Difference between revisions of "Plausible deniability"
(add) |
(links and tidy) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|constitutes= | |constitutes= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | '''Plausible deniability''' is a core concept of covert politics. | ||
| − | |||
== Compartmentalization and the "need to know" == | == Compartmentalization and the "need to know" == | ||
| − | + | {{FA|Compartmentalization}} | |
{{SMWQ | {{SMWQ | ||
|subjects=CIA, Plausible deniability, Tom Donohue | |subjects=CIA, Plausible deniability, Tom Donohue | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|source_URL=Counterpunch | |source_URL=Counterpunch | ||
|source_name=https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/22/the-cia-70-years-of-organized-crime/ | |source_name=https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/22/the-cia-70-years-of-organized-crime/ | ||
| − | |text= | + | |text=The CIA doesn’t do anything it can’t deny. [[Tom Donohue]], a retired senior CIA officer, told me about this. |
| − | The CIA doesn’t do anything it can’t deny. [[Tom Donohue]], a retired senior CIA officer, told me about this. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | [[Compartmentalization]] and '[[need to know]]' are crucial concepts in understanding intelligence agencies, yet they remain virtually unknown amongst the broader public. | |
| − | Compartmentalization and | ||
| − | Subalterns carry out orders, often ignorant of why and what the ramifications of compliance are. [[Colin A. Ross]] | + | Subalterns carry out orders, often ignorant of why and what the ramifications of compliance are. [[Colin A. Ross]] gives several examples of psychiatrists working for [[MKULTRA]], often unaware of the umbrella project or the later use of their research for [[torture]].<ref name=ColinRossInterview1>Interview Dr Colin Ross () Disconnect, Connecting the Pattern. http://coastalrain.tripod.com/disconnect/id17.html</ref> |
| − | gives several examples of psychiatrists working for [[MKULTRA]], often unaware of the umbrella project or the later use of their research for torture. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The secret race for the atomic bomb in WWII is another example of the effectiveness of compartmentalization. The [[Manhattan Project]] was split in numerous sub-projects. It was huge; it remained secret until the day the USA bombed [[Hiroshima]]. The usual outcry of the {{ccm}} that “everyone would have had to be in on it!” is a bit naive and does not reflect history very well. See Interview with [[Scott Noble]] for more examples of CIA projects that were successfully kept secret for decades. | + | The secret race for the atomic bomb in WWII is another example of the effectiveness of compartmentalization. The [[Manhattan Project]] was split in numerous sub-projects. It was huge; it remained secret until the day the USA bombed [[Hiroshima]]. The usual outcry of the {{ccm}} that “everyone would have had to be in on it!” is a bit naive and does not reflect history very well. See Interview with [[Scott Noble]] for more examples of CIA projects that were successfully kept secret for decades.<ref name=ScottNobleInterview>[[Document:Counter-Intelligence:_Spying_Deters_Democracy]]</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== No paper trail == | == No paper trail == | ||
| − | |||
{{SMWQ | {{SMWQ | ||
| − | |subjects=CIA, Plausible deniability | + | |subjects=CIA, Cut-outs, Plausible deniability |
|date=July 7, 2014 | |date=July 7, 2014 | ||
|authors=Scott Noble | |authors=Scott Noble | ||
| − | |source_URL= | + | |source_URL= |
| − | |source_name= | + | |source_name=Document:Counter-Intelligence:_Spying_Deters_Democracy |
| − | |text= | + | |text=Everyone is trying to create a disjuncture between the initial order and the operation |
| − | Everyone is trying to create a disjuncture between the initial order and the operation | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | [[National Security Council document 10/2 | + | [[National Security Council]] document 10/2 (1950?) states that illegal CIA operations (including “sabotage... demolition... and subversion against hostile states”) should be conducted in a manner by which the US government can “plausibly disclaim any responsibility.”<ref name=ScottNobleInterview/> |
| − | |||
The reason for this doctrine was that high government officials including the president should be able to give orders to the [[CIA]] and similar bodies hidden from Congress and the general public. | The reason for this doctrine was that high government officials including the president should be able to give orders to the [[CIA]] and similar bodies hidden from Congress and the general public. | ||
