Laura Pidcock

Laura Pidcock   (politician)
Born	19 August 1987
Alma mater	Manchester Metropolitan University
Shadow Secretary of State for Employment Rights In office 10 September 2019 - 12 December 2019  Member of Parliament for North West Durham In office 9 June 2017 - 6 November 2019

Laura Pidcock is a British Labour Party politician who was Member of Parliament for North West Durham from 2017 until the UK/2019 General Election. She was the Shadow Secretary of State for Employment Rights in Jeremy Corbyn's Shadow Cabinet.

In the 2019 parliamentary election, Laura Pidcock lost her seat to Conservative Richard Holden, who won the constituency with a majority of 1,144. She is being encouraged to stand as an Independent at the 2024 General Election on July 4th.

#IndependentsDay

On 29 May 2024, Philip Proudfoot posted on X:

It’s absolutely imperative that @LauraPidcock stands as an Independent against Luke Akehurst.

Laura is actually from Durham and will represent the interests of her constituency.

Akehurst is a lobbyist for Israel, a country committing unfathomable crimes against humanity.

Thank you letter

Dear Residents of North West Durham,

Firstly, I want to say thank you to the almost 19,000 of you who voted for me and the Labour Party. Standing there, watching the votes being tipped out of the ballot boxes, even when it became clear that I was going to lose, I was so proud and heartened that so many of you placed your faith in the Labour Party. To those people who felt they could not vote for Labour, I want you to know I am reflecting and trying to understand what prevented us from winning the seat this time.

So, at this point, I just wanted to share with you the lessons I learned from the two and a half years I had representing this constituency and from the six weeks of the General Election campaign. People will say it was Brexit, and, yes that was a huge factor, or that it was Jeremy Corbyn, and yes, again that was a factor too (I will talk about that a bit later), but in my view it was about more than these two important factors.

Firstly, what was acutely obvious throughout my time as the MP, was that there was a hard core of people who were bitterly angry with me before I had even opened my mouth: angry at the political establishment; angry at the expenses scandal; angry at being left behind, angry that their life was not as good now as it was; angry that their communities had not been invested in and that there was no longer a buzz and a sense of community about the place.

At many doors, there was a mixture of fury and apathy at successive governments (and I very much include New Labour in that). The current Labour Party were blamed for much of the problems in our communities, despite being out of power for a decade and I was seen as part of the establishment. I have always been very patient with this anger from people I represented. It was the same anger and rage which got me interested in standing in the first place. But it was a barrier to being believed. I so desperately wanted people to see that I am genuine about the changes we wanted to bring about and that the party I belonged to was genuine about that too.

On our spending commitments, lots of you said: “It sounds great, but how are you going to pay for it?”

Despite the costed manifesto and the painstaking and detailed work of different Labour teams, it didn’t seem achievable. You talked about wanting control back to your country, but when I relayed how a Ministry of Employment Rights would unlock power in the most fundamental way — in the control over your employment and working life — I understand that it did not resonate. I could almost hear media pundits yawning when I tried to talk about the Ministry of Employment Rights.

When we tried to talk about a fundamental shift in power, the rapid pay rise that would come for many after the election of a Labour Government, how we would move towards security and certainty for workers, the interviewers (pretty much across the board) lost interest, and instead would ask about the day’s political gossip (for example, ask repeatedly whether the leaked documents on the NHS were from Russia or not, for goodness sake). That made it hard when I got to your door, to try and explain the importance of what we were proposing, because the foundations had not stuck. I am sorry about that. Some of it was in our control, some not.

On Brexit, I listened over the last two years, I really did. People passionately wanted to Remain and passionately wanted to Leave. It became a divide so deep, never to be healed. In North West Durham, you voted by a majority to Leave, as did the nation. I repeatedly argued, inside my party, that we should respect the result of the referendum and avoid a second one. Of course, when you are in the Shadow Cabinet, you are bound by collective responsibility and I respected that.

There was no appetite for that ‘Norway-style’ Brexit in the last Parliament and, it appeared, not amongst the people I represented. People who wanted Leave would tell me that is not really Leave and people who wanted Remain would assert no possible deal could be better than remain. Brexit was without a doubt a fog that descended, and no issue could penetrate it. It was frustrating that, so often, no other issue could be discussed, that doors would close and that, in the minds of people that I cared so much about, I was lumped in with a political establishment I desperately wanted to fight.

