| Rigged science|
(Manipulation, Deception, Science/Problematic notions)
|Interest of||• Corona Investigative Committee|
• Martin Landray
|Rigged science is the process of hindering free exploration and research. It is the corrupted counterpart of science|
Rigged science (alternatively: "fraudulent science, "corrupted science", "for-profit-science") refers to the process of hindering free exploration by setting expected goals for monetary gains and survival of scientists, hiring opportinistic individuals, omitting data, avoiding the bigger picture that would contradict or put in perspective the rigged outcome.
The scientific spirit, which is based on the willingness to put hypotheses to the test and let them be falsified is perverted by subjecting heretics to character assassination and psychological warfare often supported by the commercially-controlled media and cut off funds.
Also, increasingly hypotheses are formulated in such a way, that they can not by falsified, i.e. in medicine and climate research. From a scientific POV these are ideologies rather than hypotheses.
|"COVID-19/Vaccine"||The "vaccine" for COVID 19?|
|AHPRA||Australian health regulation agency.|
|AIDS industry||According to critics, the HIV/AIDS paradigm, is politically, economically and socially driven, rather than based on verifiable scientific data.|
|Bioethics||The study of the ethical issues emerging from advances in biology, medicine and technologies. The field was marked by several treaties protecting individual rights, but during COVID-19, bioethical academics surpassed each other in supporting blatantly unethical schemes.|
|Medical Mafia||a coloquialism denoting the nexus of people and organisations - both commercial and statutory that cooperate to enforce the stablished orthodoxies of the medical establishment.|
|PCR method||A standard DNA-amplification method in medical laboratories, but misused to create a false pandemic during the COVID-19 deep event.|
|Big pharma||“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”||Marcia Angell||2009|
|Big pharma||“Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”||Richard Horton||2015|
|Matthew Ehret||“[...] The City of London is a very old institution and is has been the center of world finance for hundreds of years. So how were they able to control 400 million Indians, for 200 years, how were they able to do that? When they only had at most maybe 12-13.000 soldiers physically on the ground. That doesn't make sense.
And so it's only when you begin to realize, okay it's a much more multifaceted component, you have intelligence, you have cultural warfare, which is something reserved for the elite, as far as a knowledge of science of cultural warfare. This is not something you learn in community college. This is something which is reserved for a very select batch of young people, who are perhaps of the right family, who have the right inclinations, who are selected, they're discovered, they're provided sometimes, Rode-scholarships as part of their process of reaching upper level management position. And in the course of doing that, a set of experiences is provided to those young people, who go through an Oxford, or another, there's there's a variety of these types of scholarships that are provided, who then are brought into a sense of an understanding of the longer waves of history and how history actually moves, versus how we're taught in popular books you can buy at your local bookstore, which involves controlling the way people are thinking, controlling the way they're feeling,
[the interviewer mentions the Tavistock Institute] That's one aspect. Yeah it's the psychological warfare component of the British Empire. [on the question if it is the main component of that kind of operation]
Yeah it's an artery, there's also other aspects of it too. There is cultural wars that also involve approaches to science. What method will be permitted in the scientific world, so what sorts of theories are going to receive money, financial support, publications in peer-reviewed journals and which approaches to science are going to be crushed, choked of funding. There's things like that. There's also artistic aspects too. What sorts of artistic traditions will be provided money, revenue to grow, and which ones will be choked off. Why are we producing no more Beethovens, or Mozart's, or Schubert's today, why is that?
[interviewer mentions the sub-standard quality of modern music/artists and the propaganda aspects of it]
It's kind of like this question of, terrorism foreign and domestic, is: are these naturally occurring phenomenon, or are they artificially created to induce a certain effect in a target society you want to control, through fear and through other things, confusion. And it's the same sort of thing with abstract art, a-tonalist music, scientific theories that are useless. We discovered the god particle 10 years ago, what changed? Nothing!
[Matthew Ehret continues that with billions of founding of the LHC an observation was made that had no effect on the world that people experience, it only could unite theoretical models that were not compatible before (since gravity was a force that could not fit with the other four fundamental forces)]Is that a real scientific discovery, if you make a discovery and then nothing changes? No, not at all. A scientific discovery comes [brings] with it, a power of of action, of having an ability to make better discoveries, but also live a better life, to translate those discoveries into new ways of having better technologies, of having more power to move to live a better life [...]”
|Matthew Ehret||19 June 2022|
|Christopher Langan||“[...] but that's the way it works, it's one giant self-reinforcing system, basically it's run by people with money and if people with money want certain questions to be answered in certain ways, then they make sure that nobody advances in academia who does not parrot the party line, and say what he is expected to say, so this kind of self reinforcement is antithetical to intellectual freedom and creativity. [...] (00:11:10)”||Christopher Langan||2019|
|Peter McCullough||“I’m deeply worried concerned regarding the future of America and also deeply afraid of loss of freedom of speech and of scientific discourse.”||Peter McCullough|
|Document:Climategate its the heat source stupid||Commentary|
|Document:People and Data Cherry-Picked For the IPCC Political Agenda||article||20 April 2014||Tim Ball||A cogent critique of the UN IPCC personnel and methodology designed to suborn and harness science to a clearly political agenda. Written by a Doyen of climate science and author of the book "The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science".|
|Document:Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial||article||2 November 2021||Paul D Thacker|
British Medical Journal
|Whistleblowers from a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial say never experienced such a “helter skelter" work environment, saying speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety.|
|File:The Rape of the Mind by Joost A. M. Meerloo.pdf||book||Joost A. M. Meerloo|