Difference between revisions of "Reuters"
(→History: typo) |
(adding leadership) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Reuters | |sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Reuters | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | '''Reuters''' is an example of [[corporate media]]. Previously British, it is now owned by the Canadian company | + | '''Reuters''' is an example of [[corporate media]]. Previously British, it is now owned by the Canadian company Thomson-Reuters. |
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
“The new relationship established with Reuters in the Middle East and Latin America can lead to valuable goodwill and cooperation with the Agency on a global scale,” [[John Peck]], former head of the IRD, said in declassified government documents.<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-media/britain-secretly-funded-reuters-in-1960s-and-1970s-documents-idUSKBN1ZC20H</ref> | “The new relationship established with Reuters in the Middle East and Latin America can lead to valuable goodwill and cooperation with the Agency on a global scale,” [[John Peck]], former head of the IRD, said in declassified government documents.<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-media/britain-secretly-funded-reuters-in-1960s-and-1970s-documents-idUSKBN1ZC20H</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Leadership== | ||
+ | |||
+ | James C. Smith, CEO of the world's biggest news agency, Thomson Reuters, is on the board of Atlantic Council, the most central [[military-industrial complex|military-industrial]]/NATO think-tank. Thomson Reuters consistently promotes a very strong pro-US/NATO line in geopolitical questions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Canadian politician [[Chrystia Freeland]], who the The US State Department boasted had adopted an “America first” foreign policy, in 2010 became "global editor-at-large of Reuters, the biggest international news agency, that is the source of most foreign policy stories for the entire mainstream media." | ||
+ | |||
==Reporting== | ==Reporting== | ||
Line 29: | Line 36: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
− |
Revision as of 23:33, 12 February 2020
Reuters (Corporate media) | |
---|---|
Headquarters | Canary Wharf, London, England, U.K. |
Member of | Atlantic Council/Corporate Members, Council on Foreign Relations/Corporate Members, WEF/Strategic Partners |
Subpage | •Reuters/CEO •Reuters/Chairman •Reuters/Director •Reuters/Editor |
Reuters is an example of corporate media. Previously British, it is now owned by the Canadian company Thomson-Reuters.
Contents
History
The British government secretly funded Reuters in the 1960s and 1970s at the behest of Information Research Department (IRD), the British government's anti-Soviet propaganda unit linked to British intelligence. The source of the funding was concealed by using the BBC as a conduit to make the payments.
The secret government financing of Reuters amounted to 245,000 pounds ($317,838 at 2020 exchange rates) per year before 1969 but then reduced to 100,000 pounds per year in 1969-1970.
“The new relationship established with Reuters in the Middle East and Latin America can lead to valuable goodwill and cooperation with the Agency on a global scale,” John Peck, former head of the IRD, said in declassified government documents.[1]
Leadership
James C. Smith, CEO of the world's biggest news agency, Thomson Reuters, is on the board of Atlantic Council, the most central military-industrial/NATO think-tank. Thomson Reuters consistently promotes a very strong pro-US/NATO line in geopolitical questions.
The Canadian politician Chrystia Freeland, who the The US State Department boasted had adopted an “America first” foreign policy, in 2010 became "global editor-at-large of Reuters, the biggest international news agency, that is the source of most foreign policy stories for the entire mainstream media."
Reporting
In 2016, Reuters featured Simon Bracey-Lane (later of the Institute for Statecraft) on their website:
Quotes by Reuters
Page | Quote | Date | Source |
---|---|---|---|
COVID-19/Zero Covid | “Nearly three years into the pandemic, China is sticking with a strict COVID-19 containment policy that has caused mounting economic damage and widespread frustration, while keeping its borders shut for most international travel.
