Document:Rosebank: Omnicide for the People
Article by Mike Small dated 28 September 2023Subjects: fossil fuels, climate change, Rosebank oil field, omnicide, Equinor, Ithaca Energy
Source: Bella Caledonia (Link)
★ Start a Discussion about this document
Rosebank: Omnicide for the People
Omnicide noun:
- The destruction of all life or all human life
The approval of Rosebank oil field, and the narratives surrounding it, are terrifying.
Chris Packham, Britain’s radicalised broadcaster called it an ‘act of war against life on earth’, the Green MP, Caroline Lucas called it ‘a moral obscenity’. Naomi Klein called it a “horrific decision… Canada is still partially on fire… this is an act of environmental vandalism”. Greenpeace said: “The ugly truth is that Sunak is pandering to vested interests, demonstrating the stranglehold the fossil fuels lobby has on Government decision making…”
Rosebank is the next step in the grotesque experience we are all living through: omnicide.
We know all of the facts about this travesty, we know all the carbon figures and inevitable subsequent emissions. But the financing of the project is also mortifying. The UK taxpayer is covering 91% the cost of developing Rosebank. Rosebank’s owner Equinor is set to receive £3.75 BILLION in tax breaks for the field.
As trade unionist and activist Howard Beckett put it:
- “Equinor, Norway’s state-owned oil company gets taxed at 78% for extracting fossil fuels in Norway's waters. To extract fossil fuels off the Shetland’s Sunak is giving them a 91% tax break. We are paying foreign state owned companies to destroy the planet. You couldn’t make it up.”
- (Equinor made £62 BILLION in profits last year.)
While subsidising such vandalism is obscene, so too is the gaslighting around it. It’s no longer publicly acceptable to be an outright climate denier, so politicians and media supporters instead entertain various fantasies about these projects and the world we inhabit. These fantasies include magical thinking such as: “these actions in no way inhibit the path to ‘Net Zero’; “we need oil and gas in the interim in Scotland / UK” (no timeline is given for ‘the interim’); such new oil fields will improve ‘energy security’ and new oil and gas production will ‘reduce bills’.
Last year 75% of the UK’s oil production was exported.[1] The same will be true of Rosebank.
Oil from the field will be sold on the international market at the going rate, and it will have no little or no impact on the cost of living crisis or energy security.
Even though each of these arguments is easily dismantled within second they persist. Our broadcast media is complicit alongside the predictable gibberish of the tabloids.
Earlier in the week on Radio Scotland’s "Call Kaye" phone-in show – in the aftermath of Rishi Sunak’s u-turn on Net Zero actions – the presenter posed the question: “Has the green agenda gone too far?”
There is no sanity in the media but nor is there any credible opposition. The Labour Party are tying themselves in knots – at first condemning the Rosebank approval – and then Sr Keir Starmer coming out to say he wouldn’t rescind any approved oil fields because to do so would ‘hinder growth’. Here’s Gordon Brown:[2]
Here’s Labour’s Siobhain McDonagh:[3]
There is no timeline from the gas-lighters, there’s just a commitment of no-change, a promise of helping nurture inevitable destruction. What’s really in bad faith in all of this is it’s done of behalf of ‘the people’. But in the real world there’s a timeline and we’re watching it unfold every day. If the media is too stupid, compromised or damaged to process serious editorial content, and the political culture too redundant and doped to create any form of leadership, then it is up to the rest of us to respond by whatever means necessary.
