Difference between revisions of "COVID-19/Pathology"
m (→Statistical Method: +ref) |
m (→Case fatality: lets not get confused here.) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Case fatality== | ==Case fatality== | ||
− | [[image:Covid_19-Seasonal_Flu_comparision.jpg|right|600px|thumbnail|Numbers of infection and deaths from the [[WHO]] for 2019/2020 as reported by [[Ben Swann]] for [[Truth in Media]] on his [[Youtube]] channel on 2020-03-18.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohO8eAwi_po</ref> The base from which the percentage for the fatality rate for the coronavirus is calculated, is the number of confirmed cases. Whereas for the seasonal flu it is the number of estimated cases. So the death rate for the seasonal flu is ~0.1%. If the flu were calculated like the coronavirus, per confirmed cases, the death rate would be around 10%.]] | + | [[image:Covid_19-Seasonal_Flu_comparision.jpg|right|600px|thumbnail|Numbers of infection and deaths from the [[WHO]] for 2019/2020 as reported by [[Ben Swann]] for [[Truth in Media]] on his [[Youtube]] channel on 2020-03-18.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohO8eAwi_po</ref> The base from which the percentage for the fatality rate for the coronavirus is calculated, is the number of confirmed '''cases''' (see above how a "case" is defined). Whereas for the seasonal flu it is the number of estimated cases. So the death rate for the seasonal flu is ~0.1%. If the flu were calculated like the coronavirus, per "confirmed cases" (meaning people actually seriously ill), the death rate would be around 10%.]] |
COVID-19 has a very widely ranging rate of case fatality<ref>https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/04/something-about-the-covid-19-pandemic-feels-off-kilter/</ref> which declined steadily as more testing was carried out. It is more fatal to men than women and to those with pre-existing health problems, especially lung complaints. It is more dangerous to the old rather than the young, possibly mainly due to co-morbities.<ref>[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says Around 99% of Italian fatalities had pre-existing health conditions]</ref> It ''may'' have have most impact on Asians.<ref>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985v1.full</ref> Relatively few cases were initially reported in [[Africa]].<ref>https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236760-we-dont-know-why-so-few-covid-19-cases-have-been-reported-in-africa/</ref> It was reported in March 2020 to be more dangerous to those with blood type A.<ref>https://www.gilmorehealth.com/people-with-blood-type-a-more-susceptible-to-complications-from-coronavirus/</ref> | COVID-19 has a very widely ranging rate of case fatality<ref>https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/04/something-about-the-covid-19-pandemic-feels-off-kilter/</ref> which declined steadily as more testing was carried out. It is more fatal to men than women and to those with pre-existing health problems, especially lung complaints. It is more dangerous to the old rather than the young, possibly mainly due to co-morbities.<ref>[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says Around 99% of Italian fatalities had pre-existing health conditions]</ref> It ''may'' have have most impact on Asians.<ref>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985v1.full</ref> Relatively few cases were initially reported in [[Africa]].<ref>https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236760-we-dont-know-why-so-few-covid-19-cases-have-been-reported-in-africa/</ref> It was reported in March 2020 to be more dangerous to those with blood type A.<ref>https://www.gilmorehealth.com/people-with-blood-type-a-more-susceptible-to-complications-from-coronavirus/</ref> |
Revision as of 07:27, 19 April 2020
COVID-19/Pathology | |
---|---|
A summary from March 2020 | |
Interest of | Ryan Cole |
The effects of COVID-19 on humans are a matter of ongoing intense study. It is generally very mild, but for the elderly and infirm it can be fatal, especially (it is suspected) in the case of a high initial dose.[1] Containing it is a serious challenge because it can be asymptomatic but still infectious.[2]
Contents
Statistical Method
In order to estimate how dangerous a virus is, the total number of people who got in contact with that virus has to be compared to the group of people who got ill from it. Instead of reporting this important ratio the commercially-controlled media reported as a "case" when someone was antibody positive (a measure if someone had contact with the virus). Therefore, the increasing number of tests carried out corresponded to and were reported as increasing number of cases. This is, obviously, fraud as several scientists and medical doctors have pointed out. [3] [4] [5]
Case fatality
COVID-19 has a very widely ranging rate of case fatality[7] which declined steadily as more testing was carried out. It is more fatal to men than women and to those with pre-existing health problems, especially lung complaints. It is more dangerous to the old rather than the young, possibly mainly due to co-morbities.[8] It may have have most impact on Asians.[9] Relatively few cases were initially reported in Africa.[10] It was reported in March 2020 to be more dangerous to those with blood type A.[11]
