the group later admitted that this had been incorrect.{{cn}}</ref>
  
 
== Party politics ==
 
== Party politics ==
The restriction is also intended to exclude those seeking to promote any of the mainstream political parties. 'Deep Political' theory takes it as axiomatic that existing Establishment organisations are already hopelessly suborned and co-opted to the purposes of [[Project:Definitions|Permanent Government]] and its deep political structures. This applies especially to the main political parties whose role has morphed into inspiring energy-sapping disputation between their respective adherents over trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable. Left or Right? - it makes little difference - we will wage war, either for 'humanitarian intervention' purposes or to 'fight terrorism' with the real reasons - the elephants in the living room - remain hidden and/or out-of-bounds for allowable public discourse. When it comes to the mainstream parties, Left is NOT superior to Right - nor vice-versa; they are merely two sides of the same Establishment coin.
+
{{FA|Party politics}}
 +
[[image:Vote-squeezer.jpg|left|323px]]
 +
The [[deep politics]] illuminated on this site provides evidence that key [[establishment]] groups are more or less hopelessly co-opted by [[deep state]] groups. The occult function of [[political parties]] is to preserve the status quo by promoting endless energy-sapping and distracting disputes between their respective adherents over relative trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable.  
 +
 
 +
<center>{{QB|<big>'''Neither 'left' nor 'right' is the answer; they are merely two sides of the same [[establishment]] co(i)n!'''</big>}}</center>
  
None of which is to deny the merits and de-merits of Left/Right theory (although the whole linear political spectrum analogy is probably well past its sell-by date). It is simply that WikiSpooks is NOT the place for party political activity and registered users should understand that it will will be stamped on if it appears.
+
''Far from being opposites, Left and Right, in their political sense are both ''de facto'' supporters of the [[establishment]].'' Whether [[war]]s are fought for "[[humanitarian intervention]]", to "fight [[terrorism]]" or whatever other superficial [[casus belli]], makes no difference. The ''real'' reasons - the ''elephants in the room'' - remain hidden in plain sight, as [[third rail]]  topics for the {{ccm}}.<ref>Consider, for example, the gulf between [[Barack Obama]]'s campaign promises and his actions on assuming the [[US Presidency]].</ref>
  
 
==No barrier to debate==
 
==No barrier to debate==
None of this is intended as a barrier to vigorous evidence-based contributions that disagree with this or that aspect of alleged 'Deep Political' phenomena nor even the merits of a 'Left/Right wing' view of what society needs or does not need. It is simply to make it crystal clear that WikiSpooks is NOT the place for the promotion of ANY "[[Project:Definitions|Establishment]]" organisation or "[[Project:Definitions|official narrative]]".
+
None of this is intended as a barrier to evidence-based contributions intended to refine our collective understanding of [[deep political]] phenomena. It is simply to make it crystal clear that Wikispooks is ''not'' the place for the promotion of [[Project:Definitions|Establishment]] organisations or [[Project:Definitions|official narrative]]s.
  
== Registered user undertakings ==
+
== Editor undertakings ==
So, registered users must agree and undertake as follows:
+
By seeking registration, prospective editors agree and declare as follows:
#I understand and am broadly sympathetic to the rationale and purpose of the WikiSpooks site.
+
#I understand and am broadly sympathetic to the [[wikispooks:Site_Rationale|rationale and purpose of the Wikispooks site]].
#I will not undertake any article creation or editing...  
+
#If there is a page about me I will identify it in my application.
##at the behest of any third party - especially not an "Authoritative" third party as defined in [[Project:Definitions|WikiSpooks Definitions]]
+
#I will cite appropriate evidence to support my edits where possible.
##for monetary reward or any other consideration of personal material benefit
+
#I will seek to avoid the tactics of [[propaganda]] such as [[enemy image]]s or [[polarising perspective]]s.
#I will not engage in party-political activity nor activity on behalf of ANY "[[Project:Definitions|Establishment]]" organisation, on the WikiSpooks site.
+
#I will ''not'' post classified material on this site.
#I will confine my opposition to, or support for any "[[Project:Definitions|official narrative]]" to evidence-based argument and debate; whilst recognising that deep political theory - and hence WikiSpooks - '''holds to a presumption AGAINST "[[Project:Definitions|Authority]]" as a reliable source of evidence.'''
+
#I will ''not'' edit...
#I will not engage in persistent edit reversals but will instead involve a site administrator to arbitrate any such dispute at an early stage.
+
#*i) at the behest of any third party - especially not an "[[Authority|authoritative]]" third party</li>
#I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to dispute.  
+
#*ii) for [[money]] or any other consideration of personal material benefit</li>
#I understand that items 5 & 6 apply especially to discussion pages where it is acceptable to dispute issues vigorously but is absolutely NOT acceptable to indulge personal venom nor "Ad Hominem" <ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem "ad-hominem" - definition]</ref> type argument
+
#If my edits are reversed by another editor:
 +
#*i) I will ''not'' simply re-reverse the edit without launching a discussion on the corresponding talk page;
 +
#*ii) If agreement is not reached, I will accept arbitration by a site administrator to resolve the issue;
 +
#*iii) I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to differences of opinion.
 +
#I understand that although vigorous debate is welcome, ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks are not.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
+
{{Template:Wikispooks Footer/Policy}}
{{Main-footer}}
+
[[Category:Wikispooks Policy]]
 
