Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:Read This First"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (trim wordiness) |
m (Major Reword) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{HelpSection|image=!2orange.png}} | |
| − | '''Anyone considering serious involvement with the WikiSpooks Project will need to be fairly comfortable with the content of this article. | + | '''Anyone considering serious involvement with the WikiSpooks Project will need to be fairly comfortable with the content of this article. Scepticism is no barrier; fundamental disagreement ''is''.'''<br/><br/> |
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Introduction== |
| − | '''WikiSpooks''' is one of | + | '''WikiSpooks''' is one of many reactions to the ever more blatant hypocrisies of the "[[Establishment]]" worldview. Aggressive use of {{ccm}} and a relatively passive population have meant that '[[UK|Anglo]]-[[USA|American]]-[[Europe|Euro]]-[[NATO]]' friendly announcements are generally accompanied only by the most superficial of justifications whereas challenges to their {{on}}s are vigorously opposed on principle, whatever the facts of the case. Wikispooks is for [[red pill]]ers to critically reflect on these "[[Official narratives]]", to compile relevant evidence, exchange opinons and bounce ideas off like minds. |
==Core propositions== | ==Core propositions== | ||
| − | # | + | Wikispooks suggests that: |
| − | + | # both "[[Official narrative]]s" and "[[Official_Narrative#Official_opposition_narratives|Official ''Opposition'' narratives]]" are always more-or-less in service to {{te}} by deflecting attention from the real events, actors and their true motivations<ref>The most succinct rendering of 'Opposition' as integral to '[[Wikispooks:Definitions|Establishment]]' is probably that of the founder of modern Zionism [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Herzl Theodor Hertzl] who counseled ''"We will lead every revolution against us"''. A seemingly ridiculous contradiction, but in practice a principle at the very heart of the exercise of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machiavellianism Machiavellian] Power.</ref> | |
| − | # that | + | # that whilst there are good people everywhere, large hierarchical organisations (such as national governments and multi-national corporations) are prone to domination by psychopaths and sociopaths, and so their pronouncements must be regarded as highly suspect at best. |
| − | # | + | # early 21<sup>st</sup> century party politics is nothing more than a convenient cover for the real business of [[deep politics]] which is rarely if ever investigated by the {{ccm}}, which are more or less completely controlled by agents of the [[deep state]]. |
| − | # | + | # "all power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely"<ref>An aphorism attributed to Lord Acton in a letter to Mandell Creighton dated 1887 - more [[WikiSpooks:Site Rationale|here]]</ref> |
| + | # the early 21<sup>st</sup> century is witnessing an end-game push towards a globalised corporate capitalism - the totalitarian "New World Order" - which aspires to absolute power, is with it, absolute corruption.<ref>The nature of the modern Corporation, as essentially psychopathic, is apposite (see this [http://tinyurl.com/6j69o9r Media-Lens article]), as is the necessity for psychopathy in an individual as sine-qua-non for the acquisition and exercise of power at senior Nation State level.</ref> | ||
| − | *These propositions are | + | *These propositions are central to WikiSpooks' purpose. The only page on which they are debatable is [[talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page]]. |
| − | + | *This site is for ''questioning'' "[[Official narrative]]s", not promulgating them. They are already vastly overrepresented and WikiSpooks is ''not'' a vehicle for promoting them. | |
| − | *Anyone ignoring | + | *Anyone ignoring these admonition and editing the encyclopaedia in such a way as to purposely question or oppose these ideas will forfeit further site involvement in short order. |
| − | ''' | + | ==Good faith== |
| + | While noone has all the answers; each of us has limited experience, our opinions are necessarily biased and our knowledge flawed to a certain extent, but we can nevertheless act in ''good faith''. In our conduct on the site, WikiSpooks editors agree to subjugate local affiliations of race, creed, national, tribal, cultural or other parochial identities to the following: | ||
| + | # ''Our Common Humanity'': '''"We are all one."''' | ||
| + | # ''The Golden Rule:'' '''"We treat others as we hope to be treated by them."''' | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
| − | |||
| − | + | THIS DOESN'T EASILY FIT HERE. I WONDER WHERE WOULD BE A GOOD PLACE? OR HOW TO INTRODUCE IT? | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Examples of propositions axiomatic to mainstream discourse in Western {{CCM}}== | ==Examples of propositions axiomatic to mainstream discourse in Western {{CCM}}== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
