Dynamic silence
 Dynamic silence(Censorship)    | |
|---|---|
 | |
Dynamic silence is a method of closing off all access to the public media, and thus the larger culture, or only negative de-legitimization aspects of the unfavored individuals are reported, for people or organizations deemed to have an unacceptable point of view. Dynamic silence is most effective when all controlled corporate media unifies to all collectively act against individuals or groups to monopolize the official narrative. Invented by Rabbi Feinberg in 1947.
Contents
History
| Ryan Dawson on Zionism and the Jewish Lobby (?:??:??) ~ Ryan Dawson of The ANC Report, 2016-10-17. on thkelly67 Tim Kelly's "Our Interesting Times" podcast. They speak on dynamic silence from about 1:06:00 to about 1:11:00. |
"1947-" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation.
“Dynamic Silence was invented by Rabbi Feinberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947 as a method of closing off all access to the public media - and thus the larger culture - for people or organizations deemed to have an unacceptable point of view. In spite of minor changes and adaptations, it can still be understood as being comprised of two parts. In the first part, unfavored individuals are denied unmediated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavored individuals are reported. This starts a downward spiral of de-legitimization in the public eye in which the harder unfavored individuals try to get public exposure, the more negative and unflattering that exposure becomes until, finally, nobody wants to be associated with the ideas of beliefs of the unfavored individuals.”
(1947-) [1]
This copied definition came from Metapedia claiming it is copyrighted content they copied from Western Voices World News, now a dead link, and follow up verification searches proved fruitless.
Beyond dynamic silence
Dynamic silence is just the first two steps in silencing opposition.
- If you are a nobody speaking freely about inconvenient truths, they'll just ignore you - or maybe censor, fine, jail, or kill you - but few will notice or care.
- If you are a small celebrity/influencer speaking freely about inconvenient truths, they'll make your life difficult, harass, slander, and lie about you, perhaps worse.
- If you are a medium celebrity/influencer speaking freely about inconvenient truths, they'll belittle, discredit, ridicule, smear, and dig up dirt on you - true or not.
- If you are a big celebrity/influencer speaking freely about inconvenient truths, they'll assassinate you and make it look like an accident, suicide, or random violence.
Top row: Chris Cornell, Aaron Swartz, Anthony Bourdain, Robin Williams.
Middle row: Avicii, Inés Zorreguieta, Michael Hutchence, David Carradine.
Bottom row: Chester Bennington, Kate Spade, L'Wren Scott, Alexander McQueen.
Examples
- John Lennon, "Give peace a chance."
- Lady Di, ban land mines.
- Many celebrities were pedophile whistleblowers and ended up suicided.[2]
- Doctors, nurses, police, scientists, and countless others during COVID-19 said to "End lockdowns, quarantine the old, sick, and weak, the rest is tyranny."[3]
- Anyone with questions about the Holocaust or Zionism.
Related
External link
- Web.Archive.org: George Lincoln Rockwell on the “silent treatment” in This Time The World' Chapter XII., a possibly anti-Semitic story.
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elon Musk | “Freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.” | Elon Musk | November 18 JL |
References
- ↑ http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_silence Metapedia
- ↑ https://InfoGalactic.com/info/Pedophocracy#.22Suicided.22_resistance_silenced_on_doorknobs
- ↑ Protest sign of Jason Carswell - photo pending.
