Difference between revisions of "Election/Fraud"
(Hillary clinton subsection) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|image=Voting fraud.jpg | |image=Voting fraud.jpg | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''Voting fraud''' is hard to measure without a paper trail of votes cast. It is a subject of concern amongst many people,<ref>https://www.unhackthevote.com/category/voting-machines/</ref> although the {{ccm}} does not reflect this. | + | '''Voting fraud''' is hard to measure without a paper trail of votes cast. It is a subject of concern amongst many people,<ref>https://www.unhackthevote.com/category/voting-machines/</ref> although the {{ccm}} does not reflect this. Diebold Election Solutions was renamed [[Premier Election Solutions]] after leaks of their source code revealed the software could be subject to fraud.<ref>https://www.computerworld.com/article/2547648/security0/diebold-source-code-leaked-again.html</ref> |
==US== | ==US== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In [[USA]] in particular, paper ballots have been either partly or wholly replaced by electronic voting systems, after measures such as the [[2001]] [[Help America Vote Act]]. Since voting machines leave no conventional paper trial, they are open to abuse, which [[Jonathan Simon]] claims has happened on multiple occasions.<ref>https://t.co/Bqcz5chj8N</ref> A mound of evidence exists both that many of the voting machines are easily hacked<ref>http://www.activistpost.com/2015/08/flashback-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-with-26-and-an-8th-grade-education.html</ref>, that this is ''not'' accidental<ref>http://www.westernjournalism.com/vote-fraud-diebold-whistleblower-speaks-out/</ref>, and that the 2004 US election was decided as a result of fraudulent use of voting technology.<ref>http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/163</ref><ref>http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Election_integrity_timeline</ref> | In [[USA]] in particular, paper ballots have been either partly or wholly replaced by electronic voting systems, after measures such as the [[2001]] [[Help America Vote Act]]. Since voting machines leave no conventional paper trial, they are open to abuse, which [[Jonathan Simon]] claims has happened on multiple occasions.<ref>https://t.co/Bqcz5chj8N</ref> A mound of evidence exists both that many of the voting machines are easily hacked<ref>http://www.activistpost.com/2015/08/flashback-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-with-26-and-an-8th-grade-education.html</ref>, that this is ''not'' accidental<ref>http://www.westernjournalism.com/vote-fraud-diebold-whistleblower-speaks-out/</ref>, and that the 2004 US election was decided as a result of fraudulent use of voting technology.<ref>http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/163</ref><ref>http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Election_integrity_timeline</ref> | ||
| − | In | + | ===Diebold source leaks=== |
| + | In 2003, the source code to all [[Diebold]]'s voting machines was leaked. Researchers at [[Johns Hopkins University]] and R[[ice University]] published a damning critique of the products, based on an analysis of the software. They stated that it would be easy to program a counterfeit voting card to work with the machines and then use it to cast multiple votes inside the voting booth. Another leak of source code occurred in 2006.<ref>https://www.computerworld.com/article/2547648/security0/diebold-source-code-leaked-again.html</ref> | ||
===Hillary Clinton=== | ===Hillary Clinton=== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
===Georgia investigation=== | ===Georgia investigation=== | ||
In an effort to force the state to scrap the electronic voting system, a number of Georgia voters bandied together and sued. They asked for an independent security review of the server, expecting to find flaws that would lend weight to their argument for investment in a more modern and secure system. After a [[Freedom of Information Act]] request, emails were released in October 2017 that reveal that technicians at the election center deleted the server's data on July 7 – just days after the lawsuit was filed. ''[[The Register]]'' reported that "That same email also notes that backups of the server data were also deleted more than a month after the initial wipe – just as the lawsuit moved to a federal court. It is unclear who ordered the destruction of the data."<ref>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/26/voting_server_georgia_wiped/</ref> | In an effort to force the state to scrap the electronic voting system, a number of Georgia voters bandied together and sued. They asked for an independent security review of the server, expecting to find flaws that would lend weight to their argument for investment in a more modern and secure system. After a [[Freedom of Information Act]] request, emails were released in October 2017 that reveal that technicians at the election center deleted the server's data on July 7 – just days after the lawsuit was filed. ''[[The Register]]'' reported that "That same email also notes that backups of the server data were also deleted more than a month after the initial wipe – just as the lawsuit moved to a federal court. It is unclear who ordered the destruction of the data."<ref>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/26/voting_server_georgia_wiped/</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==="Charade" of elections=== | ||
| + | In April 2016, [[Ron Paul]] stated that the American electoral system is rigged to keep "independent thinkers" from succeeding, adding that “I see elections as so much of a charade”.<ref>http://www.blacklistednews.com/Ron_Paul%3A_US_Elections_Are_Rigged%2C_Voting_Simply_Used_to_Pacify_the_Public/50500/0/38/38/Y/M.html</ref> | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
