Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:Read This First"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Application Guidelines: Emphasise the large proportion of rejections) |
|||
| (50 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''' | + | {{HelpSection|image=ws_warning.png}} |
| + | '''Wikispooks is an open source encyclopaedia of [[deep politics]]. This page is for those readers familiar with its contents who who would like to become editors. It clarifies Wikispooks' expectations of those who apply for editing permissions.''' | ||
| − | ''' | + | ==Introduction== |
| + | ''Wikispooks'' is one of many reactions to the ever more blatant hypocrisies of the "[[Establishment]]" worldview. Aggressive use of {{ccm}} and scientifically researched projects to [[socially engineer]] a passive population have meant that '[[UK|Anglo]]-[[USA|American]]-[[Europe|Euro]]-[[NATO]]' friendly announcements are often accompanied only by the most superficial of justifications, whereas challenges to their {{on}}s are vigorously opposed on principle, whatever the facts of the case. Wikispooks is for [[red pill]]ers to critically reflect on these "[[Official narratives]]", to compile relevant evidence, exchange opinons and bounce ideas off like minds. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Core principles== |
| − | + | Wikispooks concurs that: | |
| + | # [[Wikispooks:Site Rationale|"all power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely"]] | ||
| − | = | + | Wikispooks suggests further that: |
| − | + | <ol start="2"> | |
| − | + | <li>both "[[Official narrative]]s" and "[[Official_Narrative#Official_opposition_narratives|Official ''opposition'' narratives]]" are always more-or-less in service to {{te}} by deflecting attention from the real events, actors and their true motivations;</li> | |
| − | + | <li>early 21<sup>st</sup> century party politics is nothing more than a convenient cover for the real business of [[deep politics]] which is rarely if ever investigated by the {{ccm}}, which are more or less completely controlled by agents of the [[deep state]];</li> | |
| − | + | <li>whilst there are good people everywhere, large hierarchical organisations (such as national governments and multi-national corporations) are prone to domination by [[psychopaths]] and [[sociopaths]], and so their pronouncements must be regarded as highly suspect at best;</li> | |
| − | + | <li>the early 21<sup>st</sup> century is witnessing an end-game push towards a globalised corporate capitalism. As this Orwellian "[[New World Order]]" aspires to absolute power, it embraces absolute corruption.<ref>The nature of the modern Corporation, as essentially psychopathic, is apposite (see this [https://www.medialens.org/2011/comment-is-free-but-freedom-is-slavery-an-exchange-with-the-guardians-economics-editor/ Media-Lens article]), as is the necessity for psychopathy in an individual as sine-qua-non for the acquisition and exercise of power at senior Nation State level.</ref></li> | |
| + | </ol> | ||
| − | + | Wikispooks admonishes that: | |
| − | + | <ol start="6"> | |
| − | + | <li>[[Establishment]]-sponsored "[[official narrative]]s" are already vastly overrepresented and this site is for their ''critical investigation'', not their defense or promulgation.</li> | |
| + | <li>The above principles are central to Wikispooks' purpose. This website has only one page on which they are debatable: [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this talk page]].</li> | ||
| + | <li>Anyone editing the encyclopaedia in such a way as to purposely question or oppose these core principles will forfeit further site involvement in short order.</li> | ||
| + | </ol> | ||
| − | ''' | + | ==Good faith== |
| + | [[image:Golden Rule.png|right|160px]] | ||
| + | Each of us has limited experience, so our opinions are necessarily biased and our knowledge to a certain extent flawed. We can however act in ''good faith''. In our conduct on the site, Wikispooks editors agree to subjugate local affiliations of race, creed, national, tribal, cultural or other parochial identities to the following: | ||
| + | # ''Our Common Humanity'': '''"We are all one."''' | ||
| + | # ''The Golden Rule:'' '''"We treat others as we hope to be treated by them."''' | ||
| + | <!-- | ||
| + | # ''Our Sincerity'': '''"The insights we share will be done so sincerely."''' | ||
| − | == | + | THIS DOESN'T EASILY FIT HERE. I WONDER WHERE WOULD BE A GOOD PLACE? OR HOW TO INTRODUCE IT? |
| − | + | --> | |
| + | == Application Guidelines == | ||
| + | Screening of editor applications is stringent since protection of the site's integrity is a high priority. '''''A large majority of applications are declined''' — if you wish to become an editor you will be expected to spend some time on your application''. Read the [[Wikispooks:Policy]] before you apply. Applications which are copy/pasted from elsewhere, contain grammatical errors, or those which do not mention ''why'' you wish to become an editor and what sort of edits you plan on doing'' will be rejected. We will expect you to identify yourself, include something about your background, and have published online and for your application to link to that. | ||
| − | + | If you have applied before and been rejected, you ''may'' re-apply, but you should mention this fact. Also, please mention in your application if there is a page on this site that mentions you, a document you have helped create, or if you plan on creating a page about yourself. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ==Examples of propositions axiomatic to mainstream discourse== | + | We do not approve anonymous/pseudonymous applications or those obviously intended for self-promotion. If you are applying at the request of a third party, this should be mentioned. |
| − | '''The following are akin to latter-day articles of religious faith. They can be questioned only on pain of excommunication from mainstream discourse as mediated by | + | <!-- |
| + | === Examples of propositions axiomatic to mainstream discourse in Western {{CCM}} === | ||
| + | '''The following are akin to latter-day articles of religious faith. They can be questioned only on pain of excommunication from mainstream discourse as mediated by {{te}}'s {{ccm}}.''' | ||
* Economic growth is necessary for a healthy economy and society. | * Economic growth is necessary for a healthy economy and society. | ||
| − | * Progress - as in to be 'Progressive' - is at the heart of society's endeavours (Though progress to what | + | * Progress - as in to be 'Progressive' - is at the heart of society's endeavours (Though, in similar fashion to the Emperor's New Clothes {{ref|4}} and because it is taken to be blindingly obvious, progress to what is left entirely to the imagination) |