We are leaving the EU now, on the hardest of terms. We will be moving to free trade agreements. Leaving the EU did not scare me, but this exit does. Irrespective of what I think, it is happening. I warned of the strength of feeling. I listened to you in North West Durham. But it was not enough for those Labour voting people who really wanted to Leave and sniffed a sense of betrayal. Many did not believe that we would implement the deal we re-negotiated the EU. Many of you believed that there would be something else that the political establishment would cook up to prevent leaving the EU. I very much get that sense of suspicion.

On Jeremy. This bit is hard, because when I knocked on your doors in 2017, so many of you talked about what a good guy he seemed, that he was on the side of the people and that he was getting a very hard time from people inside the Labour Party and out. People who were less friendly to Labour spoke about how damaging a divided party is, about things like the IRA and the connections internationally that you didn’t understand or agree with.

By 2019, you seemed so much angrier about Jeremy Corbyn. I had a handful of angry people say “I would shoot him” or “take a gun to his head” whilst in the next breath calling him an extremist. But mostly people were not connecting with him for lots of different reasons. I know people on either side of the Brexit division wanted him to come down on the side of Remain or Leave. I don’t want to patronise anyone by saying that this was all the fault of the media. I know people make up their own minds. But I cannot and will not accept that the media had no part. So much of the coverage sought to demolish Jeremy from day one, not because of him as a person, but because of his politics.

And that demonisation will happen to other leaders who try and challenge the way things are: the inequality, the poverty and merciless, brutal wars. It will happen to those who push for a different economic system to save the planet. It will happen again when we try and argue for a better, more equal world. For the last three years, on almost every interview on policy, or what we believe as representatives of the Labour Party, questions of his popularity intervened. That had an immense impact. If you go to Westminster and fit in, it is a relatively easy job. The biggest pressure is the response time of the emails that come in from your constituents, the issues they need help with, holding the Government to account, speaking up for your community or being away from family. However, if you are there to take on the establishment, there is another whole layer of pressure and it can be all consuming. At every turn you have to be precise in your language and behaviour, because if you are not, there are thousands of people ready to point it out.

Telling the truth in Westminster can mean people want to punish you. You must accept that there are newspapers ready to write ridiculous headlines. It is so difficult to get the truth out once the lie has been sown. And so every day is a battle to get a hearing for those you represent and for the ideas you believe in. Without the constant demands of Parliament and representation, I am sure I will get more time with my little boy, partner and family and I can begin to grieve for my father.

I never stopped being a working-class person just because I became an MP. In or out of Parliament, I hate what the system does to our communities. I hate the way large parts of our media are so complicit in hiding or concealing the silent voices or the real political catastrophes at play, because they choose to highlight other, much more superficial and insular dramas.

I will never stop believing that another world is possible, or that North West Durham can thrive — that high quality, well paid jobs can be brought and remain here. I believe there is a way to make sure people have money in their pockets at the end of the month and look forward to using the public transport system, as in many other countries. It is all possible.

I don’t regret these past two and a half years and I feel like I tried my very best. Did I get some things wrong? I am sure I did, but I did give my all to the people of North West Durham. I didn’t do it because I wanted to keep my job, but because I connected with the people here and feel like I have such a positive relationship with people, even those who disagree, even after losing.

To those of you who answered your door and begged us to get rid of this Government and testified to the damage being done and how our community could take no more, I am so sorry that we failed you, I really am. The barriers were too great. Brexit, years of decline, anti-establishment feeling, lack of trust in Westminster politics, little connection to the leader of the Party, all that turned into the perfect storm which was our defeat. I just wanted to make it clear, though, that I never took one Labour voter for granted. I didn’t ever think, that because you previously worked in the steel works, you should be Labour. Or because your grandfather was truncheoned by the police under Thatcher, you should be Labour.

I know it was my job and my party’s job to make the arguments for our politics, to prove why we would be different to the Blair years and why we would have been so much better than a Boris Johnson government and it didn’t cut through. It’s quite unbelievable how the Conservatives were able to masquerade as an entirely different party, after their failure to deal with Brexit in the previous three years and after a punishing decade of austerity, inflicting immeasurable harm on our communities.

We will hold the new MP for North West Durham to account — on every commitment he made and every statement he makes. But what we must also do is defend of our community. People voted for change, control and security. But I think we will get something very different. Will Wolsingham Sixth Form re-open? Will the school become an academy? What will happen to all the schools in our area worried sick about their budgets? Will we get a new hospital to replace Shotley Bridge? Will the council get anywhere near the £230 million back that has been taken for vital services? What will they do to tackle the low pay epidemic in North West Durham? What will ‘getting Brexit done’ mean for our communities? What will the future trade deals mean to our communities? How will we have our say?

