Difference between revisions of "National park"
(black sites) |
(shorter lede) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{place | {{place | ||
|image=1620px-Lilienstein Saxon Switzerland.jpg | |image=1620px-Lilienstein Saxon Switzerland.jpg | ||
− | |constitutes=nature preserve,black site | + | |image_width=500px |
− | |description= | + | |constitutes=nature preserve,black site, conservation movement |
− | |interest_of=1001 group | + | |description=The remote locations of national parks, protected by special laws and armed forces, make them ideal for covert activities. |
+ | |interest_of=1001 group,WWF | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | A '''national park''' is a | + | A '''national park''' is a an area where human activities are restricted or banned according to special laws. |
− | == | + | ==Official narrative== |
− | Often | + | National parks are created and protected by national governments. Often they are a reserve of natural, semi-natural, or developed land that a sovereign state declares or owns. Although individual nations designate their own national parks differently, there is a common idea: the conservation of 'wild nature' for posterity and as a symbol of national pride.<ref>https://dbpedia.org/page/National_park</ref> |
− | + | ==Special administrative areas== | |
+ | Often ruled by special laws and with their own forces to administer them and to keep people away, some parks have been bases for covert activities. During the [[Cold War]], national parks were ideal covers for [[stay-behind]] activities, from hiding weapons caches to rangers and foresters often being [[Gladio]] members{{cn}}. | ||
− | And billionaires take a keen interest in national parks, seeing them as their own playground. | + | In Africa, a large number of parks, and |
+ | in some cases the entire parks system, are under the control of private [[non-governmental organizations]], managed by international boards of trustees outside the oversight of the government.<ref name=EIR>https://archive.org/stream/TheComingFallOfTheHouseOfWindsor/Windsor_djvu.txt</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Many parks are in areas on the border between countries, making them suited for [[smuggling]] and bases for [[guerilla movements]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And billionaires take a keen interest in national parks, seeing them as their own playground. Many of them were originally game preserves for their hunting parties. After [[World War 2]] this changed more to the ideology of the [[conservation movement]]. | ||
==Pakistan== | ==Pakistan== | ||
Line 19: | Line 26: | ||
==South Africa== | ==South Africa== | ||
− | Apartheid [[South Africa]] hid covert activities such as parts of its chemical and biological program and mercenary bases inside national parks | + | Apartheid [[South Africa]] hid covert activities such as parts of its chemical and biological program and mercenary bases inside national parks. Its puppet guerilla movement [[Renamo]] in [[Mozambique]] were based in Kruger national park.<ref name=EIR/> |
+ | |||
+ | Also several anti-apatheid forces, often [[Soviet]] supported, used national parks as bases.<ref name=EIR/> | ||
==Operation Lock== | ==Operation Lock== | ||
− | In 1987, the [[WWF|World Wildlife Fund for Nature]] launched a project known as “Operation Lock,” ostensibly created to infiltrate and dismantle the African rhino horn and ivory trade. To execute the project, WWF hired [[KAS Enterprises]], a private military firm that was also used to wage war on the enemies of [[apartheid South Africa]] trying to infiltrate the borders | + | In 1987, the [[WWF|World Wildlife Fund for Nature]] under [[Prince Bernhard]] launched a project known as “Operation Lock,” ostensibly created to infiltrate and dismantle the African rhino horn and ivory trade. To execute the project, WWF hired [[KAS Enterprises]], a private military firm that was also used to wage war on the enemies of [[apartheid South Africa]] trying to infiltrate the borders.<ref>https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/05/12/18832991.php</ref> |
[[Stephen Ellis]], who broke a story on Operation Lock for [[the Independent]] in [[1991]], describes in his research how [[South African Military Intelligence]] exploited the [[trade of wildlife products]] throughout Africa for the larger effort of destabilizing the enemies of [[apartheid]].<ref name=Ellis>https://www.scribd.com/doc/121327879/Kumleben-Commission-Report</ref> | [[Stephen Ellis]], who broke a story on Operation Lock for [[the Independent]] in [[1991]], describes in his research how [[South African Military Intelligence]] exploited the [[trade of wildlife products]] throughout Africa for the larger effort of destabilizing the enemies of [[apartheid]].<ref name=Ellis>https://www.scribd.com/doc/121327879/Kumleben-Commission-Report</ref> | ||
“All of these trades tended to implicate senior government officials throughout [Africa], either because of their value, or their illegal or semi-legal nature required traders to buy political protection at a high level,” Ellis writes. “Hence, the infiltration of these networks by South African Military Intelligence was not only a means of making money but also a useful tool for South Africa’s secret servants to penetrate state machineries in pursuit of their strategy of destabilization.”<ref name=Ellis/> | “All of these trades tended to implicate senior government officials throughout [Africa], either because of their value, or their illegal or semi-legal nature required traders to buy political protection at a high level,” Ellis writes. “Hence, the infiltration of these networks by South African Military Intelligence was not only a means of making money but also a useful tool for South Africa’s secret servants to penetrate state machineries in pursuit of their strategy of destabilization.”<ref name=Ellis/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Who guards the guardians?=== | ||