| − | Command structures may be informal and loose, i.e. the [[Operations Coordinating Board]], a secretive part of the [[National Security Council]] was set up for management of [[MKULTRA]] projects and sub-projects. A representative of the president in this board - a position held by [[Nelson Rockefeller]] under [[Eisenhower]] - informed the president about its activities. | + | Command structures may be informal and loose, i.e. the [[Operations Coordinating Board]], a secretive part of the [[National Security Council]] was set up for management of [[MKULTRA]] projects and sub-projects. A representative of the president in this board - a position held by [[Nelson Rockefeller]] under [[Eisenhower]] - informed the president about its activities.<ref name=ColbyDennet>Gerard Colby, Charlotte Dennet: Thy Will be Done. The Conquest of The Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil. 263-266. Harpercollins, 1995.</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
This structure allowed the president to '''plausibly deny''' his responsibility for orders or knowledge about the sometimes illegal activities. It also makes clear the power of the middle man, [[Nelson Rockefeller]] in this case. | This structure allowed the president to '''plausibly deny''' his responsibility for orders or knowledge about the sometimes illegal activities. It also makes clear the power of the middle man, [[Nelson Rockefeller]] in this case. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 43: | ||
{{SMWQ | {{SMWQ | ||
| − | |subjects= | + | |subjects=spooks, Plausible deniability |
|date=July 7, 2014 | |date=July 7, 2014 | ||
|authors=Scott Noble | |authors=Scott Noble | ||
| − | |source_URL= | + | |source_URL= |
| − | |source_name= | + | |source_name=Document:Counter-Intelligence:_Spying_Deters_Democracy |
| − | |text= | + | |text=Intelligence officers try very hard not to get their hands dirty. |
| − | Intelligence officers try very hard not to get their hands dirty. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 73: | Line 57: | ||
===Abuse of power=== | ===Abuse of power=== | ||
| − | + | {{FA|Abuse of power}} | |
| − | + | Plausible deniability creates opportunities for abuse of power. Informal or disjunctive control mechanisms are often referred to as military "help", or training affiliated organizations, i.e. “retired” U.S. army officers on contract to Croatia "helped" command “Operation Storm” in 1995, in which hundreds of Serb civilians were killed and Krajina was ethnically cleansed of several hundred thousand Serbs (in what was probably the largest single ethnic cleansing operation in the Balkan wars).<ref>[[Document:The_Balkan_Wars]]</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | Informal or disjunctive control mechanisms are often referred to as military "help", or training affiliated organizations, i.e. “retired” U.S. army officers on contract to Croatia "helped" command “Operation Storm” in 1995, in which hundreds of Serb civilians were killed and Krajina was ethnically cleansed of several hundred thousand Serbs (in what was probably the largest single ethnic cleansing operation in the Balkan wars). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The [[CIA]] "aided" para military to "learn" about "advanced interrogation techniques" (torture) in the [[School of the Americas]]. | The [[CIA]] "aided" para military to "learn" about "advanced interrogation techniques" (torture) in the [[School of the Americas]]. | ||
After training, orders may be vague, but from previous "lessons" and dependence on financing affiliates are expected to know what to do to "maintain a good relationship". When links are informal and many "buffers" are involved blackmail might be a neccessary consequence to control plausible deniable operations. | After training, orders may be vague, but from previous "lessons" and dependence on financing affiliates are expected to know what to do to "maintain a good relationship". When links are informal and many "buffers" are involved blackmail might be a neccessary consequence to control plausible deniable operations. | ||
| − | Plausible deniability is also used by people within intelligence agencies, "going right down the line to the contractors and sub-contractors. We can see it today with mercenary organizations like Blackwater/Academi." Other companies include Booz Allen Hamilton, | + | Plausible deniability is also used by people within [[intelligence agencies]], "going right down the line to the contractors and sub-contractors. We can see it today with mercenary organizations like [[Blackwater]]/Academi." Other companies include [[Booz Allen Hamilton]], [[Halliburton]] and [[Dyncorp]].<ref name=ScottNobleInterview/> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ==The CoG network== | ||
| + | {{FA|Continuity of Government}} | ||
| + | Communication channels which can not be tapped such as encrypted phones - like the [[COG network]] referred to by [[Peter Dale Scott]] - might be of vital importance to carry out plausible deniable orders.<ref>[[Document:The_Hidden_Government_Group]]</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 12 March 2018
 Plausible deniability    | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | • J. C. King • Mark Rutte |
Plausible deniability is a core concept of covert politics.
