Difference between revisions of "Daily Express"
(Unstub) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Daily_Express | |sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Daily_Express | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | The '''''Daily Express''''' is a UK daily [[newspaper]] which began in 1900. | + | The '''''Daily Express''''' is a UK daily [[newspaper]] which began in 1900. Although generally supportive of {{on}}s, in 2016 it questioned the story of the [[destruction of WTC7]]. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Reporting== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===September 11, 2001=== | ||
| + | [[image:2016de911.png|300px|right]] | ||
| + | On June 22, 2016 the ''Express'' became the first UK corporate newspaper to deviate from the [[9-11/Official narrative]] when it headlined a story "Were 9/11 towers blown up by bombs? University probes if planes REALLY were responsible". The story centered on the [[University of Alaska]]'s sponsoring "a full investigation into claims that World Trade Center Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition during the 9/11 attacks".<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/682256/Were-9-11-towers-blown-up-by-bombs-University-probes-if-planes-REALLY-were-responsible</ref> On September 10th, 2016, [[John Austin]] published a second article entitled "Was 9/11 an inside job? Call for TRUTH over Building 7 collapse on eve of 15th anniversary" which conceded that "growing numbers of people STILL claim the Twin Towers atrocities could have been an inside job."<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/709000/Was-9-11-an-inside-job-Call-for-TRUTH-over-Building-7-collapse-on-eve-of-15th-anniversary</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===2005 London bombings=== | ||
| + | The ''Daily Express'' was unquestioning in its promotion of the {{on}} that the attacks were carried out by "[[Muslim terrorists]]" with no assistance from Western [[intelligence agencies]]. | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 01:40, 20 November 2018
 Daily Express  (newspaper)      | |
|---|---|
 The cover of the Daily Express responded to the 2005 London bombings with a lot of enemy images. The "terrorist" referred to on this page was Jean Charles de Menezes, an unarmed man whom the Metropolitan Police had shot and killed the day before. | |
| Type | newspaper |
| Founder(s) | Arthur Pearson |
| Founded | 24 April 1900 |
| Author(s) | |
| Interest of | Stop Funding Hate |
| A UK newspaper | |
The Daily Express is a UK daily newspaper which began in 1900. Although generally supportive of official narratives, in 2016 it questioned the story of the destruction of WTC7.
Contents
Reporting
September 11, 2001
On June 22, 2016 the Express became the first UK corporate newspaper to deviate from the 9-11/Official narrative when it headlined a story "Were 9/11 towers blown up by bombs? University probes if planes REALLY were responsible". The story centered on the University of Alaska's sponsoring "a full investigation into claims that World Trade Center Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition during the 9/11 attacks".[1] On September 10th, 2016, John Austin published a second article entitled "Was 9/11 an inside job? Call for TRUTH over Building 7 collapse on eve of 15th anniversary" which conceded that "growing numbers of people STILL claim the Twin Towers atrocities could have been an inside job."[2]
2005 London bombings
The Daily Express was unquestioning in its promotion of the official narrative that the attacks were carried out by "Muslim terrorists" with no assistance from Western intelligence agencies.
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Pro-Kremlin trolls infiltrating comments on news sites for major influence operation, research says | Article | 6 September 2021 | Deborah Haynes | A study at Cardiff University shows that "Pro-Kremlin trolls" are influencing opinion in the West by infiltrating the comments sections of news websites. Dissent from the Official Narrative? Must be Russian disinformation. |
A document sourced from Daily Express
| Title | Type | Subject(s) | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Absolute folly for Britain to get involved in Syria | Article | NATO Russia Syria UK Andrew Bonar Law Bashar al Assad Johnny Mercer Boris Johnson | 1 March 2018 | Leo McKinstry | Tory MP Johnny Mercer, a former soldier, has demanded: “Britain must come to Syria’s aid” and condemned those who oppose “military intervention”. |