The Daily Mail suggested on 7 April 2020 that the fatality rate was about 2%.[12]
A peer reviewed April 2020 study by Stanford University put the fatality rate at 0.14% or less.[13]
Uncertainty
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stated in a press briefing in March 2020 that "Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died," overlooking the bias towards reporting of symptomatic and serious cases.Craig Murray by contrast, noting the bias of hospital gathered statistics, estimated a rate of about "0.5%", comparable to the Hong Kong flu pandemic of 1968/9.[14] On 24 March the BBC wrote that "The UK government's scientific advisers believe that the chances of dying from a coronavirus infection are between 0.5% and 1%."[15]
Inflation of Statistics
Cases of flu precipitously declined in comparison to 2019.[16] In March Prof Walter Ricciardi, scientific adviser to the Italian government, did relate: "The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus".[17] In Germany the president of the Robert Koch Institut confirmed on 20 March that the institution does the accounting in the same way.[18] In late March / early April the United Kingdom and the United States have adopted policy that could lead to a higher number of deaths due to the coronavirus when under the same circumstances these deaths would not have been counted in such a way before.[19] The CDC announced that deaths would be counted as COVID-related without evidence if they were presumed to be so;[20] in its Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 from 03. April is advising that: "In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as 'probable' or 'presumed'."[21]
Incubation period
#Masks4All: "I protect you, you protect me." |
The incubation period is 1-14 days, with a median of 5-6 days[22] Some disease carriers remain asymptomatic.[23][24][25][26][27]
Infection
Infection occurs through a similar mechanism to traditional influenza, i.e. generally inhalation, possibly also through touch or survival on surfaces. However, COVID is significantly more efficient at entering the lungs, so the virus has a greater R0 value, meaning it spread more readily. The infectious period was suspected to be about 14 days, but March 2020 research suggested it might be over one month.[28] The initial hope was that the virus might be sensitive to heat,[29] although as of late March 2020 the suspicion was that it was not — but that high humidity could reduce its rate of transmission.[30]
Reinfection?
Some reports have suggested that reinfection may be possible,[31][32] although as of March 2020 this was unproven, possibly due to faulty testing.[33][34] Also uncertain was whether re-infection would be milder or more severe.[35][36]
Treatment
Many drugs have been suggested to treat COVID-19,[37] including Chloroquine[38], which showed efficacy against the disease in clinical trials in February[39] and March 2020.[40]
Prognosis
Like the (more deadly) SARS and MERS, severe Covid infections can cause permanent lung damage.[41][42]
Mutations
Two strains of COVID, "l" and "s" have been reported.[43]
Related Quotations
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Associated Press | “Posts continue to circulate online falsely claiming that COVID-19 survivors don’t need vaccines because of natural immunity. In fact, that protection is variable and not long-lasting, so vaccines are still recommended.” | 30 September 2021 | |
COVID-19/Timeline | “All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated... There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases... there was no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious.” | Shiyi Cao Yong Gan Chao Wang Max Bachmann Shanbo Wei Jie Gong Yuchai Huang Tiantian Wang Liqing Li Kai Lu Heng Jiang Yanhong Gong Hongbin Xu Xin Shen Qingfeng Tian Chuanzhu Lv Fujian Song Xiaoxv Yin Zuxun Lu | November 2020 |
Face mask | “Masks can help reduce your chance of #COVID19 infection by more than 80%.” | Rochelle Walensky | 5 November 2021 |
Elon Musk | “Extremely big difference between died because of or died with. Also, did the person actually have C19 or did they just have C19 symptoms? It’s almost impossible to die without feeling weakness, shortness of breath or other C19 symptoms, unless you were crushed by a falling piano.” | X Elon Musk | 2020 |
Elon Musk | “There is considerable conflation of diagnosis & contraction of “corona”. Actual virality is much lower than it would seem. I think this will turn out to be comparable to other forms of influenza. World War Z it is not” | X Elon Musk | 2020 |
Alexander Myasnikov | “It’s all bullsh*t... It’s all exaggerated. It’s an acute respiratory disease with minimal mortality. Why has the whole world been destroyed? That I don’t know.” | Alexander Myasnikov | |