+ | Just like in the [[drug trade]], which is run by deep state groups, projects such as ''Operation Lock'' might be a way to control the [[lucrative trade]] in wildlife products such as [[ivory]] and rhino horns, while eliminating the small time competition under guise of protecting the animals. The WWF is best-known for its efforts to conserve four animal species, all of which were in vastly better condition in [[1961]] than they are today. Two of these, the panda and the African black rhinoceros, are near extinction, and two others, the African elephant and the Indian tiger, are rapidly heading in that direction.<ref>http://spikethenews.blogspot.com/2016/02/rhinos.html</ref> | ||
==Rewilding== | ==Rewilding== | ||
− | While national parks are often seen as positive environmental service, they have a darker side. National parks were created by individuals who felt that pristine, natural sections of nature should be set aside and preserved | + | While national parks are often seen as positive environmental service, they have a darker side. National parks were created by individuals who felt that pristine, natural sections of nature should be set aside and preserved for more select use. In many places, like the American West and [[India]], the lands that have been set aside and protected were already being inhabited by native communities. So residents of these areas were forcibly removed and set aside to create "pristine" sites.<ref>https://dx.doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv1bkc3t6</ref> The vast park complex of [[Zambia]] closes off 32% of its area (larger |
+ | than [[Great Britain]])<ref>https://safarisafricana.com/which-country-has-the-most-national-parks/</ref>; [[Tanzania]] has 30% <ref>https://allafrica.com/stories/202103010597.html</ref> | ||
Billionaires such as [[Hansjörg Wyss]] are working to make at least 30% of the earth into wildlife reserves. | Billionaires such as [[Hansjörg Wyss]] are working to make at least 30% of the earth into wildlife reserves. | ||
Line 39: | Line 52: | ||
Operation CORDED is the codename given to the British Army’s involvement in the fight against poaching in the African country of Malawi and Zambia. The main task of Op CORDED is to train the rangers responsible for the day-to-day protection of the Park. As well as training the rangers in tracking, bushcraft and information analysis to improve the interception of poachers, the soldiers, designated as Counter-Poaching Operatives (CPOs), also taught infantry skills.<ref>http://www.warfare.today/2019/05/08/operation-corded-the-british-army-in-malawi/</ref><ref>https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2021/06/illegal-poachers-tied-up-by-corded/</ref> | Operation CORDED is the codename given to the British Army’s involvement in the fight against poaching in the African country of Malawi and Zambia. The main task of Op CORDED is to train the rangers responsible for the day-to-day protection of the Park. As well as training the rangers in tracking, bushcraft and information analysis to improve the interception of poachers, the soldiers, designated as Counter-Poaching Operatives (CPOs), also taught infantry skills.<ref>http://www.warfare.today/2019/05/08/operation-corded-the-british-army-in-malawi/</ref><ref>https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2021/06/illegal-poachers-tied-up-by-corded/</ref> | ||
− | + | ==Insurgencies== | |
− | + | Parks can function as safe havens and staging grounds for [[insurgencies]]. Many re- | |
− | + | serves and parks, especially in [[Africa]], straddle borders, with the parks functioning as "militarized zones." [[Prince Philip]]'s WWF was administering the gorilla program in the [[Virunga park]], while the [[Rwandan Patriotic Front]] was using the Virunga to maraud Rwanda since October 1990, with full financing and support from Ugandan President [[Yoweri Museveni]] and his US/British backers.<ref name=EIR/> | |
Latest revision as of 10:04, 31 December 2022
![]() (Nature preserve, Black site, Conservation movement) ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
![]() | |
The remote locations of national parks, protected by special laws and armed forces, make them ideal for covert activities. |
A national park is a an area where human activities are restricted or banned according to special laws.
Contents
Official narrative
National parks are created and protected by national governments. Often they are a reserve of natural, semi-natural, or developed land that a sovereign state declares or owns. Although individual nations designate their own national parks differently, there is a common idea: the conservation of 'wild nature' for posterity and as a symbol of national pride.[1]
Special administrative areas
Often ruled by special laws and with their own forces to administer them and to keep people away, some parks have been bases for covert activities. During the Cold War, national parks were ideal covers for stay-behind activities, from hiding weapons caches to rangers and foresters often being Gladio members[citation needed].
In Africa, a large number of parks, and in some cases the entire parks system, are under the control of private non-governmental organizations, managed by international boards of trustees outside the oversight of the government.[2]
Many parks are in areas on the border between countries, making them suited for smuggling and bases for guerilla movements.
And billionaires take a keen interest in national parks, seeing them as their own playground. Many of them were originally game preserves for their hunting parties. After World War 2 this changed more to the ideology of the conservation movement.
