Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:About"
(link) |
(Clarify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{HelpSection|image=Wikispooks logo.png}} | {{HelpSection|image=Wikispooks logo.png}} | ||
| − | ''WikiSpooks'' is an open source encyclopedia of [[deep politics]], a repository of documents and information about [[deep | + | ''WikiSpooks'' is an open source encyclopedia of [[deep politics]], a repository of documents and information about [[deep events]] and [[secret power structures]]. It was [[WikiSpooks:history|started in 2010]]. |
== Site Rationale == | == Site Rationale == | ||
{{FA|Wikispooks:Site Rationale}} | {{FA|Wikispooks:Site Rationale}} | ||
| − | WikiSpooks combines user-submitted information from third parties with a collaborative space for the joint exploration of events, opinions and theories not generally explored in {{ccm}} and as such, not tolerated in [[Wikipedia]]. Since {{on}}s sometimes change, it stands to reason that they are not always correct. WikiSpooks provides a venue for users interested in exploring such lines of research. Most of the content here is post-[[WW2]]. Analysis of historical events from earlier times is however welcome, especially when it sheds light on the hidden purposes and practices of contemporary deep politics. | + | WikiSpooks combines user-submitted information from third parties with a collaborative space for the joint exploration of events, opinions and theories not generally explored in {{ccm}} and as such, not tolerated in [[Wikipedia]]. Since {{on}}s sometimes change, it stands to reason that they are not always correct. WikiSpooks provides a venue for users interested in exploring such lines of research. Most of the content here is post-[[WW2]]. Analysis of historical events from earlier times is however welcome, especially when it sheds light on the hidden purposes and practices of contemporary [[deep politics]]. |
==What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?== | ==What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?== | ||
{{FA|WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia}} | {{FA|WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia}} | ||
| − | [[Wikipedia]] is good at what it does. However, its editorial policies | + | [[Wikipedia]] is good at what it does. However, its editorial policies guarantee a blind spot around matters of [[deep politics]], so information on such topics is superficial and fragmented at best and more often than not a smokescreen. Wikipedia's adherence to the {{on}} as promulgated by the 'reliable sources' of the {{ccm}} effectively mean that, to use an astrological metaphor "''the sun must always be represented as revolving around the earth''".<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei Wikipedia article - Heliocentrism]</ref> |
| − | The "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605 in England is an example of how it is possible to marshal copious undisputed facts but nonetheless minimise what is clearly a | + | The "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605 in England is an example of how it is possible to marshal copious undisputed facts but nonetheless minimise what is clearly a significant probability interpretation of the episode than the "{{on}}". Popular perception of that event remains consonant with the "official narrative" that the good authorities were caught off-guard by a dastardly Popish conspiracy to blow up parliament whilst in session, and that the plot was uncovered and foiled in the nick of time. Does that sound familiar? [[Wikipedia]]'s main article <ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_Plot Wikipedia main article on The Gunpowder Plot of 1605]</ref> on the subject exaplains it like this, relegating accusations of 'state conspiracy' to a single paragraph while is the copious evidence of agent-provocateuring and facilitating by the authorities of the day do not even warrant a mention. |
== Editorial Policy == | == Editorial Policy == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Any Questions? == | == Any Questions? == | ||
{{FA|WikiSpooks:FAQ}} | {{FA|WikiSpooks:FAQ}} | ||
| − | WikiSpooks has an {{WSLink|FAQ}} which answers a bunch of common queries about the site. | + | WikiSpooks has an {{WSLink|FAQ}} which answers a bunch of common queries about the site. The {{WSLink|Glossary}} should give some idea of the type of material included as well as explaining some of the specific language used. If you have further questions, {{WSLink|contact}} the site administrator. |
== Acknowledgements == | == Acknowledgements == | ||
{{FA|WikiSpooks:Acknowledgments}} | {{FA|WikiSpooks:Acknowledgments}} | ||
| − | The site uses the MediaWiki software<ref>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki on MediaWiki]</ref> developed for [[Wikipedia]]. It is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, and is inspired by [[Cryptome]], [[Wikileaks]], [[Deep Politics Forum|The Deep Politics Forum]], [[SpinProfiles]], [[SourceWatch]] and last but not least, [[Wikipedia]]. | + | The site uses the MediaWiki software<ref>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki on MediaWiki]</ref> developed for [[Wikipedia]]. It is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, and is inspired by [[Cryptome]], [[Wikileaks]], [[Deep Politics Forum|The Deep Politics Forum]], [[SpinProfiles]], [[SourceWatch]] and last but not least, that keeper of the {{on}} on the internet, [[Wikipedia]]. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 08:30, 29 May 2014
WikiSpooks is an open source encyclopedia of deep politics, a repository of documents and information about deep events and secret power structures. It was started in 2010.