Contents
Compartmentalization and the "need to know"
- Full article: Compartmentalization
- Full article: Compartmentalization
“The CIA doesn’t do anything it can’t deny. Tom Donohue, a retired senior CIA officer, told me about this.”
Douglas Valentine (Sep 9, 2017) [1]
Compartmentalization and 'need to know' are crucial concepts in understanding intelligence agencies, yet they remain virtually unknown amongst the broader public.
Subalterns carry out orders, often ignorant of why and what the ramifications of compliance are. Colin A. Ross gives several examples of psychiatrists working for MKULTRA, often unaware of the umbrella project or the later use of their research for torture.[2]
The secret race for the atomic bomb in WWII is another example of the effectiveness of compartmentalization. The Manhattan Project was split in numerous sub-projects. It was huge; it remained secret until the day the USA bombed Hiroshima. The usual outcry of the commercially-controlled media that “everyone would have had to be in on it!” is a bit naive and does not reflect history very well. See Interview with Scott Noble for more examples of CIA projects that were successfully kept secret for decades.[3]
No paper trail
“Everyone is trying to create a disjuncture between the initial order and the operation”
Scott Noble (July 7, 2014) [4]
National Security Council document 10/2 (1950?) states that illegal CIA operations (including “sabotage... demolition... and subversion against hostile states”) should be conducted in a manner by which the US government can “plausibly disclaim any responsibility.”[3]
The reason for this doctrine was that high government officials including the president should be able to give orders to the CIA and similar bodies hidden from Congress and the general public.
Command structures may be informal and loose, i.e. the Operations Coordinating Board, a secretive part of the National Security Council was set up for management of MKULTRA projects and sub-projects. A representative of the president in this board - a position held by Nelson Rockefeller under Eisenhower - informed the president about its activities.[5]
This structure allowed the president to plausibly deny his responsibility for orders or knowledge about the sometimes illegal activities. It also makes clear the power of the middle man, Nelson Rockefeller in this case.
Problems
“Intelligence officers try very hard not to get their hands dirty.”
Scott Noble (July 7, 2014) [4]
There is a risk that "orders" may be distorted when they "literally amount to a wink and a nod" but this may be "one of the reasons we don’t often see extensive “smoking gun” paper trails for the really controversial ops." [3]
Historian William Blum described an episode from the 50′s when a statement by Eisenhower that “the Nasser problem could be eliminated” (referring to Gamal Abdel Nasser, then President of Egypt) was misinterpreted by CIA head Allen Dulles to be an order for his assassination.
Abuse of power
- Full article: Abuse of power
- Full article: Abuse of power
Plausible deniability creates opportunities for abuse of power. Informal or disjunctive control mechanisms are often referred to as military "help", or training affiliated organizations, i.e. “retired” U.S. army officers on contract to Croatia "helped" command “Operation Storm” in 1995, in which hundreds of Serb civilians were killed and Krajina was ethnically cleansed of several hundred thousand Serbs (in what was probably the largest single ethnic cleansing operation in the Balkan wars).[6]
The CIA "aided" para military to "learn" about "advanced interrogation techniques" (torture) in the School of the Americas. After training, orders may be vague, but from previous "lessons" and dependence on financing affiliates are expected to know what to do to "maintain a good relationship". When links are informal and many "buffers" are involved blackmail might be a neccessary consequence to control plausible deniable operations.