Pakistan
In 1983, the WWF successfully persuaded the Pakistani government to create two national parks directly on the Afghan border in the northern region of Chitral. The remote region is not particularly renowned either for its abundance of animal life or the existence of endangered species, and presumably the flow of eco-turists into the region diminished during the Afghan War. Chitral is, however, renowned for the quality and abundance of its opium poppy, which was assiduously cultivated by the mujaheddin. It was also a primary staging area for smuggling arms into Afghanistan.[3]
South Africa
Apartheid South Africa hid covert activities such as parts of its chemical and biological program and mercenary bases inside national parks. Its puppet guerilla movement Renamo in Mozambique were based in Kruger national park.[2]
Also several anti-apatheid forces, often Soviet supported, used national parks as bases.[2]
Operation Lock
In 1987, the World Wildlife Fund for Nature under Prince Bernhard launched a project known as “Operation Lock,” ostensibly created to infiltrate and dismantle the African rhino horn and ivory trade. To execute the project, WWF hired KAS Enterprises, a private military firm that was also used to wage war on the enemies of apartheid South Africa trying to infiltrate the borders.[4]
Stephen Ellis, who broke a story on Operation Lock for the Independent in 1991, describes in his research how South African Military Intelligence exploited the trade of wildlife products throughout Africa for the larger effort of destabilizing the enemies of apartheid.[5]
“All of these trades tended to implicate senior government officials throughout [Africa], either because of their value, or their illegal or semi-legal nature required traders to buy political protection at a high level,” Ellis writes. “Hence, the infiltration of these networks by South African Military Intelligence was not only a means of making money but also a useful tool for South Africa’s secret servants to penetrate state machineries in pursuit of their strategy of destabilization.”[5]
Who guards the guardians?
Just like in the drug trade, which is run by deep state groups, projects such as Operation Lock might be a way to control the lucrative trade in wildlife products such as ivory and rhino horns, while eliminating the small time competition under guise of protecting the animals. The WWF is best-known for its efforts to conserve four animal species, all of which were in vastly better condition in 1961 than they are today. Two of these, the panda and the African black rhinoceros, are near extinction, and two others, the African elephant and the Indian tiger, are rapidly heading in that direction.[6]
Rewilding
While national parks are often seen as positive environmental service, they have a darker side. National parks were created by individuals who felt that pristine, natural sections of nature should be set aside and preserved for more select use. In many places, like the American West and India, the lands that have been set aside and protected were already being inhabited by native communities. So residents of these areas were forcibly removed and set aside to create "pristine" sites.[7] The vast park complex of Zambia closes off 32% of its area (larger than Great Britain)[8]; Tanzania has 30% [9]
Billionaires such as Hansjörg Wyss are working to make at least 30% of the earth into wildlife reserves.
Green militarization
The South African government's National Integrated Strategy to Combat Wildlife Trafficking (NISCWT), established in 2017, focuses primarily on expanding policing to prevent wildlife trafficking. This approach deploys ‘green militarization,’ which involves war-based tactics involving people and military equipment to combat environmental emergencies and the threat of wildlife trafficking. In South Africa, park rangers are equipped with military gear and guns to protect the rhinos and deter poaching. The official procedure is to arrest poachers or potential poachers as illegal trespassers in national parks and reserves. However, many men who become poachers are killed, with the rest being imprisoned, thus creating anger and resistance to military-based conservation strategies from the affected rural communities.[10]
Operation CORDED
Operation CORDED is the codename given to the British Army’s involvement in the fight against poaching in the African country of Malawi and Zambia. The main task of Op CORDED is to train the rangers responsible for the day-to-day protection of the Park. As well as training the rangers in tracking, bushcraft and information analysis to improve the interception of poachers, the soldiers, designated as Counter-Poaching Operatives (CPOs), also taught infantry skills.[11][12]
Insurgencies
Parks can function as safe havens and staging grounds for insurgencies. Many re- serves and parks, especially in Africa, straddle borders, with the parks functioning as "militarized zones." Prince Philip's WWF was administering the gorilla program in the Virunga park, while the Rwandan Patriotic Front was using the Virunga to maraud Rwanda since October 1990, with full financing and support from Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and his US/British backers.[2]
An example
Page name | Description |
---|---|
Presidio of San Francisco | Former military installation connected to serial killers and child abuse. |
References
- ↑ https://dbpedia.org/page/National_park
- ↑ a b c d https://archive.org/stream/TheComingFallOfTheHouseOfWindsor/Windsor_djvu.txt
- ↑ https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1995/eirv22n41-19951013/eirv22n41-19951013_025-sadruddin_aga_khan_mujahideen_co.pdf
- ↑ https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2020/05/12/18832991.php
- ↑ a b https://www.scribd.com/doc/121327879/Kumleben-Commission-Report
- ↑ http://spikethenews.blogspot.com/2016/02/rhinos.html
- ↑ https://dx.doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv1bkc3t6
- ↑ https://safarisafricana.com/which-country-has-the-most-national-parks/
- ↑ https://allafrica.com/stories/202103010597.html
- ↑ https://www.mironline.ca/rhino-poaching-green-militarization-in-south-africa/
- ↑ http://www.warfare.today/2019/05/08/operation-corded-the-british-army-in-malawi/
- ↑ https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2021/06/illegal-poachers-tied-up-by-corded/