Revision as of 01:00, 23 February 2018
 Election/Fraud  (fraud)    | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interest of | • Dominion voting systems • Athan Gibbs • Katie Hobbs • Tony Navarrete |
Voting fraud is hard to measure without a paper trail of votes cast. It is a subject of concern amongst many people,[1] although the commercially-controlled media does not reflect this. Diebold Election Solutions was renamed Premier Election Solutions after leaks of their source code revealed the software could be subject to fraud.[2]
Contents
US
In USA in particular, paper ballots have been either partly or wholly replaced by electronic voting systems, after measures such as the 2001 Help America Vote Act. Since voting machines leave no conventional paper trial, they are open to abuse, which Jonathan Simon claims has happened on multiple occasions.[3] A mound of evidence exists both that many of the voting machines are easily hacked[4], that this is not accidental[5], and that the 2004 US election was decided as a result of fraudulent use of voting technology.[6][7]
Diebold source leaks
In 2003, the source code to all Diebold's voting machines was leaked. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University and Rice University published a damning critique of the products, based on an analysis of the software. They stated that it would be easy to program a counterfeit voting card to work with the machines and then use it to cast multiple votes inside the voting booth. Another leak of source code occurred in 2006.[8]
Hillary Clinton
In 2016, a recording of Hillary Clinton was published. In 2006 she stated that “I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake. And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.” [9]
Georgia investigation
In an effort to force the state to scrap the electronic voting system, a number of Georgia voters bandied together and sued. They asked for an independent security review of the server, expecting to find flaws that would lend weight to their argument for investment in a more modern and secure system. After a Freedom of Information Act request, emails were released in October 2017 that reveal that technicians at the election center deleted the server's data on July 7 – just days after the lawsuit was filed. The Register reported that "That same email also notes that backups of the server data were also deleted more than a month after the initial wipe – just as the lawsuit moved to a federal court. It is unclear who ordered the destruction of the data."[10]
"Charade" of elections
In April 2016, Ron Paul stated that the American electoral system is rigged to keep "independent thinkers" from succeeding, adding that “I see elections as so much of a charade”.[11]
References
- ↑ https://www.unhackthevote.com/category/voting-machines/
- ↑ https://www.computerworld.com/article/2547648/security0/diebold-source-code-leaked-again.html
- ↑ https://t.co/Bqcz5chj8N
- ↑ http://www.activistpost.com/2015/08/flashback-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-with-26-and-an-8th-grade-education.html
- ↑ http://www.westernjournalism.com/vote-fraud-diebold-whistleblower-speaks-out/
- ↑ http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/163
- ↑ http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Election_integrity_timeline
- ↑ https://www.computerworld.com/article/2547648/security0/diebold-source-code-leaked-again.html
- ↑ http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio-emerges-of-hillary-clinton-proposing-rigging-palestine-election/ Observer.com , 2006
- ↑ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/26/voting_server_georgia_wiped/
- ↑ http://www.blacklistednews.com/Ron_Paul%3A_US_Elections_Are_Rigged%2C_Voting_Simply_Used_to_Pacify_the_Public/50500/0/38/38/Y/M.html
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| 2021 Newfoundland and Labrador general election | The first postal voting-only election in Canada. Hampered by COVID-19 , the voting process was not simple. Unsurprisingly, the results couldn't have been better for the governing Liberals. |
| Hanging chad | |
| US/2020 Presidential election/Iowa DNC Caucuses | More proof that voting is a rigged joke. |
| Voting pencil | Wikipedia considers concerns over election integrity a "conspiracy theory" |
A Election/Fraud victim on Wikispooks
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Kari Lake | US politician aligned with Trump |
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| George Carlin | “On Election Day, I stay home. Two reasons: first of all, voting is meaningless; this country was bought and paid for a long time ago. That empty shit they shuffle around and repackage every four years doesn't mean a thing. Second, I don't vote, because I firmly believe that if you vote, you have no right to complain. I know some people like to twist that around and say, "If you don't vote, you have no right to complain." But where's the logic in that? Think it through: If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and you screw things up, then you're responsible for what they've done. You voted them in. You caused the problem. You have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote—who, in fact, did not even leave the house on Election Day—am in no way responsible for what these politicians have done and have every right to complain about the mess you created. Which I had nothing to do with. Why can't people see that?” | George Carlin | |
| Corporate media/Censorship | “would through a lurid light of distrust and disbelief onto our entire electoral system, political system and basically our democracy” | Jonathan Simon | 24 November 2016 |