| − | * Globalisation is both beneficial and necessary to | + | * "[http://www.anti-globalisation.com/anti-globalisation/ Globalisation]" is both beneficial and necessary to "progress" |
| − | * Globalised | + | * Globalised "[[Free Trade]]" is good for the whole world and necessary for 'progress' |
| − | * The intent of Western Nation States in | + | * The intent of Western Nation States in general and one's own country ([[UK]], [[USA]],[[Germany]] [[France]] etc) in particular, towards the rest of the world, is essentially benign |
| − | * That | + | * That "[[democratically elected]]" governments represent the apex of national and international power structures |
| − | + | * That "democratically elected" governments' main aim is to promote the well being of the populations of their nations, i.e. to pursue essentially Utilitarian{{ref|5}} policies | |
| − | * That | + | * Anglo-American-[[NATO]] Military actions are only ever used as a last resort either in "self-defence" or for purposes of [[humanitarian intervention]]. |
| − | * That | + | * That agencies of Western Nation States, or factions controlled by them could not possibly carry out lethal [[False Flag Attacks]] against their own civilian populations. Such a proposition is unthinkable and constitutes an absolute taboo which is enforced by all the {{ccm}} |
| − | + | ''All of these proposition sit somewhere between patently false and utterly absurd, yet they are promulgated every hour of every day by more or less all the {{ccm}}.'' | |
| + | --> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | '''<big>If you are in agreement with the intent of Wikispooks and wish to contribute, subject to the guidelines outlined above, you are invited to [[Special:RequestAccount|apply for a Login]].<br/> | ||
| + | </big>''' | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | + | {{reflist}} | |
| − | == | + | <!-- |
| − | + | #{{note|4}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes The Emperor's New Clothes] - Wikipedia article. | |
| − | + | #{{note|5}}. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism Utilitarianism] - Wikipedia article on the utilitarian political philosophy of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham | |
| − | + | --> | |
| − | + | {{Template:Wikispooks Footer/Policy}} | |
| − | + | [[Category:About Wikispooks]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | #{{note| | ||
| − | #{{note| | ||
| − | {{ | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category:About | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 28 September 2024
Wikispooks is an open source encyclopaedia of deep politics. This page is for those readers familiar with its contents who who would like to become editors. It clarifies Wikispooks' expectations of those who apply for editing permissions.
Introduction
Wikispooks is one of many reactions to the ever more blatant hypocrisies of the "Establishment" worldview. Aggressive use of commercially-controlled media and scientifically researched projects to socially engineer a passive population have meant that 'Anglo-American-Euro-NATO' friendly announcements are often accompanied only by the most superficial of justifications, whereas challenges to their official narratives are vigorously opposed on principle, whatever the facts of the case. Wikispooks is for red pillers to critically reflect on these "Official narratives", to compile relevant evidence, exchange opinons and bounce ideas off like minds.
Core principles
Wikispooks concurs that:
Wikispooks suggests further that:
- both "Official narratives" and "Official opposition narratives" are always more-or-less in service to the establishment by deflecting attention from the real events, actors and their true motivations;
- early 21st century party politics is nothing more than a convenient cover for the real business of deep politics which is rarely if ever investigated by the commercially-controlled media, which are more or less completely controlled by agents of the deep state;
- whilst there are good people everywhere, large hierarchical organisations (such as national governments and multi-national corporations) are prone to domination by psychopaths and sociopaths, and so their pronouncements must be regarded as highly suspect at best;
- the early 21st century is witnessing an end-game push towards a globalised corporate capitalism. As this Orwellian "New World Order" aspires to absolute power, it embraces absolute corruption.[1]
Wikispooks admonishes that:
- Establishment-sponsored "official narratives" are already vastly overrepresented and this site is for their critical investigation, not their defense or promulgation.
- The above principles are central to Wikispooks' purpose. This website has only one page on which they are debatable: this talk page.
- Anyone editing the encyclopaedia in such a way as to purposely question or oppose these core principles will forfeit further site involvement in short order.
Good faith
Each of us has limited experience, so our opinions are necessarily biased and our knowledge to a certain extent flawed. We can however act in good faith. In our conduct on the site, Wikispooks editors agree to subjugate local affiliations of race, creed, national, tribal, cultural or other parochial identities to the following:
- Our Common Humanity: "We are all one."
- The Golden Rule: "We treat others as we hope to be treated by them."
Application Guidelines
Screening of editor applications is stringent since protection of the site's integrity is a high priority. A large majority of applications are declined — if you wish to become an editor you will be expected to spend some time on your application. Read the Wikispooks:Policy before you apply. Applications which are copy/pasted from elsewhere, contain grammatical errors, or those which do not mention why you wish to become an editor and what sort of edits you plan on doing will be rejected. We will expect you to identify yourself, include something about your background, and have published online and for your application to link to that.
If you have applied before and been rejected, you may re-apply, but you should mention this fact. Also, please mention in your application if there is a page on this site that mentions you, a document you have helped create, or if you plan on creating a page about yourself.
We do not approve anonymous/pseudonymous applications or those obviously intended for self-promotion. If you are applying at the request of a third party, this should be mentioned.
If you are in agreement with the intent of Wikispooks and wish to contribute, subject to the guidelines outlined above, you are invited to apply for a Login.
References
- ↑ The nature of the modern Corporation, as essentially psychopathic, is apposite (see this Media-Lens article), as is the necessity for psychopathy in an individual as sine-qua-non for the acquisition and exercise of power at senior Nation State level.
| ||||||
|