David Malcolm Nott | “This disease is so virulent, it's so dangerous and so pathogenic, it causes such high mortality... If you look at David Miliband and you look at his International Rescue Committee. He did some modelling based on the Imperial College London at WHO and in 34 fragile countries he has shown that in the next few weeks if we don't do anything, 500 million or one billion people will become infected and of that 3 million will possibly die... This is a global problem, and we're really all in our little countries dealing with the problems on our own... not our country but other countries are making huge mistakes... What we really really need is a global pandemic executive perhaps which can go to every country in this world and say look, we have learned from this pandemic. We know how to deal with it. We know what the problems are. [Led by who?] Led by David Miliband, without a shadow of a doubt. We've got somebody who is a respectful statesman, politician, had an enormous track record, and he needs to be in charge of it.” | David Malcolm Nott | May 2020 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:The Spartacus COVID-19 Letter | Article | 28 September 2021 | Institute for Coronavirus Emergence Nonprofit Intelligence | The Spartacus Letter - Rev. 2 (2021-09-28) Spartacus |
File:Prof. Maria Rita Gismondo- The situation was never dramatic.pdf | interview | Billy Six | Interview with Italian virologist Maria Rita Gismondo |
References
- ↑ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/these-coronavirus-exposures-might-be-the-most-dangerous/ar-BB122vLd
- ↑ "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)"
- ↑ https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/#latest List of Academics questioning the official corona narrative (Current all-cause mortality in Europe is still normal or even below-average)
- ↑ https://www.wodarg.com
- ↑ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1 paper stating ratio is 50-85 times lower than "cases" with a sample of ~100.000 in USA
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohO8eAwi_po
- ↑ https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/04/something-about-the-covid-19-pandemic-feels-off-kilter/
- ↑ Around 99% of Italian fatalities had pre-existing health conditions
- ↑ https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985v1.full
- ↑ https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236760-we-dont-know-why-so-few-covid-19-cases-have-been-reported-in-africa/
- ↑ https://www.gilmorehealth.com/people-with-blood-type-a-more-susceptible-to-complications-from-coronavirus/
- ↑ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8195771/UK-worst-coronavirus-hit-nation-Europe-66-000-deaths-scientists-predict.html
- ↑ https://www.rt.com/usa/486183-stanford-coronavirus-infection-rate-higher/
- ↑ Document:Momento Mori – Unpopular Thoughts on Corona Virus
- ↑ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51674743
- ↑ https://accordingtohoyt.com/2020/03/27/covid-19-and-us-mortality-by-i-ratel/
- ↑ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/31/counting-coronavirus-different-countries-calculating-death-tolls/
- ↑ https://swprs.org/rki-relativiert-corona-todesfaelle/
- ↑ https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/
- ↑ https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/index.htm
- ↑ https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf
- ↑ http://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200219-sitrep-30-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6e50645_2
- ↑ https://www.businessinsider.de/international/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission-chinese-woman-relatives-2020-2/?r=US&IR=T
- ↑ https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong
- ↑ https://globalbiodefense.com/headlines/report-on-asymptomatic-spread-of-coronavirus-based-on-faulty-information/
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/22/coronavirus-asymptomatic-wuhan-woman-shows-why-outbreak-will-be-hard-to-stop
- ↑ "#Masks4All: 'I protect you, you protect me.'"
- ↑ https://www.ocregister.com/2020/03/11/coronavirus-101-orange-county-edition/
- ↑ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3551767
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/30/is-coronavirus-seasonal-summer
- ↑ https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/24912/20200226/covid-19-reinfection-is-possible-experts-say.htm
- ↑ https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2020/03/06/Experts-unsure-if-cured-COVID-19-patients-are-reinfected-or-relapsed/8101583529793/
- ↑ https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200317/Can-you-get-the-coronavirus-twice.aspx
- ↑ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/covid-19-reinfection/
- ↑ https://www.dimsumdaily.hk/chinese-doctors-say-covid-19-reinfection-even-deadlier/
- ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/news/experts-unsure-if-cured-covid-19-patients-are-reinfected-or-relapsed/
- ↑ https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200317/Can-you-get-the-coronavirus-twice.aspx
- ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/19/fda-urged-to-approve-chloroquine-to-treat-covid-19/
- ↑ https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/coronavirus-covid-19-choroquine-data/
- ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074550
- ↑ https://www.healthline.com/health-news/heres-what-happens-to-the-body-after-contracting-the-coronavirus
- ↑ https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/coronavirus-x-rays-show-terrifying-21672219
- ↑ https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236544-coronavirus-are-there-two-strains-and-is-one-more-deadly/