 
[[Category:About WikiSpooks]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:33, 20 January 2021

Ws warning.png

The existing editors require that all new members of their team agree to act in good faith, as explained below:

Introduction

Spam and vandalism led to a registered users only policy for editing. This restriction was not taken lightly, but it is considered necessary because Wikispooks is NOT intended to reflect corporate-sponsored worldviews but to facilitate those whose careful study of the evidence has led them to fundamentally question the narratives told by the commercially-controlled media. Editing this site is a privilege which can and will be removed should this undertaking be persistently breached. The aim of requiring editors to register, and making registration conditional on acceptance of this undertaking, is to exclude those who are fundamentally opposed to the entire site rationale and its existence.

Enemy images

Editors should be particularly wary of invoking nebulous enemy images such as the threat of "Russian Propaganda". This has been promoted in recent years by Propornot and a UK counterpart, the Integrity Initiative. This is not to say that the Russian establishment does not engage in propaganda - but that it is far from the only government to do so, and emphasis should be given on lies by other groups such as NATO.[1]

Party politics

Full article: Party politics
Vote-squeezer.jpg

The deep politics illuminated on this site provides evidence that key establishment groups are more or less hopelessly co-opted by deep state groups. The occult function of political parties is to preserve the status quo by promoting endless energy-sapping and distracting disputes between their respective adherents over relative trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable.

Neither 'left' nor 'right' is the answer; they are merely two sides of the same establishment co(i)n!

Far from being opposites, Left and Right, in their political sense are both de facto supporters of the establishment. Whether wars are fought for "humanitarian intervention", to "fight terrorism" or whatever other superficial casus belli, makes no difference. The real reasons - the elephants in the room - remain hidden in plain sight, as third rail topics for the commercially-controlled media.[2]

No barrier to debate

None of this is intended as a barrier to evidence-based contributions intended to refine our collective understanding of deep political phenomena. It is simply to make it crystal clear that Wikispooks is not the place for the promotion of Establishment organisations or official narratives.

Editor undertakings

By seeking registration, prospective editors agree and declare as follows:

  1. I understand and am broadly sympathetic to the rationale and purpose of the Wikispooks site.
  2. If there is a page about me I will identify it in my application.
  3. I will cite appropriate evidence to support my edits where possible.
  4. I will seek to avoid the tactics of propaganda such as enemy images or polarising perspectives.
  5. I will not post classified material on this site.
  6. I will not edit...
    • i) at the behest of any third party - especially not an "authoritative" third party
    • ii) for money or any other consideration of personal material benefit
  7. If my edits are reversed by another editor:
    • i) I will not simply re-reverse the edit without launching a discussion on the corresponding talk page;
    • ii) If agreement is not reached, I will accept arbitration by a site administrator to resolve the issue;
    • iii) I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to differences of opinion.
  8. I understand that although vigorous debate is welcome, ad hominem attacks are not.

References

  1. For example, a NATO spokesman denied all knowledge of Operation Gladio, but the group later admitted that this had been incorrect.[citation needed]
  2. Consider, for example, the gulf between Barack Obama's campaign promises and his actions on assuming the US Presidency.
Wikispooks logo.png Policy.png
Wikispooks
Policy
Wikispooks to do.png Tools2.png SMW.png Help.png