Difference between revisions of "Deep state control"
(better organised) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The 1990s saw spectacular [[Corporate media/Consolidation|consolidation]] of [[corporate media]], facilitating top down control. The ability to [[Corporate media/Censorship|censor]] stories is very important as regards duplicitous tactics such as [[false flag attacks]]. | The 1990s saw spectacular [[Corporate media/Consolidation|consolidation]] of [[corporate media]], facilitating top down control. The ability to [[Corporate media/Censorship|censor]] stories is very important as regards duplicitous tactics such as [[false flag attacks]]. | ||
− | ==Individuals== | + | ==Control of Individuals== |
Deep states use a variety of control mechanisms to exert influence over people. | Deep states use a variety of control mechanisms to exert influence over people. | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The control of [[deep politician]]s is extended by [[deep state operative]]s. These may be [[deep state actors]], who are aware that they are working for a [[deep state]] group, consciously playing a role in a government or commerical organisation, and ready to subvert its official chain of command by taking instructions from their deep state handler. [[Deep state functionaries]], by contrast, are unaware assets, who can nevertheless be manipulated by agents within deep state groups. | The control of [[deep politician]]s is extended by [[deep state operative]]s. These may be [[deep state actors]], who are aware that they are working for a [[deep state]] group, consciously playing a role in a government or commerical organisation, and ready to subvert its official chain of command by taking instructions from their deep state handler. [[Deep state functionaries]], by contrast, are unaware assets, who can nevertheless be manipulated by agents within deep state groups. | ||
− | + | ===Blackmail=== | |
− | === | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | = | ||
{{FA|Blackmail}} | {{FA|Blackmail}} | ||
[[Blackmail]] (particularly [[sexual blackmail]]) is a popular tactic of the deep state because it easily lends itself to clandestine exploitation. It is hard to estimate the extent of its usage, but [[Sibel Edmonds]]' testimony indicates that not only is it routinely used, but that the careers of the sexually compromised are deliberately advanced in order to facilitate it.<ref name=ug749>https://www.unwelcomeguests.net/749</ref> | [[Blackmail]] (particularly [[sexual blackmail]]) is a popular tactic of the deep state because it easily lends itself to clandestine exploitation. It is hard to estimate the extent of its usage, but [[Sibel Edmonds]]' testimony indicates that not only is it routinely used, but that the careers of the sexually compromised are deliberately advanced in order to facilitate it.<ref name=ug749>https://www.unwelcomeguests.net/749</ref> | ||
Line 42: | Line 38: | ||
[[Margaret Thatcher]] | [[Margaret Thatcher]] | ||
UK [[Deep politician]] [[Brian Crozier]] set up the [[Shield]] committee to get Thatcher elected. | UK [[Deep politician]] [[Brian Crozier]] set up the [[Shield]] committee to get Thatcher elected. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Removal of enemies== | ||
+ | Their need to stay hidden has lead [[deep state]]s to have a well developed capacity to stifle unwanted voices. This ranges simple [[blackmail]] through to [[assassination]] as needs be. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Coups=== | ||
+ | {{FA|Coups}} | ||
+ | In extreme cases, the deep states may stage coups (either over or covert) to topple unwanted political leaders. This is inevitably not without risk, and so is usually reserved only for the most urgent cases, such as for example that [[Mohammed Mossadegh]]. Somtimes this is coincident with assasination, as in the [[JFKA|removal]] of [[John F. Kennedy]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Assassinations=== | ||
+ | The most direct method of silencing unwanted voices is to [[assassinate]] them. This appears to have applied, for example, in the case of [[Sunny Sheu]], who had shown himself impervious to both implicit and explicit threats. | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} |
Revision as of 04:08, 25 October 2018
Deep state control | |
---|---|
Deep states, by definition, exert covert control over governmental organisations. This is generally through a network of individual deep state functionaries, but occasionally directly; George H. W. Bush, for example, was simultaneously leader of the US deep state and of the US public state.
Contents
Control of Money
Effective control of the money supply is a key priority for any modern deep state.
“Whether you take the popular adage ‘money is power in its most liquid form’ or listen to the historians—‘power follows property’—an obvious job for any elite that wants to stay in power is to corner the money supply.”
Ivo Mosely (2013) [1]
Since control over money yields an effectively dominant position in the commercial world, effective control over corporations of interest is only a matter of time. From control of the money supply flow multiple other avenues of control.
Control of corporate media
- Full article: Corporate media/Deep state control
- Full article: Corporate media/Deep state control
The 1990s saw spectacular consolidation of corporate media, facilitating top down control. The ability to censor stories is very important as regards duplicitous tactics such as false flag attacks.
Control of Individuals
Deep states use a variety of control mechanisms to exert influence over people.
Deep state operatives
- Full article: Deep state operative
- Full article: Deep state operative
The control of deep politicians is extended by deep state operatives. These may be deep state actors, who are aware that they are working for a deep state group, consciously playing a role in a government or commerical organisation, and ready to subvert its official chain of command by taking instructions from their deep state handler. Deep state functionaries, by contrast, are unaware assets, who can nevertheless be manipulated by agents within deep state groups.
Blackmail
- Full article: Blackmail
- Full article: Blackmail
Blackmail (particularly sexual blackmail) is a popular tactic of the deep state because it easily lends itself to clandestine exploitation. It is hard to estimate the extent of its usage, but Sibel Edmonds' testimony indicates that not only is it routinely used, but that the careers of the sexually compromised are deliberately advanced in order to facilitate it.[2]
Margaret Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher UK Deep politician Brian Crozier set up the Shield committee to get Thatcher elected.
Removal of enemies
Their need to stay hidden has lead deep states to have a well developed capacity to stifle unwanted voices. This ranges simple blackmail through to assassination as needs be.
Coups
- Full article: Coups
- Full article: Coups
In extreme cases, the deep states may stage coups (either over or covert) to topple unwanted political leaders. This is inevitably not without risk, and so is usually reserved only for the most urgent cases, such as for example that Mohammed Mossadegh. Somtimes this is coincident with assasination, as in the removal of John F. Kennedy.
Assassinations
The most direct method of silencing unwanted voices is to assassinate them. This appears to have applied, for example, in the case of Sunny Sheu, who had shown himself impervious to both implicit and explicit threats.
Examples
Page name | Description |
---|---|
Richard Nixon/Deep state control | Prescott Bush funded Nixon's political career for the US deep state. He was toppled by the Watergate coup after he had become disloyal to them. |
Woodrow Wilson/Deep state control | Like Richard Nixon, Woodrow Wilson took money and orders from financiers even as he publicly denounced them. |
Related Quotation
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Conspiracy/Public attitudes | “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” | Woodrow Wilson | 1913 |
References
- ↑ http://ivomosley.com/in-the-name-of-the-people/ In The Name Of The People
- ↑ https://www.unwelcomeguests.net/749