Office for Special Acquisition

Office for Special Acquisition
(Intelligence service)
Office for Special Acquisition ; (Intelligence service)
Predecessor	T-kontoret
Successor	Kontoret för särskild inhämtning
Formation	1965
Founder	Birger Elmér
Extinction	1973
Interests	Sweden/Stay Behind
Exposed by	Jan Guillou
	An extra-constitutional secret intelligence organization within the Swedish Armed Forces.

Office for Special Acquisition (Swedish: Kontoret för särskild inhämtning (KSI), formerly best known under the name IB) is a Swedish extra-constitutional secret intelligence organization within the Swedish Armed Forces, and part of the Swedish Military Intelligence and Security Service (MUST). Under its previous name IB, the two main purposes of the agency were to handle liaison with foreign intelligence agencies and to illegally gather information about communists and other individuals who were perceived to be a threat to the nation.

It is still one of the most secret parts of the Swedish Armed Forces, and had a hand in the 1994 sinking of the MS Estonia and the following cover-up.

Background

The previous names until 1994 were: T-kontoret (1946–1964), IB (1965–1973), Gemensamma byrån för underrättelser (GBU) (1973–1982) and Sektionen för särskild inhämtning (SSI) (1982–1994).^[1]

The meaning of the name IB is not known with certainty. It is often said to be an abbreviation of either Informationsbyrån (The Information Office, Information Bureau) or Insamling Birger ([Information-]Gathering Birger, after its director Birger Elmér). This is, however, speculation, and neither name was in general use within the organization.

Much of the Swedish army was dissatisfied with the Police Security Service (SÄPO) and its approach to assessing people who they saw as a security risk. There was a feeling in these army circles that an organization was needed to find out who might have sympathized with the Soviet Union.

At the same time there was a political struggle between the Swedish Social Democrats and the Swedish Communist Party for influence over the trade unions. The Social Democrats therefore set up trade union shops in the larger companies. In order to use the knowledge of these groups, an agreement was reached between the defense staff and senior representatives of the Social Democratic Party. The defense staff should itself contact people who are willing to work and manage them in a new department. This department was created in 1957 and was merged in 1965 with IB.

In addition to gathering information, the secret service also worked on setting up |an organization that would provide armed resistance in the event of a military occupation of Sweden. In 1969, the Swedish parliament passed a law in which the security service SÄPO excluded a person from being registered solely on the basis of their political views. IB did not feel bound by this new law and continued to operate without public knowledge.

The management of SÄPO, on the other hand, knew what was going on, which led to strong mistrust between the two organizations. SÄPO later received permission to place two of its employees with the Defense Staff. So SÄPO had a good insight into the activities of the secret service. However, it later turned out that one of these police officers was a Soviet spy, who was subsequently arrested.

Exposure

The key persons leading to the exposure of the IB were journalists Jan Guillou and Peter Bratt and their original main source Håkan Isacson.^[2] The two reporters revealed their findings in the leftist magazine Folket i Bild/Kulturfront on 3 May 1973.^[3]^[4] Their revelations were that:

There was a secret intelligence agency in Sweden called IB, without official status. Its director Birger Elmér was reporting directly to select key persons at cabinet level, most likely defence minister Sven Andersson and Prime Minister Olof Palme.
The Riksdag was unaware of its activities.
People with far-left views had been monitored and registered.
IB agents had infiltrated Swedish left-wing organisations and sometimes tried to induce them into criminal acts through agents provocateurs.
There were Swedish spies operating abroad.
IB spies had broken into the Egyptian and Algerian embassies in Stockholm.
The IB co-operated extensively with the Central Intelligence Agency and Shin Bet, in contrast to the official Swedish foreign policy of neutrality.

In the following issues of Folket i Bild/Kulturfront the two uncovered further activities of IB and interviewed a man who had infiltrated the Swedish movement supporting the FNL, Vietnamese National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam - at this time the FNL support network was a backbone of the radical opinion - and among other things, visited Palestinian guerilla camps in Jordan. The man worked for IB and had composed reports that, it was surmised, IB later passed on to the Israeli security services which resulted in the camps being bombed. The man, Gunnar Ekberg, claimed in his interview to have broken with IB, but in fact was still working for the organization. This was exposed in the following editions of FiB/Kulturfront, but by that time, Ekberg had gone underground. Swedish authorities claimed they were unable to locate him to stand trial. In 2009, he released an autobiography of his years in IB, attacking Guillou in particular for having misrepresented facts, been involved with Palestinian militant groups (particularly the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine), and worked for the KGB; and alleging widespread terrorist ties to the groups and persons monitored by IB. He also confirmed that he had been transferred from IB to the Mossad, an Israeli intelligence agency, immediately prior to his exposure.

Guillou had opened the first article by accusing the director of IB of murder on these grounds. The same issue exposed a Swedish naval captain who had passed reports about the harbor security of Alexandria (implying, again, that IB were exchanging information with the Israelis); also the story of a woman who had, on the orders of IB, spied out potential bombing targets in Egypt.

The magazine had information from a previous employee of IB, Håkan Isacson, who claimed that IB had broken into the offices of two political organizations: the FNL Groups, a pro-North Vietnamese organization, and the Communist Party of Sweden, a Maoist political party. This concerned a Jordanian citizen and a stateless citizen. A wiretap was installed in the latter case. After this uncovering, the defense minister did admit that IB engaged in espionage outside of Sweden and infiltrated organizations within Sweden, including wiretaps.

Evidence was put forth in 1974 that IB had built up a large network of agents in Finland, which included the Finnish foreign minister Väinö Leskinen. This network's main mission was to gather information regarding the Soviet Union. IB had no contacts with the Finnish Security Intelligence Service, since it was believed to have been infiltrated by Soviet agents.

Government response

In November 1973, Prime Minister Olof Palme denied any link between IB and the Social Democrats. However, according to the memoir of ex-security service chief P.G. Vinge, Birger Elmér had regular contact with Palme and made his reports regularly to the Social Democratic Party secretary, Sven Andersson.

Defence minister Sven Andersson denied that Sweden had spies abroad. He also denied that IB was involved in burglaries and documenting citizens' political opinions.

Legal consequences and investigations

Jan Guillou, Peter Bratt, Håkan Isacson and the photographer Ove Holmqvist were arrested 22 October 1973^[3] by the Swedish Security Service on suspicion of espionage. On 4 January 1974 each was sentenced to 1 year in prison. Bratt and Guillou were both convicted of espionage; Isacson was convicted of espionage and accessory to espionage. After an appeal, Guillou's sentence was commuted to 10 months. The Swedish Supreme Court would not consider the case.^[5]

The Parliamentary Ombudsman investigated the IB organisation but came to the conclusion that they had not broken any laws. Concerning the break-ins to the leftists' organization, the Ombudsman stated that since the personnel of IB had entered the premises using a key or a lock-pick and had not stolen anything it could not be considered a crime.

In 2002 an extensive public report, named Rikets säkerhet och den personliga integriteten (Security of the Realm and personal integrity), was published on the operations of IB. This report clarified the details of the case, but it did not have any legal impact.

To date, no member of IB has ever been indicted, nor has any politician or government official, despite the revelation of widespread extra-constitutional and criminal activity.