Wikispooks:About

WikiSpooks is an open source encyclopedia of deep politics, a repository of documents and information about deep political events and organisations. It was started in 2010.

Site Rationale

Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale

WikiSpooks combines user-submitted information from third parties with a collaborative space for the joint exploration of ideas and opinions generally not explored in commercially-controlled media and not tolerated in Wikipedia. Since official narratives sometimes change, it stands to reason that they are not always correct. WikiSpooks provides a venue for users interested in exploring such lines of research. Most of the content here is post-[[WW2}}. Analysis of historical events from earlier times is however welcome, especially when it sheds light on the hidden purposes and practices of contemporary deep politics.

Language

The site is English Language only for now. The MediaWiki platform has comprehensive multi-language facilities but operating them effectively uses both scarce resources and currently unavailable language resources. In other words "English-only" is a resources issue. It does mean that Non-English language documents and articles are not suitable candidates for the site unless competently translated and applicable to the English-speaking world. It is acknowledged that this does restrict the site's scope.

What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?

Full article: WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia

Wikipedia is good at what it does. However, its editorial policies give it a blind spot around matters of deep politics, so information on such topics is superficial and fragmented at best and often more of a smokescreen. Wikipedia's adherence to the official narrative as promulgated by the 'reliable sources' of the commercially-controlled media effectively mean that, to use an astrological metaphor "the sun must always be represented as revolving around the earth".^[1]

The "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605 in England is an example of how it is possible to marshal copious undisputed facts but nonetheless minimise what is clearly a higher probability interpretation of the episode than "the official narrative". Popular perception of that event remains consonant with the "official narrative" which has it that the good brave authorities were caught off-guard by a dastardly Popish conspiracy to blow up parliament whilst in session, and that the plot was uncovered and foiled in the nick of time. Does that sound familiar? That is also the way it is presented in the Wikipedia main article ^[2] on the subject, where accusations of 'state conspiracy' are relegated to a single paragraph and copious evidence of agent-provocateuring and facilitating by the authorities of the day do not even warrant a mention.

Editorial Policy

Full article: WikiSpooks:Editorial Policy

The fundamental premise of WikiSpooks' editorial policy is that anything deemed a threat to Authority is generally successfully opposed by that authority because of the vastly greater resources which authority can bring to bear. This power imbalance becomes especially acute where matters of Deep Politics are involved. A good reference source on this syndrome in action is the small media-monitoring site Media Lens.^[3]

Although many articles on WikiSpooks use corresponding Wikipedia articles as their starting point, the fundamentally different guidelines of Wikispooks do not aim for a (status quo friendly) Neutral Point of View^[4] and do not assume that presentation by the commercially-controlled media of evidence to be any special indication of its reliability. Template:Ep

Acknowledgements

Full article: WikiSpooks:Acknowledgments

The site uses the MediaWiki software^[5] developed for Wikipedia. It is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, and is inspired by Cryptome, Wikileaks, The Deep Politics Forum, SpinProfiles, SourceWatch and last but not least, Wikipedia.

Any Questions?

Full article: WikiSpooks:FAQ

WikiSpooks has an FAQ which answers a bunch of common queries about the site. WikiSpooks also has its own Glossary which should clarify the type of material as well as explaining some of the specific language used. If you have further questions, contact the site administrator.