We have to fight for our area. We must be there for our fellow working people and their families, who will be attacked under this new government.

And lastly, I want to say thank you for giving me the privilege of a lifetime in being your MP for two and a half years — to represent you in Parliament. Even if these were the only moments I get to stand up for our communities and our class in that building, it was utterly worth it. I’ve lost this election, not with anger or resentment, but with love in my heart and a determination to build a better future.

Resignation from the NEC

On 26 January 2022, Laura Pidcock resigned from Labour's NEC:

I am today resigning from the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party. I know this will disappoint some colleagues (and no doubt delight some others!). However, I am resigning because of what I see as an irreconcilable difference between the actions of the Labour Party as it stands and the principles that underpin the way I have been taught to treat people and my idea of what a political organisation should be for.

I think every life is precious. I also think our energies are finite. The decision to dedicate that valuable time to a political cause often comes with personal and professional risk.

I promised fellow activists and friends that I would stand for the NEC. I did this as a bridge from Corbynism to what we expected to be the next stage. We weren’t to know exactly how Keir Starmer would handle matters within the party. At that stage, it was hypothetical. What has ensued is a barrage of top-down changes which is making it hostile territory for socialists, from those of us on the NEC, to those in CLPs across the country.

Despite that hostility, I have done the representative role on the NEC to the very best of my ability, spent hundreds of hours organising to protect both members and the policy legacy you all fought so hard for. I have spent so many hours organising with colleagues to try to win piecemeal amendments to plans that have undermined democracy in the party and the freedom with which members are able to express themselves. In addition, with the right of the party having a strong, inbuilt voting majority, we are repeatedly defeated when it comes to a vote.

This is on top of a full-time job which I love, being a mam to a beautiful little boy and taking on the role of National Secretary of the People’s Assembly, developing, alongside many others, exciting plans to build the broadest possible coalition against the Government, where there is an atmosphere of absolute unity in opposition to Conservative destruction.

To be really honest, the cheering of a Tory MP crossing the floor in the House of Commons, an MP who has voted against everything we believe in, crystallised the deep unease. What I immediately felt was pain for all of those who are forced to use food banks, all of those who are going through the punitive ‘social security’ system, for all of the amazing activists protesting against the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, including Gypsy and Traveller people, who are also at the heart of resisting the racism in this legislation — some of the many reasons why this whooping by elected representatives of my own party, on that day, was so inappropriate and jarring for so many.

What I have witnessed on the NEC has been immensely frustrating. This leadership is devoid of ideas, lacking vision. I can’t and won’t negotiate with these people anymore. The summit of their ideas are just small tweaks to the status quo. They challenge virtually nothing, but are noticeably determined when it comes to rule changes that alienate the left. They have demoralised thousands of people who were awakened to politics for the first in their life. I am sure, this is part of their larger strategy.

When there is so much devastation caused by this Government and the economic system we live under, when poverty is endemic, when people are hungry, when finance capital is tightening its grip on the NHS, with a Government entrenching the hostile environment, and when the ravages of climate decay are obvious for all to see, we cannot go on, giving our energy to people who want to block fundamental, positive change.

I think we also need to be honest about some of our mistakes on the left. I know circumstances have been really difficult and many people have endured personal attacks, so saying that mistakes have been made is not about blaming the membership — far from it. I have always believed that the only really effective response to these attacks, on people’s values and reputations, is from the mass membership, where we fight transparently and collectively, where we demonstrate our power.

This is also true for the position over the reinstatement of the whip to Jeremy Corbyn. Perhaps with the best of intentions, some people seem to think that we can negotiate our way to justice by appealing to the right of the party to do the right thing. That has never worked and certainly will not work in the current circumstances.

I have sadly come to the conclusion that I can’t serve on the NEC any longer. I am really sorry if this disappoints comrades and people feel let down especially those members who went out of their way to vote for me, but there is too much to be done and I can’t have these decisions, which do so much damage to the membership, made in my name. I have never viewed politics and political participation as a game of chess. I don’t think politics is complicated and I think it is ok to act according to your feelings and passion. When I don’t feel I am making a difference, I want to put my energy elsewhere and that is what I’m choosing to do.

Much love and solidarity.

Laura Pidcock

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.

References

This page imported content from Wikipedia on 21 December 2019.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks.   Original page source here