China has yet to describe when or how it will begin to exit from an approach that it calls "dynamic zero". China says it recognises domestic outbreaks are inevitable, and its policies are not geared towards having zero cases at all times but instead, are about "dynamically" taking action when cases surface. Dynamic-zero is two-pronged - prevention and containment. This year has seen the intensification of both aspects as the highly transmissible Omicron variant spread across China. Prevention focuses on early detection through regular PCR tests, especially in cities, where a recent negative result can be a requirement to enter a business or public facility. Potential or suspected cases are isolated at home or placed under quarantine at a government-supervised facility. Those deemed close contacts of infected people must quarantine, and even distant or potential contact can result in an order to stay home. Control tactics, aimed at swiftly cutting off transmission chains to forestall outbreaks, involve quarantining cases at government-supervised facilities and locking down buildings, communities or even entire cities. Since March 2020, China's borders have remained shut to most visitors. Arrivals of all nationalities are subject to seven days of quarantine at a facility and three days of home isolation. Each person's PCR test result is electronically logged on government databases, as well as one's travel history, which is tracked by mobile phone signals. People must keep a "normal" COVID profile with continual negative test results, no contact with infected people and no visits to risky places. Profiles are maintained on mobile phone "health kits". An abnormal profile bars access to public venues and mass transit, and can even require home quarantine for days with electronic seals attached to doors to enforce isolation. Profiles can without warning turn abnormal - indicated by a change in colour or the dreaded appearance of a pop-up window - if one was at a mall visited by an infected person or if one was a contact of a close contact. Sometimes profiles become abnormal even if all the requirements are met. Visits to other cities or provinces may require quarantine on arrival. Lockdowns, which can be at the building level or much wider, can be sudden. A single case can trigger the lockdown of a building or residential compound, which means people cannot leave. Some lockdowns have lasted for months. Entire cities can be locked down with only hours of notice. Big cities that have been shut, sometimes more than once, include Shanghai, Xian, Chengdu, Tianjin, Shenzhen and even entire provinces and regions such as Xinjiang, Tibet and Jilin. China argues that its policy saves lives. The authorities acknowledge Omicron is far less likely to cause serious health issues but say its high transmissibility means large outbreaks would lead to a run on medical resources and expose vulnerable groups, including hundreds of millions of elderly people. China's official death toll had stayed near just 4,600 since 2020 until more than 560 fatalities struck Shanghai in April and May, spurring other cities to further enhance their COVID defences. Chinese health authorities predicted last month that for every 100,000 infections there would be at least 100 deaths. China has yet to approve any foreign vaccines or any domestically made shots based on mRNA technology. Authorities have also not pushed for a quicker pace of vaccination this year, compared with a big vaccination campaign in 2021. As of Tuesday, 3.44 billion doses had been administered, with over 90% of China's population fully vaccinated. But only around 60% of the general population has received booster shots. About 80% of those aged 60 and above have had additional doses.” | 2022 | |
John McCain | “Republican 2008 presidential hopeful John McCain crooned the words “Bomb Iran” to a Beach Boys’ tune in joking response to a question about any possible U.S. attack over Tehran’s suspected nuclear weapons program. “That old Beach Boys song, Bomb Iran ... bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb,” the Vietnam War veteran warbled softly to the band’s “Barbara Ann” when he was asked when the United States would send an “airmail message” to Iran.” | April 2007 | YouTube |
Related Quotation
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
John Laughland | “People experience a strong psychological reluctance to accept that political events today are deliberately manipulated. This reluctance is itself a product of the ideology of the information age, which flatters people’s vanity and encourages them to believe that they have access to huge amounts of information. In fact, the apparent multifarious nature of modern media information hides an extreme paucity of original sources, rather as a street of restaurants on a Greek waterfront can hide the reality of a single kitchen at the back. News reports of major events very often come from a single source, usually a wire agency, and even authoritative news outlets like the BBC simply recycle information which they have received from these agencies, presenting it as their own.” | John Laughland | 2010 |
Employees on Wikispooks
Employee | Job | Appointed | End | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alvise Armellini | Italy correspondent | September 2021 | Also of the former Integrity Initiative | |
Nima Elbagir | Correspondent | 2002 | 2005 | |
Maria de Goeij | Analyst | March 2020 | Special Services division | |
Lucy Marcus | Host of In the Boardroom with Lucy Marcus | March 2012 | January 2016 | |
Lawrence de Neufville | North America correspondent | 1935 | 1940 | |
David Roy Thomson | Chairman | 2008 | ||
Andre-François Villeneuve | Executive director at Reuters America | 1989 | 2000 | Bilderberg 1996 |
Nawal al-Maghafi | News Producer | February 2013 | February 2014 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Meet a Propagandist | webpage | 4 August 2011 | 'Tony Cartalucci' | |
Document:The Propaganda Multiplier | media analysis | 2016 | Swiss Policy Research |
A document sourced from Reuters
Title | Type | Subject(s) | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document:South Africa Minister Denies Knowing Of Lockerbie Bomb | Abstract | Pan Am Flight 103 Pik Botha Roland Darroll Gerrit Pretorius Neil Peter Van Heerden Tam Dalyell The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie Allan Francovich Khaled Jaafar Nicola Hall | 12 November 1994 | David Tucker | Having confirmed that South African foreign minister Pik Botha and his 22-strong party had been booked on Pan Am Flight 103 but switched flights after arriving early in London from Johannesburg, spokesman Roland Darroll said: "The minister is flattered by the allegation of near-omniscience." |