Plausible deniability is also used by people within intelligence agencies, "going right down the line to the contractors and sub-contractors. We can see it today with mercenary organizations like Blackwater/Academi." Other companies include Booz Allen Hamilton, Halliburton and Dyncorp.[3]
The CoG network
- Full article: “Continuity of Government”
- Full article: “Continuity of Government”
Communication channels which can not be tapped such as encrypted phones - like the COG network referred to by Peter Dale Scott - might be of vital importance to carry out plausible deniable orders.[7]
An example
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Accident | Accidents do happen. But that truism also provides plausible deniability. |
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beatrix Armgard | “The lie rules” | Beatrix Armgard | |
| Deep state actor | “Crozier himself makes the point that many of the prominent politicians invited to sit in on Cercle strategic sessions had no knowledge of their hosts' more clandestine operational activities – if only because of the "need to know" principle. Nonetheless, a stalwart multi-functionary on the Boards of several groups linked to the Cercle can be presumed to have some deeper involvement beyond just lending his name to the cause.” | David Teacher | |
| Deep state milieu | “one of the tendencies of such groups is for their members to "play musical chairs", changing place frequently on the raft of names sponsoring an organization... [so] sharing a Board membership with someone does not necessarily imply intimate knowledge of the other's various activities.” | David Teacher | |
| Institute for Statecraft/Secrecy | “Code of Conduct (Greg to commence with internet etiquette) Anonymity of the team remains paramount. As our activity increases we will, no doubt, attract unwanted attention.” | 30 May 2018 | |
| Institute for Statecraft/Secrecy | “Be absolutely sure you have good references for people so we know we can trust them before we talk to them about our programme” | 30 May 2018 | |
| Institute for Statecraft/Secrecy | “Beware the friendly host who wants to book travel or accommodation on your behalf. Absolutely get their tips on where to stay but avoid getting into tricky scenarios and ensure you follow company guidelines and book everything yourself. If in doubt, ask advice from another team member.” | 30 May 2018 | |
| Institute for Statecraft/Secrecy | “* Chris Donnelly makes initial country introduction with nominated trusted 'cordinator' & relevant II team member/s (normally 2 members minimum per country)
| 30 May 2018 | |
| Institute for Statecraft/Secrecy | “Beware the friendly host who wants to book travel or accommodation on your behalf. Absolutely get their tips on where to stay but avoid getting into tricky scenarios and ensure you follow company guidelines and book everything yourself. If in doubt, ask advice from another team member.” | 30 May 2018 | |
| Integrity Initiative/Cluster | “An effective network is best achieved by forming in each European country a cluster of well-informed people from the political, military, academic, journalistic and think-tank spheres, who will track and analyse examples of disinformation in their country and inform decision-makers and other interested parties about what is happening.” | 30 May 2018 | |
| Integrity Initiative/Cluster | “Be absolutely sure you have good references for people so we know we can trust them before we talk to them about our programme ...
| 30 May 2018 |
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:How do Pedophiles get away with it? | article | 19 October 2012 | Anonymous |
References
- ↑ Counterpunch https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/22/the-cia-70-years-of-organized-crime/
- ↑ Interview Dr Colin Ross () Disconnect, Connecting the Pattern. http://coastalrain.tripod.com/disconnect/id17.html
- ↑ a b c d Document:Counter-Intelligence:_Spying_Deters_Democracy
- ↑ a b Document:Counter-Intelligence:_Spying_Deters_Democracy
- ↑ Gerard Colby, Charlotte Dennet: Thy Will be Done. The Conquest of The Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil. 263-266. Harpercollins, 1995.
- ↑ Document:The_Balkan_Wars
- ↑ Document:The_Hidden_Government_Group