* That agencies of Western Nation States, or factions controlled by them could not possibly carry out lethal [[False Flag Attacks]] against their own civilian populations. Such a proposition is unthinkable and constitutes an absolute taboo which is enforced by all the {{ccm}} | * That agencies of Western Nation States, or factions controlled by them could not possibly carry out lethal [[False Flag Attacks]] against their own civilian populations. Such a proposition is unthinkable and constitutes an absolute taboo which is enforced by all the {{ccm}} | ||
''All of these proposition sit somewhere between patently false and utterly absurd, yet they are promulgated every hour of every day by more or less all the {{ccm}}.'' | ''All of these proposition sit somewhere between patently false and utterly absurd, yet they are promulgated every hour of every day by more or less all the {{ccm}}.'' | ||
| + | --> | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
#{{note|4}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes The Emperor's New Clothes] - Wikipedia article. | #{{note|4}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes The Emperor's New Clothes] - Wikipedia article. | ||
#{{note|5}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism Utilitarianism] - Wikipedia article on the utilitarian political philosophy of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham | #{{note|5}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism Utilitarianism] - Wikipedia article on the utilitarian political philosophy of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham | ||
| + | --> | ||
{{Template:WikiSpooks Footer/Policy}} | {{Template:WikiSpooks Footer/Policy}} | ||
[[Category:About WikiSpooks]] | [[Category:About WikiSpooks]] | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 31 May 2014
Anyone considering serious involvement with the WikiSpooks Project will need to be fairly comfortable with the content of this article. Scepticism is no barrier; fundamental disagreement is.
Introduction
WikiSpooks is one of many reactions to the ever more blatant hypocrisies of the "Establishment" worldview. Aggressive use of commercially-controlled media and a relatively passive population have meant that 'Anglo-American-Euro-NATO' friendly announcements are generally accompanied only by the most superficial of justifications whereas challenges to their official narratives are vigorously opposed on principle, whatever the facts of the case. Wikispooks is for red pillers to critically reflect on these "Official narratives", to compile relevant evidence, exchange opinons and bounce ideas off like minds.
Core propositions
Wikispooks suggests that:
- both "Official narratives" and "Official Opposition narratives" are always more-or-less in service to the establishment by deflecting attention from the real events, actors and their true motivations[1]
- that whilst there are good people everywhere, large hierarchical organisations (such as national governments and multi-national corporations) are prone to domination by psychopaths and sociopaths, and so their pronouncements must be regarded as highly suspect at best.
- early 21st century party politics is nothing more than a convenient cover for the real business of deep politics which is rarely if ever investigated by the commercially-controlled media, which are more or less completely controlled by agents of the deep state.
- "all power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely"[2]
- the early 21st century is witnessing an end-game push towards a globalised corporate capitalism - the totalitarian "New World Order" - which aspires to absolute power, is with it, absolute corruption.[3]
- These propositions are central to WikiSpooks' purpose. The only page on which they are debatable is this page.
- This site is for questioning "Official narratives", not promulgating them. They are already vastly overrepresented and WikiSpooks is not a vehicle for promoting them.
- Anyone ignoring these admonition and editing the encyclopaedia in such a way as to purposely question or oppose these ideas will forfeit further site involvement in short order.
Good faith
While noone has all the answers; each of us has limited experience, our opinions are necessarily biased and our knowledge flawed to a certain extent, but we can nevertheless act in good faith. In our conduct on the site, WikiSpooks editors agree to subjugate local affiliations of race, creed, national, tribal, cultural or other parochial identities to the following:
- Our Common Humanity: "We are all one."
- The Golden Rule: "We treat others as we hope to be treated by them."
References
- ↑ The most succinct rendering of 'Opposition' as integral to 'Establishment' is probably that of the founder of modern Zionism Theodor Hertzl who counseled "We will lead every revolution against us". A seemingly ridiculous contradiction, but in practice a principle at the very heart of the exercise of Machiavellian Power.
- ↑ An aphorism attributed to Lord Acton in a letter to Mandell Creighton dated 1887 - more here
- ↑ The nature of the modern Corporation, as essentially psychopathic, is apposite (see this Media-Lens article), as is the necessity for psychopathy in an individual as sine-qua-non for the acquisition and exercise of power at senior Nation State level.
| ||||||
|