Contents
Site Rationale
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
- Full article: Wikispooks:Site Rationale
WikiSpooks combines user-submitted information from third parties with a collaborative space for the joint exploration of events, opinions and theories not generally explored in commercially-controlled media and as such, not tolerated in Wikipedia. Since official narratives sometimes change, it stands to reason that they are not always correct. WikiSpooks provides a venue for users interested in exploring such lines of research. Most of the content here is post-WW2. Analysis of historical events from earlier times is however welcome, especially when it sheds light on the hidden purposes and practices of contemporary deep politics.
What Is Wrong With Wikipedia?
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia
Wikipedia is good at what it does. However, its editorial policies guarantee a blind spot around matters of deep politics, so information on such topics is superficial and fragmented at best and more often than not a smokescreen. Wikipedia's adherence to the official narrative as promulgated by the 'reliable sources' of the commercially-controlled media effectively mean that, to use an astrological metaphor "the sun must always be represented as revolving around the earth".[1]
The "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605 in England is an example of how it is possible to marshal copious undisputed facts but nonetheless minimise what is clearly a significant probability interpretation of the episode than the "official narrative". Popular perception of that event remains consonant with the "official narrative" that the good authorities were caught off-guard by a dastardly Popish conspiracy to blow up parliament whilst in session, and that the plot was uncovered and foiled in the nick of time. Does that sound familiar? Wikipedia's main article [2] on the subject exaplains it like this, relegating accusations of 'state conspiracy' to a single paragraph while is the copious evidence of agent-provocateuring and facilitating by the authorities of the day do not even warrant a mention.
Editorial Policy
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Editorial Policy
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Editorial Policy
The fundamental premise of WikiSpooks' editorial policy is that authority opposes anything which it perceives as a threat, generally successfully because of the greater resources which authority can bring to bear. This power imbalance becomes especially acute where matters of Deep Politics are involved. A good reference source on this syndrome in action is the small media-monitoring site Media Lens.[3] Wikispooks therefore does not aim for a (status quo friendly) Neutral Point of View[4] and does not assume that endorsement by the commercially-controlled media of evidence to be an indication of its veracity.
Language Policy
The MediaWiki platform has comprehensive multi-language facilities, but pending the involvement of foreign-speaking members, WikiSpooks is perforce English Language only for now. Non-English language documents and articles are not suitable candidates for the site unless translated into English. We welcome the involvement of kindred spirits from other language groups.
Any Questions?
- Full article: WikiSpooks:FAQ
- Full article: WikiSpooks:FAQ
WikiSpooks has an FAQ which answers a bunch of common queries about the site. The Glossary should give some idea of the type of material included as well as explaining some of the specific language used. If you have further questions, contact the site administrator.
Acknowledgements
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Acknowledgments
- Full article: WikiSpooks:Acknowledgments
The site uses the MediaWiki software[5] developed for Wikipedia. It is inspired and informed by several other open source collaborative projects, and is inspired by Cryptome, Wikileaks, The Deep Politics Forum, SpinProfiles, SourceWatch and last but not least, that keeper of the official narrative on the internet, Wikipedia.
References
| ||||||
|
